Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb 7-8 2004 Richard Talaga, Argonne R&D Common to Monolithic and Container Designs Do we need ~ 98-99% efficient RPCs?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Development of high rate RPCs Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
Advertisements

1 m 3 Prototype Digital Hadron Calorimeter Collaborators Argonne National Laboratory Boston University University of Chicago Fermilab University of Texas.
Bulk Micromegas Our Micromegas detectors are fabricated using the Bulk technology The fabrication consists in the lamination of a steel woven mesh and.
1 Sep. 19, 2006Changguo Lu, Princeton University Induced signal in RPC, Configuration of the double gap RPC and Grouping of the strips Changguo Lu Princeton.
1 Dayabay RPC Detector Zhang Jiawen Outline  Motivation  RPC introduce  RPC for Daya Bay  Efficiency and noise  Module structure  Module.
Status of the LHCb RPC detector Changes with respect to Note cm strips instead of 3 cm (cost optimization) All gaps same size (standardization)
Electronics for the INO ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana Tata Institute of Fundamental Research For INO collaboration.
1Daya Bay RPC HV FDR 6/17/2008 RPC HV cable pick-up noise issue C. Lu, Princeton University (6/17/2008)
HCAL with Resistive Plate Chambers José Repond Argonne National Laboratory Presented at the Chicago Linear Collider Workshop January 7-9, 2002.
RPC Update José Repond Argonne National Laboratory American Working Group On Linear Collider Calorimetry 24 November 2003 What’s new since September…
D. Peterson, “Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program” TPC R&D Mini Workshop, Orsay 12-January Status of the Cornell/Purdue Program: first events with.
RPC Update José Repond Argonne National Laboratory American Working Group On Linear Collider Calorimetry 16 September 2003 What’s new since Cornell…
J. Cooper1 Off-Axis Detector with RPCs (Resistive Plate Chambers) Off-Axis Detector with RPCs (Resistive Plate Chambers) John Cooper, Fermilab We have.
Mauro Raggi Status report on the new charged hodoscope for P326 Mauro Raggi for the HODO working group Perugia – Firenze 07/09/2005.
January 25, 2003Richard Talaga1 High Voltage Distribution for RPCs Simple Model of Detector & HV Specifications & Requirements Simple HV Distribution Layout.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
B.Satyanarayana, For INO Collaboration. B.Satyanarayana, INO INO-KEK Meeting January 28, 2009, TIFR, INDIA2 48.4m 16m 14.5m To study atmospheric neutrinos.
Naba K Mondal, TIFR, Mumbai ICAL ( conceptual) INO Peak at Bodi West Hills Prototype ICAL at VECC 2mX2m RPC Test Stand at TIFR ASIC for RPC designed at.
Status of INO detector R&D B.Satyanarayana TIFR, Mumbai.
Experiences with RPC Detectors in Iran and their Potential Applications Tarbiat Modares University Ahmad Moshaii A. Moshaii, IPM international school and.
PHENIX RPC in China Li Ye Shouyang Hu Xiaomei LI China Institute of Atomic Energy
1 E906 Pre-Amplifier Card 2009/10/07. 2 E906 Wire Chambers Station1 MWPC: –build a new E906 MWPC. –4500 channels in total. Station2 DC: –recycle old E866.
Monte Carlo Comparison of RPCs and Liquid Scintillator R. Ray 5/14/04  RPCs with 1-dimensional readout (generated by RR) and liquid scintillator with.
Towards an RPC-based HCAL Design Stephen R. Magill Argonne National Laboratory Digital HCAL for an E-Flow Calorimeter Use of RPCs for DHCAL RPC Design.
Development of a DHCAL with Resistive Plate Chambers ECFA/DESY Workshop at NIKHEF, Amsterdam, Netherlands April 1 - 4, 2003 José Repond Argonne National.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
Tariq J. Solaija, NCP Forward RPC EDR, Tariq Solaija Forward RPC EDR The Standard RPC for low  regions Tariq J. Solaija National Centre for.
GEM detector development at VECC Anand Dubey. 2-GEM detector tested with source symmetric mode of biasing scheme, (i.e. same voltage across both the GEMS)
RPC Development in Beijing and Potential for NO A Tianchi Zhao University of Washington May 16, 2005.
1 Test on RPC Veto Detector Model —— Anticoincidence Detector for Daya Bay Neutrino Exp. Speaker: Jiawen Zhang 5 June 2006.
Barrel RPC Chamber consists of 2 double-gaps, each equipped with a common plane of 96 strips read-out by 6 front-end boards. The two double- gaps have.
Design of a readout system for RPCs Olu Amoda2 The LODEN Group The group is an association of Fermilab scientists who teamed up to build a cosmic ray.
BKLM RPC Signal & Ground Schematic Gerard Visser, Indiana University (for the barrel KLM team) 10th B2GM, 11/2011 magnet structure GND 7mm FOAM 3mm GLASS.
RPCs of BESIII Muon Identifier  BESIII and muon identifier  R&D  Mass production  Installation Zhang Qingmin Advisor: Zhang Jiawen.
Status summary of RPC R&D for INO ICAL detector B.Satyanarayana, TIFR, Mumbai Satyajit Jena, IIT Bombay, Powai For INO Collaboration.
NUMI Off Axis NUMI Off Axis Workshop Workshop Argonne Meeting Electronics for RPCs Gary Drake, Charlie Nelson Apr. 25, 2003 p. 1.
Towards a 1m 3 Glass RPC HCAL prototype with multi-threshold readout M. Vander Donckt for the CALICE - SDHCAL group.
Sensor testing and validation plans for Phase-1 and Ultimate IPHC_HFT 06/15/ LG1.
Proposal for LST-based IFR barrel upgrade Roberto Calabrese Ferrara University Workshop on IFR replacement, SLAC, 11/14/2002.
Readout Architecture for MuCh Introduction of MuCh Layout of Much ( proposed several schemes) Read ASIC’s Key features Basic Readout chain ROC Block Diagram.
Application of Large Scale GEM for Digital Hadron Calorimetry Jae Yu For GEM DHCAL Group June 11, 2011 TIPP 2011 The Goals 30cmx30cm 2D readout with KPiX.
Test results of Multi-gap RPC Test Chambers for a Digital HCAL  Geometrical design  Test setup  Signal: avalanche mode and streamer mode  Comparison.
A Hadron Calorimeter with Resistive Plate Chambers José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALOR 2006, Chicago, June 5 – 9, 2006.
US DHCAL Status Lei Xia Argonne National Laboratory.
Marcello Abbrescia RPCs for CMS during Phase II RPC rate capability M. Abbrescia, The dynamic behaviour of Resistive Plate Chambers, NIM A 533 (2004) 7–10.
European DHCAL development European DHCAL development CIEMAT,IPNL,LAL, LAPP,LLR, PROTVINO, SACLAY CIEMAT,IPNL,LAL, LAPP,LLR, PROTVINO, SACLAY Status :
Test on installed RPCs with the gas mixture. Preliminary results. Alessandro Paoloni on behalf of the OPERA RPC Group (Bologna, LNF, LNGS, Napoli, Padova,
Study of gas mixture containing SF6 for the OPERA RPCs A.Paoloni, A. Mengucci (LNF)
Quality Assurance procedures for the construction of ALICE TOF detector VIIIth Workshop on Resistive Plate Chambers and Related Detectors October.
Future DHCAL Activities José Repond Argonne National Laboratory CALICE Meeting, CERN, May 19 – 21, 2011.
SDHCAL. outline  SDHCAL concept, validation and construction  Test Beam and technological prototype performance  Perspectives and Conclusion  SDHCAL.
FEE for Muon System (Range System) Status & Plans G.Alexeev on behalf of Dubna group Turin, 16 June, 2009.
FGT Magnet C Assembly metric tons (59 US tons) -100mm thick steel plates -6.6m high x 3.1m wide x 1m deep (outer dimensions) -5m high x 2.25m wide.
Belle-II bKLM RPC Readout Power & Ground Discussion 12 th Belle II General Meeting Gerard Visser Indiana University CEEM 7/24/2012.
G. Drake Electronics for DHCAL R&D Oct. 13, 2005 p. 1.
Performance of timing-RPC prototypes with relativistic heavy ions
DHCAL TECH PROTO READOUT PROPOSAL
Sensitivity of Hybrid Resistive Plate Chambers to Low-Energy Neutrons
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Construction and Testing of a Digital Hadron Calorimeter Prototype
News on second coordinate readout
Semi-Digital Hadronic CALorimeter
GEM-based Digital Hadron Calorimetry for SiD
Han Jifeng BESIII MUON GROUP IHEP, CAS
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG 16 September 2002.
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
11th Pisa meeting on advanced detectors
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
RPC Electronics Overall system diagram Current status At detector
Limited Streamer Tube Project Summary
Presentation transcript:

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne R&D Common to Monolithic and Container Designs Do we need ~ 98-99% efficient RPCs? Is 93-95% OK? –Probably depends if Monolithic or Containerized –Simulations for both designs are needed to answer these questions If High RPC Efficiency (99%) is Required –Two redundant layers with offset spacers (as in the proposal) –Single layer operated in Avalanche mode –Single layer with double-gap RPC and offset spacers Strips and connections to strips –bonding Cu to particle boar3 –re-visit commercial aluminum-coated foam –techniques to score Cu or Al sheets into strips –connecting strips to readout electronics Mechanical & conductive bonding Capacitive, esp. if strips are aluminum Electronics –ASIC design –Avalanche mode? –Progress on Cosmic Ray Stand Electronics

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne RPC Efficiency RPCs in Streamer mode are about 95% efficient –Reason: around 5% of avalanches don’t mature into streamers Streamer mode has high signal threshold (~100mV) About 5% of the signals are “avalanches” (~1mV) and rejected Note: dead areas due to spacers not included in 95% figure Tests by Ammosov (NLC) using particle beam –Same chamber, in 1) avalanche and 2)streamer modes

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne RPC in avalanche mode 2.0 mm gap RPC eff, vs HV 2% and 5% of SF 6 For 2.2 mV Knee 10.0 kV 11.4 kV  V 0.8 kV 0.6 kV Thresholds mV  mV  mV 2.2 mV is best threshold eff >99% low ~ 1.4 V. Ammosov

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Comparison of avalanche and streamer modes Eff vs M streamer Ar10 mix 100 mV thr 300 mV thr N 2 10 mix 100 mV thr Avalanche - solid line There is some region for low M ( ) with eff~95% comparing with avalanche mode

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Gas Mixture is Different for Avalanche Mode (from presentations at RPC workshop) avalanche streamer

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Alternatives to Increase Efficiency Save $$ and keep Efficiency (if Needed!) Operate single layer in Avalanche mode –Signal is ~ mV instead of ~100 mV –Likely noise problem with long pickup strips –No need to re-design chamber: Chambers OK in Streamer or Avalanche modes Gas composition is the difference, with suitable HV –R & D is needed to test noise issues Avalanche mode RPCs already operating at ANL; just add long strips to test –Savings: Build only 50% of RPCs in proposal Operate single layer Double Gap RPC in Streamer Mode –Three sheets of glass with two gas gaps Multi-gap design is widely used in major experiments Gas gap can be as small as 1mm if we can hold tolerance –Spacers can be offset to reduce dead space by ~ 1% –Electrodes on the two outside plates Requires somewhat higher voltage unless gaps are 1mm –R & D to determine optimal gas gap & HV –R & D to produce a durable large-area Double Gap RPC

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne R&D on Pickup Strips John Cooper- Back to foam Hans Jostlein- Capacitive coupling

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Replace the Copper strips with Aluminum Strips already laminated by industry? The original (a year ago) scheme used foil-faced foam foam board plus a kraft paper / aluminum laminate – a standard building material Could not find an reliable cheap way to attach cables to Aluminum strips, so we moved to Cu foil Were also worried about connecting 8 ft sections to make long strips BUT, Copper cost estimate per sq ft is $0.15 for Cu + $0.30 to laminate, and we need about 6.5 million sq ft Could we deliberately do a capacitive coupled connection, using a controlled thickness spacer with copper tape overlay at the ends of strips?

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne THERMAX* Sheathing is a polyisocyanurate foam core with unique glass fiber reinforcement and solid aluminum foil facers on both sides. This reinforcement, along with chemical modifications, contributes to improved fire performance and enhanced dimensional stability. THERMAX Sheathing is available in standard widths of 16", 24" and 48", with lengths from 4' to 30' (8', 9' and 10' standard). Thickness 0.5” to 4” Applications THERMAX Sheathing is a high performance insulating sheathing for residential or commercial construction, interior basement, or exterior cavity wall applications. It's especially appropriate for time-rated assemblies. Corner bracing is required in new frame construction. Building material which may work (got “initial” price estimate of $ 0.28 /sq ft)

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Another manufacturer Feb 1 price At Menard’s: $ 7.46 for a 4’ x 8’ x ½” sheet, or $ 0.23 /sq ft

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Super TUFF-R* Insulating Sheathing consists of two, three- ply poly/aluminum foil facers laminated to a patented, high-performance polyisocyanurate foam core, resulting in unsurpassed durability. One facer is colored black, the other facer is radiant barrier quality reflective foil. Applications Super TUFF-R Insulating Sheathing is intended for concealed use in residential construction having an interior finish of a minimum 1/2" gypsum board or equivalent thermal barrier. Corner bracing is required in new frame construction. It's designed primarily as a residential exterior sheathing insulation, with many secondary uses. Yet another type Super TUFF-R Insulating Sheathing Feb 1 price at Home Depot: Also $ 7.46 for a 4’ x 8’ x ½” sheet, Or $ 0.23 /sq ft (poly ply means this one not suitable, but interesting that the price is identical)

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Capacitive coupling with short pulses Hans Jostlein

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Pulse shapes and sizes Hans Jostlein

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Test of Capacitive Coupling

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Grooving of Foam Board

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne System Architecture –Discriminate Hits from Detector –Timestamp Hits in Front End –Store Timestamps in Local Buffers –Read Buffers Periodically –Use Back End Trigger Processor to Reconstruct Hits System Overview  Trigger-less – Like MINOS  Similar to a Parallel Development for the Linear Collider  Primary Goal: Cheap Electronics, 1 Bit Dynamic Range

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne System Components –Basic Architecture Front End Amplifier & Discriminator Senses Hits Above Threshold Bits Clocked in Shift Register Save Bits & Timestamp on Ext. Trigger or Self- Trigger Serial Output – Data Serial I/O – Control 24-Bit Timestamp Counter Runs at 10 MHz Services 32 CH (  64) Front End ASIC

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne System Components –Streamer Mode vs. Avalanche Mode Streamer Mode Signals are ~X100 Bigger Chip Being Designed to Process Avalanche Signals –Chip Attenuates Signals in Streamer Mode –Chip Receives Signals Differentially in Streamer Mode For NUMI Off-Axis, Streamer Mode Gives Good Signal-to-Noise for Using Long Strips Front End ASIC (Cont.)  If Avalanche Mode Used Here, Will Need to Study Signal-to-Noise Pre-Attenuator Switched IN for Streamers

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Physical Configuration –192 Y Strips/Plane, 64 X Strips/Plane –Use 64 Ch/Chip  4 Chips/Plane –Each ASIC Resides on a Printed Circuit Board  1 FE Board/Plane –1 Data Concentrator per Plane – Collects Data from 4 Front End Chips –Each Data Concentrator Resides on Front-End PCB Electronics on Each Plane

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Physical Configuration –One Super Concentrator per Module – Services 12 Planes –One Group of Cables per Module –Cable Bundle Includes Serial Data, LV Power, HV Control –1 VME Crate Services ~200 Modules, But Need Space for LV Power Supplies… Connections to Modules

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Progress Report –1 st Draft of Specification for Chip Completed, Iteration in Progress –Chip to be Designed at FNAL –Have $$ for Prototyping (Joint Project with RPCs for Linear Collider) –Target: Prototype Chips by End of 2004 ASIC Development

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Progress Report –64-Ch 6U VME Board Built Contains Same Basic Functionality as System Joint ANL/FNAL Project –Initial Testing Completed at ANL (Linear Collider) –Planning in Progress for Production Cosmic Ray Teststand Instrumentation

Off Axis Collaboration Meeting Feb Richard Talaga, Argonne Progress Report –Cockroft-Walton HV Generates +/- 5KV Has Current Monitoring –Initial Testing Completed at ANL (Linear Collider) –4 Ch Config. Built for NUMI Off-Axis: 20 channels of HV Cosmic Ray Test Stand Instrumentation (Cont.)