Changes to: Fixed-Guideway Data & Rules for Splitting Rural/Urban.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Potential Federal and State Funding for a Madison New Start Transport 2020 Implementation Task Force June 28, 2004 Rod Clark WisDOT Bureau of Transit &
Advertisements

Urban Transportation Norman W. Garrick Lecture 3 CE 2710.
November Overview of Presentation MAP-21 Overview Outline of the FY 2013 Apportionment Notice Key Provisions and Interim Guidance – Planning and.
FY 2014 NTD Reporting Federal Register Notices Explanation of Proposed Changes 28 August 2014.
D2 Roadway Discussion Sound Transit Board September 22, 2011.
Managed Lanes Development Strategy Phase I District Four October 17, 2012.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
National Transit Database Annual Reporting. New Reporting System ( “NTD 2.0 ” ) Monthly ridership was first operational module – Reporting started October.
FTA’s Small Starts Program Charlotte, North Carolina October 11, 2007.
Tribal Consultations. Topics FY12 Extensions and IRR Program Funding MAP-21 Programs and Funding.
National Transit Database State DOT Reporting John Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning & Analysis, FTA 1.
Capital Investment Program Listening Session Presented at APTA Annual Meeting -- 10/03/2012 RailVolution /14/
1 FTA UPDATES GAMPO Annual Work Session July 10, 2009.
Copyright © 2011 Holland & Knight LLP. All Rights Reserved Capital Investment Grants Proposed Interim Policy Guidance April 15, 2015 Jeffrey F. Boothe.
MAP-21 Overview and Programmatic Impacts February 4, 2013 Serge Phillips MnDOT Federal Relations Koryn Zewers.
Tribal Transit Program August 9, 2013 State Programs Meeting Presented By Élan Flippin, FTA.
Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged 07 August 2013 Jennifer Hibbert Director FTA Office of Planning and Program Development.
Ohio Department of Transportation Office of Transit Urban Roundtable September 30,
Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process
SO YOU WANT MORE PASSENGER RAIL… LOOKING AT THE FUNDING LANDSCAPE ERIC PAPETTI FEDERAL TRANSIT ADMINISTRATION 12/10/2014.
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the Access for All Advisory Committee April.
SUSTAINABILITY CONCEPTS IN TRANSPORT SECTOR/ OPTIONS AND BENEFITS
LOW CARBON TRANSIT OPERATIONS PROGRAM [SB 862 (2014)] DECEMBER 2014.
Ch. 4 Traffic Control NY State DMV.
MAKING IT HAPPEN. AASHTO Annual Meeting Pittsburgh, PA November 18, 2012 Expanding the Potential of Tolling: A 21st Century Look Federal Tolling Law under.
1 Presentation to TAC June 17, 2009 Overview of Rapid Bus Measures and Effectiveness And Case Studies.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
National Road Pricing Conference June 4, 2010 Mark Burris, Texas Transportation Institute Jessie Yung, Federal Highway Administration.
PLEASE SIGN IN 1 Welcome to the Title VI Plan Workshop.
Calculating Transportation System User Benefits: Interface Challenges between EMME/2 and Summit Principle Author: Jennifer John Senior Transportation Planner.
Highway Program Financing July Michigan Allocations Federal Law + State Law + Michigan Policy = MDOT & Local Allocations of Federal Apportionment.
Ron Hall Tribal Technical Assistance Program Colorado State University
Introduction Nablus is the largest city in the West Bank after Jerusalem. 150,000 inhabitants live in Nablus. Nablus has the largest university in the.
BPAC. “Congestion management is the application of strategies to improve transportation system performance and reliability by reducing the adverse impacts.
Welcome to the TSIP Project Webinar Planning Technical Working Group 28 July – 3:30 pm.
Pat Bursaw, Minnesota DOT International Partnership Meeting Washington D.C. January 26, 2012.
TRB/APTA 2004 Bus Rapid Transit Conference When is BRT the Best Option? the Best Option? 1:30 – 2:40 p.m. Paul Larrousse Director, National Transit Institute.
Introductions Introduction to TCAG Federal Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Responsible for long-term planning for all modes of surface transportation.
MAP-21: Impacts to New Starts and Small Starts Senate Transportation Finance and Policy Committee Mark W. Fuhrmann Program Director, New Starts February.
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 16, 2009.
Soup to Nuts: Changing Operating Parameters for HOV Facilities Sponsored by the HOV Pooled-Fund Study and the Federal Highway Administration.
1 Development of a Regional BRT System Proposal Presented to the TPB Access for All Committee April 23, 2009 Michael Eichler and Monica Bansal Transportation.
New Starts/Small Starts and BRT: An Update APTA Bus Conference Seattle, WA May 5, 2009.
Transit Funding 101. Exciting  Management issue? Service levels Wages/benefits Safety Layoffs Why Care About Transit Funding?
Portland North Small Starts Alternatives Analysis Coordination Meeting June 15, 2009.
Using APC Data for NTD Reporting APC University, Houston, Texas 16 October, 2014 John D. Giorgis Director of Strategic Planning Federal Transit Administration.
NTD: Common Problems & Issues 24 April 2012 John D. Giorgis Acting Director, Strategic Planning & Analysis Routematch User’s Conference Atlanta, Georgia.
1 AGENDA OPEN HOUSE 6:00 PM  Review materials  Ask questions  Provide feedback  Sign up for list  Fill out comment cards PRESENTATION 6:30 PM.
TIFIA Credit Program Overview Updated October 2012 T ransportation I nfrastructure F inance and I nnovation A ct (TIFIA)
16 th Biennial FTA State Programs Meeting State Public Transit Partnerships Conference Washington, DC Keith Gates NTD Program Manager Office of Budget.
Review of Principal Arterial Routes on the National Highway System For MAP-21 Reta R. Busher Chief of Planning and Programming October 17, 2012.
1 TPB Responses to FAMPO Policies on Allocating and Sharing of Regional Transit Funds Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board Item 14 Ronald.
Weighing the Scenarios: The Costs and Benefits of Future Transit Service Produced for MTDB by The Mission Group © 2000 by The Mission Group. 1 Dave Schumacher.
Roadway Markings NV Driver Education Curriculum Unit 2: Signs, Signals, and Roadway Markings Presentation 3 of 3.
NEW STARTS/SMALL STARTS. New Starts Eligibility  Based on the results of planning and Alternatives Analysis  At least 50% or more of the total project.
THE EL MONTE HOV / BUSWAY: A Policy Driven Experiment in Congestion Management Frank Quon Division of Operations Deputy District Director HOV LANES IN.
Minnesota’s Urban Partnership Agreement UPA Timeline The UPA agreement with the US DOT requires that the project be operational by September 30, 2009,
1 Status Report on the Bus Systems in the National Capital Region Report of the Regional Bus Subcommittee to the National Capital Region Transportation.
Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) Association of MPOs 444 N Capitol St., NW Suite345 Washington, DC
1 Perspectives on Reauthorization Robert Tuccillo Associate Administrator for Budget and Policy/ CFO Federal Transit Administration State of Good Repair.
Proposed Interim Guidance – Small Starts. 2 Purpose Before Final Rule, evaluate and rate projects to: Advance projects into project development Provide.
Lecture 2: Improving Transit Service Through Planning, Design, and Operations This lecture was originally prepared by Dr. Kari Watkins, Georgia Institute.
STEERING COMMITTEE JANUARY 24, INTRODUCTIONS 2 WHO IS ON THE PROJECT TEAM?  Dakota County Regional Railroad Authority  Ramsey County Regional.
Association of Metropolitan Planning Organizations Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST Act) April 7, 2016.
GRTC Bus Rapid Transit Project July 17, Agenda 1.BRT Concept 2.Project Goals 3.Project Benefits 4.Project Corridor 5.Proposed Multimodal Access.
MAP-21 Formula Briefing Preliminary DRAFT. Moving Ahead for Progress into the 21 st Century (MAP-21) MAP-21 was passed by Congress and signed by the President.
2040 LONG RANGE PLAN UPDATE Congestion Management Process Plan (CMPP) Major Update February 24, 2016.
FAST Act Overview $305 billion 5 year bill – FY ‘16 – FY ’20
Future Construction FasTracks Corridors Federal Funding Analysis
Regional Transit Formula Fund Policies Section 5307/5340 – Urbanized Formula Fund Section 5337 – State of Good Repair Section 5339 – Bus and Bus Facilities.
Presentation transcript:

Changes to: Fixed-Guideway Data & Rules for Splitting Rural/Urban

1 Overview New Surface Transportation Bill: MAP-21 New Fixed Guideway Rules New Bus Rapid Transit Definition Rules for Allocating Service Fixed Guideway Segment Update 1

2 Fixed Guideway Pre-MAP-21 One big happy category Railroads, Ferryboats, Trolleybus, Aerial Trams, Busways, and HOV (even some HOT) All VRM and DRM used in 5307 Fixed Guideway Tier All VRM and DRM on sections that are more than 7 years old was used in the Fixed Guideway Modernization formula (a Section 5309 Program) 2

3 Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act (MAP-21) Went into effect October 1, 2012 Authorizes programs through September 30, Fixed Guideway Mod replaced by new 5337 “State of Good Repair” formula grants New fixed guideway definition that moves HOV lanes into their own category with separate funding New definition of Bus Rapid Transit with full fixed guideway treatment for BRT routes 3

– SGR Formula Grants Formula-based funding for State of Good Repair (SGR) Funding limited to fixed guideway investments (essentially replaces 5309 Fixed Guideway program but is a very different program) New formula comprises: (1) former Fixed Guideway formula; (2) new service-based formula; (3) new formula for buses on HOV lanes 4

Eligibility Meet UAFP criteria – Urbanized Area over 200,000 in population Segments are 7 Federal Fiscal years old – In service on for 2013 data – Still in service on – No credit for average monthly DRM if segment taken out of service 5

6 New Fixed Guideway Rules 5337 formula Program now has two funding tiers: Fixed Guideway Tier – Rail, Ferryboats, Aerial Trams, Trolleybuses, and Bus Rapid Transit – guideway for exclusive use by transit vehicles High Intensity Motorbus Tier– HOV – Bus service operated on HOV lanes – “Grandfather policy” for HOV to HOT conversion remains in effect, based on HOV lanes in NTD as of 1/11/2007 Both tiers use Dedicated Route Miles (DRM) and Vehicle Revenue Miles (VRM) 6

7 Fixed Guideway Rules (cont.) 5337 retains requirement for guideway to have been in service for at least 7 years – SGR Tier gets 97.15% of 5337 appropriation – HIMB Tier gets 2.85% of appropriation 7 Years Old on Basis of First Day of Federal Fiscal Year – FY14 funding begins October 1, 2014 – Must have begun operation by September 30, Fixed Guideway Tier (30.2% of appropriation) – Same rules, new definitions 7

8 Fixed Guideway Eligibility Lanes that are only exclusive for a portion of the day (or week) are not classified as Fixed Guideway (except BRT) but can qualify for 5337 High Intensity Motorbus tier 8

9 Bus Rapid Transit – USC section 5302(a)(2) New definition: ‘bus rapid transit system’ means a bus transit system (A) in which the majority of each line operates in a separated right-of-way dedicated for public transportation use during peak periods; and (B) that includes features that emulate the services provided by rail fixed guideway public transportation systems, including— (i) defined stations; (ii) traffic signal priority for public transportation vehicles; (iii) short headway bidirectional services for a substantial part of week days and weekend days; and (iv) any other features the Secretary may determine are necessary to… emulate the services provided by rail fixed guideway... 9

10 Las Vegas MAX: Example of typical BRT line Defined & Branded Station Stations are accessible, provide schedule information, and protection from weather Lanes are exclusively dedicated to public transportation during peak periods Exclusive guideway Branded vehicles run from 5:00 AM to 10:00 PM 10

11 Majority of BRT line must be Separated Right-of-Way More than half of route must be on exclusive guideway, the rest can be in general traffic (all is counted as FG) 1 st Ave. NY exclusive FG Kansas City exclusive FG overhead bus-only sign bus lane is shaded red 11

12 Exclusive Busways & Ramps are also Fixed Guideway But – only exclusive part of route counts as FG Pittsburgh Bus Ramp FG Miami-Dade Busway exclusive FG Must be exclusive 24-7 (not “during peak periods” as with BRT guideway) 12

13 Federal Funding Allocation Form (FFA-10)

14 Federal Funding Allocation (FFA-10) Rules Rules for allocation of data among multiple UZAs and non urbanized areas (non-UZA) – VRM (passenger car revenue miles for rail modes) is a direct measurement of the actual vehicle revenue miles and is used as the factor for proportional allocation of VRH (passenger car revenue hours for rail modes), PMT, UPT, and OE among the areas – Other methodology – Use the e-file tab to describe the other methodology and show your calculations

15 New Federal Funding Allocation (FFA-10) Rules Under the revised rules, the transit agency determines which UZA or non-UZA that each mode primarily serves The transit agency may then: – Allocate all the data statistics for that mode to the UZAs or non-UZAs primarily served, or – Allocate the data statistics proportionally to the UZAs and non-UZAs served using a reasonable and consistent methodology (describe in e-file)

16 New Federal Funding Allocation Rules This rule applies to transit service that connects: – Two or more large UZAs – Two or more small UZAs – Any combination of one or more large UZAs, small UZAs, or non-UZAs, as long as no 5311 funds benefit the service Data may not be allocated to a UZA within the overall service area that is not served by any route!

17 New Federal Funding Allocation - Exceptions Exceptions to the primarily served criterion involve 5311 funds (operating or capital) that benefit the service: 1.You must report entirely to non-UZA (UZA 0) any transit service that benefits from grants provided by FTA’s Section You must allocate service that connects non-UZAs and UZAs (large or small) if the service benefits from both 5307 and 5311 operating assistance; you must use the UZA proportion of operating expenses funded by 5307 program (including local matching funds), to allocate the statistics to the UZAs 3.Service that receives 5307 capital assistance and 5311 operating assistance is allocated 100% to non-UZA (UZA 0)

segment submission process NTD S-20 form The 2015 apportionment will be based off of RY2013 data Fields to determine 5337 eligibility – Segment Type Hours prohibited – Mode 18

19 How is the S-20 data used? Directional Route Miles Transfer automatically to other forms – Service Form S-10: Fiscal Year End (FYE) DRM – Federal Funding Allocation Statistics Form FFA-10: 5307 Formula: all DRM 5337 Formula: DRM ≥ 7 years old 19

20 Reporting Segments Agencies report segments to FTA using the NTD S-20 Form – Fixed Guideway Segments – High Intensity Motorbus One form for each Mode and Type of Service combination Only use for bus modes when a bus operates on fixed guideway or high intensity bus segment 20

21 Reporting segments for bus modes All information on rail S-20 form Added information on: – Segment type (NEW categories in 2012) – Peak level of service – Safe operation – Hours per week prohibited and enforced 21

22 New segment type categories New segment type categories for bus modes A.Exclusive, physical separation B.Exclusive, visual separation C.HOV, physical separation D.HOV, visual separation E.HO/T lane F.Mixed traffic roadway used by a bus rapid transit route 22

23 Reporting segments for bus modes Segment Type168 hrs hrs.0 hrs. A. Exclus./Phys.Fixed GuidewayHI Motorbusn/a B. Exclus./Vis.Fixed GuidewayHI Motorbusn/a C. HOV/Phys.HI Motorbus n/a D. HOV/Vis.HI Motorbus n/a E. HO/THI Motorbus n/a F. Mixed traffic RBn/a Fixed Guideway All segment types (A – F) for qualifying bus rapid transit (RB) routes are Fixed Guideway

24 Urban Formula Program Eligibility – Length of segment (0.25 mile criteria) – Congested travel corridor Level of service “D” or worse – Safe Operation – Restricted use (and hours per week) Buses and vanpools, carpools Enforced 24

25 Short Dist. Access Lanes <.25 Miles Eligible if they are running on: – A bridge or in a tunnel or – Connect with a transit terminal Otherwise ineligible – Highway ramps, – Meter bypasses, and – Special turning facilities 25

26 Peak Level of Service (LOS) Traffic engineering measure of congestion – LOS ranges from A to F — F is worst – Defined in Highway Capacity Manual Report LOS determined by local DOT – Only levels D, E, and F eligible 26

27 Bus Fixed Guideway Safe Operation Applies only to expressways with high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes Criteria – Must have HOV separation (facility design) from congested travel lanes – Bus-only facilities qualify as safe operation What if not safely operated? – Report as mixed traffic ROW on Service form (S-10 since it is not fixed guideway) 27

28 Bus Fixed Guideway Safe Operation 28 HOV lanes separated from general traffic lanes by:. concrete barrier pylons double solid lines. fencing

29 Not Acceptable Separation for Bus By themselves – Roadside or overhead signs – Diamond marking in HOV lane – Single line of conventional width between restricted HOV and unrestricted, congested (LOS “D”) lanes 29

30 Using Internet Reporting Preloaded data Existing and new segments Adding, modifying and deleting data 30

31 What is an Existing Segment? Operated by you in 2012 report year, or Operated and reported by another NTD reporter in

32 Reporting segments for bus modes Transit agencies should check the Segment Type dropdown field to verify correct new categories 32

33 Reporting segments for bus modes Verify Hours Prohibited and Enforced 33

34 Modifying Non-editable Fields Requests (e-File tab) 60 days before report due Documentation — data field changes: – Identify segment (segment code and name) – Describe fully the requested changes including the existing and requested values – Detail the reason for each change If length is changed, must mail detailed maps depicting exact measurement FTA approval needed before entered into calculations 34

35 Adding New Segments Add segment button (select “new segment”) Documentation – Detailed maps which clearly identify each segment, its beginning and ending point – Length to the nearest hundredth of a mile and other supporting documentation of the measurement – Proof of agency start date of revenue service — public service announcement/press release, schedule, timetable 35

36 Deleting Segments Can only delete segment incorrectly added in 2013 report year If you stopped operations, enter out of revenue service date 36

37 BRT Mixed Traffic Segment Report qualifying Bus Rapid Transit (RB) lines with mixed traffic directional route miles as segments Add these new mixed traffic segments to the S-20 form Qualifying RB lines will be considered entirely fixed guideway 37

38 Points to Remember All agencies must report the segments, but only 1 agency can claim each segment Report all FG segments regardless of funding eligibility: – Segments also used by other agencies – Segments used by multiple modes – Segments in your report as both DO and PT – Bus mode (all LOS) Use e-File tab to request modifications to existing segments 38

39 Reporting new bus segment types NTD Analysts are available to answer questions and assist in completing your report 39

40 Questions Later? NTD Help Desk (Charlottesville Ops Center) NTD Staff s – Keith Gates, – Andy Lofton, 40