Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) Recent case-law of the CJEU: enforcement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Enforcement Order for uncontested claims
Advertisements

Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
The fundamentals of EC competition law
ENAR conference on the transposition of the Race Directive – building strategies for equality SHIFT OF THE BURDEN OF PROOF Barbara Cohen, UK.
A narrow pathway between fences Seminar on free movement of same sex families in Europe European Parliament, 3 May 2011 Pál Szirányi – Permanent representation.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU European Court of Justice Prof. Dr. Martin Trybus Birmingham.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
EU responses to hate crimes and support to the victims Linda Maria Ravo DG Justice – European Commission Unit C1.
1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention and Brussels II bis Interaction within the EU and beyond Prof. Dr. Marta Pertegás First Secretary Hague Conference.
European Union and the Nationality Laws of the Member States Prof. Dr. Gerard-René de Groot
EQUINET LEGAL SEMINAR DISCRIMINATION CASES IN FRONT OF THE EUROPEAN COURT S AND THE ROLE OF NATIONAL EQUALITY BODIES Wednesday 28 March 2012, Brussels.
EU joining the ECHR New opportunities under two legal systems EQUINET HIGH-LEVEL LEGAL SEMINAR Brussels, 1 – 2 July 2010 Dr. Mario OETHEIMER EU Agency.
European values and media pluralism Petra Lea Láncos.
The Law of the European Union Information and Communication.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
The Importance of Strategic Litigation: the experience in Britain Peter Reading Director of Legal Policy Equality and Human Rights Commission, Britain.
European Commission Taxation and Customs Union Brussels, 10 November Taxation of International Artistes and Community Law European Commission
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters
Eco Swiss and its Ramifications Dr Phillip Landolt Landolt & Koch, Geneva Vienna Arbitration Days February 2012.
Circulation of authentic instruments under Regulation 650/2012 speaker – Ivaylo Ivanov – Bulgarian Notary Chamber.
,EU and Gender Equality’ Seminar on Best Practice of European Support to Women Entrepreneurship Petra Schott European Commission, October 2009
Course: Law of the European Union [5] Administrative and judicial procedures in the European Union Filip Křepelka,
Dr Marek Porzycki.  Brussels Convention on Jurisdiction and the Enforcement of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters (1968) – Member States of the.
ENAR Policy Seminar From Racism to Equality? Realising the potential of European Anti- Discrimination Law 6-7 October 2006 Brussels.
The European Union Race Directive attorney Lilla Farkas LLM.
FREE MOVEMENT OF WORKERS: INTRODUCTORY REMARKS Paul Minderhoud Centre for Migration Law Coordinator Network on Free Movement of Workers.
1 LAW OF THE EU WEEK 7 GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF COMMUNITY LAW.
Taking of evidence within the European Union Council regulation no 1206/2001 on cooperation between the courts of Member States in the taking of evidence.
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.
International legal frameworks Combating discrimination Luk Zelderloo, EASPD Secretary General 19 th – 20 th March 2009.
Directive on the protection of the environment through criminal law Anna Karamat European Commission DG Environment Unit A.2 ‘Infringements’
CHARTER OF FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS General overview, history and evolution.
1 Community Legislation on Equal Treatment DG ‘Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities’ Equality, Action against Discrimination: Legal Questions.
Finding a PPP Partner Essential EU Law Considerations Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005 Bernard Wilson Maribor, 18 January 2005.
Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating circumstances. Relevant changes to the amount of fine. Defining and applying mitigating and aggravating.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
BEIJING BRUSSELS CHICAGO DALLAS FRANKFURT GENEVA HONG KONG LONDON LOS ANGELES NEW YORK SAN FRANCISCO SHANGHAI SINGAPORE TOKYO WASHINGTON, D.C. Dawn raids.
European Commission Employment & Social Affairs European Union against Discrimination Article 13 European Legislation to Combat Discrimination ENAR Conference,
Equinet Legal Seminar 1 July 2010 New Equinet report: Influencing the Interpretation of the Law – Powers and Practices of Equality Bodies Nanna Margrethe.
Court of Justice of the European Union
Right to Information in anti- discrimination litigation concerning private employment Lilla Farkas, senior legal policy analyst,
“THE UNITARY PATENT AND THE UNIFIED PATENT COURT: A PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW PERSPECTIVE” Prof Dr Paul L.C. Torremans School of Law University of Nottingham.
European Model(s) of Protective Measures in Cross-Border Maintenance Debt Recovery Mirela Župan Professor at Faculty of Law University of Osijek Croatia.
Equinet Legal Seminar 11 October 2010 Collecting evidence – practical shortcomings of the traditional tools of evidence in discrimination cases PhD Bjørn.
European Committe for Social Rights. The Council of Europe was established in 1949 by 10 Countries. It has now 47 member States. The European Convention.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
European Law in the Case- law of the Constitutional Court of Latvia Kristine Kruma.
Commission Staff Working Document Free Movement of Workers in the Public Sector 18 January 2011 Ursula Scheuer European Commission DG Employment, Social.
Lost in Translations – An Examination of the Legal & Practical Problems Associated with the Implementation (or Non-Implementation) of Directive 2010/64/EU.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Concessions laws from EU procurement directives perspective.
Current challenges in the field of equality law Dr Sara Benedi Lahuerta Equinet Conference Strengthening the effectiveness.
The fundamental rights of LGBT citizens in Europe – EU legislation and the Charter of Fundamental Rights.
EU Agency for Fundamental Rights
Effective implementation: from Principles to Realities
EU Legislative Powers: Principles and Procedures
Overview of existing EC legislation on equal treatment between men and women and the role of the European Commission Rashmin Sagoo DG Employment, Social.
Ex-ante conditionality
ICN | The interplay between private enforcement and leniency policy
National Equality Bodies & CJEU Proceedings
of social security systems, COM (2016)815”
ПОСИЛЕННЯ ПОТЕНЦІАЛУ ІНСТИТУЦІЇ УКРАЇНСЬКОГО ОМБУДСМЕНА:
Dr. Wiebke Dettmers, LL.M. (Univ. Helsinki)
National remedies and national actions
Free Movement of Workers in the EU
Free Movement of Workers in the EU
European Committe for Social Rights
Current challenges in the field of equality law
RE-JUS methodology and dissemination tools
HUMAN RIGHTS AND EQUALITY: DIFFERENT ASPIRATIONS, DIFFERENT MANDATES?
Presentation transcript:

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) Recent case-law of the CJEU: enforcement aspects Prof. Dr. Christa Tobler, LL.M. Europa Institutes of the Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) Legal Seminar “Equality Law for Everyone: Challenges Ahead” European Commission, DG Justice Brussels, 26 November 2012 Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M. Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands)

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 2 Overview Issues briefly presented General enforcement elements Specific provisions in modern Directives Case-law (actually, only one case in 2012 on these issues) For the case-law, the presentation relies on the report written by Colm O’Cinneide (University College London) for the European Commission (Expert Network) and entitled: “The evolution and impact of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on Directives 2000/43/EC and 2000/78/EC”

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 3 General context Enforcement elements to remember Starting point: principle of sincere cooperation (pacta sunt servanda), Art. 4(3) TEU. Some specific elements: –Indirect and direct effect of EU law. –Right to an effective, proportionate and dissuasive remedy. –Right to damages from the Member State. –Duty of levelling up in individual and successful discrimination cases (subsequent levelling down on a general level is possible …). All of these were developed through case-law of the CJEU. Some where codified in the most recent generation of social non-discrimination law; plus provisions in the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 4 Specific provisions: overview Issues regulated in modern Non-discrimination Directives Usually, there is a specific chapter on ‘Remedies and Enforcement’, plus there are relevant provisions in the part on ‘horizontal provisions’. Important issues that are covered: –Defence of rights: right to a judicial procedure (e.g. Art. 7 of Directive 2000/43/EC). –Burden of proof (e.g. Art. 8 of Directive 2000/43/EC). –Right to an effective, proportionate and dissuasive remedy (e.g. Art. 15 of Directive 2000/43/EC). –Penalties. Again, most of this is codified case-law, originally developed in the context of Art. 6 of the so-called Second Equal Treatment Directive (sex discrimination law).

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 5 Recent case-law: Meister (1) Facts Ms Meister, a Russian national, applies for a job as an “experienced software developer”. Even though she satisfies all the requirements, she is unsuccessful. The job is re- advertised. Ms Meister alleges that she has been subject to discrimination on the grounds of sex, age and ethnic origin. In this context, Ms Meister seeks access to information from the employer about the selection procedure, including whether another person has been employed, and if so, based on what qualifications. She needs this in order to make her case (evidence).

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 6 Recent case-law: Meister (2) Legal issues Do the provisions of the Directives 2000/43/EC, 2000/78/EC and of 2006/54/EC give an alleged victim of discrimination a right to receive this information? If so, where the information given is not conforming, does this give rise to a presumption that discrimination exists? The national court seized with the case turns to the CJEU for help in interpreting EU law (preliminary ruling procedure): Case C ‑ 415/10 Meister, decided on 19 April 2012.

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 7 Recent case-law: Meister (3) The Court’s interpretation of the Directive (1) Starting point: the rule on the shifting of the burden of proof in the Directives. The Court applies its gender equality case-law on this matter, in particular Kelly (note the link between the different sub- fields of non-discrimination law!). Accordingly, EU law does not give alleged victims of discrimination a specific right to receive the information sought. However, a refusal by the defendant to make the information available ‘may be one of the factors to take into account in the context of establishing facts from which it may be presumed that there has been direct or indirect discrimination’, which would result in a shift of the burden of proof.

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 8 Recent case-law: Meister (4) The Court’s interpretation of the Directive (2) The fact that the employer did not dispute that the claimant satisfied the requirements for the post, the fact that she was not invited to an interview and the decision to re-advertise the post could also be taken into account in establishing the existence of a presumption of discrimination. The Court also explicitly confirms that a presumption of indirect discrimination could be established to exist on the basis of statistical evidence.

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 9 Recent case-law: Meister (5) Colm O’Cinneide’s conclusion “The judgment in Meister thus provides valuable clarification of the type of evidence that can establish a presumption of discrimination and thus give rise to a shift in the burden of proof: it is likely to become a significant point of reference for domestic courts applying the burden of proof provisions of the 2000 Directives for some time to come.”

Network_2012.ppt Prof. Dr. Christa TOBLER, LL.M., Universities of Basel (Switzerland) and Leiden (The Netherlands) 10 Thank you for your attention! For further information Basel: –Website: – Leiden: –Website: tuut tuut –