Transportation System Performance Measurement. MDOT’s First Transportation System Performance Report  Next Generation Road & Bridge Goals  Other Aspects.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan February 2010 presented by: Minnesota Department of Transportation and Cambridge.
Advertisements

Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan PAC December 14, 2010.
EFFICIENT TRANSPORTATION SOLUTIONS IN MINNESOTA A JOINT PRESENTATION TO THE Transportation Funding Advisory Committee September 14, 2012.
Updating the Washington Transportation Plan February 4,
Act 44 Transportation Funding John Dockendorf Pennsylvania Department of Transportation November 2007.
Presented to presented by East Central Florida Corridor Task Force Space Coast TPO 02/16/15 Huiwei Shen Systems Planning Florida Department of Transportation.
FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AASHTO Spring Meeting Transportation Economics and Logistics MAY 30, 2014 | LOUISVILLE KY.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Proposition 1B and the Strategic Growth Plan Randell Iwasaki California Department of Transportation.
Recent Changes in Intercity Service Delivery in Minnesota 18 th National Conference on Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Gerry Weiss, State.
Detroit Intermodal Freight Terminal Michigan Department of Transportation Gloria J. Jeff, Director Michigan Department of Transportation.
Community Transportation Association of Idaho Supporting, Coordinating and Promoting Mobility in Idaho.
2040 Metropolitan Transportation Plan Final Approval GVMC Board May 7, 2015.
2015 Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan Active Transportation and Livable Communities August 21, 2014 Scott Sauer.
California Passenger Rail Summit April 29, 2015 LOSSAN Pacific Surfliner Rail Service Update.
The Potential BRT in Asia
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center Project Update.
Program Update Baltimore MPO November 25, Internal Draft AGENDA  Program Overview  Alternatives Development  Stakeholder and Public Outreach.
May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.
Trends in Urban Transit in the U.S. – Some Comparisons Edd Hauser, P.E., PhD Nicholas J. Swartz, MPA Center for Transportation Policy Studies UNC Charlotte.
Redwood City Ferry Terminal Why Ferry Service Terminal Needs Locational Analysis Land availability for 5-6 acre terminal Vehicular access Environmental.
Utah’s Collaborative Approach to Transportation and Community Michael A. Allegra, President/CEO Utah Transit Authority October 9, 2014.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia 1 Multimodal Maturity of Virginia’s Transportation Corridors April 19, 2006 presented.
April 29,  Investment in new and improved services, with a strong focus on customer experience  Investment focused on improving efficiency  Shorter.
SKAGIT-ISLAND HSTP Skagit-Island HSTP Committee Meeting #4 October 1, 2014.
GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL DIVISION - TRANSIT Presented to G.A. MPO CONFERENCE November 2012.
Freight Issues in the Report of the National Surface Transportation Policy and Revenue Study Commission Transportation for Tomorrow.
Intercity Rail Background/ Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan Update Met Council TAC Meeting November 5, 2008.
Moving the Most People for the Least Cost Preserving the American Dream Conference Friday, September 24, 2010.
Arizona Rural Transit Needs Study Arizona Department of Transportation Public Transportation Division November 2007.
Business Logistics 420 Public Transportation Lecture 20: Transit System Design.
May 30, 2008 Community Integration Commission 1 DRPT Initiatives on Transportation Services For Older Adults, People With Disabilities.
California’s Strategic Growth Plan Ken De Crescenzo Federal Liaison California Department of Transportation.
May 14, Our transportation system will provide a safe and accessible range of options that enhances existing urban areas communities while providing.
Vanpool Investment Program ’03 –’05 ACCT Meeting Kathy Johnston August 5, 2005.
Highway Program Structure Highway Recommendations Neil Pedersen Chair, ASC Highway Legislative Team Vice Chair, AASHTO Standing Committee on Highways Administrator,
Presentation for Talking Freight, November 16, 2011 Debbie Bowden Freight and Economic Policy Analyst, Office of Freight and Multimodalism Maryland Department.
Metro’s Capital Improvement Needs Presented to the National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board By Tom Harrington, Director of Long Range Planning.
Transportation Investment Act of 2010 AASHTO/MTAP Conference December 6-9, 2010 Savannah, Georgia Steve Kish, Transit Program Manager Georgia Department.
Greater Minnesota Transit Investment Plan TAC November 17, 2010.
1 FTA Research Programs Ronald Hynes Acting Associate Administrator for Research, Demonstration, and Innovation April 17, 2007.
2008 National Rural Public and Intercity Bus Transportation Conference Nebraska Statewide Coordinated Public Transit - Human Services Transportation Plan.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
1 Mountain Metropolitan Transit Sustainability Committee March 20, 2009 Presented By: Sherre Ritenour & Tim McKinney.
PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)
June 9, 2009 VTA 2009 Annual Conference DRPT Annual Update 2009 VTA Conference Chip Badger Agency Director.
Tradeoffs involved in public transportation (example: buses) Number of buses serving a route must be determined a.A large number of buses serving a route.
Regional Transportation Council Mobility Plan Workshop North Central Texas Council of Governments November 12, 2015.
December 17, 2010 Developing Transit Performance Measures for Integrated Multi-Modal Corridor Management.
Washington Transportation Plan 2030 A comprehensive and balanced statewide transportation policy plan reflecting the multi-faceted needs of the state’s.
Hampton Roads Third Crossing I. Introduction VDOT, in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) is proposing to construct a new bridge-tunnel.
Capital Plan Update FMCB Meeting February 26, 2016 Pre-Decisional – Draft for discussion only.
Valley Metro Update Open House and Public Hearing March 9, 2007.
Investing in Infrastructure: Moving Massachusetts Forward Harvard 2015.
Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,
TPB TECHNICAL COMMITTEE MEETING September 6, 2013 District Department of Transportation Federal Railroad Administration.
WIS DOT MCLARY MANAGEMENT PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT.
1.  Transportation Vision  Near-term Recommendations  Ongoing Work / Next Steps 2.
Chelan County Transportation Element Update
and Transportation Impacts
Service Routes and Community Transit Hubs: Right Sizing Transit
Intercity Bus Study 5311/Update
Technology In Action Session: An On-Demand Sunday Transit Application
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
STIP Development OTO Board Meeting
RTC RIDE Service Improvement Recommendations
What is TSMO? TSMO encompasses a broad set of strategies that aim to optimize the safe, efficient, and reliable use of existing and planned transportation.
Travel Washington 18th Biennial State Programs Meeting and
Presentation transcript:

Transportation System Performance Measurement

MDOT’s First Transportation System Performance Report  Next Generation Road & Bridge Goals  Other Aspects of the Road and Bridge System  Integrated Across all modes  Based on MI Transportation Plan Goals

Preserve transportation system investments, protect the environment, and utilize public resources in a responsible manner. Modernize and enhance the transportation system to improve mobility and accessibility. Continue to improve transportation safety and ensure the security of the transportation system. Improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the transportation system and transportation services and expand MDOT’s coordination and collaboration with partners. Stewardship System Improvement Safety and Security Efficient and Effective Operations MI Transportation Plan Goals

 Current Phase  For each of the four goals/objectives, determine what we are already measuring  Identify how the data is being collected and where it is stored  Provide current targets with a snapshot of where we are today  Provide trends, past and future, if available MDOT’s First Transportation System Performance Report

Examples of Passenger Transportation Content Stewardship Goal BUS FLEET CONDITION Aim:Minimize the portion of the rural transit and the specialized transit fleet that are operating past their useful life Measure:The highest percent of any one rural or specialized transit agency’s fleet that is past its useful life Definition:"Useful life" is based on Federal Transit Administration’s definitions Standard:0% of bus fleet past their useful life -> Desirable Acceptable Status:As of 9/23/08, the highest percent of buses of any one agency that is past its useful life is 24%

Examples of Passenger Transportation Content Stewardship Goal LOCAL BUS TRANSIT SERVICE PRESERVATION Aim:Preserve existing local bus transit services in all 83 Michigan counties Measure:Public transit service operating assistance distribution Definition:Number of counties that receive operating assistance from MDOT for public transportation Standard:Maintain existing local bus services in all counties Status:Currently all 83 counties receive operating assistance from MDOT

Examples of Passenger Transportation Content Stewardship Goal RAIL PASSENGER SERVICE PRESERVATION Aim:Preserve existing intercity passenger rail transportation services Measure:Number of daily train miles Definition:Route miles covered while maintaining indicated service Standard:Maintain minimum of one round-trip daily service from Port Huron to Chicago and Grand Rapids to Chicago Status:Currently, the standard is being met

Examples of Passenger Transportation Content Stewardship Goal INTERCITY BUS SERVICE PRESERVATION Aim:Preserve existing intercity bus transportation services Measure:Intercity bus service proximity Definition:Population of the state within 100 miles of intercity bus service Standard:Maintain statewide access to national intercity bus transportation system, defined as everyone is within 100 miles of the intercity bus service in Michigan Status:Currently, 100% of the population of Michigan lives within 100 miles of intercity bus service

Examples of Passenger Transportation Content System Improvement Goal MICHIVAN ACCESS Aim:Expand transportation system (MichiVan) access Measure:Growth in MichiVan ridership and number of MichiVans in service Definition:Comparative counts of riders and vans Standard:Goal – Steady growth to match the increase in ridership and demand Status:Growth in MichiVan Ridership ( ) = 271.4% Growth in number of MichiVans ( ) = 270.5%

Examples of Passenger Transportation Content System Improvement Goal PASSENGER TERMINALS Aim: Expand transportation system (terminal) access Measure: Percent of passenger terminals served by two or more modes of transportation Definition: Terminals include passenger rail terminals, intercity bus terminals, and local transit terminals. These are considered serving two or more modes if they include: 1) Under a four-hour wait time for connectivity between modes; 2) Scheduled local transit is within ¼ mile of the terminal or the terminal is located within a Dial-A-Ride system service area and connection between modes is possible based on operating hours; and 3) The facility is a designated passenger facility staffed by an official agent of a carrier Standard: A statewide standard is not realistic. Each terminal has differing capacities to be multimodal depending on available services. Status: As of June 1, 2009, 34 out of 42 terminals were served by two or more modes of transportation = 81%