Compliance Monitoring─Ensuring Effective Results Jim Younk Idaho Power Company.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cypress Creek Basin Clean Rivers Program Nutrient Special Study Update Report – May 16, 2007 Roy Darville.
Advertisements

West Virginia Department of Agriculture Water Quality Monitoring Program 2009 Photo by Paul Morley.
Year of Clean Water: National Water Monitoring Day Water Testing Kits.
Water Cycle Water Quality. About the Hydrologic Cycle Hydrology is the study of movements and characteristics of water.Hydrology is the study of movements.
Public Workshop Implementation and Enforcement of Nutrient TMDLs for Lake Elsinore and Canyon Lake CA Regional Water Quality Control Board (Regional Water.
Water Quality Tests.
2009 Water Quality Monitoring Report – Fish Creek Vaughn Hauser, B.Sc. Naomi Parker, B.Sc., BIT, CEPIT.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Complexities of the Carters Lake TMDL Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech Presented by: Jeremy Wyss, H.I.T. Tetra Tech 26th Annual Alabama Water.
Stream Monitoring in Loudoun County David Ward, Water Resources Engineer Department of Building and Development, Department of Building and Development,
Division of Water Quality
Assessment of Ecological Condition in Coastal Waters Impacted by Hurricane Katrina.
Outcome of Federal Actions on WA Water Quality Standards.
Water Quality; An Introduction to Water Quality Research in the Yakima Watershed.
GSWA Stream Team A sub-committee of the GSWA Land and Water Stewardship Committee.
Presented at the 9 th Stakeholder Meeting Mike Herrmann, NCEEP Central Watershed Planner April 20th, 2010 Ecosystem Enhancement Program (EEP) Intake Stessor.
Common Monitoring Parameters. Step 1 Consider purpose/objectives of monitoring Assess use attainment Characterize watershed Identify pollutants and sources.
West Virginia Non-tidal Monitoring Network: 2010 Update West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection West Virginia Department of Agriculture USGS.
Brian Haggard Arkansas Water Resources Center UA Division of Agriculture Arkansas Water Resources Center.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed and L’Anguille River Watershed Presented by: Dan DeVun, Equilibrium.
Water Quality Monitoring and Parameter Load Estimations in Lake Conway Point Remove Watershed, L’Anguille River Watershed, and Bayou Bartholomew Presented.
Water Quality Monitoring : Galla Creek Bayou Bartholomew L’Anguille River Presented By: The Ecological Conservation Organization.
Water-Quality Monitoring for Environmental Management and Source-Water Protection U.S. Geological Survey New England Water Science Center in cooperation.
Department of the Environment Overview of Water Quality Data Used by MDE and Water Quality Parameters Timothy Fox MDE, Science Service Administration Wednesday.
Continuous Water-Quality Field Methods Micelis Doyle & Joe Rinella U.S. Geological Survey &
Water Quality Standards, TMDLs and Bioassessment Tom Porta, P.E. Nevada Division of Environmental Protection Bureau of Water Quality Planning.
Water Testing By Pearl, Marlee, and Riahna McKenny Elementary March 21,2012.
The Importance of Watershed Modeling for Conservation Policy Or What is an Economist Doing at a SWAT Workshop?
The Non-tidal Water Quality Monitoring Network: past, present and future opportunities Katie Foreman Water Quality Analyst, UMCES-CBPO MASC Non-tidal Water.
CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF LIS WATER. DISSOLVED OXYGEN What do organisms need oxygen for? How do organisms get oxygen out of the water?
Cache River Monitoring Jennifer L. Bouldin, PhD Ecotoxicology Research Facility Arkansas State University.
QA/QC Assessment of Lay Monitoring in Rhode Island Elizabeth M. Herron, Linda T. Green & Arthur J. Gold URI Watershed Watch University of Rhode Island.
Chemical Assessment Most complicated, but easiest to do. Extreme natural variations What is normal?
By Alex Fuehrer. Introduction Question- Is there statistical evidence that the water quality of the two sites of the flathead are different? Hypothesis-
2011 Upper Basin Stakeholder Forum Nueces River Authority Feb 16, 2011 – Uvalde Feb 23, 2011 – Corpus Christi.
USGS Kansas Water Science Center
Map courtesy of Alabama Water Watch Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment Of Factory Creek In Sumter County, Alabama Brian Burnes University of West.
Water Quality Monitoring in the Upper Illinois River Watershed and Upper White River Basin Project Brian E. Haggard University of Arkansas.
Deep River-Portage Burns Watershed TMDL Stakeholder Meeting March 13, 2013.
Non-tidal network monitoring update for calendar year 2011 Non-tidal Monitoring Workgroup 8 February 2011 Bill Romano MD Dept. of Natural Resources Photograph.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Upper Wabash River Basin Commission 319 Grant for Phase 2 161,079 acres along the tributaries of the Headwater of the Wabash River.
Water Quality in Tryon Creek Initial Results from Portland’s Revised Watershed Monitoring Approach.
NWQMC San Jose, CA May 8, 2006 Combining Dynamic Assessment with Traditional Monitoring Approaches to Improve Understanding of NPS Pollution Impacts William.
Snapshot Event Monitoring Results for the Clackamas River Watershed Presented by PSU SWRP Summer Capstone August
Citizen Science at Kahalu‘u Bay These slides were made possible by generous support from the Hawaii State Department of Health, NELHA, The Kohala Center.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Surface Water Monitoring Pam Anderson, MPCA May 20 th, 2015.
What is the System-Wide Monitoring Program (SWMP) and What Can It Do For You?
District of Columbia TMDL Schedule and Update D.C. Department of Health Water Quality Division March 2004.
Water Quality Assessment Cypress Creek Adrian L. Vogl Aquatic Resources Texas State University Jason Pinchback River System Institute Texas State University.
Birnamwood LID Project Update Nick Russo Team Leader-Environmental Services Architecture & Engineering Division Harris County Public Infrastructure.
Should Fish PM&E Compliance = Success?. Skagit Project History  Relicensed 1995  18 Years of PM&E Implementation  30 Year License remains in effect.
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
Water Quality Indicators and Monitoring Design to Support the Albemarle-Pamlico National Estuary Program: A Progress Report Dean E. Carpenter and William.
Water Quality Monitoring on Larkin Creek St. Francis County, AR JL Bouldin RA Warby Arkansas State University.
 Salinity: Salinity is the concentration of dissolved salts in the water and is an important element of a  habitat. Aquatic animals are adapted to living.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Commonwealth of Virginia TMDL Program Update Citizen for Water Quality Annual Summit September 22, 2001.
Water Quality Rice Creek Watershed.
Caddo Lake Nutrient Study Roy Darville - Caddo Lake Institute
Emily Saad EAS 4480 Oral Presentation 27 April 2010
Cache River Monitoring
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Use Attainability Analyses & Criteria Development
Des Plaines River Watershed Workgroup Midwest Biodiversity Institute
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring Project S
A Public Friendly Approach to Sharing Water Quality Data
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Water Quality Planning Division Monitoring & Assessment Section
Marco island water quality monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Compliance Monitoring─Ensuring Effective Results Jim Younk Idaho Power Company

Hydroelectric Projects

Bliss Lower Salmon Falls Shoshone Falls Upper Salmon Falls

Water Quality Monitoring History –Middle Snake River assessment units listed as water quality limited under CWA Section 303(d) 12/95 – IPC filed FERC relicensing applications for Bliss, Upper Salmon Falls & Lower Salmon Falls; requested 401 water-quality certification 4/97 - EPA approved TMDLs for CWA Section 303(d) listed waters 5/97 - IPC filed Shoshone Falls relicensing application; requested 401 water- quality certification 5/98 - IPC submitted temperature & dissolved oxygen (DO) monitoring plans to IDEQ 8/02 - IDEQ approved monitoring plans 8/04 - FERC issued project licenses 12/04 – IPC/Agency consultation regarding temperature & DO monitoring plans 3/05 - FERC approved monitoring plans requiring ten-minute temperature and DO data collection/reporting

Monitoring Analysis Range of flows (Period of Record high and low) Temperature & DO comparisons to State Standards

Analysis Conclusion “Water temperature and DO levels measured at the Middle Snake River hydroelectric projects are likely indicative of Snake river watershed conditions, which include the hydroelectric projects. As such, IPC believes continued water temperature and DO data collection as required by the FERC licenses would provide little additional information as data were collected across the recorded range of hydrologic conditions.”

Change Process Consulted w/designated agencies regarding temperature & DO monitoring plan modifications (IDEQ, IDFG, USFWS, NOAA Fisheries) Submitted modified monitoring plans for agency review Submitted plan modification requests to FERC FERC approved modified monitoring plans - required trend data collection

Hydroelectric Projects Trend Monitoring Sites

Measures and Analytes water temperature dissolved oxygen specific conductance hydrogen ion concentration (pH) turbidity nitrate ammonia total Kjeldahl nitrogen total phosphorus dissolved orthophosphate suspended solids volatile suspended solids total organic carbon dissolved total organic carbon chlorophyll a phaeophytin Escherichia coli bacteria

Trend Monitoring Data Use Annual reports & five-year trend analysis Upper Snake Rock TMDL evaluation (IDEQ) White Sturgeon Conservation Plan Endangered & Threatened snails