The IRB's Position on Quality Projects vs. Research R. Peter Iafrate, Pharm.D. Chairman, Health Center IRB University of Florida.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Role of the IRB An Institutional Review Board (IRB) is a review committee established to help protect the rights and welfare of human research subjects.
Advertisements

Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
A Process of Quality Improvement: Informed Participation and Institutional Process SACHRP March 27, 2008 Nancy Neveloff Dubler Director Center for Ethics.
Evaluation and Human Subjects Research Julie M. Aultman, Ph.D. Chair, Institutional Review Board Associate Professor, Family and Community Medicine Northeast.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
Ethical Considerations in Human Subjects Research Stacey Berg, M.D. Texas Children’s Cancer Center.
Health Insurance Portability Accountability Act of 1996 HIPAA for Researchers: IRB Related Issues HSC USC IRB.
Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.
Capturing and Reporting Adverse Events in Clinical Research
CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.
What Needs HSC Review? Staying compliant with Federal research regulations.
Chapter 3 Preparing and Evaluating a Research Plan Gay and Airasian
The Role of IRBs in Ensuring Ethical Conduct of QI Activities Mary Ann Baily, PhD Columbia IRB Conference April 1, 2011.
IRB Monthly Investigator Meeting Columbia University Medical Center IRB October 11, 2005.
Human Investigation Committee  Is it research?  If yes, does it involve human subjects?  If yes, can it be exempt?  If no, will a Request for.
International Forum - Quality & Safety in Healthcare |1 | An overview of the Guidance points Ethical issues in Patient Safety Research An overview.
Is this Research? Exempt? Expedited?
Continuing Review VA Requirements Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst Program for Research Integrity Development and Education (PRIDE)
How to Obtain Institutional Review Board (IRB) Approval Richard Wagner Associate Director UCSF Human Research Protection Program August 14, 2008.
Adverse Events, Unanticipated Problems, Protocol Deviations & other Safety Information Which Form 4 to Use?
Cornell Evaluation Network The Use of Human Participants in Research Office of Research Integrity and Assurance ~ May 14, 2007.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 06/18/2015 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
HSA 171 CAR. 1436/ 7/4  The results of activities of an organization or investment over a given period of time.  Organizational Performance: ◦ A measure.
Brief Introduction to Review of Human Subjects Research in the Health Sciences Presentation to Primary Care Faculty Development Program Nichelle Cobb,
Michelle Groy Johnson Quality Improvement Officer Research Integrity Office Tough Love: Understanding the Purpose and Processes of Quality Assurance.
Planned Emergency Research Exception from Informed Consent Requirements September 2007.
University of Miami Office of Research Compliance Assessment Lynn E. Smith, JD, CIM, CIP Johanna Stamates, RN, BA, CCRC With assistance from Elizabeth.
Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.
Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.
1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.
RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.
Privacy and Confidentiality. Definitions n Privacy - having control over the extent, timing, and circumstances of sharing oneself (physically, behaviorally,
How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.
 Lunch and Learn April 22, 2015 Office of Human Research.
The Paradox in HIPAA Deven McGraw, JD, MPH, LLM Partner Manatt, Phelps & Phillips, LLP December 8, 2014.
A step-by-step guide to help you determine if your research protocol is required to be reviewed by the Lindenwood University IRB INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD.
Marian University is sponsored by the Sisters of St. Francis, Oldenburg. Human Subjects Research and the Marian University Institutional Review Board (IRB)
AUDIT REQUIREMENTS, FINDINGS & BASICS RESEARCH COMPLIANCE.
Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.
Getting Your Research Through IRB (UCHS) Review Elaine Wethington, Chair Cornell University Committee on Human Subjects (Ithaca)
AAHRPP ACCREDITATION (Association for the Accreditation of Human Protection Programs)
Research Orientation to SCCA. What is the SCCA? The SCCA brings together the outstanding adult and pediatric oncology patient care services of three world-
Quality Improvement vs. Research October 27, 2011 Patrice Griffith BSMT(ASCP), MBA.
Investigational Devices and Humanitarian Use Devices June 2007.
Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.
Objective 9/23/15 Today we will be completing our research methods unit & begin reviewing for the upcoming unit assessment 9/25. Agenda: -Turn in all homework.
Human Subjects Protection Program Office of Research Compliance Navigating through the current HSPP and IRB Presented by: Danielle Griffin, M.S. Research.
1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.
Levels of Review of Research and Quality Improvement Walter Kraft, MD Associate Director, Office of Human Subjects Protection Department of Pharmacology.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Copyright c 2001 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.1 Chapter 5 Research Ethics All researchers, even students, have a responsibility to conduct ethical research.
Investigator Initiated Research Best Practices for IRB: SBER Corey Zolondek, Ph.D. IRB Operations Manager Wayne State University.
Conditional IRB Approval
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
Introduction to Research: How to develop a scholarly capstone project
MUHC Innovation Model.
How to Apply for and Receive Industry Funding for Investigator Sponsored Research Chuck Simonton MD, FACC, FSCAI Chief Medical Officer Abbott Vascular.
SOU Institutional Review Board
Chapter 5 Research Ethics
Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016
Research Ethics Matthew Billington
Determining the Difference between Clinical Research and Quality/Performance Improvement at Memorial University Medical Center A short questionnaire to.
Division of General Internal Medicine
This takes approximately 5 minutes or less from start to finish
Is it Quality Improvement or Research ?
Appendix 2 of New Application
What are the Major Changes to the IRB under the Final Common Rule?
Human Participants Research
Protocol Approval Criteria
Research with Human Subjects
Presentation transcript:

The IRB's Position on Quality Projects vs. Research R. Peter Iafrate, Pharm.D. Chairman, Health Center IRB University of Florida

Issues? Many requests from medical residents and fellows to satisfy a QA requirement – Want to include it as scholarly activity – Submit as original research – Written as a research protocol National “QA” Databases – Often has a research component – Who approves sending the data?? Sometimes, hard to tell but not a “get out of IRB free card” 2

QI vs Research Does this project involve any of the following – Investigational Drug or Device – Randomizing patients – A fixed clinical protocol that may not be altered by caregivers and staff – A non UF\Shands\VA site Is the project currently the standard of care? Objectives other than producing an improvement in safety or care.

Intent\Background Quality Describes the nature and severity of a specific local performance gap Focus is to improve a specific aspect of health or health care delivery that is currently NOT consistently and appropriately being implemented at this site Research Identifies a specific deficit in scientific knowledge from the literature Proposes to address or identify specific hypotheses in order to develop new knowledge or advance existing knowledge

Methods Quality Mechanisms of the intervention are expected to change over time (i.e., an iterative activity) in response to ongoing feedback Plan for intervention and analysis includes an assessment of the system (i.e., process flow diagram, fishbone, etc) Research Specific protocol defines the intervention, interaction, and use of collected data and tissues, plus project may rely on the randomization of individuals to enhance confidence in differences May use qualitative or quantitative methods to make observations, make comparisons between groups, or generate hypotheses

Intended Benefit Quality Intervention would be considered within the usual clinician-patient therapeutic relationship Potential local institutional benefit is specified (e.g., increased efficiency or decreased cost) Research Intervention, interaction, or use of identifiable private information occurs outside of the usual clinician-patient therapeutic relationship Potential societal benefit in developing new or advancing existing generalizable knowledge

Risk Quality Risk is to privacy or the confidentiality of health information Risk may be described as higher for patients by not participating in this activity Research Risks may or may not be minimal, but may include physical, psychological, emotional, social, or financial risks, The informed consent process describes the risks to participants, who individually and voluntarily decide whether to participate or an IRB grants an alteration or waiver of the consent process

Results Quality Implementation is immediate so that review of results occurs throughout the process and may be used for next Ql activity Extrapolation of results to other settings is possible, but not the main intent of the activity Research Results and analysis may be delayed or periodic throughout the duration of the project, except to protect patient safety. The results will primarily be used to inform further investigations Results are intended to generalize beyond the study population

Sharing Information Quality System level outcomes, processes, refinement of the intervention, and the applicability of the intervention in specific settings/contexts might be shared through peer- reviewed publication and presentation outside the institution. Research It is expected that results will be published or presented to others through a peer-reviewed process

Quality vs Research Determination Process at UF Complete QA vs Research Form to Peter Iafrate If determined to be QA – Requestor will receive an , with an attached assessment letter and a stamped copy of their completed form as a PDF – ed copied to Randy Harmatz and Debbie Lynn – If later determine that they wish to publish that data Submit a retrospective chart review study electronically Upload PDF letter and stamped form If determined not to be QA, they will be instructed to submit to the IRB