1 Learning Studios: Engaging Millennial Students in a New Classroom Environment EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI) Annual Meeting January 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING & CAPACITY BUILDING
Advertisements

Blended learning in higher education: Tapping on the best of both worlds Regina K. Masalela The Fourth Annual Conference of Learning International Networks.
First Year Experience WHERE BUSINESS MEETS FASHION.
Technology Resources  Dave Staudt Project Director, AN-MSI  Al Kuslikis AN-MSI Collaborative Project Coordinator.
A Brief Report of Columbia State’s 2009 Survey Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Prepared by De’ Marcus Jackson, M.S. Instructor.
PASSING THE BATON TO THE NEXT GENERATION: NURTURING NEW FACULTY LYNN MARECEK MARYANNE ANTHONY-SMITH SANTA ANA COLLEGE SANTA ANA, CA.
Born Digital: Looking at Information Literacy Instruction Through a Generational Lens Scott Walter University of Kansas Presented at Annual Meeting of.
Florida Community College in Jacksonville
All Points North: A Compass for Interactive Tutor Training Sessions Kim DeMur Marissa Loon Kelley Tiarks.
Enhancing the college environment Strategic plan for a diverse teaching & learning community.
Lost in Translation: Teaching College Freshmen Dr. De Gallow UC Riverside April 9, 2004.
Visioning and Fostering Quality Teaching and Learning in Higher Education in Ontario Council of Ontario Educational Developers: Judy Britnell (Ryerson)
Student Centered Learning
Education Bachelor’s Degree in Elementary Education Began the Master’s of Special Education program in January of 2011 Professional After graduation Sorensen.
SLIDE 1 Innovations Conference March SLIDE 2 The National Lone Star Report Aligning Technology with Student Success.
Notebook Freestyle Script Font COOPERATIVE LEARNING UMI CHOTIMAH
H. Johnson1 Join Together: A Vision for the Future – A Difference for Us All.
This presentation is associated with Technology Together: Whole-School Professional Development for Capability and Confidence, by Renata Phelps and Anne.
Online Teaching: Strengths and Weaknesses
LowHigh Discovery Collaboration Low High One of the first questions to ask is “How do you want your students to learn?” A professor identifies a problem.
Wendy C. Crone, Assistant Professor University of Wisconsin - Madison January 17, 2001Symposium on New Faculty for the Academy of the 21 Century The Structure.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
1 Good news from “Inside Higher Education” Kuh “Connecting the Dots” Pascarella in “Journal of College Student Development”
ELearning Update March 12, National Trends Approximately 1.9 million students were studying online in the fall of 2003 In 2009, 11.9 million students.
Distance Education: Preparing Faculty to Teach the Distant Learner by Michael Simonson.
Transitioning Content, Students and Instructors. Illustrate advantages of blended learning Identify major business impacts Examine alternative media available.
Sldeshow outline Net Generation Styles Outline of Presentation by Tammie Jensen.
Breakout Sessions The top recommendations have been prepared by each breakout session group based on the topics discussed at Mission Day XIII. The three.
COLLEGE OF EDUCATION & PROFESSIONAL STUDIES TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE Fall 2009 Student / Faculty 21 st Century Technology Survey.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement JIM Meeting Presentation January 20, 2009 Jerome Ward Director, Institutional Research Cochise College.
Hybrid Courses “By blending approaches, colleges hope to save money and meet students' needs.” Jeffrey R. Young, Chronicle of Higher Education, March 22,
Question 1 Why did a majority of students perceive the innovative web-enhanced Japanese language courses favorably and participate in additional online.
Designing for learning: a collaborative approach Dr Aziza Ellozy Director, Center for Learning and Teaching The American University in Cairo 4 th Conference.
ENHANCING STUDENT ENGAGEMENT AT IWU DR. MARY ANN SEARLE VICE PRESIDENT FOR ENROLLMENT & STUDENT AFFAIRS.
Problem-Based Learning. Process of PBL Students confront a problem. In groups, students organize prior knowledge and attempt to identify the nature of.
‘Skeptically Optimistic’ in an Open Online Course David S. Stein, Ph.D. Constance E. Wanstreet, Ph.D.
Dr. Lesley Farmer California State University Long Beach
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Dr. Christine Sabieh TESOL Toronto.  Many educators attempting to transform their teaching/learning environments into flipped classrooms  Reversing.
EDUCAUSE 2005 Annual Conference October 19, 2005.
Competency-Based Education What It Is & What It Is Not Alison Kadlec, Ph.D. Director of Higher Education & Workforce Programs Public Agenda May 14, 2015.
A Six Month Journey October 2, 2014 to March 12, 2015.
Integrating Educational Technology into the Curriculum
Problem-Solving Approach of Allied Health Learning Community.
Learning Studios at Estrella Mountain: The Next-Generation Learning Spaces Roger Yohe, Ph.D. Director Center for Teaching and Learning
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
TELELAW Distance Education: Preparing Faculty to Teach the Distant Learner by Michael Simonson.
Technology in the Classroom: A Working Discussion Group Nelson C. Baker, Ph.D. Georgia Tech SUCCEED College of Engineering CETL, OIT-Educational Technologies.
ELEARNING IN EDUCATION: AN OVERVIEW Raymond S. Pastore, Ph.D. Bloomsburg Univeristy Bloomsburg, PA SITE 2002 Thursday, March 21, 2002 Purpose: To give.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Promote a diverse, inclusive learning environment by recruiting and retaining students, faculty and staff who reflect the demographic changes in our society.
Teaching and learning online: Perceptions of UAF Rural Campus Instructors Victor and Natalia Zinger UAF.
Pathways Project Evaluation Objective #1: To change classroom pedagogy and improve the ability of faculty to effectively integrate Internet-based tools.
Personalized Learning: HISD’s Path to College and Career Readiness.
Millennials in the classroom. Are short on patience Demand more choices and make quick choices Are much less solitary and individualistic Are facile multi-taskers.
Incorporating Active Learning Teaching Strategies into Economics Courses Both Online and in Class Formats Georgia Association of Economics and Finance.
Peer-Led Team Learning University of West Georgia.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
Company LOGO ATP Connected Learning in an Open World ‘‘Developing new ideas and escaping from the old ones’ - A collaborative E learn course development.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Learning Communities at Ventura College. What are learning communities? Interdisciplinary learning Importance of sense of community for learning Student.
Faculty Senate Pat Hulsebosch, Office of Academic Quality 11/17/08.
21st Centruy Approaches to Teaching Physics
NSSE 2004 (National Survey of Student Engagement)
Tom Erwin, CIO Butler Community College (KS) Homero Lopez, Ph.D.
How does the Branding fit into ECC Excels???
Best Practices Creating Effectively Designed Learning Spaces
Changing College Delivery Models to lessen Amounts Borrowed Scott Pulsipher, President AUTHOR’S NAME HERE.
Faculty Development Models
Presentation transcript:

1 Learning Studios: Engaging Millennial Students in a New Classroom Environment EDUCAUSE Learning Initiative (ELI) Annual Meeting January 2008

2 Presenters Homero Lopez, Ph.D. Retired President, Estrella Mountain Community College (AZ) Linda L. García, Ph.D. Higher Education Consultant

3 A Vision of Today’s Students

4 The Millennial Generation

5 Characteristics of the Millennial Generation Gadget Fanatics Social Networkers Internet Enthusiasts Optimists Multitaskers Inductive Learners Team Oriented Visual Learners Source:

6 Source: The Chronicle of Higher Education Chronicle, Almanac So What?

7 The Collision: Millennials vs. Traditional Learning Environments Educational Delivery Challenges Faculty and Student Challenges Technology Infrastructure Challenges College Institutional Mindset on Facilities

8 Disengaging Students Through Space Source: Brown (2005) Memorization Recall One size fits all Repetition Acquisition of facts Transmission of knowledge Teacher = authoritative figure Fixed roles Fixed classrooms Single location

9 National Systems To Measure Student Engagement Benchmarks: Indicators of Effective Educational Practice Active and Collaborative Learning Student-Faculty Interaction Support for Learners Academic Challenge Student Effort Active and Collaborative Learning Student-Faculty Interaction Supportive Environment Level of Academic Challenge Enriching Educational Experiences

10 You can ignore this breaking Millennial wave, by treating today’s collegians as you did the last generation. You can resist it, by pursuing decades-old agendas. You can ride it, by adapting as fast as you can to new needs as they arise. Or you can lead this new youth wave, by preparing for Millennials before they arrive in full force. - Howe and Strauss, 2003, p. 5

11 Using Space as a Tool Three Principles in Developing Campus Spaces 1. Leverage physical space 2. Engagement of stakeholders 3. “Radical flexibility”

12 Learning Studios Source: Brown (2005) Understanding Discovery Tailored Construction Teacher = mentor Mobile roles Mobile, convertible, flexible classrooms

13 What Did Engagement Mean In The Learning Studio For Millennial Students and Faculty?

14 What Did They Talk About?

15 Millennial Students vs. Faculty

16 Active and Collaborative Learning A classroom with a purpose Team work Team work Ample amount of writing spaces Ample amount of writing spaces Conduct online research

17 Student-Faculty Interaction Nontraditional roles Nontraditional roles Teaching style modified Teaching style modified An increase access to students An increase access to students

18 Supportive Environment Technology is a must Color creates positive atmosphere Physical comfort

19 Concerns Constant lecture not favored Instructors not proficient with technology Technology safety Technology interruptions Social distractions

20 Moving From Disengagement To Engagement Through Space Disengagement   Instructor is dispenser of knowledge   Student is recipient of knowledge   Constant lecture   Technology not utilized   A less social environment   Fixed furniture   Instructor is a mentor   Increased student involvement   Technology inundated   Instructors technology proficient   An increased social environment   Flexible furniture Engagement

21 Creating Learning Studios Experimentation Seek Partnerships Create Prototypes Gather Research Develop Best Practices Replicate Student Engagement Student Success

22 Website: