ATTACHMENT B ASSESSMENT RECORD FOR ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT __________________________ (Academic Department Name) Biological Sciences _________________________.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 2007 ULS Information Literacy and Assessment of Learning Program.
Advertisements

Department of Biological Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Biology CIP code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement Report.
Dept. of Computing and Technology (CaT) School of Science and Technology B.S. in Computer Information Systems (CIS) CIP Code: Program Code: 411.
How to Use SBP Curricular Criteria for public health bachelor’s degrees in PHP and SPH Reviews March 2015 Arlington, VA.
General Education Revision. Mission & Purpose Mission Rooted in the tradition of liberal arts education, FGCU’s General Education Program provides students.
Core Competencies Student Focus Group, Nov. 20, 2008.
Assessment in the Biology Department in AY Caroline Solomon Friday December 5.
FAMU ASSESSMENT PLAN PhD Degree Program in Entomology Dr. Lambert Kanga / CESTA.
An Outcomes-based Assessment Model for General Education Amy Driscoll WASC EDUCATIONAL SEMINAR February 1, 2008.
School of Business University of Bridgeport Admissions Presentation Robert Gilmore, Ph.D. Associate Dean School of Business.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
NMT Gen Ed Learning Objectives An ability to communicate well An ability to reason well An ability to evaluate and apply information Development of analytical.
Stony Brook Model for General Education Assessment Pilot Report November 13, 2003 GEAR as a Catalyst for Change Beginning to Build a Campus- Wide Culture.
W. Ken Farr Economics and Finance GCSU Assessment Day 2010 The Economics Major Assessment Methodology.
NMU Towards the 21 st Century Mitchell Klett Alan Willis Ruth Watry Laura Reissner Gary Brunswick.
Overview of the Rose-Hulman Bachelor of Science in Software Engineering Don Bagert SE Faculty Retreat – New Faculty Tutorial August 23, 2005.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
October 22, 2009 Report to the Faculty Senate Professor John Stevenson Senator Sandy Jean Hicks UCGE-Subcommittee on Assessment of General Education (SAGE)
The Influence of the University/College/Department Mission How your university and department’s missions influence your engineering degree requirements.
Formulating objectives, general and specific
JIC ABET WORKSHOP No.4 Guidelines on: II Faculty Survey Questionnaire.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
General Education (GE) Assessment College of Arts and Sciences.
External Examiners’ Briefing Day Assessment Policy Tuesday 6 th January 2015.
1 Student Success Plans Regional Meeting February 9, 2007 Youngstown State University Office of Assessment Sharon Stringer
Department of Physical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.S. in Chemistry Education CIP CODE: PROGRAM CODE: Program Quality Improvement.
-SLO Development Progress -SLO Activity -Assessment Progress -Support Needs.
Department of Mathematical Sciences School of Science and Technology B.A. in Mathematics CIP Code: Program Code: Program Quality Improvement.
Chemistry B.S. Degree Program Assessment Plan Dr. Glenn Cunningham Professor and Chair University of Central Florida April 21, 2004.
Jason D. Powell Ferrum College Saturday, October 15, :30-2:30 PM ACA Summit Asheville, NC.
Undergraduate Core at Doane March 14, Overview of Undergraduate Core at Doane Philosophy of the Undergraduate Core at Doane (aligned with mission)
Designing and implementing of the NQF Tempus Project N° TEMPUS-2008-SE-SMHES ( )
American Chemical Society The Role of Undergraduate Research in the Certified Chemistry Major Thomas Wenzel Department of Chemistry Bates College Lewiston,
Computing and Technology Department School of Science and Technology BS in Information Technology CIP Code Program Code 414 Fall 2010 Program Quality.
LeMoyne-Owen College December 15, 2009 Mimi Czarnik, Professor of English and Dean of Humanities Becky Burton, Associate Professor of Biology Alverno College,
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
 Introduction Introduction  Contents of the report Contents of the report  Assessment : Objectives OutcomesObjectivesOutcomes  The data :
College of Natural and Applied Sciences Master of Science in Biology Master of Science in Biology Degree 8 Faculty: From CNAS, WERI & Marine Lab 8 Faculty:
AASCB The Assurance of Learning AASCB Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Marta Colón de Toro, SPHR Assessment Coordinator College of.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Assessment Plan Department of Biology, Queens College 12/10/2012 Assessment Forum Cathy Savage-Dunn.
Dr. Amina M R El-Nemer Lecturer Maternity and Obstetric Nursing Dep. IQAP Manager Program Specification.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
A Basic Guide to Academic Assessment Presented by Darby Kaikkonen Director of Institutional Research.
The Undergraduate Curriculum at Doane A briefing by the General Education Task Force Gerry Allen, John Burney, Alec Engebretson, Kay Hegler, Adam Hunke.
Draft implementation plan for our new purposes and objectives for General Education. Interim report of the Task Force on General Education and the Faculty.
1 Orientation 101 General Education Program Student Learning Outcomes.
Peer Reviewer - Basic Workshop 2 Prof Hala Salah Consultant in NQAAP Prof Hussein El-Maghraby Member, NQAAP.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
N ational Q ualifications F ramework N Q F Quality Center National Accreditation Committee.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP By: Dr. Shemeka McClung Director Ms. Arnitra Hunter Research Associate Institutional Research.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
Laboratory Science and Quantitative Core Requirements.
325K: COMBINED PRIORITY FOR PERSONNEL PREPARATION Webinar on the Annual Performance Report for Continuation Funding Office of Special Education Programs.
Institutional Learner Outcomes Coffeyville Community College Assessment.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Assessment Planning and Learning Outcome Design Dr
Introduction to Curriculum Mapping
CRITICAL CORE: Straight Talk.
Information Literacy Standards for Freshmen Seminars
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
High Impact Practices: HU-HIPs plan
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
Atmospheric Sciences On the Journey to Assessing Learning Outcomes
JACKSON STATE UNIVERSITY ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP
Presentation transcript:

ATTACHMENT B ASSESSMENT RECORD FOR ACADEMIC DEPARTMENT __________________________ (Academic Department Name) Biological Sciences _________________________ (Assessment Period Covered) (Date Submitted) Fall 2000 – Fall 2002 SemestersJanuary 22, 2003 Department/Program Mission Statement: “The Department of Biological Sciences strives to provide students with the fundamental understanding of the principles and methods of the life sciences within the context of a sound liberal arts education. Emphasis is on the development of the student’s ability to analyze problems, apply scientific method, communicate biological information, and interpret current advances in research.” Includes Assessment Reports for those instructional programs listed below: Title of Instructional Program Degree Level (Bachelors, Masters, etc.) ___________________________________________________________ Biological SciencesBachelors Majors:Liberal Arts Biology Cellular Biochemistry Cytotechnology Medical Technology Biology Secondary Education Form A 1

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Biological Sciences (all majors)Bachelors____________________________________________________ (Instructional Program)(Degree Level) Fall 2000 – Fall 2002 SemestersJanuary 22, 2003____________________________________________________ (Period Covered)(Date Submitted) Form B Note: Please complete one Form B for each program listed on Form A. Expanded Statement of Institutional Purpose Linkage PSU Mission Statement Reference: The Department of Biological Sciences contributes to undergraduate development of a strong foundation in the liberal arts, and a commitment to academic excellence, ethical values, lifelong learning, and responsible citizenship. The Department also takes advantage of the natural surroundings, Lake Champlain and the Adirondack Mountains, in biology courses and community service. Division Mission Statement Reference: The Department of Biological Sciences contributes to the liberal arts curriculum in which students learn to think critically and communicate effectively. Students master a specific discipline in a supportive and encouraging learning environment in the classroom and in field/laboratory research and internship opportunities. PSU College-wide Student Outcomes Supported: 1. Have mastered the core knowledge, skills and perspectives of their major field of study and therefore be prepared to hold a professional position, or pursue graduate studies, and continue to grow intellectually, professionally, and personally. 2. Communicate effectively in written and oral expression. 3. Think analytically and critically and reason logically. 4. Access, evaluate, and use information and technology effectively and efficiently. 5. Understand the process and impact of mathematics, science, and technology on society. 6. Be able to work independently and cooperatively. Intended Student Outcomes for this Program: Students should know and understand: 1. Fundamental principles of biology at the molecular and cellular level, including the interrelation between cellular organization, function, reproduction and regulation of the cellular system. 2. Fundamental processes of living organisms and major concepts in genetics and evolution. 3. Ecological systems and the interrelationships with the environment. 2

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Biological Sciences (all majors)Bachelors____________________________________________________ (Instructional Program)(Degree Level) Fall 2000 – Fall 2002 SemestersJanuary 22, 2003____________________________________________________ (Period Covered)(Date Submitted) Note: Please complete one Form C for each intended student outcome listed on Form B. The intended student outcome should be restated in the space below and the outcome number entered in the blank spaces. Intended Student Outcome: __. Students completing this program should know and understand fundamental principles of biology at the molecular and cellular level, including the interrelation between cellular organization, function, reproduction and regulation of the cellular system. First Means of Evaluation for Outcome Identified Above __.a Method of Evaluation and Criteria for Success: Students are given a question to assess their knowledge and understanding of biology. A score of: “6” indicates that they know and fully understand the subject. “5” indicates that they meet the intended outcome. “4” indicates that they are approaching the minimum intended outcome. __.a Summary of Evidence Collected: Freshmen in biology courses = 3.5 (n =121) Students in 100 level courses = 3.6 (n=170) p < 0.01 p < 0.01 Seniors in biology courses = 4.2 (n=93)Students in 300/400 level courses = 4.2 (n=198) __.a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program: Students completing this program demonstrate knowledge, but not understanding because they cannot adequately integrate and extrapolate from what they know. Greater effort will be made in the core curricula of the Biological Sciences to require students to integrate and extrapolate information they have been taught. Second Means of Evaluation for Outcome Identified Above: __.b Method of Evaluation and Criteria for Success: Proposal: “xx”% of students completing this program should successfully complete “Extraordinary Activity” that requires an application of knowledge at the molecular/cell level. __.b Summary of Evidence Collected: See Attachment “A” of Department Annual Report __.b Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program: “XX”% or more of students fulfill the criteria. Form C 3

Department of Biological Sciences Assessment of Student Knowledge and Understanding of Biology by Exam/Quiz Questions  Each semester a new question is approved by the Department of Biological Sciences for use in in the first exam/quiz of the semester.  The question is given in lower – upper level Biology courses.  The unscored student responses to the question are photocopied.  The photocopied student responses from all courses are shuffled together and graded by a committee of faculty members.  The response scores are analyzed by student class level and Biology course level for Biological Sciences Majors, Other Science Majors, and Non-Science Majors  Cumulative semester response scores are also analyzed. 4

Beginning in the Fall 2000 semester, biology course syllabi have included the following information: Assessment of Student Learning: Analytical skill development and understanding of fundamental biological principles The faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences are committed to providing students with a first-rate educational experience as articulated in the Departmental Mission Statement: “The Department of Biological Sciences strives to provide students with the fundamental understanding of the principles and methods of the life sciences within the context of a sound liberal arts education. Emphasis is on the development of the student’s ability to analyze problems, apply scientific method, communicate biological information, and interpret current advances in research.” Student progress toward attaining the goals set forth in the Departmental Mission Statement will be assessed in part by an exam or quiz question that has been selected for this purpose by the faculty of the Department of Biological Sciences. 5

The Assessment Grading Committee uses the following grading scheme: Grading Scheme for Marking Continuing Assessment Questions 0 No attempt made to answer question 1 Failed attempt. Attempt made, but no relevant information provided. 2 Fundamentally inadequate answer. Some relevant facts/components provided, but no meaningful integration of material or extrapolation from facts. 3 All relevant facts/components provided OR few or incomplete facts/components provided, but no meaningful integration of material or extrapolation from facts. 4 All relevant facts/components provided, but incomplete integration/extrapolation OR some relevant facts missing, but adequate integration/extrapolation from facts. 5 Complete facts provided/components provided. Adequate integration/extrapolation from facts OR some facts missing, but complete integration/extrapolation from facts. 6 All relevant facts present. Thorough integration/extrapolation from facts. 6

As articulated in the course syllabus, student progress toward attaining the goals set forth in the Biology Department’s Mission Statement will be assessed, in part, by examination or quiz. The following questions assess your knowledge of biology introduced and reviewed during elementary/secondary and post-secondary education in biology. 1.a. What did Watson and Crick discover and what is the primary significance of the discovery? b. Genetic information in a DNA molecule is coded in the sequence of ________________________. c. Guanine (G) makes up 40% of the nucleotides in a sample of DNA from an organism. What percentage of the nucleotides in this sample will be thymine (T)?______________ d. A particular sequence of nucleotides in the coding sequence of DNA is ATTCGGT. The corresponding sequence for the transcribed mRNA is:________________________ e. A particular protein is 600 amino acids long. How many nucleotides comprise the sequence of single stranded nucleic acid that codes for the amino acids in this protein?____________ f. Why is the genetic code considered to be “universal”? Name:___________________________________BIO102 EXAM I FALL 2002 Part A. (10 points): 7

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR Biological Sciences (all majors)Bachelors____________________________________________________ (Instructional Program)(Degree Level) Fall 2000 – Fall 2002 SemestersJanuary 22, 2003____________________________________________________ (Period Covered)(Date Submitted) Note: Please complete one Form C for each intended student outcome listed on Form B. The intended student outcome should be restated in the space below and the outcome number entered in the blank spaces. Intended Student Outcome: __. Students completing this program should know and understand fundamental principles of biology at the molecular and cellular level, including the interrelation between cellular organization, function, reproduction and regulation of the cellular system. First Means of Evaluation for Outcome Identified Above __.a Method of Evaluation and Criteria for Success: Students are given a question to assess their knowledge and understanding of biology. A score of: “6” indicates that they know and fully understand the subject. “5” indicates that they meet the intended outcome. “4” indicates that they are approaching the minimum intended outcome. __.a Summary of Evidence Collected: Freshman in biology courses = 3.5 (n =121) Students in 100 level courses = 3.6 (n=170) p < 0.01 p < 0.01 Seniors in biology courses = 4.2 (n=93)Students in 300/400 level courses = 4.2 (n=198) __.a. Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program: Students completing this program demonstrate knowledge, but not understanding because they cannot adequately integrate and extrapolate from what they know. Greater effort will be made in the core curricula of the Biological Sciences to require students to integrate and extrapolate information they have been taught. Second Means of Evaluation for Outcome Identified Above: __.b Method of Evaluation and Criteria for Success: Proposal: “xx”% of students completing this program should successfully complete “Extraordinary Activity” that requires an application of knowledge at the molecular/cell level. __.b Summary of Evidence Collected: See Attachment “A” of Department Annual Report __.b Use of Results to Improve Instructional Program: “XX”% or more of students fulfill the criteria. Form C 3

Other Assessment Outcomes to Date:  Increased faculty discussion of student progress (or lack thereof) and identification of areas for program revision.  Two recent ( ) initiatives that have been incorporated into the Department of Biological Sciences curricula are: Writing Standards Supplemental Readings This presentation was prepared by Janice Marchut Conrad and Dan Vogt. If you have questions about the method of program assessment used by Department of Biological Sciences, please contact Janice or Dan. 8