Jennifer Kates, Kaiser Family Foundation Eric Lief, Center for Strategic and International Studies/UNAIDS July 2006 International Assistance for HIV/AIDS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracking Development Assistance for Health Nirmala Ravishankar October 7, 2009.
Advertisements

Changes in Donor Financing Over Time: A Global Perspective International AIDS Economics Network Pre-Conference Meeting Jen Kates, PhD July 19, 2014 Vice.
Overview of the Global Fund: Guiding Principles Grant Cycle / Processes & Role of Public Private Partnerships Johannesburg, South Africa Tatjana Peterson,
What is "QuODA"? A methodology to measure donors' performance, developed by the Brookings Institution and the Center for Global Development – Expressed.
Statistical Reporting System OECD DAC Simon Scott Development Cooperation Directorate, OECD 28 October 2009 Bratislava, Slovak Republic.
USAID in Africa October Enhance strategic partnerships Consolidate democratic transitions Bolster fragile states Strengthen regional and sub-regional.
Web Briefing: The U.S. Global Health Budget Tracker Presented by the Kaiser Family Foundation September 11, 2014 Thursday, September 11, 2014.
The International Response to HIV/AIDS Josh Busby Princeton University Center for Globalization.
EUROPEAN ASSISTANCE TO AGRICULTURE IN SUB SAHARAN AFRICA Bruce Hearn Department of Management, University of Leicester Veli Koc Centre for Environmental.
Aid Effectiveness in Africa African Union Commission Department of Economic Affairs November 24, 2011 By Lulit Bereda.
The President’s FY15 Budget Request and Funding for Global Health Programs Wednesday, March 19, :30 p.m. ET – 1:15 p.m. ET Presented by Jen Kates.
Global health funding: and beyond By Mark Harrington Treatment Action Group 27 October 2011 Lille, France.
MDG and Development Cooperation (MDG 8): UNDP’s Emerging Donors Program Rastislav Vrbensky Country Support Team UNDP RSC Bratislava.
International HIV Assistance from Donor Governments: Commitments & Disbursements, US$ Billions Commitments (Enacted Amounts) Disbursements SOURCES:
International HIV Assistance from Donor Governments: Commitments & Disbursements, US$ Billions Commitments (Enacted Amounts) Disbursements SOURCES:
Tracking Ireland’s Funding Commitment to HIV, AIDS and Communicable Diseases Dóchas Naomi Petty-Saphon and Finola Mohan.
At What Cost? U.S. Leadership in Global Health in an Era of Austerity Dr. J. Stephen Morrison Senior Vice President; Director, Global Health Policy Center.
Financing the response to AIDS in low- and middle- income countries: International assistance from the G8, European Commission and other donor Governments,
Center for Global Health Division of Global HIV/AIDS John Pitman Division of Global HIV/AIDS, Center for Global Health, CDC.
Financing the response to HIV in low- and middle-income countries: how it is affected by the economic crisis? Robert Greener July 20, 2011.
Special study on AID TO HIV/AIDS CONTROL Results and further action Julia Benn Development Co-operation Directorate, OECD July 2004.
Response of Governments/International Institutions/Civil Society on Scaling Up HIV/AIDS Financing Global Conference Brasilia, Brazil – November 2006 Aisha.
Washington D.C., USA, July 2012www.aids2012.org Know Your Resources: How to use funding data to strengthen your messages in the critical push for.
BACKGROUND METHODOLOGY & SAMPLE SPECIFICATIONS THE SURVEY QUESTIONS SUMMARY OF THE FINDINGS PRESENTATION OF THE RESULTS Content of report.
Progress in Resource Mobilization and Creating an Enabling Environment Elizabeth Lule Population and Reproductive Health Advisor, The World Bank.
Are the Donor Countries keeping their promises on MDGs? Marco Ciapparelli, GSI ITALIA.
Achieving the health-related Millennium Development Goals Simon Wright.
International HIV Assistance from Donor Governments: Disbursements, US$ Billions.
Global Estimates of People Living with HIV/AIDS SOURCE: UNAIDS, Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, In Millions.
Investing in Health: How can the United Kingdom contribute to a grand convergence in global health? Sir Richard Feachem, KBE, FREng, DSc(Med), PhD Director,
Figure 0 The Global Burden of Disease and its Implications for U.S. Policy Council on Foreign Relations ■ February 6, 2013 Jen Kates Vice President, Kaiser.
HIV/AIDS Resource Tracking: Lessons learned and next steps Prepared for: Fourth Global National Health Accounts Symposium 7-8 July Barcelona, Spain Paul.
The HIV Response Where are we now?
Today’s Speakers from the Kaiser Family Foundation

International Resource Availability for HIV, 2015
Canada is in last place with Japan amongst global peers.
Global Health Funding Kaiser Permanente Resident Elective Health Policy Program 10 May 2017 Prof. Corrina Moucheraud UCLA Fielding School of Public Health.
Possible impacts of Brexit on EU development and humanitarian policies
Top 10 Donors for Health ODA, 2002 & 2013
Debt and Aid in Ethiopia and Brazil
U.S. Global Health Funding: Bilateral Tuberculosis (TB), FY 2001-FY 2017 Request In Millions NOTES: Includes TB funding provided through USAID. Bilateral.
Total Estimated Available Resources for AIDS from All Sources
Major Sub-Sector Share of Health ODA, 2002 & 2010
Total Estimated Available Resources for HIV from All Sources
Donor Government Disbursements for HIV,
U.S. Global Health Funding (Actual): United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), FY 2001-FY 2017 Request In Millions NOTES: FY13 includes the effects of sequestration.
Top 10 Donor Governments by Health ODA per US$1 Million GDP, 2013
Total ODA Disbursements by Sector,
U.S. Global Health Funding: Global Malaria, FY FY 2013*
Donor Government Disbursements for HIV,
U.S. Global Health Funding, FY 2006-FY 2017 Request
Major Sub-Sector Share of Health ODA, 2002 & 2013
U.S. Global Health Funding for the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), FY 2001-FY 2013* In Millions *FY 2012 are final estimates; FY 2013.
Distribution of Bilateral & Multilateral Funding in the U. S
International HIV Assistance from Donor Governments: Disbursements,
International HIV Assistance from Donor Governments: Disbursements,
Resources available to HIV-related programmes
International HIV Assistance from Donor Governments: Disbursements,
NOTES: PEPFAR was created in 2003 and funding began in FY04
U.S. Funding for the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), FY 2004-FY 2018 Request In Millions NOTES: PEPFAR was created in 2003 and funding.
U.S. Global Health Funding: President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), FY 2004-FY 2017 Request In Millions NOTES: PEPFAR was created in 2003.
U.S. Funding for Global Tuberculosis (TB), FY 2001 – FY 2019 Request
Total ODA Disbursements,
U.S. Funding for Global Tuberculosis (TB), FY FY 2018 Request
Top 10 Donor Governments by Health ODA as a Percentage of Total ODA, 2013 US$ Billions NOTES: Amounts in gross US$ disbursements. Health ODA combines data.
Commitments (Enacted Amounts)
U.S. Global Health Funding, FY 2006 – FY 2020 Request
HIV Funding from Donor Governments,
U.S. Global Health Funding, FY 2006 – FY 2020 Request
Presentation transcript:

Jennifer Kates, Kaiser Family Foundation Eric Lief, Center for Strategic and International Studies/UNAIDS July 2006 International Assistance for HIV/AIDS in the Developing World: Taking Stock of the G8, Other Donor Governments, and The European Commission

Chart 1 Notes: Data are preliminary only. Figure includes aid provided to the European Union (EU) by the four G7 members who are also part of the EU. Source: OECD, March $ billion G7 as Percent of Official Development Assistance (ODA), 2005

Chart 2 Total G7/EC and Other Donor Government Commitments for HIV/AIDS, 2005 US$ Billions Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above; Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria. Bilateral Commitments & Global Fund* Contributions

Chart 3 $4.3 billion G7/EC as Combined Share of Total HIV/AIDS Commitments by Donor Governments, 2005 Bilateral Commitments & Global Fund* Contributions Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above; Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Chart 4 G7/EC as Share of Total HIVAIDS Commitments by Donor Governments, 2005 $4.3 billion Bilateral Commitments & Global Fund* Contributions Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above; Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Chart 5 $3.5 billion G7/EC as Share of Bilateral Commitments and Disbursements for HIV/AIDS, by Donor, 2005 $2.7 billion CommitmentsDisbursements Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above. Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005.

Chart 6 G7/EC as Share of Global Fund* HIV/AIDS Contributions by Donor Governments, 2005 $813.6 million Notes: Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Chart 7 G7/EC Funding Channels for HIV/AIDS Commitments, by Donor, 2005 Global Fund Adjusted to Represent Estimated HIV/AIDS Share Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above; Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Chart 8 Assessing “Fair Share” Complex, no single methodology Many important questions about what to take into account Must look at multiple methods, such as: –Rank by share of commitment compared to share of the global economy or share of developed country GDP; –Rank by value of commitment compared with standardized measure of relative wealth, such as commitment per $1 million GDP or GNI; –Share of total compared to the cost-sharing distribution negotiated for United Nations Member States. No one measure alone can answer the question

Chart 9 Example 1: G7/EC Rank by Total HIV/AIDS Commitment per US$1 Million, Gross National Income (GNI), 2005 Bilateral Commitments & Global Fund* Contributions Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above; Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; World Bank, World Development Indicators database, July

Chart 10 Example 2: Share of Global Resources Available for HIV/AIDS Compared to Share of World GDP, 2005 Bilateral Disbursements & Global Fund* Contributions Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above; Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2006

Chart 11 Example 3: Share of Resources Available for HIV/AIDS from the G7 Compared to G7 Share of GDP, 2005 Bilateral Disbursements & Global Fund* Contributions Notes: Bilateral data from the U.K. are preliminary only. Bilateral data from Japan, Italy, and Other DAC are estimates based on prior year reporting; Funding for international HIV research not included in bilateral figures above; Global Fund contributions are by donor fiscal year, not Global Fund fiscal year, and are adjusted to represent estimated HIV/AIDS share based on Global Fund grant distribution by disease to date (57% for HIV/AIDS). Sources: UNAIDS/KFF/CSIS analysis of donor government data and online data query of the OECD CRS, July 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005; The Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria; IMF, World Economic Outlook Database, April 2006

Chart 12 But is the Need Being Met? Resources Available Compared to Estimated Need Sources: UNAIDS, 2006 Report on the Global AIDS Epidemic, May 2006; UNAIDS, Resource Needs for an Expanded Response to AIDS in Low and Middle Income Countries, August 2005 $15 billion$22 billion$11.9 billion

Chart 13 Methodology Data provided in this presentation and accompanying report were collected and analyzed as part of collaborative effort among UNAIDS the Kaiser Family Foundation and CSIS. Data were collected from multiple sources. The research team obtained bilateral assistance data directly, using standard protocols, from the governments of Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, the Netherlands, Sweden, the United Kingdom, the United States, and from the European Commission during the first half of Data for the U.S. were also derived from Congressional appropriations legislation and other official documents. While data from the U.K. were obtained directly from the U.K government, the U.K. bilateral figure is still considered a preliminary estimate only. In addition, U.K. policy is not to disaggregate resources for HIV/AIDS from sexual and reproductive health activities; these activities were reviewed and included if there was a substantial portion focused on HIV/AIDS, but further analysis is being conducted. Bilateral data for all other members of the DAC, including Italy and Japan, were estimated based on 2004 data provided to UNAIDS or to the OECD Creditor Reporting System (CRS). Data on UNAIDS contributions were collected directly from donors and from UNAIDS. Data on Global Fund contributions were collected directly from donors and from the Global Fund’s web-based databases. Included in bilateral funding were any earmarked (HIV designated) multilateral amounts, such as donor contributions to UNAIDS. Not included in totals is funding for international HIV/AIDS research. All Global Fund contributions were adjusted to represent 57% of the total, reflecting the Fund’s reported grant approvals for HIV/AIDS to date. Contributions made by donors to the Global Fund in a given year are considered to be disbursed by donors in full, although these funds are not necessarily disbursed by the Global Fund to programs in that same year. Data are by the fiscal year (FY) period, as defined by the donor, and fiscal years vary by donor. The U.S. FY runs from October 1-September 30. In some cases, therefore, data obtained directly from donors on their FY 2005 contributions to the Global Fund may differ from amounts reported on the Global Fund’s website, which are by calendar year. Other than contributions provided by governments to the Global Fund, UNAIDS, or to a UN agency for an HIV/AIDS specific purpose, general contributions to UN entities are not identified as part of a donor government’s HIV/AIDS assistance even if the multilateral organization in turn directs some of these funds to HIV/AIDS. Rather, they are counted as HIV/AIDS funding provided by the multilateral organization, as in the case of the World Bank’s efforts. All data are expressed in US dollars (USD). See report for more detailed methodology.