Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Clean Air Act.
Advertisements

Fuels and Emissions: Lessons Learned in the U.S. Lester Wyborny II U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality.
Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Proposal Overview May 13,
Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Emissions Reductions Beyond the Clean Smokestacks Act (CSA) Environmental Management Commission.
The Importance of the 2007 Highway Diesel Rule in Meeting Clean Air and Public Health Challenges Bill Becker Executive Director State and Territorial Air.
Rosalva Tapia May 22, Presentation Overview Where OTAQ fits in EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality Structure Where DERA fits in OTAQ DERA.
Robert Tekniepe Clark County Department of Air Quality and Environmental Management Air Quality Forum November 14, 2006 Clean Diesel Strategies.
“Cleaner Air Sooner” South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control Bureau of Air Quality.
Kansas City Air Quality, Emissions, and Strategies Douglas Watson Kansas Department of Health and Environment Bureau of Air and Radiation January 10, 2006.
Template Emission Controls Affecting Northeast Texas Presentation to the NETAC Policy and Technical Committees Sue Kemball-Cook, Krish Vijayaraghavan,
Final Rulemaking to Establish Light-Duty Vehicle CAFE and GHG Standards Joint Briefing for WP29 June 2010 Informal document No. WP ,
California’s Experience: Air Quality Successes and Challenges Bart Croes, P.E. Chief, Air Quality Data Branch California Air Resources Board (CARB) April.
1. 2 First authorized to be established by the Clean Air Act of 1970.
Diesel Emissions: The “ Next ” Challenge in Air Quality Management in Asia BAQ 2002, Hong Kong December 16, 2002.
Reducing Emissions from Existing Trucks and Buses
TADGER Turbulating Atomizer Diesel Gas Emission Reducer
Meeting of the Southern Ute Indian Tribe/State of Colorado Environmental Commission and the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission 4/16/2015.
Air Quality 101: Clean Air Act Overview/ Update. 2 Origins of the Clean Air Act Historic air pollution Donora, Pennsylvania, – PSD, tribes.
South Coast AQMP/SIP Ozone & PM2.5 Control Strategy Laki Tisopulos, Ph.D., P.E. Assistant Deputy Executive Officer South Coast Air Quality Management.
Better Outdoor Air Quality in African Cities
EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel Bill Charmley, U.S. EPA Tri-Service Power Expo July 15, 2003.
US-China Cooperation: Opportunities for Air Quality & Climate China Environment Forum Panel March 17, 2010.
U. S. Air Quality Program Update Working Group on Strategies and Review April 14, 2010.
0 Office of Transportation and Air Quality Update for Air Directors: Transportation and Air Quality Christopher Grundler Deputy Director NACAA Spring Meeting.
PUBLIC WORKSHOP STATEWIDE DIESEL ENGINE IDLE REDUCTION STANDARD August 23, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection Division of Air Resource Management.
EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel
Georgia Environmental Protection Division Is “Good and Gooder” Good for Georgia and Georgian’s? Jimmy Johnston Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch.
David McNew/Getty Images The downtown skyline is enveloped in smog shortly before sunset in Los Angeles, California.
Overview of EPA Policy and Guidance Supporting Innovation Presented by: Lydia Wegman Director, Air Quality Strategies and Standards Division EPA’s Office.
Name, event, date Rob de Jong United Nations Environment Programme/
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
Air Pollution Solutions Ch. 18. How should we deal with air pollution? Legal, economic, and technical tools can help us to clean up air pollution, but.
Clean Air California’s Success -- and Future Challenges.
U.S. EPA Locomotive and Marine Diesel Proposal Presentation to NRMM Working Group Geneva, June 2007 Informal document No. GRPE (54th GRPE, 4-8 June.
California Experience in Converting Vehicles to Alternative Fuels New Delhi, India May 2001 CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY Air Resources Board.
Driving Down GHG Emissions, Driving Up Fuel Efficiency: Coordinating a Groundbreaking National Vehicle Policy Kathryn Thomson Counselor to the Secretary.
Name, event, date Lew Fulton UNEP May 23, Road Map of Today’s Presentation 1.Urban Growth & Air Pollution Problems: (a)Urban populations and growth.
Clean Air Regulatory Agenda - Regulatory Framework for Industrial Air Emissions Climate Change Hub – NB Lung Association June 29 th, 2007.
Air Quality Programs.
STATEWIDE WORKSHOP ON THE CALIFORNIA MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS STANDARDS INCLUDING GREENHOUSE GASES August 23, 2007 Department of Environmental Protection.
Henry Hogo Assistant Deputy Executive Officer Mobile Source Division Science and Technology Advancement 2015 International Emission Inventory Conference.
Clean Fuels and Vehicles: Importance for Urban Air Quality Katherine Buckley Air and Climate Program Manager U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Strengthening the air quality management community in Asia Developing Fuel Quality Road Maps in Asia Sustainable Urban Mobility.
National Clean Diesel Campaign Upcoming Funding Opportunities Rosalva Tapia June 3, 2009 National Tribal Forum on Air Quality Management Conference 2009.
2  World oil reserves  U.S. owns 2-3%  U.S. uses 25% The Importance of Energy Independence.
Diesel Emissions Regulation and Control Impact of ARB Regulation.
Mobile Source Committee Update OTC Committee Meeting September 13 th, 2012 Washington, DC 1.
1 Meeting Air Quality Goals in California Nancy L. C. Steele, D.Env. The Tender Land November 6, 2004 California Environmental Protection Agency Air Resources.
California Environmental Protection Agency AIR RESOURCES BOARD Public Transit Bus Fleet Rule and Emission Standards for New Urban Buses California Air.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
State Implementation Plan for 8-Hour Ozone in San Diego Planning and Technical Support Division May 24, 2007 San Diego.
California’s Efforts to Address Air Quality Impacts Related to Goods Movement Activities.
Proposed Amendments to Heavy-Duty On-Board Diagnostic Requirements August 23, 2012 Heavy-Duty OBD.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
HD 2007 Rule Overview Clean Diesel Engine Implementation Workshop Bill Charmley & Paul Machiele US EPA Office of Transportation and Air Quality August.
On-Board Diagnostics (OBD) II Regulatory Update Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board April 25, 2002 Sacramento, California.
Class Project Report, May 2005 ME/ChE 449 Sustainable Air Quality Highway Transportation: Trends from 1970 to 2002 and Beyond By Scott Kaminski Instructor.
ARB Phase III Reformulated Gasoline Auto Industry Comments Ann M. Schlenker DaimlerChrysler Representing the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers September.
Sierra Nevada Ozone Summit June 4, 2008 State Strategies to Reduce Emissions of Ozone Forming Pollutants Kurt Karperos Chief, Air Quality and Transportation.
1 South Coast AQMD Staff Comments on Proposed Regulation for In-Use Off-Road Diesel Vehicles South Coast Air Quality Management District Agenda Item No.
November 15, Clean Air Act Framework National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) set public health goals Planning process considers science,
1 Diesel-Vehicles Emission Control in Japan Environmental Management Bureau, Ministry of the Environment, Japan Masayuki KOIWA.
Office of Transportation and Air Quality, USEPA National Association of Clean Air Agencies Fall Membership Meeting October 20, 2008.
Fuel Specifications & Alignment in Asia
Nonroad Diesel Engine and Fuel Standards
California Low Emission Vehicle (LEV II) Program in the Northeast
Benefit & Cost Analyses in Support of an ECA Application for Mexico
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
May 25, 2018 Sacramento, California
Presentation transcript:

Tier 3 Vehicle and Fuel Standards: Final Rule National Tribal Forum on Air Quality May 21,

Overview Background on OTAQ What is Tier 3? Why Tier 3? Overview of the Program Benefits and Costs 2

OTAQ: Addressing Transportation Air Quality and Climate 3 Light-duty Heavy- duty Locomotives Recreational and Commercial Marine Fuel Quality And Renewables Non-road Diesel Ships Nonroad Gasoline Aircraft

Reconciling Transportation with the Environment Through sector specific rules – Passenger vehicles – Cargo/vocational trucks – Ag and construction equip – Lawn and Garden – Locomotive/Marine – Recreational boats – Etc. Typically with emission reductions exceeding 90% and often >99% from uncontrolled levels Through Partnerships 4

40 years ago… 5

Source: Comparison of Growth Areas and Emissions

What is Tier 3? 7 A passenger vehicle and gasoline regulation A systems approach to reducing passenger vehicle pollution: more stringent vehicle standards enabled by gasoline sulfur control Creates a harmonized vehicle program – Coordinated with California Low Emission Vehicle (LEV) III standards – Enables auto industry to produce and sell one vehicle nationwide Part of comprehensive approach to create cleaner, more efficient vehicles – Begins phasing in with model year (MY) 2017 – Allows coordinated compliance with both LEV III and light-duty GHG/fuel economy standards for MY

Why Tier 3: Air Quality and Public Health Tier 3 standards will have immediate health and air quality benefits – Reduce ozone, particulate matter (PM), and toxics Help States and local areas attain and maintain ozone and PM NAAQS – Tier 3 provides cost-effective national reductions that avoid more expensive local controls Reduce pollution near roads – More than 50 million people live, work, or go to school near major roads 8

Why Lower Sulfur Gasoline? Both Tier 3 and LEV III vehicle standards depend upon lower sulfur gasoline – Sulfur at current levels degrades the performance of vehicle catalytic converters, the primary emission control system on vehicles Tier 3 vehicle standards are not achievable without lower sulfur Lower sulfur also provides immediate emission reductions from the existing fleet – Catalytic converters on existing cars will perform more effectively California already has lower sulfur gasoline (as do Europe, Japan, S. Korea, and several other countries) – Other states prohibited from controlling gasoline sulfur on their own Enables some lower-cost technologies for complying with vehicle greenhouse gas standards 9

Public Involvement Finalized February, 2014 after a March 2013 that received extensive comment Auto industry was broadly supportive – Stressed the importance of harmonizing with California LEV III States, environmentalists, health groups also supportive – No other measure provides reductions as large or as quickly Oil industry opposed to the lower-sulfur fuel standard 10

Tier 3 Vehicle Standards Phase in between 2017 and 2025 Tighter VOC and NOx tailpipe standards – 80% reduction from today’s fleet average Tighter PM tailpipe standard – 70% reduction in per-vehicle standard Evaporative emissions standards – Reduced fuel vapor emissions and improved system durability Revised certification test fuel to be E10 – Better reflects in-use gasoline – Current certification test fuel has no ethanol 11

Tier 3 Fuel Standards Lower the annual average sulfur standard from 30 to 10 ppm – Starting January 1, 2017 – In reality phased down from 2014 thru 1/1/2020 Maintain the current per-gallon sulfur caps – 80 ppm at refinery gate, 95 ppm at retail – We had sought comment on lower caps 12

Fuel Flexibilities A broad set of flexibilities that have proven successful in past EPA fuel programs Annual average standard with a sufficiently high per-gallon cap Flexible early credit program and nationwide averaging, banking and trading provide nearly to 6 years of lead time – Including carrying over “banked” credits from Tier 2 Delay for small refiners and refineries <75,000 barrels per day until 1/1/2020 Economic and technical hardship provisions available to all refiners 13

Tier 3 Emission Impacts Reductions in National On-Road Inventory Reduction (US Tons) % Reduction Reduction (US Tons) % Reduction NOx 260,00010%330,00025% VOC 48,0003%170,00016% PM %8,00016% Benzene 2,0006%5,00026% Lower NOx, VOC, and PM2.5 emissions lead to Moderate to large ozone decreases across the country Small to moderate PM decreases across the country

Benefits of Tier 3 15 Total Ozone and PM-related Premature Mortality Avoided: 770-2,000 in 2030 (based on range of ozone and PM mortality studies) Other PM- and ozone-related health impacts avoided in 2030: Hospital admissions and asthma-related ER visits: 2,200 Asthma exacerbations: 19,000 Upper and lower respiratory symptoms in children: 30,000 Lost school days, work days, and minor restricted activity days: 1.4 million Total Monetized Benefits in 2030 (2011$): $6.7 to $19 Billion

Summary of Costs and Benefits Fuel Sulfur Standard – 0.65 ¢/gal Vehicle Standards in 2025 – $72 per vehicle Annual Cost in 2030 – Total Program: $1.5 billion Vehicle Program: $0.76 billion Fuel Program: $0.70 billion Benefits outweigh costs by a factor of 4.5 to 13 16

17 AQ Impacts in Ozone

18 AQ Impacts in 2030 – Annual PM 2.5

Beijing The Day Tier 3 Was Signed 19

Thank You