Supply-Side Economics “Supply creates its own demand” - Say’s Law

SUPPLY SIDE Economics 1980’s –Early 2000’s Producer Based Milton Freidman Government tries to influence GDP by influencing aggregate supply (the total quantity producers are willing and able to supply) Goal is to promote full employment while decreasing prices

Theory Production (supply) is the source that drives consumption and living standards. In the long run, our income levels reflect our ability to produce goods and services that people value.

Business organizations: do not have profits as a goal. have similar ownership structures. do not include retail firms. serve to link scarce resources and consumer satisfaction.

How it changes Supply & Demand START GOAL

Government Actions (Supply Side) Incentives for businesses Laissez-Faire Principles Decrease regulations Taxes Decrease (especially for Businesses) Can lead to Federal Deficits

Government Regulations Regulations strangle the growth of Aggregate Supply limiting the amount being produced Favor a laissez-faire government policy

Reduce Government Sector Privatization to increase incentives and reduce costs Restrict Monopolies Deregulation to encourage competition and efficiency Private Financing of Public Services Outsourcing to Private Sector Reduction of government control of economic activity and and the transfer of these activities to the private section can give rise to more competition, greater efficiencies and lower cost of production with the added possible belief of improving the quality of goods and services. Resources will be released form unproductive uses and thus allowing potential output to increase and the LRAS curve to move right. There are two types of regulation: economic and social. Economics regulation involves government control of prices and output and other activities of firms. . These are the primary target of supply-side policies. Social regulation aims to protect consumers form undesirable consequence basically negative externalities. Some economist argues that these types of regulation may be excessive and stifle competition.

Taxes Decrease (especially for Businesses) “Supply-side economics” is also used to describe how changes in marginal tax rates influence economic activity. Supply-side economists believe that high marginal tax rates strongly discourage income, output, and the efficiency of resource use.

The Marginal Tax Rate The marginal tax rate is crucial because it affects the incentive to earn. The marginal tax rate reveals how much of one’s additional income must be turned over to the tax collector as well as how much is retained by the individual. For example, when the marginal rate is 40 percent, forty of every one hundred dollars of additional earnings must be paid in taxes, and the individual is permitted to keep only sixty dollars of his or her additional income. As marginal tax rates increase, people get to keep less of what they earn.

An increase in marginal tax rates adversely affects the output of an economy in two ways: First, the higher marginal rates reduce the payoff people derive from work and from other taxable productive activities. Second, When people are prohibited from reaping much of what they sow, they will sow more sparingly. Thus, when marginal tax rates rise, some will opt out of the labor force. Others will decide to take more vacation time, retire earlier, or forgo overtime opportunities. Still others will decide to forgo promising but risky business opportunities. These adjustments and others like them will shrink the effective supply of resources, and therefore will shrink output.

The major incentive for taking risks to own a business is based on: managing others. paying taxes. making a profit. having more leisure time.

The Laffer Curve Economists Arthur Laffer argues: after a point the disincentive effect of higher tax rates will result in high rates reducing tax revenue

Implications of Laffer Curve it’s possible to raise rates and get less revenue the higher rates cause a “recession” it’s possible to lower rates and get more revenue if the lower rates stimulate the economy enough eliminate government debt, resolving any apparent conflict between reducing revenue and fiscal responsibility.

Increasing Incentives Supply-side economists believe that the real problem was that high rates of taxation and heavy regulation had reduced the incentive to work, to save, and to invest. What was needed was not a demand stimulus but better incentives to stimulate supply.

Improve incentives by lowering taxes Improve incentives for private initiative Reduce personal taxes to encourage more work Lowering taxes on interest income to stimulate saving and investment Lowering business taxes to increase investment, R&D and innovation Reduction of government control of economic activity and and the transfer of these activities to the private section can give rise to more competition, greater efficiencies and lower cost of production with the added possible belief of improving the quality of goods and services. Resources will be released form unproductive uses and thus allowing potential output to increase and the LRAS curve to move right. There are two types of regulation: economic and social. Economics regulation involves government control of prices and output and other activities of firms. . These are the primary target of supply-side policies. Social regulation aims to protect consumers form undesirable consequence basically negative externalities. Some economist argues that these types of regulation may be excessive and stifle competition.

Make labor more responsive to supply and demand Abolish minimum wage to provide greater flexibility increase profits and spur economic growth Weaken unions to provide greater flexibility, increase profits and spur economic growth Reduce unemployment benefits to lower unemployment rates Reduce job security so firms can fire at will

"Supply-side" economics was based primarily on: stimulation of the business (supply) component. government stimulation of consumer demands. a repudiation of "trickle-down" theory. increases in taxation.

Will people have the incentive to work more if they pay less out in taxes? Will the wealthy have the incentive to produce more if they pay out less in taxes?

Supply-Side Tax Cuts—Workers Problems: After-tax income is important to workers. But it is only one -- a very important one, but nevertheless only one -- part of total job satisfaction. Job security, work environment, many other factors are also important, as numerous studies have shown. Moreover, to enjoy the incentive of take home pay, you have to have some pay to take home, and so these incentives mean nothing for the unemployed.

Supply-Side Tax Cuts—Firms As far as businesses, It doesn't matter if taxes are smaller, if profitability expectations are dimmed because of a recession and unemployment, firms aren't going to be increasing productive capacity. - They aren't able to sell all they can produce now. - A capital gains tax cut does nothing to guarantee investment. - An investment tax credit may help a little more, at least then there is some incentive to invest.

Among the criticisms of supply-side economics is that it is unlikely a tax cut would substantially increase the supply of labor. When households receive a higher after-tax wage, they might have an incentive to work more, but they may also choose to work less.

Has it worked? Reagan’s deregulation of the banking system—led to Savings &Loan crisis; $500 billion + taxpayer bailout 1990-91—Worst recession since WWII up to that time.

Has it worked Clinton/Bush deregulation of banking system-led to “Too Big to Fail” investment banks collapse; $900 billion bailout + $800 billion Stimulus Package Debt grows from $1 Trillion in 1980 to $10 trillion by 2008

Has it Worked? Created massive income inequality Demand decreased as worker’s wages only increased minimally Thus, tax revenue decreased under a combination of reduced taxes on the wealthy and less taxes from consumption.