Doc.: IEEE 802.19-10/160r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Output power management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission July 2009 Ari Ahtiainen, NokiaSlide 1 A Cooperation Mechanism for Coexistence between Secondary User Networks on.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0165r1 SubmissionPäivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Implementation aspects of a coexistence system Notice: This document has been.
July 2011doc.: IEEE tv SubmissionSoo-Young Chang, CSUS Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
tv Mi-Kyung Oh etc., ETRI Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: TV White Space.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Scenario and Use Cases Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Doc.: IEEE SubmissionSlide 1 Expectation for IEEE P system from a primary protection viewpoint Notice: This document has.
Doc.: IEEE /0091r1 SubmissionAlireza Babaei, CableLabsSlide 1 Fair Spectrum Sharing Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
New Federal Spectrum Access System - US 3.5GHz bands -
Categorization of coexistence network configuration
Doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0065r0 July 2015 Alaa Mourad, BMW GroupSlide 1 Coexistence Management in the 2.4GHz ISM Band in the automotive enviroment.
Submission November 2008 Charles Cooper, dLRSlide 1 Preliminary White Space Availability IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0262r1 Submission March 2010 Ha-Nguyen Tran et al., NICTSlide 1 Requirements and Amendment Regarding TVWS Database Access Notice:
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks(WPANs) Submission Title: Link Budget for m Date Submitted: 5 March 2012.
Doc.: IEEE /0164r0 SubmissionSlide Protocols Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis.
Doc.: IEEE /0530r1 Submission November 2007 Gerald Chouinard, CRCSlide 1 Wireless Microphone Sensing IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
A new challenge – creating a regulatory environment for implementing geo-location databases for White Space Devices (WSD) Andy Gowans Date (26 th January.
Doc.: IEEE /0287r0 Submission March 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Overview and Issues Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0462r1 Submission Nov Cheng Shan, Samsung Electronics Slide 1 Aggregated Interference from CPEs IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0002r1 Submission January 2011 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Neighbor Setting Procedures Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE Submission July 2010 Peter Bradley, Zarlink SemiconductorSlide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal.
Doc.: IEEE /161r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Resource management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /0074r2 Submission May 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 Introduction and Status Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0097r0 November 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Information exchange between independent IEEE systems Date: xx.
Doc.: IEEE /84r2 Submission October 2009 Mark Cummings, SWIMSlide 1 Working Draft PAR Presentation Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /0061r0 Submission June 2011 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Discovery system overview Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0072r0 SubmissionS. Filin H. Harada, NICTSlide 1 Coexistence algorithms Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Doc.: IEEE b Submission May 2012 Preliminary Link Budget Analysis for b IEEE P802.22b Wireless RANs Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0261r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Enabling Procedure of Communication in TVWS under FCC rules Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0110r1 Submission September 2011 Prabodh Varshney, NokiaSlide af Liaison Report Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0094r1 November 2015 Chen SUN, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Management Considering Interference Alignment Date: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /41r0 SubmissionSlide 1 P System Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered.
Doc.: IEEE /20rev0 SubmissionSlide 1 P Assumptions and Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0021r1 Janurary 2016 Chen SUN, SonySlide 1 Application scenario and text change proposal for coexistence management considering.
Doc.: IEEE /129r0 Submission September 2010 Junho Jo/Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 IEEE System description Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence architecture of Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Submission June 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 and System Design Document Notice: This document has been prepared.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0052r1 March 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Supplemental document for text proposal on amendment to entity operations Date:
Text proposal for using receiver information
TG1 Introduction and Status
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Janurary 2016
Proposal on system description, reference model and draft outline
<month year> November 2005
Resource allocation principles for coexistence system
May 2006 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Proposed European Regulations] Date Submitted:
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
doc.: IEEE <doc#>check
Submission Title: Link Budget for m
Possible Effects of FCC rules to design
doc.: IEEE <doc#>check
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 July 2015
Tutorial Introduction Section
Wireless Microphone Sensing
TG1 Introduction and Status
FCC rules and design Date: Authors: October 2010
July 2010 doc.: IEEE xxxx July 2010
Updates to the Draft Authors:
Updates to the Draft Authors:
TG1 and System Design Document
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Month Year May 2016
Tutorial Introduction Section
Examples of deployment scenarios
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
Neighbor Setting Procedures
Text proposal for using receiver information
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [Regulatory Update in Europe for Gigabit Application.
Coexistence Decision Making Topologies
Enabling Procedure of Communication in TVWS under FCC rules
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /160r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Output power management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Date: Authors: NameCompanyAddressPhone Ryo SawaiSony corporation , Kitashinagawa, Shinagawa- ku, Tokyo, , Japan Ryota KimuraSony corporation m Naotaka SatoSony corporation Guo XinSony China Ryo SAWAI, Sony Corporation November 2010

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Introduction Proposed IEEE P service models, mechanisms and its algorithms (*1) on output power management for TVWS network coexistence are highlighted here. November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 2 (*1) The explanation is in section 7.2 of reference [1]

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Service model #1 Maximum output power allocation service This service provides the maximum output power allocation for TVDBs to protect the incumbent service, such as TV broadcasting and wireless microphone service, from the aggregated interference due to simultaneous transmission of neighbour TVWS networks which are independently operated each other. The topics on aggregated interference problems from multiple WSD (White Space Device =TVBD)s in-block (= co-channel) and out-of- block (neighbor channel) emission in TVWS operation have been discussed in CEPT SE43 [2]. Also for a TVWS operation where fixed output power level approach in FCC is adopted, the TVBDs shall care about this problem from a viewpoint of incumbent service protection [3]-[5]. November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 3

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Service model #2 Information service on aggregated interference power level This information service provides the interference power level on each operable TVWS channel for each TVBD. This interference level information will be helpful for the channel selection for TVWSs. Because the master TVBD(s) of a TVWS network may be able to find adequate channel(s) from its operable frequency channel(s) without large system overhead due to spectrum sensing deployment, if the master TVBD knows its minimum network requirements such as required link quality, network coverage and so on. November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 4

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Basic criterion to specify output power of TVBDs November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 5 Aggregated mutual interference power in a co-channel operation among TVBDs for target channel # Aggregated mutual interference power in neighbour channel operation among TVBDs for target channel # Maximally allowed interference level in a reference point Required received signal power of a incumbent service (i.e. broadcasting and wireless microphone and so on) receiver Minimum required SIR (Signal to Interference Ratio) level of incumbent service receiver Interfere-victim Reference point Maximally allowed interference level of broadcasting service receiver

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Parameters (1) November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 6 ParameterNotes Maximally allowed interference level to the incumbent service (i.e. broadcasting and wireless microphone and so on) receiver in interfere-victim reference point # for the frequency channel # Maximum permitted EIRP of TVBD # for frequency channel #. This maximum value may be different from the other TVBD(s) according to its location. In a case where some fixed output power levels are defined like FCC rule, predetermined value(s) for all the TVBDs may be set in this parameter. Path loss between TVBD # and interfere-victim reference point # for frequency channel # Maximum permitted EIRP of TVBD #( or ) for frequency channel #( or ) Path loss between TVBD #( or ) and the interfere-victim reference point # for frequency channel #( or ) Total gain of TVBD #( or ) for frequency channel #( or ). Antenna gain, antenna beam pattern and so on are given in the example parameters Total loss of TVBD# for adjacent frequency channel# for the target frequency channel #. Adjacent channel selectivity, adjacent channel leakage ratio and so on are given in the example parameters. Number of TVBD(s) which may use the target frequency channel #( ) simultaneously Number of TVBD(s) which may use the target frequency channel #( ) simultaneously Number of neighbour channel(s) for the target frequency channel # being considered in calculating aggregated mutual interference power level

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Parameters (2) Selection criterion of target TVBD(s) –The system may only have to consider (active) master TVBD(s) coordinate each (active) TVWS network in the selection of this target TVBD. Selection criterion of positioning information of the target master TVBD(s) –The positioning information of the target TVBD may be the one of the closest slave TVBD or virtual slave TVBD in its network coverage area for the protected contour of incumbent service, if the interference signal in the reference point caused by the transmission of the slave TVBD is larger than the interference signal caused by the transmission of the master TVBD according to these transmission parameters. The “virtual” means here that a slave TVBD is assumed to be in the edge of network coverage area of the master TVBD. In these cases, the transmission parameters of the slave TVBD are used for this calculation step, the reference point of the slave node should be each closest point for the protected contour of the incumbent service. Counting policy of M, N and O –These numbers may count only active TVWS network coordinated by each active master TVBD. November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 7

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Margin based approach in specifying the maximum output power of TVBDs November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 8 ParameterNotes Definition of MI (Multiple Interference margin) in the section 4.3 of reference [1]: “Multiple interference margin of 3-6 [dB] (depending on the number of the interfaces) that takes account of aggregated interference from multiple (co-channel and adjacent channel ) WSD(White Space Device)s operating in a given area at the same time (3 dB corresponds to 2 interferes, 5 dB – 3 interfaces, 6 dB – 4 interfaces).” SM (Safety Margin) means the margin for some estimation errors such as path loss, interference power level and so on. Calculation methods Parameters If the target TVBD uses the same channel as the usage channel(s) of interfere-victim receiver in the reference point If the target TVBD uses the different channel with the usage channel(s) of interfere-victim receiver in the reference point,

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Maximized approach of TVWS network capacity in specifying the maximum output power of TVBDs November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 9 Step 0: The parameters for each TVBD to calculate the equation in Slide 5 are input. Step 1: Calculation of local specific maximum output power of TVBD(s) without considering mutual interference effects on in-block/out-of-block interference signal from the other TVBD(s). The criteria for the calculation are summarized in Appendix (1). Step 2: Recalculation of local specific power for each TVBD with the in-block/out-of-block interference effects from the other TVBD(s), which could be calculated based on the results ( P tx ) of step 1 for each TVBD, in the following form (7.11) in Appendix (3) Step 3: Some interference margin due to the degradation of each may be in the step 2. Therefore, in this step, the most severe interfere-victim reference point to adjust the maximum output power of TVBDs is chosen according to the criteria in Equation (7.12) in Appendix (3) Step 4: Calculation of output power adjustment value to fulfil the interference margin for each TVBD in the criteria in Equation (7.13) in Appendix (4) Step 5: The final results of local specific maximum output power of TVBDs are calculated in the Equation (7.15) in Appendix (4). Proposed procedures

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Pros./cons. Margin based approach in specifying the maximum output power of TVBDs –Pros.: Easy to calculate –Cons.: Network capacity of each TVWS network permanently decreases, because of its excessive margin setting Maximized approach of TVWS network capacity in specifying the maximum output power of TVBDs –Pros.: Maximized network capacity of each TVWS network permanently can be obtained –Cons.: Burden for the calculation overhead November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 10

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Conclusions Proposed IEEE P service models, mechanisms and its algorithms on output power management for TVWS network coexistence were summarized. November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 11

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission References Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 12 [1] “ coexistence-mechanism-and-its-algorithm”, IEEE mentor, October 2010 [2] “Technical and operational requirements for the possible operation of cognitive radio systems in the ‘White Spaces’ of the frequency band MHz”, DRAFT ECC Report 159, October [3] “ expectation-for-ieee-p system-from-a-primary- protection-viewpoint”, IEEE mentor, July 2010 [4] “Second report and order and memorandum option and order”, FCC , 2008 [5] “Second memorandum option and order”, FCC , 2010 November 2010

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Appendix November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 13

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Appendix (1) Criteria using in step 1 The following four methods are given in equations (7.5) – (7.10), –#1: Equal transmission power distribution method, –#2: Path-loss based/Unequal transmission power distribution method, –#3: Extension of the former two methods using the SM (Safety Margin) value, which will be caused by the interference power level estimation errors in master TVBD of each TVBD network, and –#4: Network prioritized method of the former two approaches. November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 14

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Appendix (2) Equations November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 15 #1: Equation (7.5) #2: Equation (7.6) #3: Equation (7.7) #4: Equation (7.8) shows the weight TVBD#

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Appendix (3) Equations November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 16 Equation (7.11) Equation (7.12) Equation (7.11)

doc.: IEEE /160r0 Submission Appendix (4) Equations November 2010 Ryo SAWAI, Sony CorporationSlide 17 Equation (7.14) Equation (7.15) Equation (7.13)