Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The RE-LY Study: Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at.
Advertisements

ROCKET-AF Rivaroxaban Once Daily Oral Direct Factor Xa Inhibition Compared with Vitamin K Antagonism for Prevention of Stroke and Embolism Trial in Atrial.
Atrial Fibrillation – TIMI 48
JOURNAL REVIEW Newer Antithrombotics in AF 1 Dr Ranjith MP Senior Resident Department of Cardiology Government Medical college Kozhikode.
1 Novel Oral Anticoagulants: Benefits and risks Matthew Moles, MD December 4, 2012 University of Colorado.
Update on Anti-platelets Gabriel A. Vidal, MD Vascular Neurology Ochsner Medical Center October 14 th, 2009.
New Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs) Dabigatran and Rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation Dr Dipti.
Standard Medical Therapy TRA 40 mg mg/d TRA 40 mg mg/d Placebo EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp for RI/urgent coronary revasc. 1  EP:CV Death/MI/stroke/hosp.
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs. Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation - Japanese population in the RE-LY ® - Shinya Goto, MD., PhD. Tokai.
CAPRIE: Clopidogrel versus Aspirin in Patients at risk of Ischemic Events Purpose To assess the relative efficacy of the antiplatelet drugs clopidogrel.
ARISTOTLE TTR Subanalysis
Study by: Granger et al. NEJM, September 2011,Vol No. 11 Presented by: Amelia Crawford PA-S2 Apixaban versus Warfarin in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.
Luigi Oltrona Visconti Divisione di Cardiologia IRCCS Fondazione Policlinico S. Matteo Pavia Sindromi coronariche acute nei pazienti con fibrillazione.
Anti-thrombotic agents. New and Emerging Anticoagulants  Anti – Xa : direct  Rivaroxaban (oral)  Apixaban (oral)  Betrixiban (oral)  Edoxaban (oral)
Manufacturer: Daiichi Sankyo FDA Approval Date: 01/08/2015
The Definitive Thrombosis Update
Randomized Evaluation of Long- term anticoagulant therapY Dabigatran Compared to Warfarin in 18,113 Patients with Atrial Fibrillation at Risk of Stroke.
ACS is a major public health challenge In the US:  Over 1.5 million people experience ACS annually 1 In the EU:  ACS is the most common cause of death,
ROCKET AF Renal Dysfunction Substudy Objective Evaluate the 2950 patients in the per-protocol cohort with a baseline CrCl of 30 to 49 mL/min who received.
  Warfarin Dabigatran Rivaroxaban Apixaban Edoxaban Target
Supervisor: Vs 余垣斌 Presenter: CR 周益聖. INTRODUCTION.
The Long Term Multi-Center Extension of Dabigatran Treatment in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation (RELY-ABLE) study To reviewers and moderators: These.
VBWG OASIS-5 The Fifth Organization to Assess Strategies in Acute Ischemic Syndromes trial.
ACTIVE Clopidogrel plus Aspirin versus Aspirin in Patients Unsuitable for Warfarin.
Endarterectomy versus Stenting in Patients with Symptomatic Severe Carotid Stenosis Dr. Quan, Dr. Mirhashemi, Dr. Chiang N Engl J Med 2006; 355:
Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism N Engl J Med Apr ;348(15) : PREVENT (Warfarin) Trial.
Dodson Thompson, DO Northlakes Community Clinic Minong, WI.
Atrial Fibrillation Management Past, Present and Future
 3 million Americans  160,000 new cases each year  16 million by 2050  90% of patients have recurrences  Incremental cost.
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
John H. Alexander, MD, MHS Associate Professor of Medicine Director, Cardiovascular Research Duke Clinical Research Institute Duke Medicine Update on antithrombotics.
Stroke Prevention Using the Oral Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Ximelagatran in Patients With Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation SPORTIF V Trial Presented at American.
ARISTOTLE Objectives Primary: test for noninferiority of apixaban, a novel oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, versus warfarin Secondary: test for superiority.
Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism.
Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.. Lancet 2013;382: Albers G et al. Chest. 2001; 119 (suppl): 300S. Ischemic stroke 85% Hemorrhagic stroke 15% Other 5% Cryptogenic.
A Randomized Trial of Dabigatran versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Acute Venous Thromboembolism Schulman S et al. Proc ASH 2011;Abstract 205.
Le basse dosi dei NAO: uso ed abuso Giuseppe Patti Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome.
Dabigatran Etexilate is Effective and Safe for the Extended Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism Following Total Hip Replacement Eriksson BI, Dahl OE,
Presented by Renato D. Lopes, MD, PhD, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University, USA for the ARISTOTLE investigators. Efficacy and Safety of Apixaban.
NSTE Acute Coronary Syndromes
Hypothesis: baseline risk status of the patients and proximity to a recent cardiovascular event influence the response to dual anti-platelet therapy. Patients.
Oral Rivaroxaban Compared with Subcutaneous Enoxaparin for Extended Thromboprophylaxis After Total Hip Arthroplasty: The RECORD1 Trial Eriksson BI, Borris.
WarfarinApixaban Primary outcome: major/clinically relevant bleeding (through 6 months) Secondary objective: Death, MI, stroke, stent thrombosis Randomize.
Rikki Weems, PGY III August 20, 2015
Novel Anticoagulants (NOACs) in Non Valvular Atrial Fibrillation
Six Months vs Extended Oral Anticoagulation After a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism ‘ The PADIS-PE Trial’ Nate Peyton.
N Engl J Med 2009;361: Stuart J. Connolly, M.D., Michael D. Ezekowitz, M.B., Ch.B., D.Phil., Salim Yusuf, F.R.C.P.C., D.Phil., John Eikelboom,
Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin in Nonvalvular Atrial Fibrillation Manesh R. Patel, M.D., Kenneth W. Mahaffey, M.D., Jyotsna Garg, M.S., Guohua Pan, Ph.D.,
Date of download: 7/1/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Transition of Patients From Blinded Study Drug to.
Net clinical benefit of OAC
Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation NEJM Aug 27, 2015.
Review on NOACs Studies DR. KOUROSH SADEGHI TEHRAN UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES.
Denise Sutter, PharmD, BCPS
Volume 149, Issue 6, Pages (June 2016)
Con: Sanjay Kaul, MD Division of Cardiology
You can never be too Thin…. An Update on NOACs
A Comparison of RE-LY and ROCKET AF Trial Designs and Outcomes
Efficacy and Safety of Dabigatran vs
SOCRATES Trial design: Patients with acute ischemic stroke were randomized in a 1:1 fashion to receive either ticagrelor 180 mg load + 90 mg BID or aspirin.
Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation
Randomized Evaluation of Long-term anticoagulant therapY
Novel oral anticoagulants in comparison with warfarin
Click here for title Click here for subtitle
Oral Anticoagulation and Preventing Stent Thrombosis
Selecting NOACs for High-Risk Patients
New Oral Anticoagulants and VTE Management
Oral Anticoagulation in AF
Factor Xa Inhibitors in PAD
Which NOAC and When for Stroke Prevention in AF?
ACC 2003 Late Breaking Trials
Presentation transcript:

Jim Hoehns, Pharm.D.

Edoxaban Oral factor Xa inhibitor Bioavailability: 62% Tmax: 1-2 hrs Elimination: 50% renal Half-life: 9-11 hours

ENGAGE AF-TIMI 48 Randomized, double-blind, double-dummy trial N=21,105 patients with Afib Median follow-up: 2.8 years 1393 centers; 46 countries Treatment “High dose” edoxaban 60mg QD “Low dose” edoxaban 30mg QD Warfarin INR Randomization: stratified according to CHADS 2 score and need for a reduced dose Dose-modification for edoxaban groups Half-dose if any present: Clcr ml/min, weight <60 kg, or use of verapamil, amiodarone, dronedarone

ENGAGE - Methods Inclusion criteria Age ≥21 years ECG tracing of Afib within previous 12 months CHADS 2 of 2 or greater Exclusion criteria Afib due to reversible disorder Est Clcr <30 ml/min ACS or stroke within past 30 days Use of dual antiplatelets “High risk” of bleeding

ENGAGE - Methods Endpoints Primary efficacy: time to first stroke or systemic embolism Primary safety: major bleeding Analysis Modified ITT Noninferiority: upper boundary of 97.5% CI could not exceed 1.38 vs. warfarin Superiority testing: if met noninferiority criteria Power: If 672 endpoints, >87% power

ENGAGE - Results 21,105 patients randomized Reduced dose: 25% of patients Warfarin: mean TTR 68%

Observations High study drug discontinuation rate (33%) Similar rates among groups; would like more clarity re: symptomatic AE’s Low-dose edoxaban 30mg QD likely not tenable Met criteria for noninferiority Primary endpoint: warfarin 1.5%/yr vs. low-dose 1.61%/yr Significant increased risk of ischemic stroke vs. warfarin HR 1.41 (95% CI: , P<0.001) Warfarin: 1.25%/yr Low-dose edoxaban: 1.77%/yr

Summary Edoxaban: a new factor Xa inhibitor Will compete with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixiban “high-dose” edoxaban 60mg QD Same lower risk of ICH and hemorrhagic stroke as other new anticoagulants Efficacy and bleeding data look very favorable Higher GI bleeding than warfarin

Afib Trials - Comparison CharicteristicDabigatranApixabanRivaroxaban Age (yrs)71.5 (mean)70 (median)73 (median) Prior VKA use50%57%62% CHADS %34% (1 only)0% 235%36%13% ≥333%30%87% Prior MI17%14%17% Prior stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism 20% 55%

Afib Trials - Comparison Dabigatra n (%/yr) Warfari n (%/yr) Apixiban (%/yr) Warfarin (%/yr) Rivaroxa. (%/yr) Warfarin (%/yr) Primary end (stroke/emb. ) * * Hemorrhagi c stroke * * * Ischemic stroke * MI *? Death – any cause * Major bleeding * * Significantly different (P<0.05)