Analysis of causes and development of a prediction methodology

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Robert Gordon University School of Engineering Dr. Mohamed Amish
Advertisements

Karin Larsson. Exposure, Disease and Risk. Presentation of some case studies using geographical information systems (GIS) Occupational and Environmental.
17. Radiometric dating and applications to sediment transport William Wilcock OCEAN/ESS 410.
GIS IN GEOLOGY Miloš Marjanović Lesson
StatisticalDesign&ModelsValidation. Introduction.
Handling NORM : Examples of work from uranium mining and other operations Riaz Akber contact.
Sustainable water supply in Swedish coastal areas – possibilities and challenges Bosse Olofsson Royal Institute of Technology, KTH NGL Annual Meeting at.
Modeling species distribution using species-environment relationships Istituto di Ecologia Applicata Via L.Spallanzani, Rome ITALY
Lesson 3 How does radon enter a home?. Slide 3-1 Predicted average indoor radon levels (U.S.) This map cannot be used to determine the radon level of.
Design Parameters.
3/2003 Rev 1 I.4.1 – slide 1 of 33 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 1Terrestrial Radionuclides Module I.4.1 IAEA Post.
E&P NORM Characteristics Gert Jonkers Engineering & Analytical - GSEA/4 “ Problem Solving ” (Shell E&P Ionising Radiation/NORM HSE Expert CHP) location.
A spatially-distributed model of pesticide leaching Aaldrik Tiktak
Basic geostatistics Austin Troy.
S-SENCE Signal processing for chemical sensors Martin Holmberg S-SENCE Applied Physics, Department of Physics and Measurement Technology (IFM) Linköping.
Spatial distribution models From the truth to the whole truth? Senait D. Senay & Sue P. Worner.
KELLY HAYDEN Applying GIS to Watershed Pollution Management.
Factors that Influence the Occurrence of Nitrate in the Upper Willamette Valley Basic Groundwater Hydrology Understanding Nitrate and its Distribution.
Using the Maryland Biological Stream Survey Data to Test Spatial Statistical Models A Collaborative Approach to Analyzing Stream Network Data Andrew A.
Lesson 3 How does radon enter a home?. Slide 4-1 Predicted average indoor radon levels (U.S.) This map cannot be used to determine the radon level of.
Geographical & Environmental Modelling Dr Nigel Trodd Coventry University.
IAEA Natural Terrestrial Radiation Day 3 – Lecture 7 Sources of Radiation 1.
The Global Digital Elevation Model (GTOPO30) of Great Basin Location: latitude 38  15’ to 42  N, longitude 118  30’ to 115  30’ W Grid size: 925 m.
INDOOR AIR POLLUTION: RADON In 1990 EPA placed indoor air pollution at the top of the list of 18 sources of cancer risk Indoor pollution is rated by risk.
Radon Awareness Dr Julian MacDonald Radiation Protection Adviser Medical Physics Department.
RADON The Health Risks and Solutions. What is Radon? A naturally occurring radioactive gas. Colorless, odorless and tasteless. Found all over the U.S.
Intro to Geomorphology (Geos 450/550) Lecture 4: dating methods More on field trip #2 Radiometric techniques Cosmogenic techniques Additional detail on.
Radon Overview How Radon Enters the Home. Learning Outcomes Upon completion of this module you will be able to:  Recall the predominant source of radon.
Kening Wang, Charles Stegman, Sean W. Mulvenon, and Yanling Xia University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, AR, Using Kriging and Interactive Graphics.
1 of 25 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules 15 minutes Presenter: Sebastian Tindall DQO Training Course Day 2 Module 14.
Basic Data Analysis for Quantitative Research
More people die on dusty days (Thorax, 2013)
Spatial Statistics Applied to point data.
Tutor: Prof. A. Taleb-Bendiab Contact: Telephone: +44 (0) CMPDLLM002 Research Methods Lecture 8: Quantitative.
Kinematic Porosity and Heteroscedasticity in Hard Rock Terrains Extreme variability and its role in hydrogeology Land and Water Resources Engineering Robert.
Texture. Texture is an innate property of all surfaces (clouds, trees, bricks, hair etc…). It refers to visual patterns of homogeneity and does not result.
CRITICAL PATHWAY ANALYSIS FOR RADIOLOGICAL IMPACT CONTROL AND ASSESSMENT Riaz Akber
RADIOACTIVITY IN VIRGIN SOILS AND SOILS FROM SOME AREAS WITH CLOSED URANIUM MINING FACILITIES IN BULGARIA Ivanka Yordanova, Lidia Misheva, Martin Banov,
Radioisotopes, and their use in “dating” rocks. Radioactive Decay Certain isotopes of some elements are not stable. They naturally change (decay) over.
Application of Neuro-Fuzzy Techniques to Predict Ground Water Vulnerability B. Dixon, Ph.D. University of South Florida St. Petersburg, Florida 33701,
BUILDINGS. Shallow Foundations rafts pads strips Raft Pads.
Geo479/579: Geostatistics Ch4. Spatial Description.
Academic Research Academic Research Dr Kishor Bhanushali M
1 of 27 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 5 - Define Decision Rules (15 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 5.
During the 20 th century, thematic maps have been an ever useful tool for correlating data sets and representing relevant information. Recent technological.
Development of Spatial Probability Models to Estimate, Integrate, and Assess Ground- Water Vulnerability at Multiple Scales Earl A. Greene and Andrew E.
CHEE320 Analysis of Process Data J. McLellan Fall, 2001.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Screening-Level Assessments of Public Water Supply Well Vulnerability to Natural Contaminants Stephen.
Radon and Lung Cancer of Ohio A Geospatial Analysis Douglas Schoewe.
Radon in the home For most Americans, greatest exposure to radon is in home, especially in rooms that are Below grade (such as basements) In contact with.
Copyright © 2011, 2005, 1998, 1993 by Mosby, Inc., an affiliate of Elsevier Inc. Chapter 19: Statistical Analysis for Experimental-Type Research.
Occurrence of Radium-224, Radium-226, and Radium-228 in Aquifers Used Primarily for Drinking Water in the United States: Retrospective Survey of Results.
Proposal for estimation of surface water bodies background levels for selected metals Slovak Republic.
Stochastic Hydrology Random Field Simulation Professor Ke-Sheng Cheng Department of Bioenvironmental Systems Engineering National Taiwan University.
Educational Research: Data analysis and interpretation – 1 Descriptive statistics EDU 8603 Educational Research Richard M. Jacobs, OSA, Ph.D.
Goal of Stochastic Hydrology Develop analytical tools to systematically deal with uncertainty and spatial variability in hydrologic systems Examples of.
Spatial Distribution of Arsenic in Ohio Soils Nate Wanner, CPG Cox-Colvin & Associates, Inc. Ohio Brownfield Conference 2016 Columbus, Ohio April 6, 2016.
Ljubljana, | Slide 1 Groundwater Quality Assessment Determination of chemical status and assessment on individual sites Austrian experience.
7. Air Quality Modeling Laboratory: individual processes Field: system observations Numerical Models: Enable description of complex, interacting, often.
An Integrated Approach for Subsidence Monitoring and Sinkhole Formation in the Karst Terrain of Dougherty County, Georgia Matthew Cahalan1 and Adam Milewski1.
NCSR “DEMOKRITOS” INSTITUTE OF NUCLEAR AND RADIOLOGICAL SCIENCES & TECHNOLOGY, ENERGY & SAFETY (I.N.RA.S.T.E.S.) ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY LABORATORY.
Using Geology as a Predictive Tool: Creating Radon Potential Maps
Numerical Descriptive Measures
Stochastic Hydrology Random Field Simulation
Numerical Descriptive Measures
Half-Life.
Use of non-parametric statistics as a tool for the hydraulic and hydrogeochemical characterization of hard rock aquifers by David Banks, Geir Morland,
Principal Component Analysis
Numerical Descriptive Measures
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of causes and development of a prediction methodology Radon in groundwater Analysis of causes and development of a prediction methodology Skeppström K. PhD. Student Dept. of Land and Water Resources Engineering, KTH

Layout of presentation Radon (focus of Rn in groundwater) Objective of project / Phases involved Methodology Results & Discussions

Radon Radioactive Colourless, odourless, noble gas Exists as 3 main isotopes: 222Rn (uranium decay series, 238U),Half-life ( T1/2) = 3.8 days 220Rn (Thorium decay series, 232Th), T1/2 = 56 seconds 219Rn (Actinium decay series, 235U), T1/2 = 4 seconds Cancer risk 500 cases of lung cancer/year in Sweden; smokers have a higher risk. Risk of developing of other cancers ?

Uranium decay series 238U (parent) 222Rn 206Pb (stable) 226Ra 218Po 214Bi   238U (parent) 214Po   234Th  210Pb   234Pa  210Bi    234U 210Po  +  206Pb (stable)  230Th  + 

Principal cause of radon problem Geology

Genomsnittlig årlig stråldos i Sverige Source: Statens Strålskyddsinstitut

 Exposure routes groundwater Construction material Soil gas / bedrock (Granite) groundwater

Regulatory limits (Sweden) Radon in water Radon in air Radon > 1000 Bq/l Gränsvärde för otjänligt Radon: 400 Bq/m3 Riktvärde för radon i befintliga bostäder Radon > 100 Bq/l Gränsvärde för tjänligt med anmärkning Radon: 200 Bq/m3 Gränsvärde för radon i nya bostäder

Radon problems in water Surface water Groundwater Dug wells (soil/sand aquifer) Drilled wells (Hard rocks)

How radon in water is a problem? 1000 Bq/l in water 100 Bq/m3 in air Dish washing 95 % Shower 60 – 70 % Bath 30 – 50 % Washing machine 90 – 95 % Tap water 10 – 45 % WC 30 %

Radon in water - Radon emanated in mineral grain escape in the pore space Recoil Theory Prerequisites Presence of parent elements, 238U or 226Ra Transport mechanisms Diffusion Convection Pore space filled with water- Radon dissolves in the water Dosimetry 1000 Bq/l is dangerous Water extracted from drilled wells (fracture water) How is it a problem ?

Precipitation of 238U 234U, 230Th, 226Ra from water to surface of fracture Leaching of 238U and 234U Emanation of 222Rn Content of 238U in the rock: 10ppm 222 Rn Concentration of 222Rn in Bedrock: 0.33Bq/m3 rocks Concentration of 222Rn in groundwater: 5 milj Bq/m3

Radon Emanation Radium atom Radon atom  Mineral grain    Pore 

Radon risk in Sweden Groundwater radon risk map of Sweden (after Åkerblom & Lindgren, 1997)

(Knutsson & Olofsson, 2002)

Any deduction?  not always the case Granite types of rocks with high uranium concentration High radon concentration in water  not always the case

Hypothesis of project The hypothesis stipulates that the occurrence of radon from groundwater is governed by a number of well-defined factors ranging from: Geological (bedrock, soil, tectonic structures, flow pattern and surrounding environment) Chemical (oxidation reaction, other processes in water) Topographical (difference in elevation and slope that determine flow pattern and renewal tendency and frequency) Technical (withdrawal system & frequency which determine circulation as well as ventilation possibilities.

Purpose of research Map processes and factors influencing radon content in groundwater Develop a prediction model, based on statistics, that can be used to determine areas at risk.

Study area

Phases of the project Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Using GIS and multivariate analysis of data to assess factors affecting radon concentration – REGIONAL LEVEL Phase 1 Detailed study at Ljusterö to determine spatial & temporal variation of radon concentrations due to a range of factors. LOCAL SCALE Phase 2 Development of risk prediction model Phase 3

Phase 1 Data collection from: Swedish National Land Survey (elevation and landuse data) Swedish Geological Survey, SGU (soil & bedrock geology, fractures, radiometric) Municipalities (data about wells and radon content) Data transformation and extraction using ArcGIS and its spatial analyst function Statistical analyses including multivariate analysis of data.

Factors considered Elevation Derived factors Soil geology Bedrock Fracture zone Landuse Uranium content Variables Derived factors Altitude difference Predominant soil, bedrock, landuse within a certain vicinity e.g. 200 m Slope of the terrain

Geographical Information System (GIS) GIS is a computer system for managing spatial data. Purpose of GIS Organisation Visualisation Spatial Query Combination Analysis Prediction

Visualisations with GIS Bedrocks Soil

What is my objective? For each well, relevant spatial patterns need to be extracted from the factor maps To generate continuous surfaces with a spatial resolution of 50 m + Derive factors Data obtained in different formats, e.g ASCII, point vector GIS Software: ArcMap Spatial analyst function Geostatistical software Ultra edit software

Methodology using GIS

Statistical methods Which method? Relate radon concentration with a large number of variables Variables are both qualitative and quantitative in nature Non-normal distribution of many variables Use of covariance and correlations ? Careful with the interpretations Not much information about association between variables Non-linear associations can exist Very sensitive to ‘ wild observations- outliers ’

Statistical Analyses Use of multivariate analysis of data Each observational unit is characterised by several variables. It enables us to consider changes in several properties simultaneously Non normality of data (non parametrical tests) Statistical Methods Analysis of variance Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

PCA method Eigenvectors of a variance-covariance matrix Linear combinations of these variables Its general objectives: Data reduction (A small amount of k components account for much of the variability of the data) Interpretation (may reveals relationships that were not previously suspected)

Results of statistical analyses

Descriptive Statistics Statistic parameters Number of wells 4439 Minimum radon concentration (Bq/l) 4.0 Maximum radon concentration (Bq/l) 63560 Mean radon concentration (Bq/l) 492 Median value 230 Variance 1505978 Standard deviation 1227

Radon concentrations in Stockholm County

Boxplot Median 25%-75% Non-outlier range

ANOVA - Altitude

Anova - Relative altitude

ANOVA-Bedrock

ANOVA- Fracture

ANOVA - Soil

ANOVA- Landuse

ANOVA- Uranium

Summary of results High radon concentration in drilled wells is related to: Low altitude Granite rocks Close distance to fracture When overlying geology is lera/silt Infrequent use of wells (summer houses) An overview of the terrain in the surrounding of the wells (flat or hilly) is also of interest in connection to groundwater flow tendencies and speed of flow.

Risk Variable Method Preparation Phase (Expert system) Data collection Statistical analyses Expert assessment Selection of significant variables Determination of risk values Determination of uncertainty values Suming up risk and uncertainty values Final Risk Evaluation Preparation Phase (Expert system) Operational phase (User Interface) Define study area

Risk Variable Modelling (RVM) V1 x R1 + V2 x R2 + V3 x R3 + ……….+ Vn x Rn = FRV FRV = Final risk value Where Vi= a risk value for a specific variable (-2 to +2) Ri = the rating of the variable (1 to 3)

Distance from fracture Ratings after RVM Altitude 2 Soil Uranium 3 Landuse Bedrock Distance from fracture

An example of a risk map

Field Studies

Field studies at Ljusterö Why Ljusterö? Number of wells = 198 141 wells exceeding 500 Bq/l (71%) 96 wells exceeding 1000 Bq/l (48%) Radon concentration Mean = 1942 Bq/l Minimum = 50 Bq/l Maximum = 63560 Bq/l

Wells on ljusterö predominant geology is gnejsgranitoid

What was done? To choose 3-4 study areas on Ljusterö, exhibiting drastic fluctuations in the radon concentration and to perfom detailed study at these locations

Detailed study Analysis of geology (bedrock type, fracture zones, tectonic zones and fracture filling minerals, soil type and soil depth) Altitude and other terrain considerations Analysis of technical factors (wells technical design, hauling system, spatial temporal extraction patterns of wells) Radiometric measurements of radiation (from soil around wells as well as measurements of radiation in wells and in tap water) Chemical analyses in water samples (U, Ra, Rn, fluoride and other water components)