Best Practices In Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
Advertisements

Low-Income Energy Efficiency: Brantford Power’s Conserving Homes Program The History The Barriers The Benefits The Program The Results The Lessons Learned.
Ontario Electricity Support Program
Why Implement a Program? Indiana, unlike other states, is without a safety net program Indiana relies solely on Federal LIHEAP funding which has not responded.
Through Collaboration and Commitment The story of Ottawa’s record investment in housing and homelessness We see a city where everyone has a place to call.
Ontario Electricity Support Program Webinar – LDCs and USMPs March 30, 2015.
Have you been wondering just what is so special about the Osborn Special Opportunity Action Planning Team ????????????
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Performance Contracting The Honeywell One Source Solution.
NJ Comfort Partners Evaluation Jackie Berger August 21, 2014.
Best Practices In Low-Income Programming Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference May 6, 2015.
Expanding the Reach of Your Credit Union Through Strategic Partnerships: TAP Talent – A Collaborative Program in NJ and NY June 2013 National Disability.
Washington State Low Income Weatherization Program Evaluation Calendar Year 2011 DRAFT Results Prepared by: Rick Kunkle July 2013.
National Study of Low Income Energy Programs NARUC Consumer Affairs Committee David Carroll, APPRISE Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Roger Colton, Fisher, Sheehan,
Legislative Analyst’s Office Presented to: Ryan Woolsey, Fiscal and Policy Analyst CSDA/CWDA Policy Symposium March 4, 2015.
Achieving High Savings from Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs David Carroll and Jackie Berger ACI Conference – May 2015.
CSI Phase II: R Solar for Affordable Housing CPUC Intent: Set aside a “minimum” of 10% of budget $216.8M Solar Economics Less Compelling to CARE-Households.
Elements of Ratepayer-Funded Low-Income Programs Affordable Comfort May 2005 Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Incorporated Suzanne Harmelink, WI Energy Conservation.
Sponsoring Unaffiliated Centers: A Strategy to Increase Viability and Improve Program Integrity.
On Target Group Coaching
Customer Segmentation: “Whole Neighborhood Approach” LIEE/CARE IOU Budget Applications Workshop CPUC Energy Division July 17, 2008.
Performance Metrics for Weatherization UGI LIURP Evaluation Yvette Belfort Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014.
National Study of Low Income Energy Programs Lessons for Connecticut January 29, 2008 David Carroll - APPRISE Roger Colton – Fisher, Sheehan, and Colton.
1 Clients As a Resource in Energy Education Jackie Berger David Carroll 2004 Affordable Comfort April 28, 2004.
Georgia’s Universal Pre-K Marsha Moore, Executive Director Office of School Readiness.
Weatherization 201: Weatherization Works! Updated September 23, 2008.
WAP 101 Jackie Berger David Carroll June 14, 2010.
Module 10 Session 10.4 Visual 1 Module 10 Organizing Procurement Session 10.4 Procurement of Services: Use of Consultants and Developing Terms of Reference.
1 What does your Provider Organization need to know and get ready for DFCS Opportunities?
1 Making Shared Services Work for Your Bottom Line General Services Conference: Always On and Making It Work April 4, 2014.
1 Current Funding Streams in New York State The 2008 Equity Symposium Comprehensive Educational Equity: Overcoming the Socioeconomic Barriers to School.
Implementation Update of PG&E’s LIEE Budget Application Presentation to the LIOB March 24, 2009 Burbank, CA Frances Thompson.
1 NJ SHARES ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN Jackie Berger 2004 NFFN June 7, 2004.
The Challenges of Managing Microinsurance Schemes in Uganda Objective to analyze the challenges of managing micro- insurance schemes in Uganda. (i) Introduction.
Energy Payment Assistance Programs National Energy and Utility Affordability Conference Denver, Colorado Jacqueline Berger David Carroll June 17, 2008.
Ohio’s Percentage Income Payment Plan (PIPP) Dave Rinebolt, Executive Director and Counsel Ohio Partners for Affordable Energy PO Box 1793, Findlay, OH.
How Energy Efficiency Can Reduce Bill Subsidization Affordable Comfort, April 2007 John Augustino, Honeywell Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Susan Moser, Ohio.
Energy Behavior – Lessons from Low-Income Education Programs David Carroll, Jackie Berger ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings August 20,
Home Energy Assistance Program Evaluation Jackie Berger July 28, 2010.
1 Rapid Re-Housing: An Overview Welcome Home: Addressing Today's Challenges in Homeless Services June 2,
Demand Side Management Programs National Energy and Utility Affordability Conference Denver, Colorado David Carroll June 18, 2008.
Ratepayer Funded Low-Income Energy Programs Performance and Possibilities 2007 NLIEC David Carroll, APPRISE Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Roger Colton, Fisher,
New Evidence on Energy Education Effectiveness Jackie Berger 2008 ACI Home Performance Conference April 8, 2008.
Achieving Higher Savings in Low-Income Weatherization Jacqueline Berger 2015 IEPEC Conference ― Long Beach, California.
BGE Limited Income Pilot Programs - Evaluation ACI Home Performance Conference March 2012.
Energy Education in the Home Jackie Berger 2014 BECC December 9, 2014.
Non-Energy Benefits Estimating the Economic Benefits of the Ohio Electric Partnership Program 2006 ACI Home Performance Conference May 25, 2006 Jackie.
Comparison of Pooled and Household-Level Usage Impact Analysis Jackie Berger Ferit Ucar IEPEC Conference – August 14, 2013.
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services Chapter 257 of the Acts of 2008 Provider Information & Dialogue Session: Lead.
Coordination of LIHEAP with State and Utility Payment Assistance Programs NEUAC Conference June 28, 2011 Jackie Berger.
Covered California: Promoting Health Equity and Reducing Health Disparities Covered California Board Meeting March 21, 2013.
Why Data Matters Building and Sustaining a Business Case NEAUC Conference June 18, 2014.
Universal Service Fund Program & Home Energy Assistance Program Overview NJ Dept. of Community Affairs PSE&G LIHEAP Agency Conferences 2015.
Impact of Energy Efficiency Services on Energy Assistance NEUAC Conference June 18, 2014.
Utilities’ Update on Energy Savings Assistance Program Studies Ordered in D LIOB Meeting August 21, 2013 Sacramento, California.
Affordable Payment Plans Design Options and Lessons Learned NLIEC June 13, 2006 David Carroll.
[Presentation location] [Presentation date] (Confirm ABT logo) Building Bridges and Bonds (B3): An introduction.
CALIFORNIA EMERGING TECHNOLOGY FUND Mission BASIC HUMAN NEEDS.
Best Practices In Low-Income Programming and Achieving High Savings Jackie Berger NEUAC Conference June 7, 2016.
Housing First For Families Overview Prepared By: J.X. Gilmore Grant Compliance Officer.
Presenters Kathie Boling National Center on Child Care Subsidy Innovation and Accountability (NCCCSIA) Katherine Falen.
National Study of Low Income Energy Programs Lessons for Connecticut
Research, Evaluation, and Performance Measurement
Best Practices in Residential Energy Efficiency
Understanding & Improving Energy Affordability in New Jersey
Energy Affordability Policies and Programs in New York State
Health and Safety Investments to Increase Energy-Saving Opportunities
Health and Safety Investments to Increase Energy-Saving Opportunities
Evaluating Low-Income Programs Why and How
Presentation transcript:

Best Practices In Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014

Presentation Outline Program Goals Management Eligibility Targeting and Outreach Services Energy Education Service Delivery Data Management Quality Control Evaluation 2

GOALS 3

Program Goals Options Energy savings Benefit cost ratio Greenhouse gas emissions Bill impacts Reduce ratepayer subsidy Number of homes served Amount spent per home or in the program year Targeting need (elderly, disabled, children, energy burden) Innovative usage reduction measures Innovative program delivery systems 4

Program Goals Advantages & Disadvantages Energy Savings –Advantages: sets concrete standards of measurement for program and contractor. –Disadvantages: Particular level of savings may be difficult reach depending on condition of customer homes and budget constraints. Time lag to estimate impacts based on billing data. 5

Program Goals Advantages & Disadvantages Cost-Effectiveness –Advantages: Concrete Justifiable –Disadvantages: Which formula – TRC, Utility, Societal… Difficulty and controversy in measuring benefits – health impacts, environmental, etc. 6

Program Goals Advantages & Disadvantages Reduce ratepayer subsidy –Advantages: if achieved, the program will result in cost-effective savings for the ratepayers. –Disadvantages: if all benefits go to the ratepayers, there may be less motivation for customers to participate in energy reduction strategies. 7

Program Goals Advantages & Disadvantages Number of homes served –Advantages: ensure that benefits are distributed to a minimum number of customers –Disadvantages: With a set budget, places limits on the level of services that a household can receive. What benefit is achieved? 8

Program Goals Advantages & Disadvantages Amount spent per home –Advantages: ensure that a certain number of homes can be served within the allocated budget. –Disadvantages: May not allow enough flexibility to address homes with severe problems. May be leaving savings opportunities unaddressed. 9

Program Goals Advantages & Disadvantages Targeting high need customers –Advantages: provides benefits to those who may suffer most from unaffordable energy bills. –Disadvantages: may not provide the most cost- effective program if these are not the highest energy users. 10

Program Goals Advantages & Disadvantages Innovative usage reduction measures Innovative program delivery systems –Advantages: Allows for testing of these new measures and systems that may prove to be cost-effective in the long-run. May lead to more effective program. –Disadvantages: Due the to learning curve, program may not be as cost-effective. Need opportunity to pilot test. 11

Program Goals Best Practices Relates to program’s mission Concrete –Save X ccf/kWh on average per home served –Reach 1.25 benefit-cost ratio –Reduce ratepayer burden by 5% Measurable –Plan for how you are going to measure Challenging, but achievable –Based on past results or other benchmark 12

MANAGEMENT 13

Program Management Options Public Utility Commission State Team of Utilities Individual Utility 3 rd Party Administrator 14

Program Management Advantages & Disadvantages Centralized program – PUC or State –Advantages Customers across the state receive equivalent benefits. Utilities may work together to develop best practices for combined approach. May be greater opportunity for joint delivery across electric/gas utilities. –Disadvantages Utilities may not have the same program commitment and involvement. May lose utility-specific customer knowledge. 15

Program Management Examples Pennsylvania: Each utility manages its own usage reduction program. New Jersey: Utilities work together on joint program. Ohio: Electric Partnership Program managed by the state. 16

Program Management Best Practices Opportunities –What is there to gain from each option? Capabilities –Which organization is best positioned to manage? Constraints –What staffing or resource constraints are faced? 17

ELIGIBILITY 18

Program Eligibility Options Income level –Usually up to150% or 200% of Federal Poverty Level Home Ownership Usage Guidelines Participation in bill payment assistance programs 19

Program Eligibility Advantages & Disadvantages Income level –Advantages: more restrictive income limits mean that those with the least ability to pay their bills receive services. –Disadvantages: more restrictive income limits may mean that the highest use customers are may not be served. 20

Program Eligibility Advantages & Disadvantages Home Ownership –Advantages: Home owners may be more likely to remain in home and see benefits over time. Landlord permission is not needed. –Disadvantages: some needy households are not served. 21

Program Eligibility Advantages & Disadvantages Usage –Advantages: restricting eligibility to highest use customers usually results in greatest energy savings. –Disadvantages: exclusive focus on usage does not allow for serving those most in need, i.e. lowest income, highest energy burden, elderly, disabled, young children. 22

Program Eligibility Advantages & Disadvantages Participation in bill payment assistance programs –Advantages: reductions in usage result in reduction in subsidies that burden the ratepayers. –Disadvantages: customers who do not participate in bill assistance will not receive usage reduction benefits. 23

Program Eligibility Best Practices Review goals Assess other available programs –May try to reach population that is not served by other programs Revisit over time –After several years, may need to revise pre-treatment usage guideline down 24

TARGETING AND OUTREACH 25

Targeting and Outreach Options Highest use customers Highest subsidy customers Payment troubled customers Vulnerable households (young children, elderly, disabled) 26

Targeting and Outreach Advantages & Disadvantages Highest use customers –Advantages: Usually results in highest energy savings. Utilities can develop list of high-usage, low-income customers. –Disadvantages: May not focus on lower usage customers with high needs due to income, energy burden, other characteristics. Highest users may have conditions in home that prevent service delivery. Centrally managed program may have more difficult time finding high users. 27

Targeting and Outreach Advantages & Disadvantages Highest subsidy customers –Advantages: Benefits of the program go to the ratepayers Utility or program manager can develop list of targeted customers –Disadvantages: other needy customers may not be served 28

Targeting and Outreach Advantages & Disadvantages Payment troubled customers –Advantages: May increase bill payment coverage rates. Customers may be motivated to reduce usage. Utility can target customers who express need for assistance. WAP agency can target customers who received LIHEAP. –Disadvantages: May not result in greatest usage reduction. Some households may be better served with energy assistance (low usage, lowest income.) 29

Targeting and Outreach Advantages & Disadvantages Vulnerable households (young children, elderly, disabled) –Advantages: Reduce energy usage for those who are sensitive to temperature extremes. Nonprofit agency can prioritize these households for service delivery. –Disadvantages: May not result in greatest usage reduction. May restrict opportunity to coordinate with utility programs. 30

Targeting and Outreach Examples PGW – one contractor initially targeted highest users, but found too many barriers in home. PGW – good savings with very high usage customers. OH REACH – additional services delivered to customers with health problems. NJ Comfort Partners & PPL – customers at subsidy limit can benefit. 31

Targeting and Outreach Best Practices Review goals Work collaboratively –State office, utilities, CBOs, other Take multi-pronged approach –Different approaches work based on population segment. Assess what is working Revisit over time 32

SERVICES 33

Services Options Comprehensive – maximize savings per home Cost threshold / $ limit per household Minimal – increase number of households served Varied, depending on energy usage 34

Services Advantages & Disadvantages Comprehensive –Advantages Maximize usage reduction for homes served. Minimize administrative expenses as a percentage of total costs. Reduce need for another program to return to home. –Disadvantages Fewer homes may be served. 35

Services Advantages & Disadvantages Cost threshold –Advantages Serve a greater number of households. Ensure that a minimum number of households are served. –Disadvantages Does not take individual household circumstances into account. May spend too little in some homes and too much in others. May spend more than what is cost-effective in some homes. 36

Services Advantages & Disadvantages Minimal –Advantages Increase number of households served. –Disadvantages Customers may not receive significant savings. Administrative costs are duplicated when other programs return to serve the household. 37

Services Vary By Customer Usage Advantages –Service level is targeted to need. Disadvantages –Households are not treated equally. 38

Services Example CO Energy Efficiency Programs –Full cost –Low cost in home –Kit with postcard –Kit sent to list PPL WRAP Full cost Water heating Baseload 39

Services Best Practices Review goals Research program models Pilot test Evaluate Re-visit 40

ENERGY EDUCATION 41

Energy Education Options Partnership between program/educator and customer Understanding the energy bills Energy use and costs around the home Customer goals for usage reduction Customer action plan Follow-up 42

Energy Education Advantages & Disadvantages Partnership between program /educator and customer –Advantages: if successful, customer has more motivation to take steps to reduce energy usage. –Disadvantages: takes skilled and dedicated auditor to make it work. 43

Energy Education Advantages & Disadvantages Understanding the energy bills Energy use and costs around the home –Advantages If the customer understands how to read the bill and determine when usage is decreasing, it provides positive re-enforcement for energy- saving actions. Allows customer to make decisions about energy usage based on the costs of those uses. –Disadvantages Requires auditor with good communication skills. Increases length of audit. 44

Energy Education Advantages & Disadvantages Customer goals for usage reduction Customer action plan –Advantages Provides motivation for customer to reduce energy usage Provides direction for customer. –Disadvantages Some customers will not be interested. Auditors must be skillful and willing to take the time required. 45

Energy Education Examples NJ Comfort Partners –Energy education notebook –2 hours allocated PECO –Energy education in home –Monthly follow-up letters 46

Services Best Practices Assess capabilities Provide training Perform quality control Evaluate Refine Re-train 47

SERVICE DELIVERY ORGANIZATIONS 48

Service Delivery Options Private contractors Weatherization agencies Community Action Agencies Other nonprofit Mix of the above groups 49

Service Delivery Advantages & Disadvantages Private contractors –Advantages Cash flow management Data management capabilities Ability to hire additional staff –Disadvantages May have less knowledge/experience with other public programs May be too focused on profit 50

Service Delivery Advantages & Disadvantages Weatherization agencies Community Action Agencies Other nonprofit –Advantages: Ability to provide joint service delivery of multiple utility programs and/or WAP. WAP agencies already have consistent policies and procedures that can be implemented in utility program. –Disadvantages: may not have experience with contract work. 51

Service Delivery Example NJ CP, PGW – private contractors PPL – combination UGI – WAP agencies 52

Service Delivery Best Practices Review goals Assess capabilities and experience Assess operating environment Hold accountable Re-visit 53

DATA MANAGEMENT 54

Data Management Options Paper data collection –Data collected on paper at the customer’s home –Data entered by contractor after the visit Computerized data collection –Customer data loaded into software –Data entered in laptop or PDA while in the customer’s home –Data uploaded to data management system 55

Data Management Advantages & Disadvantages Computerized data collection –Advantages Auditor can have customer data (including usage) available on site. Data entry is not necessary following the visit. Software can calculate cost-effectiveness based on customer usage and other characteristics. –Disadvantages Computer can interview with customer relationship. Data can be lost. Providers may be resistant. 56

Service Delivery Best Practices Assess data needs –Management –Operations –Evaluation Assess capabilities and experience Assess operating environment Perform cost-benefit analysis Provide training 57

QUALITY CONTROL 58

Quality Control Options Internal/External –State or utility personnel –Third party inspectors Sampling –What percent of jobs should be inspected? Targeting –Equal/random inspection of each contractor –Focus on contractors who have shown problems in the past 59

Quality Control Advantages & Disadvantages External quality control –Advantages More time may be devoted to quality control. May have more systematic procedures for quality control. May be more objective. –Disadvantages May be more expensive. Inspectors may not have good understanding of program design and procedures. 60

Quality Control Best Practices Assess provider capabilities and experience Develop systematic procedures Collect and review data Re-visit based on findings 61

EVALUATION 62

Evaluation Options Internal/External –Conducted by state/utility –Conducted by third party evaluator Impact –Energy usage –Bill payment –Environmental –Economic Process –Efficiency/effectiveness of program –Why is the program achieving the outcomes 63

Evaluation Advantages & Disadvantages External –Advantages More time may be devoted to evaluation. Evaluation expertise. May have more systematic procedures for evaluation. May be more objective / less biased. –Disadvantages More expensive. May not have an understanding of the program and components. 64

Evaluation Best Practices Assess information needs Design evaluation Use results to improve performance –Policies and procedures –Systems and tools –Training –Quality Control 65

SUMMARY 66

Summary Recommendations Identify and prioritize goals Recognize unique characteristics of environment –Geography/weather –Political/social –Resources Review program models Pilot test before implementing Evaluate and improve 67