Austin Neighborhood Council Civil & Family Courthouse April 22, 2015 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Noor Ismail, AICP, Director of City Planning Joy Abbott, Assistant Director, Strategic Planning Division Corey Layman, Senior Planner Stephen Patchan,
Advertisements

Module 3 SMART PARKING. Module 3 Smart Parking Introduction This is one of seven Transit Oriented Development training modules developed by the Regional.
Muskegon County New Jail Facility and Juvenile Transition Center Presentation to JJTCC, September 5, 2013.
Example of an Appropriate Development Concept for the Hine Junior High School Site This concept is an example of how the site could be developed for the.
CITY OF MIAMI CITY OF MIAMI. Health District Traffic Study July 21, 2008 Miami Partnership.
Local Government.
FACILITY PLANNING October 1, :00 PM – Raymond School Tour 6:30 PM – Interactive Workshop Raymond Community Workshop.
Washtenaw County Strategic Space Plan Recommendations November 1, 2006.
ACMA Conference February 8, 2007 Evaluating Investments in Infrastructure Panel Overview of Public Infrastructure Financing in the City of Phoenix.
GFOAz May 11, 2007 The ABC’s of Municipal Financing.
THOMAS MEMORIAL LIBRARY A NEW VISION FOR THE “LIGHTHOUSE OF KNOWLEDGE”
Presentation to Nevada Assembly Committee on Government Affairs February 17, 2015.
Facility Needs Assessment and Conceptual Design Pleasant Grove Civic Center.
Ector County Courthouse Needs Assessment Study Status Report Brinkley Sargent Architects Greg Read Gina Irwin January 12, 2015.
1 Corey W. Hill Chief of Public Transportation May 20, 2008 May 20, 2008.
Jim Ned CISD School Bond Election May 8 th, 2010.
1 Purpose  Summarize Monday’s workshop  Update on the Radio System – confirm staff’s recommendation  Jail Expansion – discussion/direction  Discussion.
Property Tax Hearing August 12, Purpose Of Public Hearing Meet Requirements of State Law Explain the City’s reasoning for the proposed tax increase.
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
Convention Center Community Coalition 1. Time Line 2008: Feasibility Study by CS&L May 2009: Follow-Up Data April 2010: Appleton Council/Mayor Appoint.
Module 3 SMART PARKING 1. Module 3 Smart Parking Goals for Smart Parking Balance parking supply and demand Consider innovative parking management policies.
Property Appraiser and Tax Collector Office Space Search Update Real Estate Management March 25, 2014.
Local Government in Texas Chapter 13. Local Government in Texas Local officials should be easily accountable to the public. Conditioned upon public and.
Urban Design Goals: Produce a high quality living environment for all residents. Clarify and enhance the relationship between new housing development and.
Pacheco Transit Center Regional Express Bus Hub and Park and Ride Project Description and Background TRANSPAC TAC Meeting November 19, 2009.
Local Government in Texas Local officials should be easily accountable to the public. Conditioned upon public and media attention More time cost to follow.
Substance Use Disorders Integral Care Community Forum June 17, 2014.
WELCOME! GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas GREATER 288 PARTNERSHIP Promoting the Gateway to Texas.
Civil and Family Courts Complex September 8, 2015.
Presentation to ***(group) on ***(date) 1.  Cities - 11  Highway districts – 3  Ada and Canyon Counties  School districts – 2  Valley Regional Transit.
Sustainable mobility in Lviv mobility.lviv.ua. Sustainable mobility – any type of transportation that can help reduce environmental impact. This may include.
West Phoenix / Central Glendale Transit Corridor Study Public Meetings May 2013.
1 FY County Manager’s Recommended Capital Budget July 18, 2006.
Families and Children Task Force Overview and Findings May 8, 2008.
Planning & Community Development Department 1336 and 1347 East Colorado Blvd. Pre Development Plan Review City Council Meeting January 28, 2013.
City of Rehoboth Beach Summary of Master Plan Consultations, Recommendations and Progress to date By Stan Mills for July 7 Board of Commissioner's Meeting.
Regional Transit Study Project Update. Four open houses held between November , 2009 Informed and engaged the public in the study process Provided.
Welcome!. Strategic Development and Facility Master Planning Board Approved in October 2010 Hot Springs County Memorial Hospital.
STATE HIGH PROJECT Agenda ● Background ● Design ● Financial ● Questions C RABTREE, R OHRBAUGH & A SSOCIATES ARCHITECTS.
Missoula County Space Needs Plan Planning Logistics Phasing Plan Schematic Designs Questions.
One Voice Central Texas Civil & Family Courts Complex June 18, 2015.
Return site to its rightful glory with cleaner water and more enjoyable experience Propose appropriate additions and renovations to pool, buildings and.
Why a Bus Transit to Workplace Study? COST TO OWN A VEHICLE.
Aquatic Facility Concept Design. “Every Dog has its Day” Park Valley Pool Pool is 28 years old and nearing the 4-9 years of identified life expectancy.
Presentation to the Multnomah County Board of Commissioners October 28, 2010.
South Greenville Recreation Center and Park Master Plan.
MOSCONE EXPANSION PROJECT OCTOBER 21, 2013 Civic Design Review – Phase I.
C ENTRAL E STUARY P LAN A V ISION F OR O AKLAND’S W ATERFRONT Central Estuary Plan A VISION FOR OAKLAND’S WATERFRONT Specific Plan and Environmental Assessment.
Presentation Downtown Real Estate Market Analysis Presented to: The City of Concord, North Carolina Presented by: Economics Research Associates April 8,
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
ULI Symposium: Central City Commercial Development 1988.
Mobility for all Modes Update to the Transportation Chapter of the City’s Comprehensive Plan City Council May 27,
“BACK TO BASICS” November 2, 2010 CITY BOND ELECTION Facilities & Infrastructure Municipal Court Courthouse (Proposition 401) Municipal Services Maintenance.
1 Budget Presentation Fiscal Year 2011 May 10, 2010.
Update on Oak Cliff Municipal Center Addition Economic Development Committee June 6, 2016.
Council for Quality Growth North Fulton Advisory Meeting
253 South Los Robles Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
County Government ESSENTIAL QUESTION:
City of Stoughton Comprehensive Plan Update
Bond 2017 Capital Projects Linda Degman | January 19, 2017.
CITIZENS BLUE RIBBON COMMITTEE
CFT Gateway Center ( E. Foothill Blvd
Capital Metro Board Meeting
City Council September 18, 2017
Nolanville Main Street Sidewalk & Bicycle Connectivity
83 North Lake Avenue Predevelopment Plan Review
Executive Summary The Vision helps Decisions (How having a clear vision helps your decision process): “As trusted stewards of Boulder County’s future,
254 East Union Street Pre Development Plan Review
115-Unit Mixed-Use Project (711 E
JASPER COUNTY PHASE 2 JUDICIAL SYSTEM AND JAIL EXPANSION PROJECT
Presentation transcript:

Austin Neighborhood Council Civil & Family Courthouse April 22,

2 Importance of the Court System The provision of safe, secure, accessible and functional facilities to house the Courts is a mandated obligation of the Commissioners Court. The first duty of society is justice. -Alexander Hamilton

3 Growth Demands – Travis County = Population 25,000 people ,631, ,158, , ,777

4 Historical and Projected Case Loadings

2015 Need 318,000 sf 2035 Need 509,000 sf 5 Heman Marion Sweatt Courthouse 158,000 sf 2025 Need 453,000 sf Projected Space Needs = 10,000 sq. ft.

6  Designed for 3 courtrooms (1931) -Now houses 19 courtrooms -Current need: 24 courtrooms  Three expansions since opening -1958, 1962, and 1964  The building still has significant deficiencies. Heman Marion Sweatt Courthouse

7  Degraded infrastructure  Costly to maintain  Security weaknesses -No separation of in-custody participants  No appropriate waiting areas for children  ADA compliance issues  No family considerations  Inefficient courtroom layouts  Inadequate jury facilities  Poor user amenities  Lacks technology capabilities HMS Courthouse Deficiencies

8 Site Selection

9 Historic Location 1839 Plan of the City of Austin – the ‘Waller Plan’ 1855 Travis County Courthouse on CFCH site  The Civil & Family Courthouse will be on site originally planned to house the Courthouse dating back to 1839  The first Courthouse occupied the site with a jail from 1855 to 1874  The Heman Marion Sweatt Travis County Courthouse has been in continuous use since June 1931 N N CFCH Site

Bicycle Priority Streets 10 The CFCH location is one of the most accessible locations in all of Travis County. Accessibility Overflow Parking Options Civil and Family Courthouse Site Future Development – Significant Parking Potential The Lance Armstrong Bikeway along 3 rd Street (south side of site) is projected to be completed in Every major CapMetro bus route through downtown, stops at or near the site. Pedestrian Priority Streets/Paths Automobile Priority Streets Bus Priority Streets N

11 Concept

12 Development Analysis  Allowable Development Capacity is ~1.9 million square feet  CFCH Building Concept is 520,000 square feet  4 levels of underground parking N

13 Courthouse Concept  14 stories  270-feet tall  520,000 gsf  4 level, underground garage  513 parking spaces  Secured Judicial parking

14 Courthouse Concept  Oriented to complement park  Public views of park  Flexible & efficient  LEED Silver  Site accommodates space for future expansion office building

15 Engagement with Republic Park N 4 th Street Guadalupe Great Streets Profile (18ft) Covered Portico Space for Cart Vendors Drop Off Area Disguised Security Bollards Benches and Bike Racks Pedestrian Garage Access

16 CFCH Future Expansion Space Great Streets Profile Drop Off Public Entry N 16 CFCH Project Site Service and Vehicle Entrances off San Antonio

17 18-ft Floor to Floor Height Standardization -Courts can be accommodated on every floor -Economies of scale & consistent template reduces construction cost In-Custody Elevators -Accessible to all Court floors -Increases flexibility for future needs Building Designed to meet 2035 Needs -Building to accommodate present and known future needs Core and Shell Flexibilities Higher Use Courts – Lower in Building -Focuses “Wear and Tear” to specific areas

18  Iterative & Open Approach -Departmental Forecasts Reviewed & Refined -Day-to-day functionality assessed & challenged  Judicial Forecast -Statistical Trend Analysis -Realistic and reasonable judicial needs identified Space Program Efficiencies Courts Offices and Departments Civil Courts (Courtrooms and Judiciary) Courts Admin District and County Clerks Domestic Relations Office of Child Representation Office of Parental Representation Law Library and Self Help Center Dispute Resolution and Mediation Spaces Sheriff Transport and Staging Building Support Building Amenities (incl. Children’s waiting area) IV D Associate Judge’s Courts Probate Court District Attorney and County Attorney work areas KEY RESULTS  Maintained overall building size while adding Probate Courts

19 Program Budget

20 Preliminary Program Budget Program Total (Recommended Bond Amount) Includes - Construction Costs, Owner’s FF&E and Misc. $ 291,600,000 Preliminary Program Budget  Budget predicated on November 2015 Bond Referendum Estimated impact of $42 on annual tax bill Based on a Travis County home with a 2015 assessed value of $325,000

21 Regional Courthouse Comparison Given location and timing of construction, CFCH passes Test of Reasonableness. Given location and timing of construction, CFCH passes Test of Reasonableness. South Atlantic $ 377 East North Central $ 353 Mid-Atlantic $ 353 Pacific $ 875 Mountain $ 360 West South Central $ 451 Travis County CFCH $ 447

22  newtraviscountycourthouse.com  Project Contact Information