1 Planning and Funding Basics Lauren Amos and Liann Seiter, NDTAC Chandra Martin, Arkansas Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Advertisements

The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
Campus Improvement Plans
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
October 5, 2010 Title III Services to Private Schools.
OJJDP Performance Measurement Training 1 Incorporating Performance Measurement in the Formula Grant RFP and Application Format Presenter: Pat Cervera,
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
Manager Orientation Budgeting & Forecasting. 2 UFundamentals Today’s Agenda New Budget Model Principles Overview of budgeting and forecasting Timelines.
Schoolwide Planning, Part III: Strategic Action Planning
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
1 (Almost) Everything You Need To Know About the Annual Count.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
ND Community Call Salmon Community October 23, 2013.
Title I-D, Subpart 2 Neglected, Delinquent, and At- Risk Youth Program ESEA Odyssey Summer 2013 Russ Sweet Education Specialist Oregon Department of Education.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 What’s It All About?
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
1 ND Communities Meeting. 2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity:
The Life of a Policy Council Member
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
Making Sound Use of Funds Decisions for Title I, Part D Nicholas Read and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC Jeff Breshears, California Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Annual Counts: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
Title ID Subpart 2 Introduction Coordinator Tutorial
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Spring N or D Application.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
TITLE I, PART D Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 2 LEAs and TACF Neglected,
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
Title I Part A: Back to Basics ESEA Odyssey Fall 2010.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Proposed Changes to the Title I, Part D, Federal Data Collection As of June 28, 2012.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
Thoughts for today *Teacher: I want you to tell me the longest sentence you can think of Pupil: Life imprisonment! You know you can’t sleep in this workshop…would.
Focus Schools Grant Monitoring and Support Consolidated Planning and Monitoring September 2015.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of Federal Educational Programs ECTAC ADMINISTRATOR’S MEETING SONYA G. MORRIS, BUREAU CHIEF MARCH 3, 2016.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
Annual October Count of Children in
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective
Equitable Services Sections 1117 and 8501 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), as amended by the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA),
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Presentation transcript:

1 Planning and Funding Basics Lauren Amos and Liann Seiter, NDTAC Chandra Martin, Arkansas Department of Education

2 Your Roles and Responsibilities You are a guardian and a catalyst: 1.Allocating funds 2.Administering funds 3.Training and technical assistance

3 Allocating vs. Administering Funds Different eligibility requirements. Different reporting requirements and timeframes: –Annual Child Count –Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) The youth themselves are different. January 2014 Report 2013 Annual Count of students to ED July 2014 R eceive FY 2014 funding and make awards for SY January 2015 Report on students served in SY via CSPR to ED

4 Allocating Funds Getting Part D Dollars

5 Why Get the Count Right? To ensure your State’s full share of Part D (and Part A, neglect) funds –The pie has been baked, but they haven’t cut your slice yet. To increase your knowledge of populations and their needs: –Take note of large or unusual increases or decreases. –Track where (locality) numbers are increasing or decreasing. –Note changes in program (neglected, delinquent, or at-risk) populations. To pass Federal audit

6 Annual Count Refresher POP QUIZ!!!!!

7 State Agency—Subpart 1: Annual Count Quiz What is(are) the optimal day(s) to choose for the count? U.S. Department of Human Services June 1July 1Aug. 1Sept. 1 Facility Facility U.S. Department of Corrections June 15July 15Aug. 15Sept. 15 Facility

8 State Agency—Subpart 1: Annual Count Quiz (cont. 1) Each facility under a State Agency (SA) must use the same day for its Subpart 1 count. However, different SAs can use different days. September 1 and June 15 maximize the counts for the Dept. of Human Services and Dept. of Corrections, respectively, and for the State overall. U.S. Department of Human Services June 1July 1Aug. 1Sept. 1 Facility Facility U.S. Department of Corrections June 15July 15Aug. 15Sept. 15 Facility

9 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Count Window Which of the following date ranges are acceptable for the Subpart 2 Annual Count? A. Oct. 1–30 B. Sept. 20–Oct. 10, Oct. 20–Nov. 10 C. Oct. 31–Nov. 29 D. Sept. 1–30 E. Sept. 1–Oct. 1

10 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Count Window Which of the following date ranges are acceptable for the Subpart 2 Annual Count? A. Oct. 1–30 B. Sept. 20–Oct. 10, Oct. 20–Nov. 10 C. Oct. 31–Nov. 29 D. Sept. 1–30 E. Sept. 1–Oct. 1 A and C are both acceptable. B is not because the count window is not consecutive. D is not because one of the days in the count window does not fall in October. E is not because the count window is more than 30 days.

11 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count: Count Window A local education agency’s (LEA’s) Subpart 2 count window can start as early as September 2 or as late as October 31. The window must be 30 consecutive days, and at least one day of that window must be in October. The State education agency may set the window for all LEAs, or it may allow LEAs and facilities to choose their windows independently. September SMTWTFS October SMTWTFS November SMTWTFS

12 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting How many students who reside in a facility that is designated as a neglect institution should be counted? Joe and Kelly are considered neglected, and Shawn is considered delinquent. Sun.Mon.Tue.Wed.Thu.Fri.Sat. Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe

13 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting (cont. 1) How many students who reside in a facility that is designated as a neglect institution should be counted? Joe and Kelly are considered neglected, and Shawn is considered delinquent. Sun.Mon.Tue.Wed.Thu.Fri.Sat. Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Kelly Joe Child Count = 3

14 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting (cont. 2) How many students who reside in a facility that is designated as a neglect institution should be counted? Joe and Kelly are considered neglected, and Shawn is considered delinquent. Sun.Mon.Tue.Wed.Thu.Fri.Sat. Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe

15 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting (cont. 3) How many students who reside in a facility that is designated as a neglect institution should be counted? Joe and Kelly are considered neglected, and Shawn is considered delinquent. Sun.Mon.Tue.Wed.Thu.Fri.Sat. Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Shawn Joe Kelly Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Shawn Joe Child Count = 4

16 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting (cont. 4) How many students who reside in a facility that is designated as a neglect institution should an LEA count? Neglect Institution 1 Neglect Institution 2 Delinquent Institution 1 Delinquent Institution 2 10 students who are neglected 10 students who are delinquent 20 students who are neglected 40 students who are delinquent 10 students who are neglected 20 students who are delinquent

17 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting (cont. 5) How many students who reside in a facility that is designated as a neglect institution should an LEA count? Neglect Institution 1 Neglect Institution 2 Delinquent Institution 1 Delinquent Institution 2 10 students who are neglected 10 students who are delinquent 20 students who are neglected 40 students who are delinquent 10 students who are neglected 20 students who are delinquent Neglect Institution Child Count = 40

18 State Agency—Subpart 1: Annual Count Quiz (cont. 2) Which of the following are eligible for a SA count? A.Facilities that have an average length of stay of at least 30 days B.Students who are 21 years of age or younger C.Community day program D.Students who are enrolled in State-funded regular programs of instruction for at least 20 hours/week (in an adult facility) or 15 hours/week (in a juvenile facility or community day program)

19 State Agency — Subpart 1: Annual Count Quiz (cont. 3) Which of the following are eligible for a SA count? A.Facilities that have an average length of stay of at least 30 days B.Students who are 21 years of age or younger C.Community day program D.Students who are enrolled in State-funded regular programs of instruction for at least 20 hours/week (in an adult facility) or 15 hours/week (in a juvenile facility or community day program)

20 State Agency—Subpart 1: Annual Count Eligibility State Agency Eligibility SAs responsible for providing free public education to children and youth who are in N or D institutions, community day programs, or adult correctional institutions Facility Eligibility Facilities that serve neglected or delinquent children and youth Facilities that have an average length of stay of at least 30 days Student Eligibility Students who are 20 years of age or younger Students who are enrolled in State-funded regular programs of instruction for at least 15 hours/week (in an adult facility) or 20 hours/week (in a juvenile facility or community day program)

21 Local Education Agency — Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting (cont. 6) Which of the following are ineligible for an LEA count? A.Private residential institution B.Students counted by an SA C.Students that attend a community day program D.Students with an average length of stay of less than 30 days

22 Local Education Agency — Subpart 2 Annual Count Quiz: Counting (cont.) Which of the following are ineligible for an LEA count? A.Private residential institution B.Students counted by an SA C.Students that attend a community day program D.Students with an average length of stay of less than 30 days

23 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Annual Count Eligibility LEA Eligibility LEAs with children and youth in locally operated correctional facilities, including public or private institutions and community day programs Facility Eligibility Locally operated facilities that meet the definition of an institution for children and youth who are neglected, an institution for children and youth who are delinquent, or an adult correctional institution Facilities need not have a 30 day average length of stay Eligibility Based on Count Window Children and youth who are residents of a live ‑ in institution or facility for at least 1 day within the 30 ‑ day count window (one day of which must be in October) Student Eligibility Students 5–17 years of age Students not counted in the SA/Subpart 1 Annual Count

24 Annual Count Processes: How Are State Agency and Local Education Agency Counts Different? SA Count In a program for youth who are N or D, including juvenile and adult correctional facilities and community day programs Enrolled in a State-funded “regular program of instruction”regular program of instruction Enrolled in a program that has an average length of stay of at least 30 days on day of count during the calendar year 20 years of age or younger LEA Count Living in local institutions for children and youth who are N or D or adult correctional institutions Living in the institution for at least 1 day during the 30 day count period 5–17 years of age

25 State Agency—Subpart 1 Program: Students Counted vs. Students Served Students Counted (Annual Count) In a program for youth who are N or D, including juvenile and adult correctional facilities and community day programs Enrolled in a State-funded “regular program of instruction” Enrolled in a program that has an average length of stay of at least 30 days on day of count during the calendar year 20 years of age or younger Students Served In a program for youth who are N or D, including juvenile and adult correctional facilities and community day programs Enrolled in a State-funded “regular program of instruction” Enrolled in a program that meets the length of stay requirements for the given program type (requirements vary) 21 years of age or younger

26 Local Education Agency—Subpart 2 Program: Students Counted vs. Students Served Students Counted (Annual Count) Living in local institutions for children and youth who are N or D or adult correctional institutions Living in the institution for at least 1 day during the 30 day count period 5 through 17 years of age Students Served Living in local institutions for children and youth who are delinquent or in adult correctional institutions; eligible for services under Title I, Parts A and C; or identified as “at risk” (e.g., migrants, immigrants, gang members, pregnant or parenting youth) 21 years of age or younger

27 Annual Count vs. the CSPR Students in the Annual Count Purpose: To determine formula counts for allocating funds Instructions differ per subpart A subset of “eligible” students enrolled during a specific time period within the calendar year Adjustments are made to calculations to estimate the student population (SA, Subpart 1) Multiple enrollments within a facility can be counted (LEA, Subpart 2) Students in the CSPR Unduplicated Count Purpose: To track student achievement Instructions do not differ per subpart Adult corrections = Subpart 1 At-risk programs = Subpart 2 ALL students that benefitted from Part D funding during the school year Unduplicated counts are not adjusted, so they are actual counts of the total population served Students are counted once per facility, regardless of multiple enrollments

28 Food for Thought What are you doing to control the quality of your State’s Annual Count?

29 Quality Control 1.Prepare for the count: –Understand the purpose of the count and its process –Plan for the process –Develop or update your materials (e.g., survey forms) 2.Provide training or technical assistance as appropriate: –Plan what training or technical assistance you will offer (e.g., training, phone calls, conference calls) –Revise training or technical assistance materials based on data/experience –Be prepared to address common issues (e.g., facility and student eligibility questions) 3.Verify and submit counts: –Review counts before submitting –Submit counts with additional information if necessary

30 Administering Funds Allocating Part D Dollars

31 Why Plan Your Funding? To be more effective: –Foster better outcomes for youth –Meet Federal, State, and local requirements –Meet program, agency, and facility goals and mandates –Ensure future Federal program funding To be more efficient: –Do more with less in times of financial struggle –Effectively administer Part D along with other responsibilities

32 Fund Allocation Steps 1.State plans 2.Application development a.Needs sensing b.Formal agreements 3.Application review a.“Use of funds” proposals 4.Fund allocation

33 Step 1: Know Your State Plan Read your State plan! It is… –The foundation of your Part D program –An agreement with the U.S. Department of Education Know when to change it, when these occur: –New understandings of Part D –Changes in populations and needs

34 Step 2: Use the Application as a Tool The Part D application is like an RFP. The application provides the chance to shape State and local programs through: –Meeting Federal requirements –Providing additional guidelines and regulations –Setting funding or serving priorities –Requiring specific details in program narratives and budgets to encourage more effective programming

35 Step 2a: Focus Applications on Needs Needs sensing and/or assessments: Can be conducted at the State, agency, and facility/program levels Can focus on a single interest area or a whole system or program Can be completed by: 1.Defining the purpose and scope 2.Establishing a planning team 3.Developing an agency/facility/program profile 4.Identifying desired data, availability, usability, and collection methods 5.Analyzing data, identifying needs, and setting priorities

36 What a Needs Assessment Tells You Educational offerings within facilities and programs Additional available services and supports Students’ demographics and their unique needs Academic and vocational outcomes Transitional or postrelease outcomes Professional development offerings and needs Relationships and their quality Where we are now? Where we need or want to be? How we can get there?

37 Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements A formal agreement is: A contract between the funder and provider –Keeps expectations clear and creates lines of accountability for services Required for LEAs and facilities—a good idea for SAs and facilities.

38 Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements (cont. 1) As the State Education Agency, consider specifying formal agreement components in the application instructions: How the grantee will use funds—meeting all requirements and the needs of students and staff What students will be served What staff (if any) will be funded and their qualifications What materials and equipment will be used and their costs Any potential for blended or braided funding What types of data will be collected and how often How data will be used for program improvement

39 Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements (cont. 2) Formal agreements inform recipients about … Purpose of the funds Application requirements Award amount Period of agreement and reapplying timelines Use of fund requirements and restrictions Data collection and reporting requirements Monitoring expectations Consequences for not complying with agreement

40 Step 3: Review Applications Thoroughly Did I receive what I asked for? Does what I received make sense? –At the facility, agency, and State levels –How does one program affect the others? Is the application focused on improvement? –Does it take into account past outcomes? –Does it address current needs?

41 Step 3a: Evaluate “Use of Funds” Proposals Decide on allowable and appropriate uses –Use detailed decision rules –Prioritize “musts,” then work through to “shoulds” Remember Federal, State, and agency or program priorities and goals Be strategic Feel comfortable with the process and confident in your decisions

42 Step 4: Allocations and Technical Assistance Funding can be formulaic or competitive or discretionary. –Generating does not have to mean receiving. –Hybrid funding models can be used. The State Agencies and State and local education agencies are more than just “pass throughs.” These agencies: –Facilitate coordination and build relationships –Maintain ongoing knowledge of programs –Make course corrections along the way –Provide ongoing technical assistance to foster better monitoring outcomes.

43 Training and Technical Assistance

44 Strategies Application Fact sheets Discretionary or competitive subgrants Webinars eNewsletters Other?

45 Institutionwide Projects An SA can use Title I, Part D funds to help upgrade the entire education and transition efforts of its facility or program through an Institutionwide Project (IWP) The steps to implementing IWPs include: Conduct a comprehensive needs assessment Write a comprehensive IWP plan Implement the IWP according to plan

46 Institutionwide Projects (cont.) IWPs allow an SA to upgrade the entire education and transition efforts of its facility or program by enabling it to: Focus on adopting strategies that aim to improve the overall educational program of the facility, rather than providing add-on services for individual students Combine Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 funds with other State and Federal funds for education programs to support comprehensive approaches that meet the educational needs of all children and youth in N or D facilities Conduct a more targeted evaluation of a facility’s needs in terms of educating and supporting its students and staff Provide the opportunity for focused and sustained professional development for all facility staff Use Title I, Part D, Subpart 1 funds more flexibly

47 Planning and Funding Resources

48 Planning and Funding

49 Annual Count Web Page

50 Annual Count Web Page (cont.)

51 Application Development and Review Web Page

52 Institutionwide Projects Web Page

53 State Plans Web Page

54 Tips from Karl Koenig Understand the count process Know who is responsible for the Title I, Part A allocations in your state Know how your state is allocating funds (formula, discretionary, or a combination) Understand what’s a good formal agreement

55 Karl’s Template