50th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society 11 July 2005 - Spokane, Washington, USA Kevan D. Weaver, Ph.D. U.S. System Integration Manager, Gas-Cooled.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Generation IV international Forum Overall Mission :
Advertisements

Euradwaste04 – Partitioning and transmutation - Panel discussion Transmutation and partitioning Fast neutron spectrum Critical Heterogeneous Homogeneous.
(1) Office of Nuclear Energy, Nuclear Energy – Advanced Fuel Cycles and the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership Buzz Savage Office of Nuclear Energy U.S.
Clear Thinking on Nuclear: Hydrogen fuel 1.Demand for hydrogen is large and rapidly increasing 2.Cost effective with no gas emissions that pollute the.
Argonne National Laboratory is managed by The University of Chicago for the U.S. Department of Energy Advanced Fuel Cycles and Repositories Dr. Phillip.
Argonne National Laboratory 9700 S. Cass Avenue Argonne, IL  Original name for Argonne – the “Metallurgical Lab”, a code name for Enrico.
15-5 What Are the Advantages and Disadvantages of Nuclear Energy?
Page 8File ref: An impression of EPR at Olkiluoto …..
1 Nuclear Division - GLF FP6 - Proposal for a Specific Targeted Research Project on Innovative Technologies for the Sodium cooled fast Reactor ITSR - FP6.
Nuclear Power – Need and Future. Outline Economics of Nuclear Energy Basics of a Power Plant Heat From Fission History of Nuclear Power Current Commercial.
Generation IV Systems: Key Technological Challenges for Fission Reactors and What It Means for Fusion David Petti R&D Technical Director Next Generation.
Nuclear Energy University Programs MS-RC1 - Reactor Concepts RD&D August 10, 2011 Christopher Grandy Argonne National Laboratory.
Ann S. Bisconti, PhD Bisconti Research, Inc. New Opinion Climate For Nuclear Energy And Global Nuclear Energy Partnership (GNEP)
Princeton - Department of Chemistry USC - Department of Physics Princeton - Department of Chemistry Nuclear Physics Lab – Oliver R. Gothe May 12, 2008.
To drill or not to drill? Nuclear Energy FIGURE 16: Structure of the atom.
Introduction to Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems
Resource and Energy.
Nuclear Power Technology Steven Biegalski, Ph.D., P.E. Director, Nuclear Engineering Teaching Laboratory Associate Professor, Mechanical Engineering The.
Indian strategy for management of spent fuel from Nuclear Power Reactors S.Basu, India.
Clean and Sustainable Nuclear Power
February 19th, 2005 Non-CO 2 -emitting Energy Sources for the Future NUCLEAR POWER: SECURE ENERGY for the 21 st CENTURY Mike Corradini Nuclear Engineering.
James D. Myers Director, Wyoming CCS Technology Institute Professor, Department of Geology & Geophysics University of Wyoming.
 Benefits of Nuclear Energy  How Fission Works  Nuclear Power Plant Basics  Overview of Uranium Fuel Cycle  Energy Lifecycle of Nuclear Power  Generation.
Generation IV Reactor International Efforts American Nuclear Society Washington D.C. Section John E. Kelly Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Reactor.
BNFL/Westinghouse’s Perspective on the Nuclear Hydrogen Economy Dr PJA Howarth Head of Group Science Strategy.
Overview of the United States Partitioning and Transmutation Research Program OECD/NEA 8 th Information Exchange Meeting On Partitioning and Transmutation.
Office of Nuclear Energy U.S. Department of Energy
© OECD/IEA 2010 Cecilia Tam International Energy Agency Martin Taylor Nuclear Energy Agency The Role of Nuclear Energy in a Sustainable Energy Future Paris,
The Nuclear Energy Future John F. Kotek, Deputy Manager Idaho Operations Office U.S. Department of Energy November, 2003 The Government Role in Creating.
Types of reactors.
Future perspectives of nuclear energy
Environment Institute Where ideas grow atomexpo 2013 forum: “Nuclear energy and public acceptance”, Saint Petersburg, 28 June 2013 Plentiful Energy – key.
CANDU Fuel Options: Practical Adaptability Jerry Hopwood Vice President, Marketing & Product Development World Nuclear Association, Annual Symposium September.
1 The Future of Nuclear Energy Hydrogen and Electricity Production Charles W. Forsberg Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oak Ridge, Tennessee Tel: (865)
Can Thermal Reactor Recycle Eliminate the Need for Multiple Repositories? C. W. Forsberg, E. D. Collins, C. W. Alexander, and J. Renier Actinide and Fission.
US Priorities for New and Renewable Energy Technologies Cary Bloyd Argonne National Laboratory APEC Expert Group on New and Renewable Energy Technologies.
Accession by South Africa to the “Framework Agreement for International Collaboration on Research and Development of Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems”
The Nuclear Reactors from a « Natural History » Perspective Bertrand BARRÉ, AREVA President European Nuclear Society Director ANS Vice-president INSC.
PBNC- 1 Overview of US Nuclear Energy Initiatives /06- 1 Harold McFarlane President American Nuclear Society.
A NUCLEAR RENAISSANCE Ping Wan The Tenth Nuclear Utility Meteorological Data Users Group Meeting June 2005.
Sustainable Cycle Solutions World Nuclear Association London, Sep 12 th, 2013 Caroline Drevon SVP Strategy, Sales & Innovation Back-End Business Group.
STRUCTURE OF PRESENTATION 1. Energy Policy goals and Review remit 2. Key challenges 3. Conclusions and Impact 4. Next Steps/Issues 1.
Clean Energy Solutions Milton L. Charlton Chief for Environment, Science, Technology and Health Affairs U.S. Embassy Seoul.
4/2003 Rev 2 I.4.7 – slide 1 of 48 Session I.4.7 Part I Review of Fundamentals Module 4Sources of Radiation Session 7Nuclear Reactors IAEA Post Graduate.
Atoms for Peace +50 Andy White – President & CEO, GE Nuclear Energy.
AERVA NP AREVA HTR Development November 3, 2006 University of Calgary Calgary, Alberta, Canada Dr. Finis Southworth.
America’s Energy Future Presented to: 2006 BIO World Congress America’s Energy Future- Role of Agricultural and Forestry Community July 14, 2006 Toronto,
Johnthescone The IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation UN Climate Change Conference June 2011 Bonn, Germany, 7.
THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER GREG RAABERG NOVEMBER 24, 2008 The University of Texas at Austin Department of Chemical Engineering ChE 359.
1 Massimo SALVATORESiemtp 8 – November th Information Exchange Meeting on Actinide and Fission Product Partitioning and Transmutation University.
1 Nuclear Energy Division MIT Report on the Future of Nuclear Power in the United-States : review and discussion Eric Proust Director, Industrial Affairs.
PIME 2004 / Barcelona, Feb. 10, 2004Nuclear Energy Division 1 PIME 2004 plenary session February 10, 2004 – Barcelona Preparing the future : New challenges.
ENERGY FOR THE 21 ST CENTURY the Potential for Nuclear Power Luis Echávarri Director-General, OECD Nuclear Energy Agency IAEA Scientific Forum at the General.
Critical and Source Driven Subcritical Systems for: - Waste Transmutation - Fuel Breeding Phillip Finck Associate Laboratory Director for Nuclear Science.
DAVID VAN WAGENER NOVEMBER 26, 2008 CHE 384: TECHNOLOGY REPORT Nuclear Power: Advanced Generations and Outlook.
Future Nuclear Reactors Third and Third-Plus+ Generation Reactors Next Generation is Simpler
Johnthescone The IPCC Special Report on Renewable Energy Sources and Climate Change Mitigation.
Department of Nuclear Energy International Atomic Energy Agency Overall Roadmap Organization NERAC GEN IV Roadmap NERAC Subcommittee (GRNS) Technical Community.
Briefing on the Pebble Bed Modular Reactor Portfolio Committee on Public Enterprises 18 February Top Secret - 1.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
MANOJ CHANDRA RAO A/L RAMA RAO ME DHINESHKARAN A/L BALKARAN ME MITHIRAN A/L GENESEN ME PIVINESH NAIR A/L SREETHARAN NAIR ME
Introduction to Nuclear Energy Candace Davison Senior Reactor Operator Penn State University.
NuScale Generator A Practical Energy Alternative for the Future
IAEA PERSPECTIVE ON THE FUTURE OF NUCLEAR POWER
IAEA International Conference on Fifty Years of Nuclear Power – The next Fifty Years Moscow - Obninsk, Russian Federation - June 28, 2004 Nuclear.
Collaborative Research in
Chapter 20: Nuclear Energy
NEI Perspectives on Small Modular Reactors
Nuclear Energy.
NUCLEAR HYDROGEN PRODUCTION :
Presentation transcript:

50th Annual Meeting of the Health Physics Society 11 July Spokane, Washington, USA Kevan D. Weaver, Ph.D. U.S. System Integration Manager, Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor Future Nuclear Energy Systems: Generation IV

The Legacy of U.S. Energy Leadership Growing world tension over energy supplies. Widening gap between energy haves and have-nots. Increasing air pollution and greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. Diverse, affordable, secure global energy supplies. Growing world prosperity. Protection of the global environment.

Source: Energy Information Administration We Will Need More Energy But Where Will It Come From? Oil: –U.S. imports 51% of its oil supply –Vulnerable to supply disruptions and price fluctuations Natural Gas: –Today’s fuel of choice –Future price stability? Coal: –Plentiful but polluting Renewables: –Capacity to meet demand? –Still expensive Nuclear: –Proven technology –Issues remain

Forecast for Energy Growth Annual outlook is 1.5% growth in U.S. energy to 2025 Most growth is in natural gas and coal Imports will increase Nuclear can contribute if deployed in the near-term, but waste will become a major issue for significant growth

Potential for Nuclear in Transportation Transportation sector growth leads electricity & heating Outlook is for a disproportionate increase in imports Increasing dependence on imports clouds the outlook for energy security and stability Hydrogen can contribute if production- distribution-end use issues can be successfully addressed

Nuclear Power The Indispensable Option Reliable, domestic base-load energy No carbon emissions Sustainable, long-term energy supply Supports use of advanced energy infrastructures to –Increase the efficient use of energy –Reduce overall environmental impacts –Deal with transportation fuel needs through production of hydrogen

The Potential for Nuclear Energy is Tremendous 50% of U.S. electricity produced by nuclear power by % of U.S. transportation fuel produced by nuclear energy (nuclear-produced hydrogen) by 2050 Demonstrate a closed fuel cycle system by 2020 Demonstrate a global nuclear energy system consisting of intrinsic and extrinsic safeguards that reduces proliferation risk

The Evolution of Nuclear Power Early Prototype Reactors Generation I - Shippingport - Dresden, Fermi I - Magnox Commercial Power Reactors Generation II - LWR-PWR, BWR - CANDU - VVER/RBMK Generation IV - Highly Economical - Enhanced Safety - Minimal Waste - Proliferation Resistant - ABWR - System AP600 - EPR Advanced LWRs Generation III Gen I Gen IIGen IIIGen III+Gen IV Near-Term Deployment Generation III+ Evolutionary designs offering improved economics Atoms for Peace TMI-2 Chernobyl

Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Systems that are deployable by 2030 or earlier Six ‘most promising’ systems that offer significant advances towards: –Sustainability –Economics –Safety and reliability –Proliferation resistance and physical protection Summarizes R&D activities and priorities for the systems Lays the foundation for Generation IV R&D program plans

Gen IV International Forum: 2000 – 2002 Washington Initial meeting to discuss R&D interests Seoul Drafted charter and technology goals Paris Finalized charter Finalized goals Identified Roadmap participants Miami Reviewed evaluation methodology and results to date London Reviewed results to date Reviewed selection methodology CH Joined Jan 00AugJan 01MarJulOctJan 02Feb Charter Approved Miami, 2001

GIF: 2002 – 2004 *Rio de Janeiro Finalized selection of six systems Reviewed R&D plans Paris Initial selection of six systems Tokyo Identified R&D projects Formed MATF Cape Town Formed R&D steering committees for GFR, SCWR, SFR and VHTR Jan 02MayJulSepJan 03MarSep Jan 04 Toronto Drafted principles for legal agreements LFR SC Regulators’ session EU Joined Zurich Draft R&D agreements R&D Plans Rio de Janeiro, 2003 Roadmap Issued

GIF Member Interests in System R&D Teaming Red Letter: Co-chair GFR -- Gas-cooled fast reactor LFR -- Lead-cooled fast reactor MSR -- Molten salt reactor SFR -- Sodium-cooled fast reactor SCWR -- Supercritical water-cooled reactor VHTR -- Very high temperature reactor GFR LFR MSR SFR SCWR VHTR                    International Collaborations Benefit Gen IV 

A Long-Term Strategy for Nuclear Energy Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Generation IV Thermal Reactors Thermal neutron systems Advanced, high burnup fuels High efficiency, advanced energy products Available by 2020 Generation IV Fast Reactors Fast neutron systems Proliferation-resistant closed fuel cycles Minimize long-term stewardship burden Available by 2030 to 2040

Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Thermal Systems Example: Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) –Thermal neutron spectrum and once-through cycle –High-temperature process heat applications –Coolant outlet temperature above 1,000 o C –Reference concept is 600 MWth with operating efficiency greater than 50 percent Advanced Energy Production –High efficiency electricity generation –High efficiency hydrogen production via thermochemical water cracking or high temperature electrolysis Likely Partners: United Kingdom South Korea JapanFranceSouth Africa Water Oxygen Hydrogen Heat O2O2 SO 2 2H 2 O H2H2 H 2 SO 4 H 2 0+SO 2 +½O 2 H 2 SO 4 HI I 2 + SO 2 + 2H 2 O 2HI + H 2 SO 4 2HI H 2 + I 2 I2I ,100 o C

Molten Salt Reactor - MSR Molten/liquid fuel reactor High outlet temperatures Operates at atmospheric pressure Flexible fuel: no cladding

Supercritical Water-Cooled Reactor - SCWR LWR operating above the critical pressure of water, and producing low-cost electricity. The U.S. program assumes: –Direct cycle, –Thermal spectrum, –Light-water coolant and moderator, –Low-enriched uranium oxide fuel, –Base load operation.

Generation IV Nuclear Energy Systems Fast Systems Example: Gas-Cooled Fast Reactor (GFR) –Fast neutron spectrum and closed fuel cycle –Efficient management of actinides and conversion of fertile uranium –Coolant outlet temperature of 850 o C –Reference concept is 600 MWth with operating efficiency of 43 percent; optional concept is 2,400 MWth Advanced Energy Production –High efficiency electricity generation –Good efficiency for hydrogen production via thermochemical water cracking or high temperature electrolysis Likely Partners: United Kingdom JapanFrance EUSwitzerland

Lead Cooled Fast Reactor - LFR Deployable in remote locations without supporting infrastructure (output, transportation) High degree of proliferation resistance 15 to 30-yr core lifetime Passively safe under all conditions Capable of self- autonomous load following Natural circulation primary Fuel cycle flexibility Options for electricity, hydrogen, process heat & desalination Licensable through testing of demonstration plant

Sodium-cooled Fast Reactor - SFR Pool and loop designs Modular and monolithic designs Thermal efficiency about 40% Low pressure system Pool-type design example

January 2003 Advanced Fuel Cycle Initiative The Path to a Proliferation-Resistant Nuclear Future Develop fuel cycle technologies that: –Enable recovery of the energy value from commercial spent nuclear fuel –Reduce the toxicity of high-level nuclear waste bound for geologic disposal –Reduce the inventories of civilian plutonium in the U.S. –Enable more effective use of the currently proposed geologic repository and reduce the cost of geologic disposal

Nuclear Energy Production PHASE 2 Thermal recycle of Np/Pu PHASE 1 Separations for waste management PHASE 3 Burndown transuranics in dedicated thermal or fast spectrum systems PHASE 4 Equilibrium cycle based on Gen IV Phase 4 Phase 3 Phase 2 Generation IV and Spent Fuel Options PHASE 0 Current plants w/increased performance volume, radiological risk, short term heat load, long term heat load, plutonium inventory Waste Burden Phase 1 Phase 0

Spent Fuel From Commercial Plants Direct Disposal Conventional Reprocessing PUREX Spent Fuel PuUranium MO X LWRs/ALWRs U and Pu Actinides Fission Products Repository Less U and Pu (More Actinides Fission Products) Advanced, Proliferation-Resistant Recycling ADS Transmuter Trace U and Pu Trace Actinides Less Fission Products Repository Gen IV Fast Reactors Once Through Fuel Cycle European/Japanese Fuel Cycle Advanced Proliferation Resistant Fuel Cycle Gen IV Fuel Fabrication LWRs/ALWRs Gen IV Thermal Reactors Advanced Fuel Cycle Technologies Application to Fast Reactors Advanced Separations

Summary Developing and demonstrating advanced nuclear energy systems that meet future needs for safe, sustainable, environmentally responsible, economical, proliferation-resistant, and physically secure energy –Innovation in nuclear energy systems to meet future needs –A new look at advanced fuel cycles to better manage waste