System Reliability Procurement: Non-wires Alternatives in Rhode Island Tim Roughan National Grid.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
00 Project Gates Briefing to the Capital Program Oversight Committee February 2011 Capital Program Management.
Advertisements

Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Demand Response: The Challenges of Integration in a Total Resource Plan Howard.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
The Power to Make a Difference PPL Electric Utilities April 2010.
Save Energy and Money PNM Energy Efficiency Programs
Grow your business with Dominion Power and Good Cents
Making Clean Local Energy Accessible Now Storage Bid Evaluation Protocols Role of CEP, Quantifiable Benefits Stephanie Wang Policy Director Clean Coalition.
1 NARUC/FERC Collaborative on Demand Response Pepco and Delmarva Power Blueprint for the Future Filings J. Mack Wathen July 15, 2007.
1 Conservation: An Alternative Energy Source for Local Communities Ted Coates, Power Manager September 20, 2008.
City of Boulder Meeting Kyoto -- Carbon Emissions Reduction: Commercial Lighting.
CEAC update Energy Efficiency | Renewables | Smart Grid November 19, 2010.
University of Pittsburgh School of Law 2013 Energy Law and Policy Institute Eric Matheson Energy Advisor to PAPUC Commissioner James H. Cawley August 2,
Regulatory View of DSM/EE David Drooz Public Staff – N.C. Utilities Commission April 2015.
Gene Rodrigues Director of Customer Energy Efficiency & Solar Southern California Edison Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency NARUC February.
1 EERMC Public Meeting on Combined Heat and Power September 17, 2013.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
Promoting Energy Efficiency In Buildings in Developing countries.
Solar Incentives for Arizona Public Service, Salt River Project, Tucson Electric Power.
1 State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
The Efficiency of Energy Efficiency Program Tom Van Paris Vice President-Member Services & Communications October 18, 2012.
Evaluation of LIPA’s Efficiency Long Island & Renewable Technology Programs Presented to: LIPA Board of Trustees By: Bill Norton Chief.
Conservation & Demand Management July 2004 – September 2007 Joyce McLean Director, Strategic Issues Toronto Hydro
PLS WORKSHOP September 18, 2012 Greg Miller Ice Energy Terry Andrews CALMAC Manufacturing Corp.
1 Docket 7081 Transmission Planning Information Workshops Third Workshop September 30, 2005 Shaping Demand-Side Resources To Address Transmission Constraints.
+ Customer-side Smart Grid Technologies How will they change utility offerings? Karen Herter, Ph.D. Association of Women in Water, Energy, and Environment.
HARVEST GROUP Smart Grid Harvest Power Technologies 30 th Aug 2014.
Regional Technical Forum End-use Load Shape Business Case Project Project Initiation Meeting Portland, OR March 5, 2012.
MEC: Customer Profitability Models Topic DSM – DR, Advanced EE and Dispatch Ability Jesse Langston, OG&E Oct 20 th 2013.
Energy Efficiency Programs for Your AG Business Randy Vagnini Connecticut Light & Power & Yankee Gas.
Efficiency Vermont your resource for energy savings The Economic Benefits of Energy Efficiency.
KEEA Energy Efficiency Conference 2011 September 20, 2011.
Energy Analysis Department Cost-Effectiveness Valuation Framework for Demand Response Resources: Guidelines and Suggestions Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley.
Strategic Planning for DSM in a Community-owned Utility Presented by Shu-Sun Kwan & Ed Arguello Colorado Springs Utilities 2005 APPA Engineering & Operations.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N NEET Work Group 6 Update: BPA Demand Response April 21 st Karen Meadows Pam Sporborg.
2010 Massachusetts Energy Efficiency Programs July 1, 2010.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
CEC 08-DR-1 Efficiency Committee Workshop 3/3/08.
New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) – NGA Center for Best Practices April 29, 2004 Bob Callender Vice President for Programs NYSERDA.
Northwest Power and Conservation Council 1 Distribution System Efficiency Potential & Conservation Voltage Reduction Power Committee April 2009.
Renewable Energy Incentive Program (REIP) 2010 Operations Update Tammy Gray Senior Operations Specialist.
Senate Bill 1 and the New Solar Homes Partnership Valerie Hall California Energy Commission December 8,
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON® SM Preferred Resources Pilot August 17, 2015
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
California Solar Initiative Dian M. Grueneich, Commissioner California Public Utilities Commission March 30, 2006.
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
1 1 DISTRIBUTION EFFICIENCY INITIATIVE (DEI) Benefits on Both Sides of the Meter RTF MEETING February 5, 2008.
PECO Smart Ideas for Your Business Greater Philadelphia Association of Energy Engineers Mike O’Leary, PECO April 20, 2016.
UM 1751 Energy Storage Workshop #3 May 9, UM 1751 Workshop #3 Topics Most viable and beneficial applications (HB 2193 time frame: ) Emerging.
EmPower MD Act overview and Demand Response Training EmPower Maryland.
PPL Electric Utilities Act 129 Phase 3 Non-Residential Programs April 20, 2016.
PG&E’s Distribution Resources Planning READ AND DELETE For best results with this template, use PowerPoint 2003 Planning the “Networked Grid“ Integrated.
2015 Statewide Collaborative December 1, 2015 Ameren Missouri and Laclede Co-delivered Residential Direct-Install Low Income Energy Efficiency Program.
1 Pepco and Delmarva Power Demand Side Management Programs Stakeholders Meeting February 20, 2009.
Benefit Cost Framework for Energy Efficiency Programs.
SMECO Demand Response filing
Technical Advisory Group Meeting on BGE’s Conservation Program
National Grid Rhode Island: Piloting Wireless Alternatives
Proposed FY18 Program Changes
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
NWA Suitability Criteria
Subteam 1a Competitive Solicitations Framework Working Group Meeting
FY18 NJCEP Reporting* as of May 2018
Arun Vedhathiri, Director, Project Delivery, National Grid
Can DER Defer Traditional Distribution Capital Investments?
Low Income Programs - Hydro One Experience
Integrated Distribution Planning Process
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
MA DG Collaborative – Year 1
UM 1856 PGE’s Energy Storage Proposal – Commission Workshop #1
Presentation transcript:

System Reliability Procurement: Non-wires Alternatives in Rhode Island Tim Roughan National Grid

2 Origins – RI Legislation  Least Cost Procurement Law  Intended to:  Increase stability through resource diversification  Integrate renewables  Reduce cost of energy  Increase accountability in planning and administration  Required the development of Standards for Energy Efficiency and System Reliability Procurements  Basis for 3-year EE plans  Approved in 2009  Updated in 2011

3 Origins – RI Legislation  Despite approval of proposed SRP Plan in 2009, no SRP funding  Some EE budget money set aside for SRP analysis tool development  Internal guidelines for NWA consideration developed in 2010/2011  EE/SRP Standards updated in 2011  More detail in SRP section on funding, BC analysis and reporting  Incorporated project eligibility criteria from internal guidelines  Established annual reporting  First SRP Report was approved and funded in 2012

4 Our Internal Process  Internal Principles Document  Cross-functional agreement on NWA process  Approved in February 2011  2 Review Cycles (below)  If NWA options are available, wires and NWAs are considered together Initial Review: Engineering Review capital project needs to determine potential for NWA Viable needs must: Have >$1M wires option budget Be unrelated to asset condition Have >= 3 year lead time Be <20% of total area’s load Secondary Review: Customer Org. Review shortlist from T&D for quantitative NWA potential Review should include assessment of: Customer base Load drivers Available technologies

5 Identified Need  Two Feeders out of Tiverton substation serving Tiverton & Little Compton  Forecasted to be overloaded starting in 2014  Potential for ~5,600 affected Customers: 80% Residential, 20% C&I  Wires solution – substation upgrade – will cost $2.9 million in 2014  Non-wires Goal: provide load relief starting in 2014, up to 1MW by 2017

6 Pilot Design – A Collaborative Approach  Project plan includes SRP and EE components  New technology, enhanced incentives, marketing and evaluation through SRP funding  Measures delivered through EnergyWise, the RI single family, residential audit program  Demand response events conducted through SRP funding  Benefit/cost analysis uses the Total Resource Cost model  Uses same avoided costs as the statewide programs  Added benefits associated with the DR events  Regional T&D deferral benefit is replaced with specific locational T&D deferral benefit as calculated as a revenue requirement for deferral years 2014 through 2017  Associated benefits/costs of the leveraged EE components included in BC but not claimed by SRP  Pilot must be cost effective over full six-year life, not in each year

2012 Components Wi-fi Thermostats for Central AC Units Higher Frequency of EE Audits DR Lighting Ballast (Commercial Only) 2013 Enhancements Wi-fi Thermostats and Smart Plugs for Window AC Units Energy Star Window AC Purchase Rebate AC Unit Recycle Rebate Increased, Direct Marketing Community Event 7 Technologies and Methods

Preliminary Results to Date YearParticipants Thermostats Installed Window AC Control Plugs Installed Estimated kWh Savings Estimated kW Savings Anticipated DR Savings (kW) Total Estimated kW , , Total ,  150kW load reduction needed in  This does not include savings from measures installed as a result of home energy audits completed in the area  180 customers in 2012  83 customers so far in 2013  Evaluation of pilot program will determine amount of resulting savings that are attributable to the pilot

Thank You!