Tempus “QUASYS” Dubrovnik, October 11-12, 2003. Harmonization with European Trends in Higher Education Prof. dr. Pero Lučin Vice-Rector University of Rijeka.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF- 18 MAY BOLOGNA PROCESS CARDIFF 18 MAY 2009 BACKGROUND - ERASMUS SORBONNE DECLARATION 1998 (FRANCE, GERMANY, ITALY, UK)
Advertisements

1 Bologna Shaping the Agenda Bologna today and tomorrow Lesley Wilson Secretary-General, European University Association.
Attractiveness of the HEIs in the EHEA An Introduction to WG 3 Pavel Zgaga University of Ljubljana Bologna Conference Fostering student mobility: next.
Bologna Process Stocktaking Conclusions and Recommendations Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers, Chair of Bologna Stocktaking WG 6th Bologna Ministerial Conference.
Developing Joint Masters Programmes for Europe: lessons from the EUA Joint Masters Project BFUG Workshop: Joint Degrees – Further Development Stockholm,
ENQA’S CONSULTATIVE MEMBERSHIP IN THE BFUG - WHAT DOES IT ENTAIL
1 BFUG meeting in Manchester, Oct Stocktaking introduction to discussion Andrejs Rauhvargers, Latvia.
1 Bologna Process Seminar Friday 12 May The Mobility Challenge Sorbonne Declaration, May 1998 “At both undergraduate and graduate level, students.
Quality and the Bologna Process Andrée Sursock Deputy Secretary General European University Association (EUA) EPC Annual Congress, March 2005, Brighton.
Ministry of Civil Affairs of Bosnia and Herzegovina The Framework for Higher Education Qualifications in Bosnia and Herzegovina Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Bologna Process and Quality Assurance
Prof. Dr. Andrä Wolter Permeability between Vocational Training and Higher Education New Opportunities for Non-traditional Students and Lifelong Learners.
COIMBRA GROUP ANNUAL CONFERENCE Anita Lehikoinen.
The participation of Polytechnics in the European Higher Education Area
Improving Institutional Quality in Europe: The role of the European University Association Kate Geddie, EUA Brussels Tor Vergata, 27 November 2003.
The challenge of accreditation in Europe Peter Cullen Head of research and policy analysis Higher education and training awards council IRELAND EFQM Education.
1 Education in Europe: Quality Enhancement and Setting Standards Dr Marie Donaghy Head of School of Health Sciences.
Bologna Process in Finland (Observations on the Bologna Process in Russia) Dr. Carita Blomqvist Head of Unit Recognition and international comparability.
The role of European standards and guidelines for the development of the national system of independent assessment of the quality of higher education Seidakhmetova.
The Bologna Process The UK HE Europe Unit Tish Bourke.
National Frameworks of Qualifications, and the UK Experience Dr Robin Humphrey Director of Research Postgraduate Training Faculty of Humanities and Social.
University of Zadar, Croatia. University of Zadar The University of Zadar is the youngest Croatian university in organisational sense (it was established.
Quality Assurance in the Bologna Process Fiona Crozier QAA
Conference on the Bologna Process: European Higher Education Policies and Reform Baku, April 2005 The Social Dimension of Higher Education in Europe-Current.
University Reforms in Europe: In search of the holy grail of quality April 13th, 2012 Astrid (Bassanini) Conference Rome Professor Geert Bouckaert Public.
Mobility Joint Degrees Bologna Promoters Seminar in Dubrovnik, 30 June 2005 Vera Stastna Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports.
TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH TEMPUS AND BOLOGNA PROCESS IN BIH BERGEN – LONDON PHASE Tempus Information Day, Sarajevo, June 7, 2006.
Joint Studies A New Way to Earn a Diploma Third Croatian Seminar on BP Dubrovnik, Juny 30 to July 2, 2005 Melita Kovačević.
The Structure and Role of QA Bodies at the University and faculty/department levels UNIVERSITY OF BELGRADE Serbia.
Bologna Process and Developments in the Netherlands, 9 May 2005 Robert Wagenaar Director of Undergraduate and Graduate Studies Faculty of Arts / Chair.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto ENQA Rogaska Slatina, 30 November 2007.
BFUG Work Program on QA Agenda Gayane Harutyunyan Astana, Kazakhstan Ensuring quality higher education is one of the most important.
Akkreditierungsrat The German System of Accreditation Franz Börsch Accreditation Council Office SYSTEM OBJECTIVES STANDARDS PROCEDURE.
University of Zagreb Aleksa Bjeliš Vice-rector for science and development 29 October 2004.
Update on Bologna process Current status of Quality Assurance Conference on self-evaluation July, Belgrade Lewis Purser.
The Bologna Process and the Syrian Context Dr. Ali Saud Hasan Prof. of Applied linguistics (ELT) Faculty of Education, Damascus university
Bologna Process Information Briefing Tbilisi, Georgia 22 July 2008  Cynthia Deane  Ireland (With thanks to Prof Andejs Rauhvergers, Chairman of Stocktaking.
ACE Opening Session 2002 News from the Recognition Field Lesley Wilson Secretary General European University Association (EUA)
Implementing the Bologna Process The Experience of Hungary Baku, 21 April 2005.
University of Novi Sad Quality, curricula, credit system short overwiew Radmila Marinkovic-Neducin
Improving the recognition system Prof. Andrejs Rauhvargers President, Lisbon Convention Committee.
1 Joint EAIE/NAFSA Symposium Amsterdam, March 2007 John E Reilly, Director UK Socrates-Erasmus Council.
1 FIRST STAGE OF THE HIGHER EDUCATION REFORM IN CROATIA – TASKS OF AUTHORISED BODIES.
Curriculum reform Tirana 16th-17th March. A bit about ESIB ESIB-the National Unions of students in Europe is an umbrella organization representing over.
Bologna Stocktaking Bologna Stocktaking for 2007 Andrejs Rauhvargers, Chair of Stocktaking WG.
An overview in slides. A: the intergovernmental process Step 1: Sorbonne Declaration 1998 Step 2: Bologna Declaration 1999 Step 3: Prague Communiqué 2001.
Prof. Dr. Mehmet Durman /27 RECENT DEVELOPMENTS ON QUALITY ASSURANCE IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TURKEY.
University autonomy and governance Baku Bologna Seminar - Current issues in the Bologna process Bastian Baumann, Baku, 26 May 2008.
The European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) More details in the site: Dr Michalis Glampedakis Professor Technological Institution (University)
Bologna Process in Croatia Melita Kovačević University of Zagreb Consortia Meeting of the Tempus Project UM-JEP Moving Ahead with the Bologna Process.
1 EAN CONFERENCE June 30 – July 2, 2008, Berlin. 2 „Challenges for Europe: European Higher Education in a Global Setting“ Barbara Weitgruber Austrian.
“Three Cycle System in the Framework of Bologna Process”, Summer School, Erevan, Armenia, 2008 The Three-Cycle System Algirdas Vaclovas Valiulis, Bologna.
Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area Tibor Szanto Vice-President, ENQA Ljubljana, 20 October 2009.
Bologna Declaration: Professional Education for Landscape Architects LE:NOTRE Spring Workshop, Budapest, DRAFT, Summary 1. Bologna.
Andy Gibbs Yerevan 2009 Winter School “Promoting European Dimension in Higher Education”
Sjur Bergan, Council of Europe Final Conference of the joint EU-CoE project “Strategic Development of Higher Education and Qualification Standards” Sarajevo,
Recognition issue in the Bologna Process: from London to Leuven/Louvain-la-Neuve Kevin Guillaume NARIC-French Community of Belgium DG non compulsory education.
Polish Norwegian Paths Katowice 17 – 18 June 2009 Sigrid Ag.
European Higher Education Area: focus from structures to better learning Head of Higher Education Unit Helka Kekäläinen, PhD.
Bologna Process - objectives and achievements Ms. Sirpa Moitus, FINEEC Mr. Kauko Hämäläinen Baku, 29 September 2015.
Mobility, Recognition, ECTS Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
1 Presentation 2 Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland. Ireland.
Tempus THE BOLOGNA PROCESS An overview in slides.
Bologna Promoters’ Presentation Material (to be adapted as needed)
The Bologna Process and Tuning Project: Educational Structures in Europe Dag Wiese Schartum.
African Union Perspectives
Senior project leader at CIEP Former President of ENQA
The Malta Qualifications Framework (MQF)
Quality assurance of higher education in the European Higher Education Area - developments and ways forward Paula Ranne, Deputy Director European Association.
Republic of Macedonia - Ministry of Education and Science
Presentation transcript:

Tempus “QUASYS” Dubrovnik, October 11-12, Harmonization with European Trends in Higher Education Prof. dr. Pero Lučin Vice-Rector University of Rijeka

Berlin Communique “Realising the European Higher Education Area” Communiqué of the Conference of Ministers responsible for Higher Education in Berlin on 19 September 2003 Law on Scientific Activity and Higher Education Adopted in Croatian Parliament 17 Jully 2003

Degree structure: Adoption of a system essentially based on two main cycles Ministers are pleased to note that, following their commitment in the Bologna Declaration to the two-cycle system, a comprehensive restructuring of the European landscape of higher education is now under way. All Ministers commit themselves to having started the implementation of the two cycle system by Ministers encourage the member States to elaborate a framework of comparable and compatible qualifications for their higher education systems, which should seek to describe qualifications in terms of workload, level, learning outcomes, competences and profile. They also undertake to elaborate an overarching framework of qualifications for the European Higher Education Area. Ministers stress their commitment to making higher education equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity, by every appropriate means. Three cycles: First – bacalaureus ( ECTS) Second – master ( ECTS) Third – doctoral (min. 3 years) First cycle degrees should give access to second cycle programmes. Second cycle degrees should give access to doctoral studies. Doctoral studies starting from the academic year 2004/2005. First and second cycle introduced by the academic year 2005/2006. Postgraduate specialist education – introduction of LLL. HE public good equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity. Qualification framework should be established. Three cycles: First – bacalaureus ( ECTS) Second – master ( ECTS) Third – doctoral (min. 3 years) First cycle degrees should give access to second cycle programmes. Second cycle degrees should give access to doctoral studies. Doctoral studies starting from the academic year 2004/2005. First and second cycle introduced by the academic year 2005/2006. Postgraduate specialist education – introduction of LLL. HE public good equally accessible to all, on the basis of capacity. Qualification framework should be established.

Establishment of a system of credits Ministers stress the important role played by the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) in facilitating student mobility and international curriculum development. They note that ECTS is increasingly becoming a generalised basis for the national credit systems. They encourage further progress with the goal that the ECTS becomes not only a transfer but also an accumulation system, to be applied consistently as it develops within the emerging European Higher Education Area. ECTS the only credit transfer system. Accumulation of ECTS credits within the first and the second cycle possible. ECTS credit accumulation may be required within the third cycle. Problem of credit accumulation in the context of LLL not yet solved. Transfer of ECTS credits between universities and non-university sector possible. ECTS the only credit transfer system. Accumulation of ECTS credits within the first and the second cycle possible. ECTS credit accumulation may be required within the third cycle. Problem of credit accumulation in the context of LLL not yet solved. Transfer of ECTS credits between universities and non-university sector possible.

Recognition of degrees: Adoption of a system of easily readable and comparable degrees Ministers underline the importance of the Lisbon Recognition Convention, which should be ratified by all countries participating in the Bologna Process, and call on the ENIC and NARIC networks along with the competent National Authorities to further the implementation of the Convention. They set the objective that every student graduating as from 2005 should receive the Diploma Supplement automatically and free of charge. It should be issued in a widely spoken European language. They appeal to institutions and employers to make full use of the Diploma Supplement, so as to take advantage of the improved transparency and flexibility of the higher education degree systems, for fostering employability and facilitating academic recognition for further studies. Lisabon Recognition Convention ratified in Croatian Parliament ENIC/NARIC network introduced by HE Law – establishment under way. Law on Recognition of Degrees and Qualification in parliamentary procedure. National Council for Higher Education identified as a competent body for implementation of Lisabon Convention. Diploma Supplement introduced by Law on HE – defined by Rectors Conference – now in the process of implementation. From Diploma Supplement will be available to all students in Croatian and one European languages, free of charge. Lisabon Recognition Convention ratified in Croatian Parliament ENIC/NARIC network introduced by HE Law – establishment under way. Law on Recognition of Degrees and Qualification in parliamentary procedure. National Council for Higher Education identified as a competent body for implementation of Lisabon Convention. Diploma Supplement introduced by Law on HE – defined by Rectors Conference – now in the process of implementation. From Diploma Supplement will be available to all students in Croatian and one European languages, free of charge.

Quality Assurance The quality of higher education has proven to be at the heart of the setting up of a European Higher Education Area... They also stress that consistent with the principle of institutional autonomy, the primary responsibility for quality assurance in higher education lies with each institution itself and this provides the basis for real accountability of the academic system within the national quality framework. Therefore, they agree that by 2005 national quality assurance systems should include: A definition of the responsibilities of the bodies and institutions involved. Evaluation of programmes or institutions, including internal assessment, external review, participation of students and the publication of results. A system of accreditation, certification or comparable procedures. International participation, co-operation and networking. At the European level, Ministers call upon ENQA through its members, in co-operation with the EUA, EURASHE and ESIB, to develop an agreed set of standards, procedures and guidelines on quality assurance, to explore ways of ensuring an adequate peer review system for quality assurance and/or accreditation agencies or bodies, and to report back through the Follow-up Group to Ministers in QA introduced by Law on HE – QA network. The primary responsibility lies within each institution. Project of QA network prepared and under implementation. - National Agency for Science and Higher Education – a core institution for QA network – cooperation with ENQA - University Centers for QA and development of quality culture Evaluation and accreditation body – National Council for Higher Education. Internal and external evaluation of institutions and programmes, includes international experts – implementation starts in the Student participation in QA network. QA introduced by Law on HE – QA network. The primary responsibility lies within each institution. Project of QA network prepared and under implementation. - National Agency for Science and Higher Education – a core institution for QA network – cooperation with ENQA - University Centers for QA and development of quality culture Evaluation and accreditation body – National Council for Higher Education. Internal and external evaluation of institutions and programmes, includes international experts – implementation starts in the Student participation in QA network.

Promotion of mobility Mobility of students and academic and administrative staff is the basis for establishing a European Higher Education Area. Ministers emphasise its importance for academic and cultural as well as political, social and economic spheres. They note with satisfaction that since their last meeting, mobility figures have increased, thanks also to the substantial support of the European Union programmes, and agree to undertake the necessary steps to improve the quality and coverage of statistical data on student mobility. They reaffirm their intention to make every effort to remove all obstacles to mobility within the European Higher Education Area. With a view to promoting student mobility, Ministers will take the necessary steps to enable the portability of national loans and grants. Mobility of students possible. All legal obstacles for student mobility are still not removed. Mobility of staff - policy issue of each institution. Portability of national loans and grants still extremely complicated – no clear grant system. Loan and grant system should be established. Financing of mobility – still policy issue. No access to EU mobility grants. No national mobility policy and grants. Mobility of students possible. All legal obstacles for student mobility are still not removed. Mobility of staff - policy issue of each institution. Portability of national loans and grants still extremely complicated – no clear grant system. Loan and grant system should be established. Financing of mobility – still policy issue. No access to EU mobility grants. No national mobility policy and grants.

Promotion of the European dimension in higher education Ministers note that, following their call in Prague, additional modules, courses and curricula with European content, orientation or organisation are being developed. They note that initiatives have been taken by Higher Education Institutions in various European countries to pool their academic resources and cultural traditions in order to promote the development of integrated study programmes and joint degrees at first, second and third level. Moreover, they stress the necessity of ensuring a substantial period of study abroad in joint degree programmes as well as proper provision for linguistic diversity and language learning, so that students may achieve their full potential for European identity, citizenship and employability. Ministers agree to engage at the national level to remove legal obstacles to the establishment and recognition of such degrees and to actively support the development and adequate quality assurance of integrated curricula leading to joint degrees. Lack o courses and Curricula with European content. Joint studies possible and introduced by the HE Law – but still lot of obstacles to be removed and number of issues to be solved (policy issue) Several joint studies with neighboring countries under preparation. Lack of joint studies within the national system (no policy measures to promote joint degrees). Lack of institutionally organized studies abroad – policy issue. Lack o courses and Curricula with European content. Joint studies possible and introduced by the HE Law – but still lot of obstacles to be removed and number of issues to be solved (policy issue) Several joint studies with neighboring countries under preparation. Lack of joint studies within the national system (no policy measures to promote joint degrees). Lack of institutionally organized studies abroad – policy issue.

Lifelong learning Ministers underline the important contribution of higher education in making lifelong learning a reality. They are taking steps to align their national policies to realise this goal and urge Higher Education Institutions and all concerned to enhance the possibilities for lifelong learning at higher education level including the recognition of prior learning. They emphasise that such action must be an integral part of higher education activity. Ministers furthermore call those working on qualifications frameworks for the European Higher Education Area to encompass the wide range of flexible learning paths, opportunities and techniques and to make appropriate use of the ECTS credits. They stress the need to improve opportunities for all citizens, in accordance with their aspirations and abilities, to follow the lifelong learning paths into and within higher education. Concept of LLL introduced by HE Law. Short studies of 60 to 120 ECTS credits leading to certificate, but not to degree. Postgraduate specialist studies at universities and non-university institutions, from 60 to 120 ECTS credits, leading to degree specialist (spec.). Modular structure of undergraduate and postgraduate education. Flexibility of learning paths should be build up by the national qualification framework and HE institutions. Concept of LLL introduced by HE Law. Short studies of 60 to 120 ECTS credits leading to certificate, but not to degree. Postgraduate specialist studies at universities and non-university institutions, from 60 to 120 ECTS credits, leading to degree specialist (spec.). Modular structure of undergraduate and postgraduate education. Flexibility of learning paths should be build up by the national qualification framework and HE institutions.

Stocktaking With a view to the goals set for 2010, it is expected that measures will be introduced to take stock of progress achieved in the Bologna Process. A mid-term stocktaking exercise would provide reliable information on how the Process is actually advancing and would offer the possibility to take corrective measures, if appropriate. Ministers charge the Follow-up Group with organizing a stocktaking process in time for their summit in 2005 and undertaking to prepare detailed reports on the progress and implementation of the intermediate priorities set for the next two years: quality assurance two-cycle system recognition of degrees and periods of studies Participating countries will, furthermore, be prepared to allow access to the necessary information for research on higher education relating to the objectives of the Bologna Process. Access to data banks on ongoing research and research results shall be facilitated – ECTS and Diploma supplement introduced – National Agency for Science and Higher Education – National Council for Higher Education and National Council for Science – Functional integration of universities (beginning of legal integration) – Lump-sum financing – QA network established – Evaluation system established – Accreditation procedure established – National ENIC/NARIC network – Third cycle established – First and second cycle established – ECTS fully established – Diploma Supplement fully in operation – Legal integration of universities – Binary system – ECTS and Diploma supplement introduced – National Agency for Science and Higher Education – National Council for Higher Education and National Council for Science – Functional integration of universities (beginning of legal integration) – Lump-sum financing – QA network established – Evaluation system established – Accreditation procedure established – National ENIC/NARIC network – Third cycle established – First and second cycle established – ECTS fully established – Diploma Supplement fully in operation – Legal integration of universities – Binary system.

Can we do that?