Earlier Diagnosis of Cancer Dean Harmse Carole Stoddard Madeleine Stephens.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Managing Your Staff.
Advertisements

Program Evaluation. Overview and Discussion of: Objectives of evaluation Process evaluation Outcome evaluation Indicators & Measures Small group discussions.
Leadership in Clinical Practice Quality of Care Rounds Improving Quality Programme and Ward Accreditations Deborah Carter Deputy Director of Nursing (Quality)
Lead Healthcare Scientist Personal Perspective. Introduction David Wells Lead Laboratory Manager and Lead Biomedical Scientist, Laboratory Medicine &
To eliminate unnecessary delays in the safe transfer of care of patients from acute therapy teams to community services by improving the quality of information.
SEPEP Emily, Emma, Steph, Maddi and Kiah. SEPEP only works if everyone works as a team and nobody is lazy or doesn’t give it their all. All of the team.
Productive Efficiency
Effective Principles for Student Engagement: Chapter B5 and how to use it Karl Hobley - Student Engagement Coordinator, QAA Partnership for Wales conference,
Delivering the 18 Weeks Referral to Treatment Time Standard Nicki McNaney Programme Director Access Support Team.
Self-Service Business Intelligence for the Product Management Department (Concurrency Corporation)
Ideas from UK modernisation: The Improvement Partnership for Hospitals Penny Pereira Ideas from UK modernisation.
CCG Assurance Framework Scorecard 2014/15 – Month 1 Sandra Iskander.
Supplier Development Kaizen Implementation Kit
Narrowing the achievement gap through curriculum development – probe 6 Natalia Buckler (CUREE) & Michael Jopling (University of Wolverhampton)
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
Specifically designed to engage, challenge & improve performance Hello we’re K2P Personal Potential.
Lean Fundamentals Hit the Target! People Power Provide your people with the Power!
Roles and Responsibilities QMS Infrastructure. All Rights Reserved, Juran Institute, Inc Performance System.v1 1.PPT Learning Objectives 1.Become.
How to Effectively Implement Set-up Reduction in Any Organization.
Macquarie University Library1 LAMS, e-learning & Information Literacy: possibilities & practicalities Margaret Wright, Macquarie University Heather Cooper,
TOOL KIT INTERNAL COMMUNICATION. PRESENTERS Faiza Ameer Husnain Yousuf Abeer Amin Atia Iqbal Hasan Aziz.
Leadership in the Financial Aid Profession Aaron Steffens MASFAA President-Elect
Identification, Analysis and Management
The Lean Sourcing Process
Welcome Maria Hegarty Equality Strategies Ltd. What ? Equality/Diversity Impact Assessment A series of steps you take that enable you to assess what you.
Develop your Leadership skills
1 By The End of The Workshop, Participants Will Be Able To:  Describe the PDQ methodology  Know when and how PDQ can be used to strengthen quality and.
ISE 428 Quality Professional Interview Mrs. Stacey Odom, Management Engineer at Northside Hospital Interviewed by Alexandra Blaha April 2014.
1 Workflow Optimization | Our assessment approach Respond to the Challenge | What will be your approach?
Engaging in Effective Performance Discussions June 6, 2013.
The Cedar Foundation Stephen Mathews – Chief Executive Stella Maguire – Head of Organisational and Service Development.
Initial Findings from Evaluation of Service Improvement Activity Dr Zoe Radnor Giovanni Bucci AtoZ Business Consultancy.
QI approach to EDL completion May 2012 Emma Vaux.
Long-term twinning seconding and young talents’ involvement for the improvement of land administration development projects Fredrik Zetterquist Managing.
© 1998 by Prentice-Hall Inc Russell/Taylor Oper Mgt 2/e Chapter 15 Lean Operations in Services and Support Functions.
Evaluation of the SEND Pathfinder Programme: Early Findings Graham Thom and Meera Prabhakar May 2012.
1 Fairview Health Services: A LEAN Case Study “Using Data to Make Decisions and Drive Quality and Results ” Institute for Quality in Laboratory Medicine.
Chapter Quality Network (CQN) Asthma Pilot Project Team Progress Presentation State Name: OREGON Practice Name: Doernbecher General Pediatrics Team Members:
The Health Roundtable Demand Escalation Planning Presenter: Karen Caldwell : Calvary Healthcare ACT Innovation Poster Session HRT1215 – Innovation Awards.
Ms Suzanne O’Boyle Project Manager NI Essence of Care Project.
BUILDING CAPACITY THROUGH PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP DR. SANDRA J. MOORE DR. ROBERT C. MCCRACKEN RADFORD UNIVERSITY COLLEGE.
NATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES COLLABORATIVE Report of Independent Evaluation Presentation – 7 th February 2012 NATIONAL MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES COLLABORATIVE.
LABORATORY MANAGEMENT The Administrative Process.
Releasing Time to Care. Why Releasing Time to Care? Fits with use of quality improvement methodology used for CQIs Uses ‘lean’ to improve processes and.
Project Management Workshop James Small. Goals Understand the nature of projects Understand why Project Management is important Get an idea of the key.
Transforming Patient Experience: The essential guide
© EXPRESSWORKS SharePoint Implementation & Adoption Challenges Laura Calaway.
FASA Middle School Principal ’ s Leadership Academy Don Griesheimer Laura Hassler Lang July 22, 2007.
Name of Project Agency(ies) involved
Insert organisational logo here on master slide What is PPI? (Public & Patient Involvement) Name Title Organisation Name.
Phase IV: Taking Action and Monitoring Implementation and Impact.
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
VALUES DASHBOARD NATIONAL WAITING TIMES CENTRE Developed their own Values Dashboard to measure if they are living their values from a staff, patient, visitor.
Sustaining Your Gains.  Up to 70% of change initiatives fail, impacting: › Best possible care › Staff and provider frustration › Reluctance to engage.
Overview Spectrum Health Systems Lincoln St OTP Reducing administrative discharges.
MIS.
Dan Austin 2004 COLLABORATIVE PROJECT PLANNING : Leveraging the Collective Wisdom of the Team Small problems are easy to fix, hard to detect. If you let.
Individual Placement & Support Project Dr Louise Thomson.
Improving access to CAMHS Applying LEAN within CAMHS Beverley Mack Bexley CAMHS.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Lies, Damned Lies & KPIs Part Deux Improving quality: Developing KPIs for Stage 0 & beyond 20 th September 2011 National Improvement Leads NHS Improvement.
WHY DO ORGANIZATIONS NEED TO COMMUNICATE?. WHY DO ORGANIZATION NEED TO COMMUNICATION INTERNALLY? IS IT IMPORTANT?
Creating Positive Culture through Leadership (Recovery Orientation) Jennifer Black.
IS&T Project Reviews September 9, Project Review Overview Facilitative approach that actively engages a number of key project staff and senior IS&T.
From Media to Influence Unions 21 Conference Tom Sandford Director, RCN England 18 March 2011.
Introduction to the Victorian state disability plan 2013–2016
Squamous cell carcinoma pathway update
Presentation transcript:

Earlier Diagnosis of Cancer Dean Harmse Carole Stoddard Madeleine Stephens

The Innovation  Based on Lean Principles  Green Stream, Yellow Stream, Red Stream  Established flow, reduced carve out and moved towards FIFO  Scheduling of tasks throughout the process  Collection of meaningful data and presentation of data in a useful format.

The Context of the Challenge  Backlog of > 500 unreported cases in the laboratory  Turnaround Times of more than 10 weeks  Delays in diagnosis of Cancer  Critical Incidents due to delayed cancer diagnosis

Patient M.E. -Male 64 yrs  Lesion on finger removed 12 Jan. 06  Reported 14 Mar. 06  Dx: MALIGNANT MELANOMA with infiltration of bone  9 WEEK DELAY IN DIAGNOSIS OF POTENTIALLY FATAL NEOPLASIA

Previous Strategies  Internal Reviews (including my own)  External Reviews  Focused on demand & capacity  Need for more staff  Never explored change in working practice.  Need to do More with Less

National Base Lines  RCPath. Key Performance Indicators % of cases reported within 7 days and 10 days  NHS Improvement % of cases reported in 3 days, 7 days and 10 days

Comparison to Standards TATNational Standard Local Baseline 3 Day50%15% 7 Day80% (biopsies) 38% 10 Day80% (all cases) 48%

The Change ‘The Hard Side’ - What we did - Maddie ‘The Soft Side’ – Team Engagement - Carole

The Hard Side The way things were……..  Historic prioritisation of consultant cut up in the laboratory (carve out)  Inefficient work output  ↑ Laboratory staff time spent on ↓ numbers of cases  Delay of many diagnostic biopsies and the aim of the Innovation

The Hard Side What we did………. Red Stream Very complex biopsies and large resections requiring a vast amount of technical work  Large numbers of blocks  Range of complex staining techniques

The Hard Side What we did………. Yellow Stream Small biopsies and excision specimens requiring a moderate amount of technical work  More than one block and/or levels

The Hard Side What we did………. Green Stream Small biopsies and excision specimens requiring little technical work  One block  One H&E slide This includes Basal Cell Carcinomas & Squamous Cell Carcinomas

The Hard Side What we did…… Cut up Green Streams highlighted and segregated Design of in-house digital template system to facilitate voice recognition reporting

The Hard Side What we did……….. Main Laboratory Green stream cases scheduled with designated members of laboratory and consultant staff nominated to deal with them  Technical target 9.15  Consultant target 12.00

The Hard Side Control Systems…… Visual control system for target day of reporting to achieve 7 day turnaround time First In First Out New Quality Control Procedure

Change Leaders taking the ‘soft’ side Working together to overcome the perception that it was counterintuitive to change what we had done for the last years

Change Leaders taking the ‘soft’ side Out performed to show that the target was achievable Whole Departmental Team participation in the change was instrumental in making the difference Maintained Open communication for feedback and fine tuning Encouraged Ownership rather than just Buy In

Communicating the Change

Communicating the Innovation

Change Leaders monitoring the change Technical Dashboards Set time targets Traffic light colour scheme Good for positive sense of achievement and increased work satisfaction

Change Leaders monitoring the change Weekly publishing of TATs to all staff & posted on Departmental Notice Board Good for morale and ownership of the effort

6 months on

The Results

Influence on 18 Week Wait Suspected Cancer Diagnosis

18 Week Cancer Breaches

Basal Cell Carcinoma

Delayed Diagnosis and Treatment

Improved BCC Reporting

Impact on Cost  Changes were cost neutral Human Resource : No additional staff employed Consumables : No additional use of consumables  The change was achieved despite: Cost saving measures in Trust (£1.54 M saving target for directorate) Loss of Staff: 1 x WTE Consultant Pathologist 2 x Biomedical Scientists 2 x Assistant Technical Officers 23% overall reduction in staffing level in terms of posts filled  We are doing More with Less

Potential for Spread  Moderately easy  Identification of work streams  Scheduling of work  Collection of meaningful data  Convincing people that the ‘traditional way’ of working is not always the best

Summary  Established flow through the laboratory by using Lean principles  Resulted in overall improvement of TAT  Dramatic improvement of TAT for patients on the 18WW Cancer pathway  The key to success was involvement of the whole departmental team at every level

The Team That Made It Happen!