Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Module N° 4 – ICAO SSP framework
Advertisements

The Department of Energy Enterprise Risk Management Model
PRESENTATION ON MONDAY 7 TH AUGUST, 2006 BY SUDHIR VARMA FCA; CIA(USA) FOR THE INSTITUTE OF INTERNAL AUDITORS – INDIA, DELHI CHAPTER.
Participation Requirements for a Patient Representative.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing Fiscal Estimate.
DR MACIEJ JUNKIERT PRACOWNIA BADAŃ NAD TRADYCJĄ EUROPEJSKĄ Guide for Applicants.
Participation Requirements for a Guideline Panel PGIN Representative.
Panel Discussion Safety Culture Richard Lagdon, Chief of Nuclear Safety, Office of the Under Secretary for Nuclear Security.
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
SAFA- IFAC Regional SMP Forum
Departmental Initiative to Enhance Activity-level Work Planning and Control DOE and DOE Contractors Industrial Hygiene Meeting in Conjunction with the.
Purpose of the Standards
Role of Independent Regulatory Body for Safe Operation of NPPs Zia Hussain Shah Director, Centre for Nuclear Safety Pakistan Nuclear Regulatory Authority.
Acceptable Means of Compliance & Alternative Means of Compliance Margit Markus Moossen Legal department 31 January 2013.
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
Work Planning & Control for “All” Activity Level Work Tim Flake Maintenance Advisor Washington Savannah River Company ISMS Work Shop November 28, 2007.
Safety Analysis Working Group FY2010 EFCOG Semi-Annual Meeting Brad Evans, Chair Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Rob McKeehan, Vice-Chair Oak Ridge.
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
NEI Issues & Current Events George Oliver June 22, th Annual RETS – REMP Workshop South Bend, Indiana.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
International Atomic Energy Agency Code of Conduct on the Safety and Security of Radioactive Sources Training Course on Technical Requirements to Fulfill.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Senior Regulators Meeting Technical Cooperation Programme Supporting Radiation Safety Infrastructure in Member.
FIRE PROTECTION TOPICS OF INTEREST Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
ISMS Best Practices Workshop Initial Steps to Integrate HPI into ISMS Continuous Improvement CH2M HILL Hanford Group, Inc. September 12-13, 2006.
Agency Drafts Statement of Scope Governor Approves Statement of Scope (2) No Agency Drafts: Special Report for rules impacting housing
Quality Assurance. Identified Benefits that the Core Skills Programme is expected to Deliver 1.Increased efficiency in the delivery of Core Skills Training.
1 Public Hearing to Consider Proposed Amendments to the Emission Inventory Criteria and Guidelines Regulation for the AB 2588 Air Toxics “Hot Spots” Program.
IAEA - Department of Nuclear Safety & Security
IAEA activities and documents related to CM C. Toth February 2007 Slide No. 1/ IAEA INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY IAEA activities and documents related.
School for Drafting Regulations on Radiation Safety Vienna, November 2012 Rules and responsibilities of the regulatory body Jiří Veselý, SONS, Czech republic.
HIT Policy Committee NHIN Workgroup Recommendations Phase 2 David Lansky, Chair Pacific Business Group on Health Danny Weitzner, Co-Chair Department of.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.1 Steps in the Licensing Process Geoff Vaughan University.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
New DOE Software Quality Assurance Requirements: Implications for Meteorological Software Cliff Glantz Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Departmental Initiative to Enhance Activity-level Work Planning and Control DOE and DOE Contractors Industrial Hygiene Meeting in Conjunction with the.
REGULATORY PERSPECTIVE ON USING OPERATIONAL EXPERIENCE Thomas E. Murley Former Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation USNRC Conference on Improving Nuclear.
Wholesale Market Rule Monitoring and Enforcement by the Public Utility Commission of Texas Danielle Jaussaud PUCT Wholesale Market Oversight March 23,
Medicaid Fee-for-Service: Prior Authorization Criteria & the Role of the DUR Board Charles Agte, Pharmacy Administrator Health Care Services June 19, 2013.
Responsible Care® Health & Safety Task Force – 06 H&S.
“Safety & Hope” Monitoring Success in the Texas Juvenile Justice System.
STATE AND LOCAL IMPLEMENTATION GRANT PROGRAM 1 December 6, 2012.
Integration of Safety into the Design Process Overview of DOE-STD-1189 Richard Black, Director Office of Nuclear & Facility Safety Policy.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency International Standards, Codes and Guidance for Radiation Safety Regulatory Infrastructure IAEA Advanced Regional.
1 October 2015 Daryl D. Green Oak Ridge Office of Environmental Management OREM 2015 Safety Culture Evaluation Results LESSONS LEARNED.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
P1. Overview of Objectives & Agenda of Technical Meeting
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Milestones in the development of a national infrastructure for nuclear power The Nuclear Security dimension Technical.
Monitoring the Long-Term Effectiveness of Integrated Safety Management System (ISMS) Implementation Through Use of a Performance Dash Board Process Mike.
PRESENTED TO: ENERGY FACILITY CONTRACTORS GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKING GROUP SAFETY ANALYSIS WORKSHOP BY: CHRIS CHAVES NSR&D PROGRAM OFFICE OF NUCLEAR.
Milestones for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development Establishment of A Regulatory Framework Gustavo Caruso, Section Head, Regulatory Activities Section.
0 Software Quality Assurance Implementation Plan Briefing to the Board June 20, 2003.
Qualification & Training of Work Planners Steven K. Little Work Control Department Manager.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
OSHA Safety and Health Program Management Guidelines
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Development of the Basis Document for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards and Public Exposure to Radon Trevor Boal Radiation Protection Unit - NSRW.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Making Programs Make more Systematic use of Evaluations and
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
DOE Nuclear Safety Research and Development Program
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Overview – Guide to Developing Safety Improvement Plan
Research and Test Reactor Safety: The Regulatory Perspective
Leadership and Management for Safety
Presentation transcript:

Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board DNFSB Staff Perspective on Changes to DOE Directives and Standards Jeffrey L. Shackelford

§ 2286a. Functions of the Board. [Atomic Energy Act, Sec. 312] The Board has a statutory requirement to review and evaluate the content and implementation of Directives and Standards at Defense Nuclear Facilities Enabling Statute of the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board (42 U.S.C. § 2286) § 2286a. Functions of the Board. [Atomic Energy Act, Sec. 312] (a) In general. The Board shall perform the following functions: (1) Review and evaluation of standards. The Board shall review and evaluate the content and implementation of the standards relating to the design, construction, operation, and decommissioning of defense nuclear facilities of the Department of Energy (including all applicable Department of Energy orders, regulations, and requirements) at each Department of Energy defense nuclear facility. The Board shall recommend to the Secretary of Energy those specific measures that should be adopted to ensure that public health and safety are adequately protected. The Board shall include in its recommendations necessary changes in the content and implementation of such standards, as well as matters on which additional data or additional research is needed.

Orders of Interest to the Board Board Recommendations Specifically Related to DOE Directives and Standards 1990-2, Codes and Standards 1991-1, Safety Standards Program 1993-1, Standards Utilization in Defense Nuclear Facilities 1994-5, Integration of DOE Safety Rules Orders, and Other Requirements Other Board Recommendations and Letters Have Resulted in the Development of or Significant Revisions to DOE Directives and Standards DOE Standard 1186, Specific Administrative Controls DOE Standard 1189, Integration of Safety Into the Design Process Recommendation 2009-1, Risk Assessment Methodologies at Defense Nuclear Facilities DOE Guide 424.1-1B, Implementation Guide for Use in Addressing Unreviewed Safety Question Requirements 2010-1, Safety Analysis Requirements for Defining Adequate Protection for the Public and Workers And Many Others…. Orders of Interest to the Board http://www.dnfsb.gov/board-activities/doe-orders-of-interest

Staff Directives Review Process DOE Coordination with Staff Directives Lead Lead Reviewer and Subject Matter Experts Assigned Management Review Staff Communication and Resolution of Comments Case Study - DOE Standard 3009 Broad Staff Distribution and 16 Active Reviewers Senior Staff and Subject Area Experts 181 Substantive Comments and Concerns Relaxation of current expectations for protection of the workers Crediting of self protective actions for worker protection in lieu of controls Relaxation of fundamental safety principles such as defense-in-depth and hierarchy of controls

Beyond Design Basis Events Staff Comment on the Proposed Revision to DOE Standard 3009 [Comment] Very little useful guidance is provided relative to BDBEs. This lack of definitive expectations and guidance is likely to lead to a minimization of meaningful effort in this important area. DOE’s recent commitments to study and address BDBEs implied that there would likely be the need for meaningful improvements in the safety posture at a number of facilities. The lack of forceful guidance is unlikely to foster any such improvements. [Suggestion] Expand the guidance on the need for a systematic evaluation of BDBEs. Further, articulate an expectation that for certain BDBEs, cost effective controls should be identified to provide an additional margin of safety beyond that which is formally established by credited controls.

Discussion DNFSB Contact Jeffrey L. Shackelford Jeffs@dnfsb.gov 202-694-7122