Governor Response Sequence Bob Green Garland Power and Light ERCOT Future AS Workshop January 20, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Spinning Reserve from Load Consideration of a Trial at Xcel Energys Cabin Creek Station Presentation to CMOPS January 7, 2005 John Kueck ORNL Brendan Kirby.
Advertisements

Electrical Engineering Department
1 FREQUENCY CONTROL -- Bhanu Bhushan -- (April, 2011)
Ancillary Services and SCED Jeff Gilbertson Market Analyst Congestion Management Working Group 9/4/2013.
Bob Green Garland Power and Light
FREQUENCY CONTROL DURING BLACK START OPERATIONS
POWER GRID CORPORATION OF INDIA LIMITED Presentation on ‘FREE GOVERNOR OPERATION” By D.K.Guru & S.P.Barnwal.
Announcements Be reading Chapter 6, also Chapter 2.4 (Network Equations). HW 5 is 2.38, 6.9, 6.18, 6.30, 6.34, 6.38; do by October 6 but does not need.
Active Power and Frequency Control
Rudolf Wieser, Matthias Baechle, Valerijs Knazkins – ATPE
PRESENTATION FREQUENCY CONTROL
ANCILLARY SERVICES THE NEXT STEP IN MARKET GRANULARISATION.
MICRO HYDROELECTRIC POWER PLANT WITH CHAIN TURBINE
Frequency Control Turbine Governor Droop NERC Requirement
Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering Generating Electricity.
1 © Alexis Kwasinski, 2012 Introduction Field Excitation Q Synchronous generators Input: Mechanical power applied to the rotor shaft Field excitation to.
Costs of Ancillary Services & Congestion Management Fedor Opadchiy Deputy Chairman of the Board.
Introduction to Transient Stability Starrett Mini-Lecture #1.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Adding Incremental Flexibility to the Pacific Northwest Power System? Maury Galbraith Northwest Power.
Market Based Solutions for Demand Response Providers Today and the Future Alice Jackson Occidental Energy Ventures Corp.
PDCWG Report to ROS August 12, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
1 U.S. Energy Information Administration, Annual Energy Review All energy input US average = 90.3 MWh per person, per year. Corresponds to 10.3 kW.
Demand Side Working Group Load Resource Performance Subgroup April 9, 2010 Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America.
BAL-001-TRE-1 Primary Frequency Response in the ERCOT Region
Comparison of Governor Deadband & Droop Settings of a Single 600 MW Unit A Hz Deadband with a Straight Line Proportional 5% Droop Curve Compared.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
Effect of generation loss and Frequency Response Characteristics (FRC) on tie-line flow to Southern Region under various scenarios and Target setting for.
1 TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OVERVIEW NETWORK OPERATING COMMITTEE April 17, 2007 New Mexico Transmission System Overview.
1 Welcome to Load Participation Orientation Elev MenWomen Phones Info Presentation and other Load Participation information will be posted at:
Frequency Response Standard. ERCOT Governor Droop.
FREQUENCY CONTROL AND AUTOMATIC GENERATION CONTROL
Lead from the front Texas Nodal 1 Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 Release 6 - Handbook EDS 3 Release 6 MP Planning.
WGR Ramp Rate in Nodal: “As High as Possible” Mike Grimes for QMWG Meeting 10 August 2009.
Overview of Revised Ancillary Services (AS) Framework Proposal
GENERATION PROTOCOL AND SETTLEMENT TODAY COMET WG / RMS Workshop Electric Reliability Council of Texas May 2, 2007.
Managing Reliability and the Markets with PI
1 PDCWG Report to ROS October 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Congestion Management and Ramp Rate for Delivering Ancillary Services Resmi Surendran.
Graph Trend Definitions Telemetered SCE: Sum of all QSE’s Telemetered SCE (uses “Left” scale). Regulation Deployed: Sum of all Regulation Ancillary Service.
October Project Release (NPRRs 710, 706, 698 and 595) ERCOT Operations & Market Operations WebEx Training October XX, 2015.
Operational Issues & Risks ERCOT Operations Planning August 22, 2008.
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 14: Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
FREQUENCY-POWER CHARACTERISTICS OF SYNCHRONOUS GENERATOR
1 Presentation MIT November 14, 2011 Metering Issues Taskforce (MIT) Elimination of Time Error Correction Potential Impact on Wholesale Settlements.
-- Bhanu Bhushan -- < > (August, 2011)
Floyd Trefny, P.E. Director of Wholesale Market Design Nodal Market Tools to Manage Wind Generation January 29, 2009 Presentation to the Renewables Technology.
GENERAL BACKGROUND AND SPEED GOVERNORS
BAL-001-TRE-01 ERCOT CPS2 R2 Waiver Regional Variance April 16, 2009 Sydney Niemeyer.
PDCWG Report to ROS Sydney Niemeyer Chair NRG Energy Don Blackburn Vice Chair Luminant Energy.
Texas Nodal © Electric Reliability Council of Texas, Inc. All rights reserved. 1 Load Frequency Control (LFC) Business Requirements Energy.
PDCWG Report to ROS March 11, 2010 Sydney Niemeyer.
Improving Primary Frequency Response Bob Green PDCWG August 3, 2011.
Responsive Reserve Service Deliverability Review September 15,
PDCWG Report to ROS January 13, 2011 Sydney Niemeyer.
Synchronous Inertial Response
Restoration Concepts PEAK RC Training Classification: Confidential Version No.: 1.5 Date of Document: Document Owner/Author: B Pederson Classification:
Real Time Balancing (RTB) & Resource Plan Statuses Change to the QSE practice of showing offline units as online and available ERCOT Presentation to ROS.
07/27/2006 Overview of Replacement Reserve Procurement ERCOT Staff PRS RPRS Task Force.
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability
ECE 576 – Power System Dynamics and Stability Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
SMJE 2103 Synchronous Generator. Scope of discussion 1)Construction 2)Rotation speed 3)Generated voltage 4)Equivalent circuit 5)Power and Torque 6)Testing.
1 10. BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN ANCILLARY SERVICE MARKETS Asko Vuorinen.
7. FREQUENCY CONTROL AND REGULATING RESERVES
Current FRRS Language & Explanation of Posted Data
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Texas Nodal Load Frequency Control (LFC) EDS 3 R6
Sarath Chandrasiri / EPD / MEW DYNAMIC RESPONSE OF GAS TURBINES PRESENTED BY: THE DIRECTORATE OF ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION  K. A. CHANDRASIRI.
Automatic Generation Control (AGC)
ECEN 460 Power System Operation and Control
Svetlana Rybina, Lauri Holopainen
Presentation transcript:

Governor Response Sequence Bob Green Garland Power and Light ERCOT Future AS Workshop January 20, 2014

You get the idea: if the power generated exceeds the load, frequency rises. If the generator power is less than the total loads, frequency declines

Governor Response Issues Traditional training simplifies the reason for frequency deviations from 60HZ. See “You get the idea” on the previous slide. In reality, power generated always equals the load. This training module describes what actually causes frequency deviations: mechanical power into a turbine not being equal to the electrical power output of the connected generator. The trip of a large generator is used to illustrate the process.

Voltage Regulator Armature Turbine Valves Energy Source Boiler Reactor Penstock Field Auxiliary Load Transient Reactance Gross Metering Step – Up Transform er To Load Net Metering Governor Response Schematic Governor

Loss of Generation - 1 In response to a unit trip, each real generator in the interconnected system increases their MW output in proportion to their electrical distance from where the generator tripped. The rotating kinetic energy in each tandem turbine-generator assembly supports the increased instantaneous power output. With power output greater than the power input, shaft speed [frequency] decreases.

Torque and Inertial Energy Steam input hits turbine blades creating torque that increases rotational speed of the T-G which in turn increases the kinetic (inertial) energy. When the electrical torque is greater than mechanical torque, the rotation slows extracting stored inertial energy from the mass.

Loss of Generation - 2 The governors sense the slower speed and open valves between the mechanical energy sources [boiler, etc.] and the turbine to balance the generator mechanical input with the electrical output. When the mechanical input equals the increased electrical output, the frequency stop decreasing [this is called the C point]. The frequency increases as the kinetic energy is replaced and settles at a new steady state frequency value [this is called the B point].

Loss of Generation - 3 The transition from the initial steady-state frequency [the B point] to restoring frequency to the scheduled value normally consists of sustained power plant control and control from the center control [AGC/LFC]. 1.Plant controllers need to recognize the higher desired output [MW] due to low frequency. 2.Control Centers need to send AGC signals to increase the governor set-points and restore frequency to schedule [usually 60 HZ].

Loss of Generation - 4 Traditional Control Areas and the ERCOT Zonal Market typically started sending LFC control within 10 seconds of a unit trip. – Control Areas responded to a steady ACE value. – ERCOT Zonal QSEs responded to a Responsive Reserve deployment. ERCOT Nodal sends RegUp deployments to QSEs but waits approximately 60 seconds for SCED to calculate new Base Points utilizing capacity released by RRS deployments.

Loss of Generation - 5

Closing Misunderstandings Frequency Nadir is where the total transient mechanical turbine input equals the total electrical generator output [not the system load]. Slope of the dark green line is also influenced by whether the generator trips [steep slope] or if the turbine trips [generator stays connected to the grid for several seconds]. Settling Frequency is where the governors have driven the steady-state mechanical turbine input equal to the electrical generator output.

Review of Frequency Control Steps 1.Electrical/mechanical energy imbalance caused by a change in load or change in generation 2.Turbine-generator shaft speeds [frequency] increase or decrease 3.Initial governor response due to the resulting change in frequency 4.Stabilizing frequency at new steady-state value 5.Restoring scheduled frequency [and interchange] using Automatic Generation Control 6.Preparing for next imbalance

Primary versus Secondary Frequency Control

After Governor Response to 7 MW of Load Added

After AGC Secondary Frequency Control

Primary ControlSecondary or Supplementary Control Common NameGovernor Control/ResponseAGC Control/Response Function-GenericHolds the system together as load changes occur and also as un-commanded generation excursions occur Shifts generation between units to achieve security and economic objectives plus restores frequency to the rated value. Function-TechnicalProvides the correct amount of mechanical input to turbines to match the electrical output of the corresponding generators Changes the 60HZ governor set-points of the units to achieve scheduled values established by the market. Control InputFrequency/rotational speed of the turbineIn ERCOT, the SCE for the portfolio of units Control Time ConstantFast - SecondsSlower - Tens of seconds and minutes Style of ControlLocal within the Units/PGCs—A QSE has no direct control over governor response. Centralized from ERCOT to Units via QSEs Performance Optimization Having more governors on-line (with a given droop characteristic) will minimize the magnitude of frequency deviations Having more units being controlled by AGC will minimize the duration of frequency deviations Key ParametersSteady state speed characteristic (droop), governor dead-band, first stage boiler pressure (steam units) and head (hydro units) Base power schedule plus deployments of balancing energy, regulation energy, responsive and non-spinning reserve. AGC dead-band, gains and frequency bias term. Market CharacteristicsIf there ever is a governor response market, there will probably be bids, awards and settlement, but the market will never deploy the governor response. Bids, awards, deployments and settlement through the Ancillary Service Market. Performance monitoring of individual Services is approximate and complicated. Disturbance TimelineInitial governor response (to point B) is over completely by the time units start receiving secondary control signals in response to the disturbance. There needs to be recognition of governor response and coordination between RRS and RegUp deployments to insure smooth, rapid and sustained frequency recovery.