Scott’s Proposal for Phosphorous Reduction in Fertilizers Prepared by Heidi Bonnaffon WRTC Meeting May 11, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Promoting Watershed-Based Stormwater Management for Linear Projects through the Green Highways Partnership Patrick Jeffers, U.S. Environmental Protection.
Advertisements

Department of Environmental Quality Environmental Management System Overview.
Northeast Wisconsin Stormwater ConsortiumNortheast Wisconsin Stormwater Consortium “Green Hair Guy Phosphorus Education Campaign”
The Effect of the Changing Dynamics of the Conowingo Dam on the Chesapeake Bay Mukhtar Ibrahim and Karl Berger, COG staff Water Resources Technical Committee.
Members: Patrick Lawrence (chair), Geography and Planning Kevin Egan, Economics Ken Kilbert, Law/Legal Institute of the Great Lakes Neil Reid, Urban Affairs.
It’s all in the outputs: Choosing partners for successful NPS pollution reduction in an urban watershed St. Albans, Vermont Karen Bates, Vt. Agency of.
Chesapeake Bay Restoration An EPA Perspective Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
1 Evolution of the Scotts Turf Builder Line University Recommendations for Growing Lawns: 3 to 5 lbs N 1 lb P 2 O 5 2 lbs K 2 O per year Apply ~ 1 lb N/application.
Chesapeake Bay and New York State Water Quality and the Potential for Future Regulations Presented by the Upper Susquehanna Coalition.
FUNDING FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STATEWIDE LAND COVER DATA Jennifer Tribo, Senior Water Resources Planner Hampton Roads Planning District Commission VGIN Advisory.
Lessons from Chesapeake Bay Restoration Efforts Understanding the role of nutrient reduction activities in improving water quality.
2013 Annual Strategic Action Plan Evaluation. Overview Background Role of SAP Implementation Evaluation process Council feedback Enhancement of SAP.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
Chesapeake Bay Program Partnership’s Basinwide BMP Verification Framework Briefing CBP Partnership’s Communications Workgroup July 10, 2014.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report OVERVIEW Joan Rohlfs, Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments October.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Bowie City Council Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
Laila Racevskis 1, Tatiana Borisova 1, and Jennison Kipp 2 1 Assistant Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida 2 Resource.
Options for CBP Agreement and EC Membership For Principals’ Staff Committee Consideration March, 2013.
Trust for a Clean Water Economy Rappahannock Watershed A Systems Approach to Bay Restoration Presentation to the Virginia Water Commission January.
National Capital Region Climate Change Report Presentation for the Potomac Watershed Roundtable Stuart A. Freudberg Director, Environmental Programs Metropolitan.
Climate Change Steering Committee’s Draft Climate Change Report September 5, 2008 Joan Rohlfs Chief, Air Quality Planning Metropolitan Washington Council.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 30, 2010.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
VIRGINIA SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICTS ANNUAL MEETING DECEMBER 9, 2013 Richard Street Tri-county & City SWCD Fredericksburg VA.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee January 8, 2009 Briefing to the Water Resources Technical.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
The Chesapeake Bay Program February 16, 2006 How the Bay Program Affects the COG Region Briefing for Loudoun County Supervisor Sally Kurtz Credit for several.
Lee County Fertilizer Ordinance No Why is there an ordinance? Protect the quality of our coastal waters Prevent excess nutrients from entering.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Karl Berger Dept. of Environmental Programs Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments COG Bay Policy Committee Some Recent Developments.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Non-agricultural regional fertilizer application Tampa Bay Region Model Ordinance Non-agricultural regional fertilizer application Tampa Bay Region Model.
Oliver Avramoski Lake Ohrid Conservation Project MANAGEMENT OF NON-POINT SOURCES OF POLLUTION IN THE REGION OF OHRID AND THE PRESPA LAKES AN ECOSYSTEM.
Impact Marketing For Small Contractors. 7 Tips to Impact Marketing #1 – Assess Your Current Marketing Efforts #2 – Assess Your Market Potential #3 – Research.
Chesapeake Bay Initiatives in The State of the Bay has been in decline over the past 30 years. The major problem is non-point pollution, which cannot.
1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.
Caroline County Pilot Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Katheleen Freeman, AICP, Director Caroline County Department of Planning & Codes Leslie Grunden,
OVERVIEW: CHESAPEAKE BAY PROGRAM DEVELOPMENTS AND WATER & CLIMATE CHANGE ACTIVITIES Water Resources Technical Committee Oct. 29, 2015 Presented by Tanya.
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments Briefing to the Water Resources Technical Committee October 9, 2009 (revised) Briefing to the Water Resources.
Abridged Chesapeake Bay Agreement: Initial Reactions WRTC September 6, 2013.
Draft Stormwater Proposal Home Builders Association of Virginia Richmond, Virginia June 29, 2009.
JULIE MAWHORTER MID-ATLANTIC URBAN & COMMUNITY FORESTRY COORDINATOR CHESAPEAKE TREE CANOPY STRATEGY & WORKPLAN UPDATE CITIZEN’S ADVISORY.
Presented by: Brenton McCloskey, MD DNR Associate Director for Restoration Financing and Policy Watershed Restoration in Maryland Helping Advance Restoration.
Request approval to proceed to EMC with 2014 Tar-Pamlico River Basin Plan.
Integrated Approach for Assessing and Communicating Progress toward the Chesapeake Bay Water-Quality Standards Scott Phillips USGS, STAR May 14, 2012 PSC.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Meeting March 17, 2011 Virginia Phase II Watershed Implementation Plan (WIP) Approach.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
The Chesapeake Bay: How is it Doing? An Overview of The Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
3. Background Resolution No Adopted February 26, 2008 Sausalito joins ICLEI – Local Governments for Sustainability.  City pledged to take a leadership.
MISSION: Be the economic engine for the eastern shore of Maryland by graduating students who are college and career ready. Contact:
Chesapeake bay program: Funding & Bay TMDL Midpoint Assessment
Update on Chesapeake Bay Program Developments
Operation Shop Supervisor
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
2025 Chesapeake Bay Climate Change Load Projections
Chesapeake Bay Program Principals’ Staff Committee December 20, 2017
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Jim Edward Acting Director Chesapeake Bay Program Office May 23,2018 EPA’s Draft Final Phase III WIP Expectations.
Chesapeake Bay Program Climate Change Modeling 2
CBP Organizational Structure
Expectations for Federal Agencies in Support if Chesapeake WIPs/TMDL
City Council February 4, 2019 Item No. 2
Leadership Centre County
Presentation transcript:

Scott’s Proposal for Phosphorous Reduction in Fertilizers Prepared by Heidi Bonnaffon WRTC Meeting May 11, 2006

Background  The Chesapeake Bay Program’s Nutrient Subcommittee (NSC),  Businesses for the Bay, and  the CSREES/Land Grant University Mid Atlantic Water Quality Program (MAWQP) have worked with Scotts for ~ 2 years to reduce nutrient loss from “do it yourself” (DIY) lawn fertilizer application.

Background on Fertilizer Loads  Urban nonpoint sources and account for ~1/4 phosphorus reaching the Bay ~1/8 nitrogen reaching the Bay  Retrofitting urban storm water is costly and new growth is increasing urban loads  Targeting fertilizers may be the most efficient way to address urban non-point pollution.

Home Lawn Care Number of Home Lawns (millions)

Home Lawn Care – 2 Total Number of Applications (millions)

National Bag Sales: 35 million Avg. # Applications: 1.8 per year Unit Sales by State: Maryland million bags Virginia million bags

Scotts Proposal  The Scotts Miracle Gro Co. has discussed with the CBP plans to reduce the P in its commercial lawn products 50% by  Scotts expects other major fertilizer companies to change their formulas as a result of market pressure.  Over time, Scotts plans to address N reduction in their fertilizers.  Could equate ~1 million Ibs/year P reduction in lawn applications in the Chesapeake Bay watershed.

NSC Recommendations to Principal Staff Committee  Chesapeake Bay Program should enter into an agreement with the “Do It Yourself” (DIY) lawn fertilizer industry, led by The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company, to: 1. endorse a 50% reduction in phosphorus in their bagged DIY fertilizer lines 2. initiate discussions on nitrogen content and form in DIY lawn fertilizers 3. work with the DIY lawn fertilizer industry and major retail outlets to educate the public at the point of sale on proper methods of fertilizer application.

Next Steps for CBP  Charge the Implementation Committee, through a cooperative effort of the NSC, B4B, MAWQP and Scotts/RISE, with drafting the proposed agreement and the point of sale education program.  Campaign will be unveiled at the Executive Council Meeting, with roll out at retail outlets Spring  It is further recommended that The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company be recognized at the Executive Council for their proactive leadership in this effort.

Potential Roles for COG The Scotts Miracle-Gro Company is also interested in ways to partner with local governments. Representatives of Scott’s will brief COG’s Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee at its May 19 meeting.

Recommended Actions for CBPC Sign an agreement between industry and COG member governments pledging to work together to minimize potential for pollution. Local governments could conduct outreach/education that Scotts and the rest of the commercial lawn care industry have researched and are advocating.  NVRC Radio ad campaign vehicle or individually by local governments.

Recommended Actions for CBPC Demonstrate the use of reduced P fertilizers on county- owned or city-owned properties, and possibly other lawns with high-visibility.  As part of demonstration projects or other activities, conduct research into the water quality impacts of following innovative lawn care practices.  Universities with demo plots showing lawn care and nutrient reduction results of lower P (lower N) Potentially arrange industry training courses for county and city employees (or their contractors) on how to correctly apply fertilizers. Others?

Comments…. Questions?