1 Proposed ENERGY STAR Specifications for Computer Monitors Craig W. Hershberg ENERGY STAR Office Equipment and Consumer Electronics www.energystar.gov.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimating Key Parameters for the Retail Plug-Load Portfolio (RPP) Program: Recommended Methodological Approaches EM&V, Residential Programs, Products.
Advertisements

Step Up Payback Proposal Program “How-To” 9/4/07.
Energy Star and Government Purchasing Craig Hershberg, EPA Jeff Harris, LBNL Power Supplies Workshop San Francisco, CA January 14, 2002.
System Design System Design - Mr. Ahmad Al-Ghoul System Analysis and Design.
Power Mode Definitions and User Interfaces US TAG - TC 108 / October 4, 2002 Bruce Nordman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
1 E NERGY S TAR ® Monitor Industry Meeting April 29, 2002 San Francisco, CA Craig Hershberg US EPA
Specification Development Process Update. A Bit of Background….. TV / VCR specification revision (6/01- 6/02) June meeting: EIA, ITI, NEMA and EPA –discuss.
By: Paul Yao, Principal, Enovative Energy Solutions
ENERGY STAR Computer Monitor Test Methodology Craig Hershberg US EPA
ENERGY STAR ®. Earning the ENERGY STAR ® means a product meets strict energy efficiency guidelines set by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the.
Copyright © 2007 Heathkit Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved PC Fundamentals Presentation 40 – Displays and Resolution.
Key Questions Behind Ecos Consulting’s Power Supply Research How many power supplies are out there? What does it mean for a power supply to be energy efficient?
Energy Audit- a small introduction A presentation by Pune Power Development Pvt. Ltd.
Examining Display Devices Computer Concepts Unit B.
1 CCTV SYSTEMS CCTV MONITORS. 2 CCTV SYSTEMS A monitor simply allows remote viewing of cameras in a CCTV system from a control room or other location.
 A monitor or display is an electronic visual display for computers.  The monitor consists of : o the display device o circuitry o enclosure The display.
Monitor. The Basics Often referred to as a monitor when packaged in a separate case, the display is the most-used output device on a computer. The display.
Specification Discussion
Chapter 22 Alternating-Current Circuits and Machines.
Rachel Weaver Program Manager Maryland Energy Administration
Next-Generation Power Management User Interface for Office Equipment Power Management Controls Bruce Nordman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Enabling High Efficiency Power Supplies for Servers : Update on industry, government and utility initiatives Brian Griffith System Power Architect Intel.
© Copyright 2012 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice. HP EliteDisplay Series.
Color Theory in Web Design Web Design – Sec 2-2. Objectives  The student will: –Have a better understanding of effective use of color on the web. –Be.
22 April 2004Energy Star Conference1 of 27 EC ENERGY STAR ® The Way Forward Conference Frankfurt 22 April 2004.
Output Thomas W. Davis. What is Output? Output it data that has been processed into a useful form Output includes: Monitors Printers Speakers Etc.
Overview of Draft 2 (Version 4.0) ENERGY STAR Specification for Computer Monitors Craig Hershberg US EPA
Speaker Notes for employee discussions on how Canada Post is getting greener – August 2008 The Issues Canada Post needs to upgrade its current printer.
Power Supply Workshop Craig W. Hershberg ENERGY STAR Office Equipment & Consumer Electronics US EPA January 14, 2002 San Francisco, California
Landscape for Deemed Lighting Workpapers Building Code and Voluntary Program Relationship Building Code Changes Driven by Big Vision Voluntary Program.
Software Estimation and Function Point Analysis Presented by Craig Myers MBA 731 November 12, 2007.
Chapter 6 : Software Metrics
INTERNATIONAL ENERGY AGENCY AGENCE INTERNATIONALE DE L’ENERGIE Reducing Standby Power to 1 Watt (and less) Alan Meier International Energy Agency
Active Mode Discussion Chris Calwell Ecos Consulting.
B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Smart Power Strips in Commercial Office Applications RTF October 4, 2011.
Power Management Controls E NERGY S TAR Monitor MOU, v3 Introduce Active Power Criterion –watts ≤ * megapixels Reduce / Consolidate Sleep (≤ 4.
E NERGY S TAR ® Refrigerated Beverage Vending Machine Industry Meeting Rachel Schmeltz, US EPA Georgia World Congress Center October 22, 2002.
1 ENERGY STAR ® Context ENERGY STAR program is voluntary; co-managed by EPA & DOE Specifications initially target the most energy efficient 25% of available.
Improved and Standard User Interface for Power Management Bruce Nordman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Prof R T KennedyEMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING 1 EET 422 EMC & COMPLIANCE ENGINEERING.
Chapter 14 Global Production, Outsourcing and Logistics 1.
PAGE 1 Sustainable Buildings 2030 © 2008 THE WEIDT GROUP Building Energy Benchmarks THE WEIDT GROUP.
E NERGY S TAR ® Preliminary Draft Specification for Vending Machines October 22, 2002 Rachel Schmeltz, EPA
Color Theory in Web Design Web Design – Sec 2-2. Objectives  The student will: –Have a better understanding of effective use of color on the web. –Be.
Chapter 13: Software Quality Project Management Afnan Albahli.
1 Energy star policies and actions – dena´s view Stephan Kolb Energy Star conference Frankfurt April 22, 2004.
Output Hardware Monitors  Basic Terms:  – smallest element that can be changed independently on a  – number of on a screen  The more the better the.
Estimating “Size” of Software There are many ways to estimate the volume or size of software. ( understanding requirements is key to this activity ) –We.
Copyright 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chapter 3 Monitoring and Controlling the Transformation System.
Human Computer Interface INT211
1 Evaluating the User Experience in CAA Environments: What affects User Satisfaction? Gavin Sim Janet C Read Phil Holifield.
What Retailers Need to Know About New Light Bulb Legislation November 2011.
Buying Energy Efficient Products: Policy Requirements, Purchasing Tools, and Agency Experiences Christopher Payne Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
WEEK 3 Project Planning.
Federal Procurement of Energy-Efficient Products: Policy Requirements & Purchasing Tools Christopher Payne Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory June 17,
Hardware Considerations
SUBMITTED BY Vandana ue7465
Seminar On Energy Audit Submitted To: Submitted By:
System Design Ashima Wadhwa.
Economic Operation of Power Systems
Energy Saving Guide How much in Energy Savings are you missing out on?
Competent Body Meeting Ecolabel Criteria for ‘Televisions’
Energy Saving Guide How much in Energy Savings are you missing out on?
Next-Generation Power Management User Interface for Office Equipment Power Management Controls Bruce Nordman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Introduction to ISO 9000 ISO
More on Estimation In general, effort estimation is based on several parameters and the model ( E= a + b*S**c ): Personnel Environment Quality Size or.
ENGINEERING ECONOMICS
Competent Body Meeting Ecolabel Criteria for ‘Televisions’
Conjoint analysis.
Chapter 11: Printers IT Essentials v6.0 Chapter 11: Printers
Presentation transcript:

1 Proposed ENERGY STAR Specifications for Computer Monitors Craig W. Hershberg ENERGY STAR Office Equipment and Consumer Electronics

2 Agenda Computer monitor specification Objectives History Specification highlights Industry feedback Next steps Questions from EU - EPA agreement Your comments / questions Our questions for you

3 Agenda (cont’d) Do you need specifics ? –Sleep, Off, On, Non-energy aspects Test method The time is right - LCDs

4 Agenda (cont’d) Logistics and other issues How to collaborate when revising the specifications Subsequent meetings Summary of meeting, including action items and schedule for follow-up Preliminary plans for other Office Equipment Products –procedure for collaboration

5 Objectives Provide understanding and disclosure of draft monitor specification Provide detailed answers to questions Receive constructive feedback from you Develop consensus on direction identified today Agree on next steps

6 The history: What monitor specs. exist in Europe now ? –GEEA –TCO Reviewed independent monitor research from DisplaySearch, IDC, Europeans, and others Met with monitor manufacturers at COMDEX, CES, DisplaySearch, and one-on-one (HANS-PAUL) Analyzed self-reported data from manufacturers in STAR database Independently measured monitor power use Compared data with LBNL, ADL studies Made recommendations to EPA. EPA weighed them with others and created draft specification.

7 Revising the ENERGY STAR Computer Monitor Specification: Highlights

8 Terminology ON:“active”, “full power” SLEEP:After x minutes of inactivity, monitor goes to lower power usage mode. “low power” OFF:“Standby” Remember: ON, SLEEP, AND OFF

9 Current E NERGY S TAR Specification Sets minimum wattage levels in low- power or “sleep” mode. –First Sleep Mode:  15 watts –Second or “Deep Sleep” Mode  8 watts

10 Why Revise the Current Specification? Virtually all monitors meet current E NERGY S TAR specification. Large percentage of monitors are not sleep enabled (i.e., we are not getting the energy savings we could be). Recent NRDC research shows energy use in “on” mode is 80 –90% of total kWh/yr. For “on” and “off” modes, wide range of performance between similar-sized models. Broad interest in limiting standby power use.

11 Goals for Revised Specification Incorporate all 3 operating modes: –On (active) –Sleep (inactive) –Off (standby) Performance-based specification. One specification for all monitors, not one for CRTs, one for LCDs, etc. Equal or better performance compared to non-E NERGY S TAR labeled models.

12 The Core Requirements Maximum allowable power consumption levels for each mode: On, Sleep, Off Consensus test method for measuring active power usage. Minimum consumer acceptance criteria (brightness, warranty, etc.) Product and package labeling.

13 Why Active Power? Feasible without negatively affecting product performance; in fact, some manufacturers are already meeting the proposed specifications Limited additional energy savings potential in sleep and off modes; ; 90% of savings with proposed spec is from “active” Not dependent on enabling rates Allows a variety of technologies (e.g., CRT and LCD) to qualify

14 LCDs Highlight a new technology in the marketplace Additional benefits: –Space –Heat –Power consumption –Useful life –Installation –Disposal

15 On Mode: Active Power Use Sets maximum allowable active power (W) Power as a function of mega pixels: W = X Example: monitor has resolution of: 1280 x 1024 = 1,310,720 or 1.31 mega pixels W = (1.31) = 56 W

16 On Mode (cont.) Technology neutral, agnostic to monitor type (LCD or CRT), size (15”, 17”, etc.). If monitor yields more information, allow a little more power consumption.

17 Sleep Mode Just one sleep mode level. Maximum allowable power: 4 W If multiple sleep modes, all must meet 4W requirement.

18 Sleep Mode Advisory Language For consideration in updated E NERGY S TAR computer specification: Maximum default time:15 minutes Maximum recovery time: 5 seconds Goal – increase likelihood that users actually use and are not annoyed by energy management features.

19 Off Mode Synonymous with standby. Power consumed when device is plugged in, but switched off:  2 W. Working to harmonize with US Executive Order for Standby Power Consumption (1 watt executive order)

20 Non-energy Reqts. Must be: bright enough, easy-to-read, reliable. Brightness: minimum luminance of 100 nits (candelas/m 2 ). Contrast: minimum contrast ratio of 200:1. Defective Pixels:  5 sub-pixel faults per million sub-pixels. Warranty: at least 2 years. User Interface: UI Standard recommended

21 Labeling Requirements E NERGY S TAR logo must be displayed on: top/front of product, product package, product literature.

22

23

24 What did the monitor industry think about our draft specification?

25 Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification Industry expressed few concerns on having the new specification include requirements for all three operating modes: on, sleep, and off. With few exceptions, industry agreed to a pixel per watt approach for on mode EPA and industry agreed to define a common test method for measuring on mode power consumption. Manufacturers to test and submit data once test method is finalized

26 Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification (cont’d) Should ENERGY STAR set one specification (one line) that covers all CRT and LCD monitors, or should the specification differentiate between CRTs and LCDs (2 lines) ? Specification too stringent for CRTs, particularly for the desktop publishing environment (e.g., large screen sizes) Wake-up time for monitor. Industry wants more guidance on how to measure/define wake-up time

27 Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification (cont’d) Industry supports a single sleep mode specification, as opposed to the current sleep and deep sleep design 4-watt sleep mode specification is agreeable off mode of 2 watts may be difficult for LCDs

28 Key Industry Feedback Regarding Draft Specification (cont’d) Several manufacturers questioned non-energy requirements Specific concerns include: –Brightness level will be harder to meet for larger CRT monitors. –EPA should reference ISO standards for contrast ratio; CRTs and LCDs are measured differently. –Pixel faults only applies to LCD monitors. –Warranties could be a serious challenge with retailers, and may not work in international markets.

29 Next Steps...

30 Key Next Steps for EPA and Industry Establish test procedure Industry to submit input to EPA on non-energy parameters Manufacturers to test monitors according to new test procedure and submit data to EPA. EPA to analyze new data and revise specifications, as necessary.

31 Changes to specification based on Industry Response May need to allow more CRTs to qualify large screen CRTs issue Scale down non-energy attributes Monitor wake-up time ? Test procedure

32 Questions ? Comments ?

33 Were their questions or comments on the first draft? –Test procedure, non-energy attributes, etc.... Like to submit next draft to you first provided we receive comments in timely fashion (3 weeks) Can you provide data from European manufacturers? Questions for You...

34 Sleep, Off, On Mode and non-energy attributes The Specifics

35 Sleep Mode Current E NERGY S TAR Specification: First Sleep:  15 W; Second Sleep:  8W Proposed Specification: Just one level :  4 W; simplifies spec Under the new spec, sleep mode power is about 10% of active mode power Roughly two-thirds of existing models can meet the proposed sleep requirement.

36 Sleep Mode Questions Verify consensus: Only 1 tier (no deep sleep)? Maximum power level : 4 W? Advisory levels set at right levels? -Default time till sleep: < 15 minutes -Recovery time: < 5 seconds

37 Off Mode Current specification: no standby power limit. Current measured levels: some as high as 8-9 W, several at 4-5 W. Proposed specification:  2 W. Lots of models currently meet the 2W limit.

38 “Off” Mode Questions Verify Consensus: –Is 2W the right level? –Beneficial to have same level set in Executive Order (not simply 1W)? –Suggestions on how to harmonize with European Union. (TCO)

39 On (Active) Mode Discussion

40 What Does The Term “Energy Efficient Monitor” Mean? Efficiency = Useful Output or Service Provided / Total Energy Input Useful output or service could be diagonal inches of screen size, square inches of screen size, or total pixels displayed Monitor not displaying information (providing useful output) in sleep or standby modes, so minimize power use at those times to achieve high overall efficiency Can account for all energy use in all three modes separately or with a duty cycle E NERGY S TAR seeks to recognize top 25% efficiency

Estimated Annual Energy Use for CRTs and LCDs

42 The Advantages of Pixels/Watt Pixels/watt approach has a number of key advantages: More technology neutral – avoids difference between viewable screen size and total Screen area (square inches) unknown to consumers Credits CRTs for their present resolution advantage, yet allows for very high resolution options like IBM’s new 9.1 million pixel LCD Emphasizes display quality over physical size Avoids difficulty of trying to estimate a representative “duty cycle” for all monitors Simple, like lumens/watt (lighting) or CFM/watt (fans). Can also be characterized as watts/megapixel

Effect of Resolution and Monitor Type on Active Power Consumption

Effect of Resolution and Monitor Type on Active Power Consumption for Monitors 17” and Less

Effect of Resolution and Monitor Type on Active Power Consumption for Monitors Greater than 17”

46

47

48 Applying Active Power Spec to Standard Resolutions 93 watts3,145, x watts2,592, x watts1,920,000UXGA1600 x watts1,310,720SXGA1280 x watts786,432XGA1024 x watts480,000SVGA800 x watts307,200VGA640 x 480 Maximum Power UseTotal PixelsCategoryResolution

49 Need for Consistent Measurement STAR database contains self-reported data from manufacturers Not all monitors measured under identical conditions in active or “on” mode Depending on user settings and image displayed, CRT power variations can be +/- 30%. LCD variations can be +/- 50%. E NERGY S TAR has helped develop common test methods to the ventilation and lighting industries – may be able to bring standardization to monitor measurements as well.

50 Effects of User Settings on Power for a 21” CRT Monitor

51 Effects of User Settings on Power for a 17” LCD Monitor

52 Non-Energy Aspects of the Specification

53 Why Include Non-Energy Attributes? Goal is to ensure a level playing field – maintain or enhance quality while saving energy What aspects of product quality or performance could be compromised if a manufacturer looked for a “quick fix” to meet the new E NERGY S TAR spec? E NERGY S TAR and the utilities that support it want to ensure that customers will have a satisfying experience with labeled products. Reliability -- Saving energy is the product of power savings and time (kwh = w*h). An energy efficient product that fails early won’t save much energy.

54

55 Key Non-Energy Spec Provisions Brightness – Minimum of 100 nits at default brightness and contrast settings –LCDs typically 150 to 250 nits –CRTs typically 80 to 120 nits Contrast ratio – Minimum of 200:1 (can adjust settings to achieve this level) –LCDs typically 200:1 to 400:1 –CRTs typically >400:1 Without these specs, very dim or low contrast screens could more easily meet E NERGY S TAR but may not satisfy users

56 Other Key Attributes Refresh rate – Minimum of 85 Hz for CRTs and 60 Hz for LCDs – attempt to preserve ergonomic quality Pixel faults – No more than 5 sub-pixel faults per million sub-pixels (Class II, ISO ) – seek to minimize quality differences between CRT & LCD Warranty – At least 2 years - 3 years common from many major manufacturers, but spec recognizes retailer preference for selling extended warranties

57 Other Possible Non-Energy Attributes Viewing angle – How far from the horizontal and vertical axes of the screen can it still be clearly seen? Wake from sleep time – How long before information is legible on screen after wakeup? Is there a consensus way to measure that? Pixel density – pixels per inch (PPI) Resolution/Addressability Ratio (RAR) – VESA Section 6.6 – ability of a screen to resolve individual lines or pixels Others?

58 Test Method Discussion

59 Elements of a Standard Test Procedure Identical on-screen image (alternating black and white lines 1 pixel in height?) filling full viewable area of screen Default brightness and contrast settings (balance between simplicity and risk of manipulation) Highest VESA supported resolution with a refresh rate of at least 85 Hz for CRTs, native resolution and 60 Hz refresh rate for LCDs – is other timing language needed?

60 Other Test Procedure Elements Reference VESA specifications for power measurement – true RMS power at 3 combinations of voltage and frequency, averaged across at least 5 test samples –100 VAC, 50 Hz; 117 VAC, 60 Hz; 230 VAC, 50 Hz Leave off or disconnect any included peripheral features – TV tuner, microphone, speakers, USB hubs, etc. Others?

61

62 ENERGY STAR Office Equipment specification revisions… What does the future hold?

63 Future Specification Revisions Other Office Equipment Laptops (initiate research March 2002) Scanners, printers, copiers, MFDs, fax machines –(Scanner USB issue; initiate research Sept. 2002) computer (initiate research mid-2003) Vision EU-EPA collaboration sleep, active power and standby power energy efficient power supplies USB driven products universal imaging specification