Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network and new possibilities of their correction and validation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Data assimilation experiments for AMMA, using radiosonde observations and satellite observations over land F. Rabier, C. Faccani, N. Fourrié, F. Karbou,
Advertisements

Numerical Weather Prediction Parametrization of Diabatic Processes Cloud Parametrization 2: Cloud Cover Richard Forbes and Adrian Tompkins
© Crown copyright Met Office E-AMDAR evaluation. Mark Smees & Tim Oakley, Met Office, May 2008.
Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche 3 rd COPS and GOP workshop April 2006 Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Istituto di Metodologie per lAnalisi.
Upper Tropospheric Humidity: A Comparison of Satellite, Radiosonde, Lidar and Aircraft Measurements Satellite Lidar Aircraft Radiosonde.
Observing Networks and Data Aircraft Humidity Sensor Enters the E-AMDAR Fleet A. Hoff (Deutscher Wetterdienst, Department of Observing Networks and Data)
Hygrometer Intercomparison Campaign at Sodankylä, LAUTLOS Jan 26-Feb 28, 2004 Esko Kyrö 1, Rigel Kivi 1, Juha Karhu 1, Timo Turunen 1, Tuomo Suortti 1,
Radiometrics Corporation 1 Fog Detection & Forecasting Using the the Radiometrics TV/WVP-3000 Temperature, Humidity & Cloud Liquid Profiling Radiometer.
Homogenization (instrumental correction) of water vapour data from Vaisala radiosondes and older (MARZ, RKZ) used in Polish aerological service Barbara.
ISSI Working Group on Atmospheric Water Vapor, 11 Feb 2008 Holger Vömel Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences University of Colorado.
Radiosonde and Hygrometer humitidy measurements at Sodankylä NDACC-H2O workshop, IAP, University of Bern July 5-7, 2006 Esko Kyrö, Tuomo Suortti, Rigel.
1 / 17 Deutscher Wetterdienst Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg Richard Assmann Observatory The GCOS Reference Upper Air Network Holger Vömel GRUAN.
Lecture 1 Geraint Vaughan. Radiosondes Vaisala RS80 Vaisala RS92 Launching a radiosonde European radiosonde stations (launch 00 and 12 UTC) Data available.
OWP: Radiosondes and profilers Doug Parker, CEH Wallingford, 21 January 2005.
FLASH-B FLASH-B FLuorescent Advanced Stratospheric Hygrometer (for balloon) Instrument design. Observations and comparison. Central Aerological Observatory.
6 July 2006First NDACC Water Vapor Working Group Workshop, Bern, Switzerland. 1 NDACC and Water Vapor Raman Lidars Thierry Leblanc JPL - Table Mountain.
Ben Kravitz November 12, 2009 Limb Scanning and Occultation.
Observed and modelled long-term water cloud statistics for the Murg Valley Kerstin Ebell, Susanne Crewell, Ulrich Löhnert Institute for Geophysics and.
1 Review of WMO test results on the accuracy of radiosonde relative humidity sensors John Nash Observing Methods Technology Centre, Development, Met Office.
J31 Data Workshop 9-10Mar05 Water Vapor during ICARTT 2004: Comparison of AATS-14, J31 in situ, Ron Brown sonde measurements NASA Ames Airborne Sunphotometer.
FLASH-B FLASH-B FLuorescent Advanced Stratospheric Hygrometer (for balloon and aircraft) Instrument design. Observations and comparison. Central Aerological.
COST workshop, 12th March Assimilation of stratospheric ozone and water vapour at DARC Alan Geer, Carole Peubey, Ross Bannister, Roger Brugge, William.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Recent progress in the development of Upper air Systems Catherine Gaffard Met Office Upper Air Team, University of Reading.
Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg – Richard Assmann Observatory The GCOS Reference Upper Air Network.
Rigel Kivi (1), Holger Vömel (2), Franz Immler (2), Terhi Lehtola (3), Niklaus Kämpfer (4), Corinne Straub (4), Vladimir Yushkov (5), Sergey Khaykin (5),
Introduction A new methodology is developed for integrating complementary ground-based data sources to provide consistent ozone vertical distribution time.
Herman G.J. Smit/FZJ-COST723-WG-I Overview Noordwijk March 2004 COST723-WG1- Working Group I: Data and Measurement Techniques Overview Herman G.J.
GEWEX/GlobVapour Workshop, Mar 8-10, 2011, ESRIN, Frascati, Italy WATER VAPOUR RAMAN LIDARS IN THE UTLS: Where Are We Now? or “The JPL-Table Mountain Experience”
Deutscher Wetterdienst Measurement Technology Humidity Measurements by Aircraft of the E-AMDAR Fleet TECO 2008 Axel Hoff Deutscher Wetterdienst Observing.
Water vapour soundings in the upper troposphere Geraint Vaughan University of Wales, Aberystwyth With thanks to: Clare Cambridge, Alan Phillips, Les Dean,
Diagnosing Climate Change from Satellite Sounding Measurements – From Filter Radiometers to Spectrometers William L. Smith Sr 1,2., Elisabeth Weisz 1,
NARVAL South Lutz Hirsch, Friedhelm Jansen Sensor Synergy While Radars and Lidars provide excellent spatial resolution but only ambiguous information on.
Operation of Backscatter Lidar at Buenos Aires (34.6 S / 58.5 W) for the Retrieval and Analysis the Atmospheric Parameters in Cirrus Clouds, Tropopause.
COSMO General Meeting, Offenbach, 7 – 11 Sept Dependance of bias on initial time of forecasts 1 WG1 Overview
Boundary layer temperature profile observations using ground-based microwave radiometers Bernhard Pospichal, ISARS 2006 Garmisch-Partenkirchen AMMA - Benin.
Herman G.J. Smit, COST 723, Bern, 6-7 Oct, MOZAIC-Data, Particularly the Use of Water Vapor Data for UTLS-Studies and the Urgent Need for Integrated.
Evaluation of the WVSS-II Sensor Using Co-located In-situ and Remotely Sensed Observations Sarah Bedka, Ralph Petersen, Wayne Feltz, and Erik Olson CIMSS.
Intercomparisons of Water Vapor Measurements during IHOP_2002 – Radiosonde and Dropsonde Junhong (June) Wang NCAR Atmospheric Technology Division Acknowledgement:
GPS GPS derived integrated water vapor in aLMo: impact study with COST 716 near real time data Jean-Marie Bettems, MeteoSwiss Guergana Guerova, IAP, University.
Kunming campaign, first in situ observation of water vapor and ozone in the UTLS during the Asian summer monsoon Jianchun BIAN, and Hongbin CHEN LAGEO,
Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg Results of the Measurement Strategy of the GCOS Reference Upper Air Network (GRUAN) Holger Vömel, GRUAN.
The GCOS Reference Upper-Air Network H.Vömel 1, F.J. Immler 1, M.Sommer 1, P. Thorne 2, G. Bodeker 3 and the WG-ARO 4 (1) GRUAN Lead center, Richard-Assmann-Observatorium,
Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg – Richard Assmann Observatory (2010) GCOS Reference Upper Air Network Holger Vömel Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg.
SRL/Reference sonde P. Di Girolamo, D. Whiteman, B. Demoz, J. Wang, K. Beierle, T. Weckwerth The Reference sonde (C34) consists of a Snow White (SW) chilled-mirror.
AIRS science team meeting Camp Springs, February 2003 Holger Vömel University of Colorado and NOAA/CMDL Upper tropospheric humidity validation measurements.
Airborne/ground-based sensor intercomparison: SRL/LASE Paolo Di Girolamo, Domenico Sabatino, David Whiteman, Belay Demoz, Edward Browell, Richard Ferrare.
Deutscher Wetterdienst Lindenberg Meteorological Observatory Richard Assmann Observatory Michael Sommer GRUAN Lead Centre, DWD 2 nd GRUAN Implementation.
Monitoring of Eyjafjallajökull Ash Layer Evolution over Payerne- Switzerland with a Raman Lidar Todor Dinoev, Valentin Simeonov*, and Mark Parlange Swiss.
Layered Water Vapor Quick Guide by NASA / SPoRT and CIRA Why is the Layered Water Vapor Product important? Water vapor is essential for creating clouds,
A new method for first-principles calibration
1 / 22 Deutscher Wetterdienst Lindenberg Meteorological Observatory Richard Assmann Observatory What final GRUAN observations may consist of and look like.
AMSR-E Vapor and Cloud Validation Atmospheric Water Vapor –In Situ Data Radiosondes –Calibration differences between different radiosonde manufactures.
Observed Recent Changes in the Tropopause Dian Seidel NOAA Air Resources Laboratory ~ Silver Spring, Maryland USA Bill Randel NCAR Atmospheric Chemistry.
Charles L Wrench RCRU Determining Cloud Liquid Water Path from Radiometer measurements at Chilbolton.
Evaluations of AMDAR Observations using Co-Located Radiosonde and Inter-Aircraft Comparisons Lee Cronce 1, Ralph Petersen 1, Erik Olson 1, Wayne Feltz.
Page 1© Crown copyright 2004 Results of the RS92 Acceptance Test performed by the Met Office (UK) Richard Smout, John Nash, Mark Smees, Darren Lyth, May.
PRELIMINARY VALIDATION OF IAPP MOISTURE RETRIEVALS USING DOE ARM MEASUREMENTS Wayne Feltz, Thomas Achtor, Jun Li and Harold Woolf Cooperative Institute.
UT/LS H 2 O validation issues Important issues that remain unresolved:  Establishing the frequency and also temperature dependence of supersaturation.
Report to WCRP Observations and Assimilation Panel David Goodrich Director, GCOS Secretariat Towards a GCOS Reference Upper Air Network.
NCAR - Atmospheric Technology Division Reporting work by: Erik Miller (ATD) Junhong Wong (ATD) Ari Paukkunen et al. (Vaisala, OY) Funded by: ATD, Vaisala;
Welcome to the COST 723 Meeting! Bern, October 6-7, 2003.
DOE ARM Calibration / Validation Instrumentation Data essentially available in real-time –ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement) –CART (Cloud And Radiation.
A U.S.-Japan Workshop on the Tropical Tropopause Layer
U.S. Radiosondes Jan. 2000, NWS awarded contracts to two radiosonde manufacturers, Sippican and InterMet Systems, for the development and submission of.
The GCOS Reference Upper-Air Network H.Vömel 1, F.J. Immler 1, M.Sommer 1, P. Thorne 2, G. Bodeker 3 and the WG-ARO 4 (1) GRUAN Lead center, Richard-Assmann-Observatorium,
Seasonal variability of the tropical tropopause dehydration
Hygrometer Intercomparison Campaign at Sodankylä, LAUTLOS
Jianchun BIAN, and Hongbin CHEN
Validation of NOAA-16/ATOVS Products from AAPP/IAPP Packages in Korea
Item Taking into account radiosonde position in verification
Presentation transcript:

Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network and new possibilities of their correction and validation Ulrich Leiterer and Horst Dier, Meteorological Observatory Lindenberg, German Weather Service, Lindenberg, GERMANY

Content I. Overall view of the global aerological network II. The method of „standardized frequencies“ FN and comparison with uncorrected RS80-A-Humicap humidity data III.Correction steps for routine RS80 humidity measurements IV. Validation V. Results from the troposphere VI. Results from the stratosphere

I. Overall view of the global aerological network Radiosonde types and –stations which contribute with high availability (>= 67 %) for the data assimilation. ECMWF Data Coverage (All obs) - TEMP Differences in relative humidity (RH) measurements in the global radiosonde network Confirmation of the differences between several radiosonde types

Radiosonde types and –stations which contribute with high availability (>= 67 %) for the data assimilation. Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

ECMWF Data Coverage (All obs) - TEMP Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Differences in relative humidity (RH) measurements in the global radiosonde network Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Confirmation of the differences between several radiosonde types Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

II. The method of „standardized frequencies“ FN and comparison with uncorrected RS80-A-Humicap humidity data RS 90 Sensor Unit The Fn method Standardized Frequencies Fn calibration matrix Comparison with uncorrected RS80 routine data

RS 90 Sensor Unit Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

The Fn method Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Standardized Frequencies Fn calibration matrix Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Comparison with uncorrected RS80 routine data Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

III. Correction steps for routine RS80 humidity measurements weather screen/groundcheck (100 % RH) - correction of RS80-A- radiosonde Temperature dependent correction function  2Uw(t) for RS80-A-humicap rel. humidity (water) on ice saturation Detection of sensor icing a) Example for an icing case Detection of sensor icing b) the climatologic treshold as criterion for icing Frequency of sensor icing

weather screen/groundcheck (100 % RH) - correction of RS80-A-radiosonde Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Temperature dependent correction function  2 U w (t) for RS80-A-humicap rel. humidity (water) on ice saturation Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Detection of sensor icing a) Example for an icing case Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Detection of sensor icing b) the climatologic treshold as criterion for icing Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Frequency of sensor icing Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

IV. Validation Example for Ceilometer backscattering signal if the relative humidity is slightly below ice saturation Relative humidity profiles of the corrected RS80 routine sonde and two experimental sondes (FN Method), simultaneous ascent Relative humidity profiles of the corrected RS80 routine sonde and two experimental sondes (FN Method), simultaneous ascent (detail) Example of corrected RS80 A Humicap profile in cirrus clouds Comparison of RS80-A-Humicap with MOZAIC-Aircraft humidity sensor relative humidity comparison RS80 orig., RS80 corr., RS92, RS90 orig., RS90-reference Example for the precision of measurements of temperature and relative humidity in the simulation chamber : FN calibration matrix on the basis of several measuring methods

Example for Ceilometer backscattering signal if the relative humidity is slightly below ice saturation Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Relative humidity profiles of the corrected RS80 routine sonde and two experimental sondes (FN Method), simultaneous ascent Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September The relative humidity is in cirrus level at 9 km (no backscattering) near 5% RH below ice saturation.

Relative humidity profiles of the corrected RS80 routine sonde and two experimental sondes (FN Method), simultaneous ascent (detail) Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Example of corrected RS80 A Humicap profile in cirrus clouds Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Comparison of RS80-A-Humicap with MOZAIC-Aircraft humidity sensor Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

relative humidity comparison RS80 orig., RS80 corr., RS92, RS90 orig., RS90-reference Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September Lindenberg, :00 UTC

Example for the precision of measurements of temperature and relative humidity in the simulation chamber : Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September Basis for temperature : PTB gas calibration, basis for humidity : FN method

FN calibration matrix on the basis of several measuring methods Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

V. Results from the troposphere homogenized time series of the rel. humidity U [%] above Lindenberg Frequency of the occurence of ice supersaturation (ISS) classes corrected radiosonde (RSA), microwave profiler (MWP) and GPS water vapor column (cmppw) comparison Examples for the incorrect relative humidity measurements in the stratosphere by different radiosondes Example for water vapor mixing ratio measurement in the stratosphere by FN-method; the same date as in Figure 26

homogenized time series of the rel. humidity U [%] above Lindenberg Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Frequency of the occurence of ice supersaturation (ISS) classes Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

corrected radiosonde (RSA), microwave profiler (MWP) and GPS water vapor column (cmppw) comparison Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Examples for the incorrect relative humidity measurements in the stratosphere by different radiosondes Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September RS80origuncorrected (calibration issue 1988), RS92calibration issue (March 2003), RS80corrcorrected by FN-method RS90 FNFN-method (reference humidity profile) RS90 (Vaisala) the same sensor as used for FN-method, but with Vaisala calibration issue September 2003

Example for water vapor mixing ratio measurement in the stratosphere by FN-method; the same date as in Figure 26 Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

VI. Results from the stratosphere Time series of water vapour content results from reference sonde ascents (FN-method) in the period June 1999 – April 2003 Mean vertical profiles of water vapour mixing ratio. FN-Method 99-01; 99-03; HALOE Seasonal course of water vapour mixing ratio over Lindenberg from FN data in the period 1999 – 2003 (4 years) Seasonal course of water vapour mixing ratio over Boulder, Co from NOAA frost point hygrometer data (Vömel and Oltmans) in the period 1979 – 2003 (24 years)

Time series of water vapour content results from reference sonde ascents (FN-method) in the period June 1999 – April 2003 Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Mean vertical profiles of water vapour mixing ratio. FN-Method 99-01; 99-03; HALOE Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Seasonal course of water vapour mixing ratio over Lindenberg from FN data in the period 1999 – 2003 (4 years) Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September

Seasonal course of water vapour mixing ratio over Boulder, Co from NOAA frost point hygrometer data (Vömel and Oltmans) in the period 1979 – 2003 (24 years) Problems and measuring errors of radiosonde humidity measurements in the global aerological network DWD-Lindenberg Observatory September