Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gerald L. Ullman, Ph.D., P.E. Texas Transportation Institute Designing and Maintaining a Pedestrian-Friendly Work Zone.
Advertisements

Highway & Rural Driving
Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.
Created by: Victor Lund, PEKen Johnson, PE, PTOE St. Louis CountyMnDOT.
Lec 33, Ch.5, pp : Accident reduction capabilities and effectiveness of safety design features (Objectives) Learn what’s involved in safety engineering.
TRAILS AS TRANSPORTATION Design & Construction Michael J. Kubek, P.E. Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 Production Administrator.
From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.
I-69 Strategic Planning Corridor Study: Fulton To Eddyville, KY Fulton, Hickman, Graves, Marshall, Livingston, Lyon Counties Public Meeting November 15,
S.R. 256 Road Reconstruction Project From City of Austin to S.R. 203 Thursday, February 6, 2014 Austin Elementary School 6:00 p.m.
VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Spring 2015.
INTRODUCTION This chapter presents guidance on the application of geometric design criteria to facilities functionally classified as collector roads and.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
AASHTO Subcommittee on Design Reducing Engineering Standards: Good or Bad? July 14, 2008 Marc Cote, P.E. (302) /14/08.
INTRODUCTION This chapter presents guidance on the application of geometric design criteria to facilities functionally classified as local roads and streets.
Interchange Design Nick Hoernke, Bill Roth and Eric Sorensen.
1 Channelization and Turn Bays. 2 Island Channelization flush, paved, and delineated with markings – or unpaved and delineated with pavement edge and.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Work Zone Traffic Control
Maintenance and Protection of Traffic (MPT) – HDM Ch 16.
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Ch. 7 1.
Cross Sections CE 453 Lecture 22 Iowa DOT Design Manual Chapter 3.
Design Speed and Design Traffic Concepts
Project Manager: Tim Brown Project Editor: Tabatha Doughty Project Engineer: Drew Furry Project Engineer: Jim Walter.
2014 CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATES Estimates Estimates 3 Point of the illustration? Document your assumptions.
Design Exceptions 101 Ed Fischer, State Traffic-Roadway Engineer Mike Morrow, FHWA Field Operations Engineer Kent R. Belleque, Senior Interchange Engineer.
2002 AASHTO ROADSIDE DESIGN GUIDE A CONCISE OVERVIEW.
Martha Moore, P.E. Ghyabi & Associates October 10, 2014
Office of Traffic, Safety, and Operations Application Guidelines Warning Signs Signing Plan Design (At-Grade) June 20, 2012.
INTRODUCTION Grade separation is an effective way of handling intersecting traffic with greatest efficiency, safety, capacity. An interchange is a system.
Road Design.
Alameda Creek Bridge Replacement Scoping Meeting March 4, 2014.
 Cross section elements consist of the following:  1.Traffic lanes (carriage ways);  2.Shoulders;  3.Medians;  4.Curbs;  5.Side slopes.
Local Government Section
Fall 2014 Most of the Material taken from: Roadside Design Guide (2011) published by AAHSTO.
INTRODUCTION An intersection is the general area where two or more highways join or cross, including the roadway and roadside facilities for traffic movements.
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
1 At-Grade Intersection Design. 2 Objectives Define general intersection design objectives Describe factors that influence curb return design For a nice.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 4 Work Zone Applications Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
4. GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS
1 INTERCHANGE SELECTION CE 550 SPRING OBJECTIVE Identify types of interchange by function and geometry Learn process for optimizing the type of.
Office of Traffic, Safety and Technology Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Module 5 Work Zone Plan Sets Traffic Control Plan Development Course.
Strategic Highway Research Program 2 Project L07 Identification and Evaluation of the Cost- Effectiveness of Highway Design Features to Reduce Nonrecurrent.
Roadside CE 453 Lecture 23. Sideslopes – Foreslope (Backslope) Design 1.Considerations: Stability and Vehicle Recovery a.if slope “>” 3:1 use barrier.
Bristol BF 021-1(33) Regional Concerns Meeting VT Route 116 – Bridge #12 over Baldwin Creek April 27, 2015.
Design Criteria CTC 440. Objectives Know what “design criteria” means Determine design criteria for various types of facilities.
Understanding Work Zones
Driving Environments. Rural Driving  The speed limit on rural roads when not posted is 35 mph.  Many rural roads are two-lane, two-way roadways.  Curves.
CE 453 Highway Design Iowa State University Highway Design Criteria Overview April 24, 2006 David R. Dougherty, P.E.
General Tab Project, Cost Schedule, and Work Limits Roadway Character
© 2014 HDR, Inc., all rights reserved. North Country Access Improvements Stakeholder Advisory Committee Meeting No. 9 January 19, 2016.
Chapter 9 Capacity and Level of Service for Highway Segments
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
At-Grade Intersection Design
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
FHWA: Revision of Thirteen Controlling Criteria for Design; Notice for Request and Comment. Comments Due: December 7, 2015 Jeremy Fletcher, P.E., P.S.M.
Maintenance and Temporary Traffic Control
Preserving the Lost Art of Geometric Design: Tools, Techniques and Talent TRB Workshop - January 23, 2011 Understanding the Art Mark Doctor, PE Federal.
Brookeville Bypass Final Design Presentation Initech May 6, 2004.
The I-465 West Leg Reconstruction Project
Project Management Team Meeting #3
INTERCHANGE DESIGN Fall 2017
Roadside Safety Design
Technical Committee on Geometric Design
PRACTICAL ROAD SAFETY ENGINEERING
State Aid Standards Development
Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.
Design Criteria CTC 440.
HERO UNIT Training Module
3R Standards Resurfacing, Restoration, & Rehabilitation Note: Need to update based on revisions to Ch 7 of HDM (freeway and non-freeway now covered in.
Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Limit Practices
Presentation transcript:

Detours – Selection and Design Highways & Engineering Conference March 2, 2006

Presenters:  Paul Ferry, Highways Engineer  Lesly Tribelhorn, Highways Design Engineer

Objectives  Know which types of detours are appropriate  Apply proper design criteria  Consider safety and costs  Think about environmental, other site constraints  Know where to look for information

Types of Detours

 Detour traffic onto an existing route  Temporary detour  Median crossovers (divided highways)  Lane closures  Part-width construction

Interstate/Freeway

 Median crossovers – design considerations Guardrail Bridge widths Interchange proximity and access Review distance between crossovers Location (topography, geometrics, distance between) Drainage Future projects

Interstate/Freeway  Median crossovers – safety + Ingress/egress controlled + Interstate standards met – Two-way traffic – Cross over of traffic – No passing

Interstate/Freeway  Median crossovers – cost considerations Construct & remove crossover Traffic control (length, maintenance) Guardrail revisions  Median crossovers – site constraints Topography considerations for crossover location No environmental No R/W

Interstate/Freeway  Lane closure – design considerations Bridge widths Temporary barrier rail –Length of area to be protected –Barrier deflection –Taper rates –End treatment

Interstate/Freeway  Lane closure – safety + Directional traffic separated + Interstate standards met + Access controlled – Excavation located next to travel lane – Bridge work – extended duration – No passing

Interstate/Freeway  Lane closure – cost considerations Traffic control  Lane closure – site constraints Interchange locations

Interstate/Freeway  Temporary detours – design considerations Usually for culvert replacement in high fill May need temporary widening, barrier rail Jack and bore instead (≤ 48 ” diameter)? Need temporary access control fence? Proximity of interchanges

Interstate/Freeway  Temporary detours – safety + Short length – Driver expectations violated  Temporary detours – cost considerations Construction & removal of detour Traffic control minimized

Interstate/Freeway  Temporary detours – site constraints Environmental involvement possible R/W, access fence possible

Interstate/Freeway  Detour traffic onto an existing route Bridge widths, structural capacity, clearance Road surfacing and structure Roadway width Safety issues (mixing traffic, accesses, standards) Clear zone Length and duration of detour Costs - traffic control and surfacing improvement

Interstate/Freeway

Two-lane rural routes

 Detour onto an existing route - design Cost of temporary detour excessive? Bridge widths and capacity Adequate clearance Roadway widths and structural capacity Clear zone Work with construction and maintenance

Two-lane rural routes  Detour onto an existing route Safety depends on route selected Costs minimal – traffic control, route maintenance Site constraints should be minimal

Two-lane rural routes  Temporary detours

Two-lane rural routes  Temporary detours Replacement of drainage structures Excavation leaves insufficient room for traffic

Design Criteria – temporary detours

Alignment  Design speed Route design speed – 10 mph Location Duration Sight distance

Alignment  Location Topography – which side most economical Utility impacts R/W issues Environmental impacts Impacts to adjacent developments Accesses

Alignment  Request adequate survey for proper design  Offset and detour length  Normal crown horizontal curves  Adequate cover over culverts  Bridge freeboard  Downstream location preferred

Surfacing  Traffic loading  Detour duration

Roadway Width  24’ adequate for most  ADT < 400, consider narrower lanes 10’ – 11’ Two-way, one lane

Grading/side slopes  Typically 3:1 Traffic volumes Detour duration Temporary barrier Geotech involvement! Detour embankment part of roadway?

Drainage  Size provided by Hydraulics  Address sequencing for flowing streams

Safety and costs  Safety level varies Design Traffic Driver expectations  Costs can be significant Construction and removal R/W, utility moves Traffic control and maintenance

Environmental considerations

 Coordinate with district biologist  Special construction methods for streams  Wetland, historic, archaeological site avoidance

Part-width construction  Design considerations: Low speed environment? Wide enough for oversize loads? Bridges impacted? Practical locations available for temp. detour? Can temporary barrier rail reduce widening?

Part-width construction  Safety can be compromised Driver expectation – sudden speed reduction? Design may be necessary Offset by short construction time  Cost savings can be significant  Evaluate environmental, R/W involvement

Lane closures  Special case for two-lane highway Costs or construction issues for other detour types Safety compromised - very short duration only 24-hour flaggers for safety Short length preferred (sight distance, safety) Costs low – traffic control only Environmental, other impacts minimal

Two-lane rural routes

Other options?

 Offset alignment and use PTW Detours for drainage installation not needed More efficient construction operation Enhanced safety  Jack and bore  Road closures

Urban construction

 Pedestrian/ADA access  Utility considerations  Emergency vehicle access  Impacts to businesses  Public relations  Worker safety

Urban construction  Costs and safety comparisons  Depend on work, location  Specific to project

Urban construction  Detour traffic onto an existing route Close one block at a time Sequencing and coordination

Urban construction  Existing route detour considerations: Additional traffic loads on adjacent streets Surfacing improvements necessary? Pedestrian/ADA accommodation Business access – signing critical Hospital, residences, school access

Urban construction  Lane closures Room to accommodate traffic and construction work Need positive separation for utility work in trenches? Access to businesses - may need detour Pedestrian/ADA access on both sides of street

Urban construction  Temporary detour & median crossovers Usually impractical Costs Adequate room

Safety features compromise  Detour traffic onto an existing route  Temporary detour  Median crossovers (divided highways)  Lane closures  Part-width construction

General questions to address

 ADT and truck traffic; emergency vehicle use  Site considerations  Can the road be closed to through traffic?  Are there adjacent projects?  Are there other projects that may be affected? Detour onto another construction project Wide loads

Summary  Types of detours  Types of highway  Considerations: Design issues Cost comparisons Safety compromises Environmental impacts; other site constraints

Resources  MDT Road Design Manual; 2006 Chapter 15  AASHTO: A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets (Green Book); 2004  AASHTO: Guidelines for Geometric Design of Very Low-Volume Local Roads (ADT < 400); 2001

Resources  Paul Ferry (406)  Lesly Tribelhorn (406)