JOHN F. SHEEHAN, PH.D. EVIDENCE-BASED OBSERVATIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Framework for Teaching Charlotte Danielson
Advertisements

Professional Growth and
1 Phase III: Planning Action Developing Improvement Plans.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Making Your Own Luck with PGES: “What Happens When Preparation Meets Opportunity” Overview by Jill Cabrera, PhD Educational Administration, Leadership.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
An Overview of TPGES: The Framework for Teaching Jenny Ray, Facilitator Kentucky Department of Education & NKCES July 26, 2013.
Professional Growth and
Alaska Educator Evaluation Overview Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Connections to the TPGES Framework for Teaching Domains Student Growth Peer Observation Professional Growth Planning Reflection.
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
December 13, 2011 ICSD facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas & Cheryl Covell TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 4.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Resources and Beyond FfT Facilitator Training January 8, 2013.
RESA Standards 2015 Revised Standards for District and School Effectiveness.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Lesson Design Study Suggestions from our text: Leading Lesson Study.
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE)
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Boston Debate League and Boston Public Schools Evidence Based Argumentation: Engaging English Language Learners in Boston Public Schools Brandon Finegold,
© 2008 by PACT PACT Scorer Training Pilot.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Pre-Conference Workshop – June 2007 BUILDING A NATIONAL TEAM: Theatre Education Assessment Models Robert A. Southworth, Jr., Ed.D. TCG Assessment Models.
COMPONENT 3A: COMMUNICATING WITH STUDENTS Framework for Teaching Domain 3: Instruction.
LCSD APPR: Overview Review and Focus on the 60 points December 3, 2012.
From the Beginning Planning for Impact in Writing Instruction, 6-12 Dr. Patti McWhorter
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources: 1.Print copies for each person of the following from the Resource Tab: a)Grain Size Visual.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Compass: Module 2 Compass Requirements: Teachers’ Overall Evaluation Rating Student Growth Student Learning Targets (SLTs) Value-added Score (VAM) where.
CTE Literacy Support Session 3 Using Templates for Scaffolding Student Writing Feedback and evaluation of student writing.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
TEACHER DEVELOPMENT, EVALUATION, AND PEER SUPPORT Overview Session for MPS Staff March 10, 2014.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
Thoughtful Classroom Research-Based Strategies Task Rotations.
1 Introducing Danielson’s Framework for Teaching NYCDOE | November
+ Linked Learning Certification Criteria and Process High School Principal and Leadership Team Institute August 18, 2011.
Lincoln Intermediate Unit 12 August 11, 2014 Differentiated Supervision: The Danielson Framework.
Professional Growth Systems And Nevada Academic Content Standards Strengthening teacher capacity through powerful feedback March 20, 2015.
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Evidence in Evaluations. What is Evidence? ITED Document – Evidence refers to data, information, artifacts and performances that educators and evaluators.
Unit 3: Looking at Student Work Learning Objectives Become aware of key components of quality classroom assessment aligned with on CCSS-ELA Literacy in.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
COMPONENT 2B: ESTABLISHING A CULTURE FOR LEARNING Domain 2: The Classroom Environment.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Teachscape Reflect User Guide Teacher Observation and Evaluation Howard County Public School System.
NYC DOE – Office of Teacher Effectiveness F. Prioritize Areas for Feedback 1.
EngageNY.org Principals’ Session Approaching Argument Writing: Module 9.4.
SEPTEMBER 20, 2011 facilitated by Dr. Heather Sheridan-Thomas TST BOCES Network Team Lead Evaluator of Teachers Training: Session 2 Developed by Teaching.
The School Effectiveness Framework
Instructional Leadership: Monitoring Insights, Patterns, & Trends.
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 OBSERVATION CYCLE: CONNECTING DOMAINS 1, 2, AND 3.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
In-Service September 19, 2012 Teacher Evaluation System.
Lesson Design Study Leading Lesson Study.
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Standard Four Program Impact
SUPPORTING THE Progress Report in MATH
OTL:NGP:EA:1217.
Our Leadership Journey
Presentation transcript:

JOHN F. SHEEHAN, PH.D. EVIDENCE-BASED OBSERVATIONS

CONCERNS 2 major concerns Examples from classrooms Uneasiness with the Danielson Framework

ADDRESSING THE CONCERN 2011 Revised Edition Domains, components, elements are identical Goals Increase effectiveness, precision, and usefulness Precise Language Critical Attributes Teacher Examples

EXAMPLES Embedded videos from classrooms, that are examples of framework

OBJECTIVES Describe the 2011 Danielson Framework Apply the Danielson Framework to observations Distinguish between opinions, evidence, and claims Apply the above distinctions within our observations Review goals, establish benchmarks, data collection

OBJECTIVES CONTINUED Review school calendar, and establish important dates (that support the implementation of Race to the Top) for the school year Review key documents for Race to the Top (publishers’ criteria, key deliverables, complexity of text, math priorities…)

2011 DANIELSON FRAMEWORK Read the overview for each Domain and category (1a, 1b, 1c,…) Select one of the categories (1a, 2b, 2c, 3d, 4e, 4f) and read that section of the rubric

DANIELSON IN THE CLASSROOM

OBSERVATION We are going to watch a video of a classroom: imagine you are within the classroom, and are conducting an observation. The teacher in the classroom is a second year teacher. You are asked to engage in your usual observation practice(s).

CLASSROOM OBSERVATION

SHARE OUT WHAT YOU OBSERVED

EVIDENCE V. OPINION Evidence- observable and measurable (Focus on the learning processes within the classroom) Opinions- evaluations Claims: 1.Valid Claims- based on evidence that you observed and documented which is connected to the enhancement of student learning 2.Invalid Claims- evaluations with hidden evidence (internal criteria), or claims linked to evidence, but not linked to student learning 3.Low Effect Claims- do not focus on improvement of learning for students

WHAT TYPES OF OBSERVATIONS DID WE MAKE? For each observation shared, evaluate whether it was evidence or opinion. Place an “E” next to claims that are evidence-based Place an “O” next to claims that are opinion-based

APPLICATION Please select an observation from the previous year, and make two copies of the observation. Read over the evaluation, and determine if your statements are opinions, or evidence, by writing an (o) or (e) at the beginning of the sentence. After this, examine each of the claims you made in the observation, mark each claim at the beginning of the sentence with (v) for valid (v), (inv) for invalid, (le) for low effect.

QUESTIONS Are there any existing patterns that emerge within the observations?

RELIABILITY Provide your observation to another person. As you had done previously, mark this observation with an “E” next to claims that are evidence-based, and “O” next to claims that are opinion-based.

MEET WITH PARTNER AND SHARE: REVIEW THE DOCUMENT Did you agree on your ratings?

INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Step 1- Review goals Step 2- Select the top 4 goals Step 3- Share the goals with the group, and their importance

FOUR GOALS: Indicate what data you will use to know when you have been successful. Select benchmark dates

ACTION ONE COMMITMENT ONE To enhance my instructional leadership, I will log the actions I have taken, and the effects on student learning throughout the year. Establish four benchmarks to monitor progress.

KEY DOCUMENTS Review of Key Documents

MAKING TIME

CALENDAR If it is not on calendar, it either did not happen, or it will not happen Key dates, and benchmarks