COACHE Survey Results Faculty of Arts & Science March 28, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Bernie Engel, Professor and Head Agricultural and Biological Engineering 1 March 25, 2014.
Advertisements

Using LibQUAL+ to Develop Accountability with Key Stakeholders Raynna Bowlby Based upon presentation made w/co-presenter Dan O’Mahony (Brown U. Library)
Faculty Senate Faculty are consulted and given the opportunity for input on decisions that impact faculty members. – Faculty senate representatives.
Mid-Career Planning & Post-Tenure Mentoring Patrick M. Scanlon Professor and Director School of Communication.
ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION Assessment, data analysis and evaluation of findings as essential components of the self study for determining if objectives.
Tenure Track Faculty Survey Spring  Population:241 ◦ Female: 79 ◦ Males: 162 ◦ Faculty of Color: 54  Sample:159 (66%) ◦ Females: 52 (66%) ◦ Males:
The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education 2010 Survey of Pre-tenure Faculty.
AdvanceVT Mentoring. Let’s Benchmark: Who Does Mentoring Well? 2008 Faculty Worklife Survey, 700 tenure- track faculty responses (53% RR); College RRs.
Retention Plan  Between 2007 and 2009, several committees, including A&S department chairs, issued recommendations for student retention.  Their.
1 Faculty Leadership Development Programs at Virginia Tech Peggy Layne, P.E., Director, AdvanceVT.
Promotion and Ten ure October 21, 2014 S. Laurel Weldon Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs (Interim) PURDUE FACULTY.
Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey DATA COMPILED FROM THE COLLABORATIVE ON ACADEMIC CAREERS IN HIGHER EDUCATION (COACHE)
UAB ADVANCE Retention Programs and Initiatives. Retention Activities for ADVANCE Symposium with Professor Virginia Valian Seminars for Success.
Benchmarks from the Harvard Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE) Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey University Faculty Meeting October.
Data Compiled from the Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education (COACHE)
Presentation to Faculty March-April, Agenda What is Faculty Forward? Why the emphasis on job satisfaction? How can our organization benefit? Why.
FACULTY PERFORMANCE REVIEW AND DEVELOPMENT: Key Issues and Challenges Penn State “Academic Leadership Forum” February 12, 2015 Presented by: Theodore H.
Mitchell D. Feldman, MD, MPhil Professor of Medicine; Associate Vice Provost Faculty Mentoring; Co-Director CTSI Mentor Development Program UCSF Co-Editor.
University Senate August 26, 2014 KEY FINDINGS FROM THE COACHE FACULTY JOB SATISFACTION SURVEY.
New Annual Faculty Assessment... after the Beta.
Advancing Faculty Success Understanding Perspectives on Satisfaction, Climate and Culture at RIT National Technical Institute for the Deaf COACHE Lecturer.
COACHE Presentation LUCINDA FINLEY Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs.
2014/15 Fixed Term Faculty Committee Nancy C. Fisher, Ph.D. Chair Report to UNC Chapel Hill Faculty Council April 24, 2015.
CHAIRS & DEANS MEETING Tenure and Promotion November 21, 2002.
Mentoring: More than just a welcome Michael DeBisschop, Pharmacy Alan Pogroszewski, Sports Management Kelly McCormick-Sullivan, Communication/Journalism.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Vice Provosts Meeting November 5, 2012 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
Ron Strauss Lynn Williford Jim Dean Office of the Provost.
The P&T Process Roles of the Candidate, Supervisor and P&T Committee.
Developed by Yolanda S. George, AAAS Education & Human Resources Programs and Patricia Campbell, Campbell-Kibler Associates, Inc. With input from the AGEP.
COACHE Faculty Job Satisfaction Survey Deans’ Council Meeting November 8, 2012 Betsy Brown and Nancy Whelchel.
USING DATA FOR PRACTICES OF INSTITUITONAL TRANSFORMATION Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator Georgia Tech – NSF ADVANCE Initiative Session on “Using.
Promotion in the Clinical Track Lois J. Geist, M.D. Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs and Development.
North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES DEPARTMENTAL RPT COMMITTEE WORKSHOP September 26 and September.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Promotion Process A how-to for DEOs. How is a promotion review initiated? Required in the final probationary year of a tenure track appointment (year.
02 April 2012 Provost's Report to College Senate.
McGill UniversityFaculty of Engineering Faculty of Engineering McGill University Faculty of Engineering McGill University Faculty of Engineering Career.
AAU Undergraduate STEM Education Initiative Tobin Smith AAU Vice President for Policy ISSUES Workshop January 30, 2014.
Visioning 2 Committee 15,800 by 2018 JoyceArmstrongFamily Sciences 13 JessicaGullionSociology GovernorJacksonFinancial AidMarkHamnerInstitutional Research.
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
Promotions on the Clinician Educator Track Larry L. Swift, Ph.D. Vice Chair for Faculty Affairs Department of Pathology, Microbiology & Immunology.
PROMOTION AND TENURE: THE LONG AND WINDING ROAD. WHAT ARE THE RANKS? WHAT DO THEY MEAN? ASSISTANT PROFESSOR ASSOCIATE PROFESSOR PROFESSOR –NOT THE “PHILOSOPAUSE”
Georgia Tech-NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation Program Mary Lynn Realff, Director and Co-PI March 31, 2005.
Building an Inclusive Faculty: Stakeholders, Standards, and Strategies Luis Ricardo Fraga Associate Vice Provost for Faculty Advancement Russell F. Stark.
Faculty Well-Being North Carolina State University March 10, 2009 Committee on Faculty Well-Being.
Georgia Tech NSF ADVANCE Research Program Mary Frank Fox Co-Principal Investigator NSF ADVANCE Site Visit June 2004.
Faculty career development through establishing institutionalized mechanisms to address the needs of pre- tenure and post-promotion faculty in the IDEAL.
Kapil Bawa, Ph.D., Professor of Marketing, Zicklin School of Business Micheline Blum, Director, Baruch College Survey Research, Distinguished Lecturer,
P&T Update: College of Medicine, Carol S. Weisman, PhD Associate Dean for Faculty Affairs Distinguished Professor of Public Health Sciences.
COACHE Spring 2015 Faculty Satisfaction Survey Overview of Results Presentation to NC State Faculty Senate January 26, 2016 Katharine Stewart, VP for Faculty.
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE IT Program under Award HRD Any opinions, findings, and.
Building Your Personnel Action Dossier
LUCINDA FINLEY Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Cultivating An Inclusive Culture for Faculty Retention:
Introduction to the Faculty Evaluation System
IDEAL–N Kent State University
Faculty mentoring in Department of Agronomy
The 2015 COACHE Survey YORK COLLEGE Faculty Satisfaction
COACHE Survey Results Monday, February 5, 2018
Faculty Performance Reviews at MSU
Considerations in Engineering
Partial support for this work was provided by the National Science Foundation’s ADVANCE IT Program under Award HRD Any opinions, findings, and.
Director of Community Engagement, Office of the Provost
Heather Brod, Executive Director of Faculty Affairs and FAME
Promotion on the Clinician Educator and Clinical Practice Tracks
TENURE AND PROMOTION IN ECAS
GOING UP FOR PROMOTION TO FULL
Report on the Office of Faculty Development
Promotion to Full Professor: Regulations and Procedures
Presentation transcript:

COACHE Survey Results Faculty of Arts & Science March 28, 2014

The COACHE Survey C ollaborative o n A cademic C areers in H igher E ducation Online survey to assess faculty perceptions on career satisfaction Look at differences in experience by rank and gender Identify impact of policies and processes on satisfaction Assess performance against cohort and select peer institutions

Survey Themes  Nature of Work (Research, Teaching, Service)  Collaboration & Interdisciplinary Work  Departmental Culture  Tenure, Promotion & Mentoring  Policies & Benefits  Leadership

Other Institutions  81 participating institutions  Peer Institutions –University of North Carolina – Chapel Hill –University of Virginia –University of California – Davis –Indiana University – Bloomington –State University of New York – Stony Brook

Highlights Overall Satisfaction Leadership Departmental Culture Areas for Improvement

Overall Satisfaction

Arts & Science: 95.3% Arts & Science: 93.6%

Leadership

Communication of Priorities

Stated Priorities

Ensuring opportunities for faculty to have input into local policy decisions

Pace of Decision Making

Department Culture

50.1% Arts & Science

Pre-Tenure Faculty Arts & Science: 87.5% Pre-Tenure Faculty Arts & Science: 87.5% Tenured Faculty Arts & Science: 78.9% Tenured Faculty Arts & Science: 78.9%

A&S 76% A&S 20% A&S 11% A&S 83%

Areas for Improvement

Good Practices – Promotion  Set up regular meetings with associate professors approaching promotion.  Provide opportunities to discuss the tenure/promotion process with recently tenured/promoted faculty.  Provide feedback to associate professors considering promotion in relation to expectations around teaching and research achievement.  Make sample dossiers available.  Be aware of the workload that is placed on associate professors – ensure that they’re not being buried with service, mentoring responsibilities, student advising or leadership/administrative duties that may actually get in the way of their continued trajectory to full professor.  Encourage pre-tenure and tenured faculty to attend the sessions provided by the Office of the Vice Provost, Faculty and Academic Life

Good Practices – Mentoring  Work with the Office of the Vice Provost, Faculty and Academic Life to establish and evaluate a mentoring program.  Provide mentors for both pre-tenure and tenured faculty. Just because a faculty member gets tenure and is promoted to the associate rank does not mean that s/he no longer needs or wants a mentor.  Don’t make assumptions about what type of mentoring faculty will want (or if they will want it at all). Mentoring should be tailored to individual needs.  Develop written guidelines for both mentors and mentees.  Consider some alternative types of mentoring – peer mentoring, group mentoring, collaborative support models.  If you’re in a small department or division, consider building networks beyond the department or division, particularly in order to support underrepresented faculty to find a mentor with a similar background.  If possible, provide some kind of reward to those who act as mentors.

59.3% 48.8% 58.9% 61.7%

Next Steps

Resources for Chairs  COACHE results with: – Questions for Discussion and – Good Practices – /resources/ /resources/  Can provide department presentations upon request  Suggestion box: mments/

Questions?