Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air.  Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiological Assessment March 29, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems totaled more than 130 hours of flying – Flight operations were.
Advertisements

Nuclear Accident in Japan: A Summary
Radiological Assessment March 25, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 70 hours of flying – Flight operations.
Response to a nuclear plant incident in Wisconsin How a nuclear power plant incident could affect your county October 14, 2009.
PUBLIC DOSES ESTIMATION BASED ON EFFLUENTS DATA AND DIRECT MEASUREMENTS OF TRITIUM IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES AT CERNAVODA E. Bobric, I. Popescu, V. Simionov.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
Overview of Developments: Environmental Protection Agency’s Radiological Emergency Preparedness Program Bonnie Gitlin, Acting Director, Radiation Protection.
Title Here Title Here, Optional or Unit Identifier Nuclear Engineering Program Impact and Radiation Effects Resulting from the Nuclear Events in Japan.
HPT Rev. 2 Page 1 of 17 TP-1 ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords History, post-accident sample, containment air, three mile island, NUREG 0578, NUREG.
Safety Implications of the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Sheldon L. Trubatch, Ph.D., J.D. Vice-Chairman Arizona Section American Nuclear Society.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 6, 2011.
Meltdown alert at Japan reactor Technicians are battling to stabilise a third reactor at a quake-stricken Japanese nuclear plant, which has been rocked.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant May 13, 2011.
Overview of Incident at Fukushima Daiich Nuclear Power Station (1F) (Informal personal observations) April 2011.
Contamination of food imports into the United States in the early days after the Fukushima accident Robert L. Metzger, Ph.D. Radiation Safety Engineering,
Nuclear Power.
Northwest Area Committee Meeting June 29, 2011 C. Terada, EPA Japan 2011 US National Radiation Monitoring.
EPA’s Response to Fukushima Japan Nuclear Emergency Mike Boyd, Senior Health Physicist EPA/Office of Radiation & Indoor Air Presented at 2011 OAS Annual.
Background Roundtable of Federal Hazard Mitigation Partners in the Pacific Islands (FHMPPI) (2002 – 2003) Pacific Risk Management `Ohana (PRiMO) (2004.
ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES REPORT Environmental health And Nuclear issues Ana Ormaechea Santi Mateos Silvia Saura.
Radiological Monitoring of Air and Drinking Water in British Columbia Following the Fukushima Nuclear Incident Environmental Health Services (EHS) British.
Phillip Ray Gibson NC Radon Program
Radon Overview Introduction: Radon and Radon Exposure Health Effects.
Radon and lung cancer Annual deaths (1995) from lung cancer: 146,400
Fukushima Incident Preliminary Analysis, Consequences and Safety Status of Indian NPPs Part-1 Dr. S.K.Jain Chairman & Managing Director NPCIL & BHAVINI.
IT’S NOT OVER YET! THE FUKUSHIMA FACILITY IS STILL LEAKING RADIATION INTO THE AIR DAY 14 MARCH 25, 2011 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
The political aspects of monitoring radioactive materials in the environment of our region E. Wirth, M Zähringer Federal Office for Radiation Protection,
J.M. Navarrete, G. Espinosa, J.I. Golzarri, G. Müller, M.A. Zúñiga, M. Camacho NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF MEXICO ID 38: MARINE SEDIMENTS AS A RADIOACTIVE POLLUTION.
N45 E NVIRONMENTAL RADON LEE WILSON – NOVEMBER 2011 OVERSEAS ENVIRONMENTAL BASELINE GUIDANCE DOCUMENT.
Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill On April 20, 2010, an explosion on the Deepwater Horizon MC252 drilling platform in the Gulf of Mexico caused the rig to sink.
James A. FitzPatrick NPP Ingestion Pathway Exercise May and June 21-23, 2011 and LHD Radiological Plan Template Kevin Kraus Associate Radiological.
Safety of Alaska’s food sources Kristin Ryan Program Director Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Health Anchorage,
Fukushima Nuclear Disaster Team Alpha Student1 Name, Student2 Name, Student3 Name, Student4 Name, Student5 Name.
1 Module 2 Health and Medical Effects. 2 Health and Medical Effects Terminal Objective: DESCRIBE the indicators, signs, and symptoms of exposure to radiation.
EPA's Radiological and Nuclear Emergency Response Program June 18, 2009 Presented by: Ronald Fraass, Lab Director National Air and Radiation Environmental.
Nuclear Disasters A Historical Look.
PA State Participation in Liberty RadEx Randolph Easton PA BRP.
Worldwide Commercial Energy Production. Nuclear Power Countries.
Nuclear Power Plant Accidents Reporters: Uyangurin, Mareinne L. Suico, Monica Sharlyn L. Waresa, Daryl Mae B.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions.
February 2012 better environment with nuclear energy Nuclear Power: Facts and Fiction Better Environment with Nuclear Energy.
March 11, 2011 to Present. Presentation Overview Reactor Design and FeaturesChronology of EventsCurrent Status of Each ReactorRecovery Actions Kashiwazaki-Kariwa.
FUKISHIMA Nuclear Reactors Radiological Assessment Air Measurement Surveillance AMS March 22,
Radiological Assessment March 22, AMS Summary 2 Ops Summary – Aerial Measurement Systems totaled more than 40 hours of flying Plot interpretation.
To explain how earthquakes are created To discover their impact and how people responded in Japan How close did we come to nuclear meltdown? Key terms:
Fukushima Power Plant – Japan Post March 11, 2011
Chronic Atmospheric Releases Using GENII V.2 EXAMPLE Dose Calculation for Chronic Atmospheric Releases Using GENII V.2 FRAMES-2.0 Workshop U.S. Nuclear.
Atom’s Nucleus and Radioactivity 08 October 2015 Background Background Radioactivity and natural background exposure Radioactivity and natural background.
Radiological Assessment April 4, AMS Summary Ops Summary – Aerial Measuring Systems have totaled more than 221 flight hours in support of aerial.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 7, 2011.
Radiological Assessment - of effects from - Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant April 18, 2011.
A dramatic explosion and reactor meltdown resulted in the release of radioactive material, resulting in the loss of hundreds of human lives and immense.
A BRIGHT SPOT AFTER A YEAR OF BAD NEWS FOLLOWING JAPAN’S MARCH 11, 2011 CATASTROPHE February 2, 2012 Walter Hays, Global Alliance for Disaster Reduction,
Conventional Nuclear Fission nuclear fuel cycle: producing uranium ore used in nuclear reactors & disposing of radioactive wastes.
A LTERNATIVE ENERGY : NUCLEAR Group 4 Bar Shida Keane.
2011 Pan American Health Organization Módulo NUCLEAR EMERGENCY IN JAPON 30 March 2011 Pablo Jiménez Regional Advisor in Radiological Health NUCLEAR.
FROM CHERNOBYL TO FUKUSIMA. Lesson Objectives  foster lexical and grammar skills;  develop comparison-contrast strategies;  activate scanning and monologue.
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response April 20, 2011.
2011 japan earthquake and tsunami
Nuclear Power.
PAG Manual Revision Update and Next Steps
Fukushima Daiichi Jourdan Robbins 12/6/ /16/16.
9.5 Nuclear Power Although nuclear power does not come from a fossil fuel, it is fueled by uranium, which is obtained from mining and is non-renewable.
Risk Assessment Fukushima
Nuclear Power.
Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Plant Event Summary and FPL/DAEC Actions
Fukushima Lessons Learned
Japanese Nuclear Accident And U.S. Response
Radiological Assessment March 22, 2011
16th Annual City Tech Poster Session
Presentation transcript:

Jed Harrison Office of Radiation & Indoor Air

 Review the Incident – What Happened  Describe the EPA Response  Review EPA’s RadNet Monitoring System  Present Illustrative Monitoring Results  Discuss results, potential impacts and risks from the Fukushima in US

Friday March 11  9.0 Earthquake – 2:46 pm ◦ Automatic shutdown / Control rods lowered maps-of-earthquake-and-tsunami-damage-in-japan.html  14 Meter Tsunami– 3:42 pm ◦ Loss of power, incl. backup ◦ Sea water pumps disabled

Damage to the Reactors  Level 7 - "Major Accident" on International Nuclear Event Scale ◦ "A major release of radioactive material with widespread health and environmental effects requiring implementation of planned and extended countermeasures" ◦ Loss of Cooling ◦ Damage to Secondary Containment Vessels ◦ Fuel Meltdown Releases of Radiation to the Environment  “ More than several tens of thousands of terabequerels of I-131” ◦ Air releases – Intentional Venting & Hydrogen Explosions ◦ Ocean Releases – Intentional release of Cooling water & Leakage

NOAA Projection of Plume Deposition 4/22-4/25/2001

 Emergency Operations Center  Radiological Emergency Response Team  Regional Response  RadNet ◦ Fixed Network ◦ Deployable Monitors ◦ Precipitation Sampling ◦ Milk Sampling ◦ Drinking Water Sampling ◦ Laboratory Analysis  EPA Japan Incident Website:

 EPA's RadNet monitors across the US show typical fluctuations in background radiation levels.  Additional Deployable Monitors were sent to the Aleutian islands, Hawaii, Guam and Saipan to improve monitoring coverage for this event.  The levels detected are far below levels of concern

Nome Juneau Nome SaipanGuam

 Why focus on Iodine-131? ◦ Primary Component of Fukushima release ◦ Gaseous Phase  Transported Great Distance in Atmosphere ◦ Sensitivity  Easily detected and measured ◦ Clearly Illustrates impacts and trends ◦ Primary Source of Potential Exposure

Maximum Concentration: 2.8 pCi/L, Dutch Harbor, 20 March 2011

Maximum Concentration: 390 pCi/L, Boise, 27 March 2011 EPA’s Drinking Water Maximum Contaminant Level (MCL )for Iodine-131 is 3 pCi/L. This Drinking Water MCL is based on long-term chronic exposures over a 70 year lifetime.

FDA's Derived Intervention Level (DIL) for Iodine-131 in milk is 4,770 pCi/L.

Boise Maximum Precipitation and Drinking Water Concentrations Precipitation390 pCi/lMarch 27 Drinking Water0.2 pCi/LMarch 28

 Radioactive Material released to Ocean ◦ Intentional release of contaminated water used for cooling* ◦ Leakage from damaged reactor  Dilution and Decay contribute to dramatic reduction of levels in Sea Water: Iodine-131:3 May - below drinking water MCL 30km offshore of Fukushima 4 June - Not Detectable at Japanese offshore sampling locations  Modeling indicates greater potential impact to US coastal areas from precipitation than from transport

 No levels above MDC seen in migratory fish species  Japanese sand lance is only fish that exceeded radiation standards - does not migrate  Migratory patterns of North American Pacific Salmon most commonly do not reach the coastal or offshore waters of Japan  The majority of Alaska Salmon spend most of their ocean residence in the Gulf of Alaska  FDA Monitoring seafood shipments to US

Calculate your estimated annual radiation dose:

 Trace levels of radioactive isotopes measured are consistent with the Japanese nuclear incident and far below levels of public health concern.  Additional exposure from well below 1 mrem for individuals in US and Territories  Measured levels hundreds to thousands of times lower than FDA Derived Intervention Levels (DILS)  Greater risk from Radon mrem/yr NCRP 160, 2009  Bottom line? Test your house for radon!

“While we do not expect radiation from the damaged Japanese reactors to reach the United States at harmful levels, I want to assure you that EPA will continue our coordination with our federal partners to monitor the air, milk, precipitation and drinking water for any changes, and we will continue our outreach to the public and the elected officials to provide information on our monitoring results.” – Administrator Lisa P. Jackson