Overview – Non-coincident Peak Demand

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Determining and Forecasting Load Reductions from Demand Side Programs September 11-12, 2007 Presented by: Bill Bland, V.P. Consulting, GoodCents Liza Thompson,
Advertisements

2006 USL Load Data Study Presentation to EB Unmetered Load Working Group Stan But January 18,
2013 Statewide BIP Load Impact Evaluation Candice Churchwell DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
Electric Rates and Standby Charges Presented by: Cheryl Eakle – KPPC Jason Volz – Harshaw Trane August 13, 2014.
2013 SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation Dr. Stephen George DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 7, 2014.
Energy and Environmental Economics 1 Avoided Cost and E3 Calculator Workshops Energy and Environmental Economics, Inc. October 3, 2005.
California Energy Commission Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments R Resource Adequacy Workshop January.
Electrical Billing and Rates MAE406 Energy Conservation in Industry Stephen Terry.
1 Managing Revenues in Regulated Industries Rate Design May 2008 Richard Soderman Director-Legislative Policy and Strategy.
Copyrighted © 2000 PG&E All Rights Reserved CASE Initiative Project TDV Economic Update Brian Horii and Snuller Price Energy & Environmental Economics,
February 23, 2006Karen Herter, LBL/CEC/UCB-ERG 1 /29 Temperature Effects on Residential Electric Price Response Karen Herter February 23, 2006.
Presented to the PWG Meeting of May 26, 2010
SINTEF Energy Research 1 Remodece meeting January 2007 Nicolai Feilberg.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
Presentation Overview
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
Electric / Gas / Water Eric Fox Oleg Moskatov Itron, Inc. April 17, 2008 VELCO Long-Term Demand Forecast Methodology Overview.
Farmers Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Coincident Peak Load Forecasting Methodology Prepared for June 3, 2010 Meeting with Division of Public Utilities.
ERCOT 2003 UFE ANALYSIS By William Boswell & Carl Raish AEIC Load Research Conference July 13, 2005.
1 Resurrecting A Load Research Program Susan Romer NSTAR 2006 AEIC Load Research Conference September 2006.
Chap 20-1 Statistics for Business and Economics, 6e © 2007 Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 20 Sampling: Additional Topics in Sampling Statistics for Business.
Technical Conference on Net Metering Load Research Study November 5, 2014.
California SONGS\OTC Plants Assumptions TEPPC – Data Work Group Call Tuesday, September 15, 2015.
Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation
Grayson Rural Electric Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
California Energy Commission California Energy Demand Preliminary Electricity Forecast July 7, 2015 Chris Kavalec Energy Assessments Division.
EvergreenEcon.com ESA 2011 Impact Evaluation Draft Report Public Workshop #2 August 7, 2013 Presented By: Steve Grover, President.
Demand Response and the California Information Display Pilot 2005 AEIC Load Research Conference Myrtle Beach, South Carolina July 11, 2005 Mark S. Martinez,
UFE 2003 Analysis June 1, UFE 2003 ANALYSIS Compiled by the Load Profiling Group ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation June 1, 2005.
Load Research Status January 15, © 2000 PACIFICORP | PAGE 2 What is Load Research? “An activity embracing the measurement and study of the characteristics.
0 The Basics –There are 4 POLR customer classes: Residential, Small Non-Res. (
Time-Series Forecasting Overview Moving Averages Exponential Smoothing Seasonality.
California Energy Commission Plug Loads in the Residential and Commercial Forecasts June 18, 2015 Tom Gorin Energy Assessments Division
1 ERCOT LRS Precision Analysis PWG Presentation February 27, 2007.
Load Research Status Presentation to the Load Research/Forecasting Working Group June 3rd, 2010.
UFE 2005 Analysis 1 UFE 2005 ANALYSIS Compiled by Load Profiling ERCOT Energy Analysis & Aggregation.
Rocky Mountain Power - Utah Workgroups I and II Load Research and Peak-Hour Forecasting Presented by UTAH INDUSTRIAL ENERGY CONSUMERS Salt Lake City, Utah.
1 Knowing Your Customers Better Through Load Research Presented By: Lawrence M. Strawn Senior Retail Pricing Coordinator Orlando Utilities Commission September.
DR issues in California discussed last year in March Historical DR in California: some background issues –Twenty years of programs/tariffs I/C and AC cycling.
1 ERCOT LRS Sample Design Review PWG Presentation March 27, 2007.
Blue Grass Energy Cooperative Corporation 2006 Load Forecast Prepared by: East Kentucky Power Cooperative, Inc. Forecasting and Market Analysis Department.
Analysis of the ERCOT IDR Threshold Requirement Presented by Bill Boswell PWG Meeting May 27, 2009.
South Texas Electric Cooperative Load Forecasting Methodology ROS Meeting, 6/10/10.
The Impact of Retail Rate Structure on the Economics of Commercial Photovoltaic Systems in California Ryan Wiser, Andrew Mills, Galen Barbose & William.
LOAD RESEARCH Irrigation Load Study Utah Cost of Service Task Force August 25, 2005.
Variable Load on Power Stations
Terms & Definitions.
ECE498HZ: Power Distribution System Analysis
1 ERCOT COPS Round 2 Sample Design Review April 10, 2007.
2015 California Statewide Critical Peak Pricing Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May, 2016 Prepared.
Metering and Measuring of Multi-Family Pool Pumps, Phase 1 March 10, 2016 Presented by Dan Mort & Sasha Baroiant ADM Associates, Inc.
2015 ElectriCities Advanced Meter School. Rate Design Goals The two primary goals of rate design are to (a)provide rates that lead to utility revenues.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation Capacity Bidding Program (CBP) Steve Braithwait, Dan Hansen, and Dave Armstrong Christensen Associates Energy Consulting DRMEC.
DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impacts Evaluation Workshop San Francisco, California May 10, SDG&E Summer Saver Load Impact Evaluation.
Calculations of Peak Load Contribution (PLC) AND Network Service Peak Load (NSPL) As of 1/1/2016.
Matinee Pricing Opt-in Pilot Rate Proposal (R ) Commission Workshop February 24, 2016 Manager, Pricing Design.
2015 SDG&E PTR/SCTD Evaluation DRMEC Spring 2016 Load Impact Workshop George Jiang May 11 th, 2016 Customer Category Mean Active Participants Mean Reference.
2013 Load Impact Evaluation of Southern California Edison’s Peak Time Rebate Program Josh Schellenberg DRMEC Spring 2014 Load Impact Evaluation Workshop.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Comparing Load Profiles: Art or Science?
Emergency Response Service Baselines
UNC Modification Proposal 0202 National Grid Distribution
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
PLC = Peak Load Contribution (aka “ICAP”)
California Energy Demand Electricity Forecast (CED 2014) Update: Method and Summary of Results November 5, 2014 Chris Kavalec Demand Analysis.
It’s a Matter of Time: Analyzing the Effects of Dynamic Rate Designs on Low-Income and Senior Electricity Consumers.
Resource Adequacy Demand Forecast Coincidence Adjustments
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Beartooth Electric Cooperative Rate Design Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Estimation of Total of Non-Coincident Peak Demands CPUC NEM Cap Calculation Workshop Joint IOU Presentation June 25, 2012 Cyrus Sorooshian, SCE Josh Mondragon, SDG&E Zeynep Yücel, PG&E

Overview – Non-coincident Peak Demand For a given year, the total of non-coincident peak demands for all customers in each IOU’s service territory is defined as the sum of each customer’s maximum demand in that year. For each IOU, the value represents the maximum demand for the service territory that would occur if all customers use their maximum load at the same time. The total non-coincident peak demand value is an estimated value calculated in each IOU’s annual class load research studies where the calculations are based on load research samples for the rate classes which are not 100% metered.

Overview – Class Load Research Studies Class load research studies produce estimated load profiles by customer class that inform energy usage behavior of each IOU’s customers. These studies support a wide variety of applications such as revenue allocation and rate design for General Rate Case (GRC), CEC Load Data Delivery, and various other load research related data analyses. Standard statistical sampling techniques are used to design and select representative load research samples. Load research meters are installed to collect interval data from the samples. Class load research studies are designed to statistically estimate class load profiles based on the sample profiles of the customers that are in the load research samples.

Total of Non-Coincident Peak Demands in NEM Cap Calculation – IOU Approach In the NEM Cap calculation formula, for the total non-coincident peak value, the IOU’s approach is to use the value calculated in the annual class load studies. Even with AMI data availability, the class load studies will be based on samples, and load profiles will be estimated from those load research samples. The availability of more interval data will help enhance the sampling design and sample size to ensure that the estimated load profiles have the desired levels of precision. After a certain point, adding more samples does not significantly improve the precision levels.

Data - SCE We used 15-minute load data from approximately 29,000 customers representing all customer classes. 78.5% of the total of non-coincident customer peaks is estimated from samples (rate groups < 200kW). 21.1% represents accounts with individual load data (> 200 kW). 0.4% of the total is modeled (un-metered street lighting and traffic control). The most recent three years for which data are available are used in this computation. Three year averaging serves to account for weather and economic variability. Current value provided is 44,775 MW using the three year average of 2008-2010.

Methodology - SCE The total of non-coincident peak demands is a product of SCE’s annual rate group load studies1. This statistic is available by month, season, and Time of Use periods, in either 15-minute or 30-minute values. To estimate the total of annual non-coincident peak demands for the sampled rate groups: Calculate the annual peak of each account in the sample. Calculate each stratum mean. Calculate the weighted average of the stratum means. The total of annual non-coincident peak demands is the product of the number of customers and the weighted average. Balance sampled rate groups load profiles and total of annual non-coincident peak demands to recorded kWh sales. 1 http://www.sce.com/AboutSCE/Regulatory/loadprofiles/methodology.htm

Comparison of Load Research Estimate and Actual Billing Data – SCE Example To gauge how close our estimate of the total of non-coincident customer peak was to the value that would be computed from Smart Meter data; We examined the data from one of the sample groups whose demand meter records maximum demand values over a billing period. (i.e. GS-2 rate group which is for 20-200 kW commercial/industrial customers). The total of non-coincident customer peaks estimated from the load research data and the value calculated from the billing data varied by 0.2-0.8% depending on the year. However, after adjusting for the variations in the number of customers from the two data sources by expanding the average value per customer to an identical number of customers, the differences varied from 0.1-0.3%.

Data – SDG&E Source Result Non-Coincident Demands are products of SDG&E’s Annual Load Studies. Derived for 17 Commercial and Residential rate classes. DA and Bundled customers. 15-minute IDR data read through MV90 system. Combination of actual, estimated and calculated demands: Result 2007 2008 2009 3-Year Average 12,209 MW 12,124 MW 11,965 MW 12,099 MW Actual 11% Estimated 89% Calculated .23%

Methodology – SDG&E Actual Estimated Calculated C&I Customers GT 500 kW Stacked Highest Annual Demand Actual Representative Sample Stratified and Weighted Sample to Population Annual Consumption Ratio Applied Estimated Lighting Annual Energy divided by operating hours Flat Load Calculated

Data – PG&E Stratified random sampling design is used to select the load research samples that would produce class load estimates that have 10% precision at the hour of system peak with 90% confidence. Load research meters collect 15-min interval data. The load research studies system uses data with 30-min intervals collected over the year to estimate the half hourly load profiles by customer class. Estimated annual total non-coincident peak load from the class load research studies for the last three years are:

Methodology – PG&E Calculate the Class Diversified Peak Load (DPL) for each class. Class DPL is the maximum load for the class for the year. Calculate the Class Coincidence Factor (CF) for each class. The class CF provides insight into how that customer class spreads its peak over a period of time. A CF is always between 0 and 1. A value of 1 means that customers within the class peak at the same time. CF Calculation: Class CF = Max Average Class Load / Sum of Weighted Average Strata Peak Load Weighted Average Strata Peak Load = Average Strata Peak Load * (Strata Pop / Class Pop) Average Strata Peak Load = Sum of Sample Peak Loads in Strata / Number of Samples in Strata Calculate the class Non-Coincident Peak Load (NCPL) Class NCPL = Class DPL / Class CF Sum up all class NCPL’s to get the Total NCPL.