WFD: HMWB & AWB Geomorphological MMA Workshop Arup Campus, Monday the 28 th of May 2012 Process

2 General Approach Specific Actions for Specific Locations

3 Quick! Decision Making Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody General Approach

4 Specific Actions for Specific Locations Quick! Decision Making Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody General Approach Excel-based

5 Specific Actions for Specific Locations Quick! Decision Making Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody General Approach Excel-based

The Team & Input

7 MMA Team (Arup & ASM) EA Teams (EM, FRB, Ops, A&R, FRM) Third Parties (IDBs, LAs) Data (Site visits, NFCDD, GIS) Input

8 MMA Team (Arup & ASM) EA Teams (EM, FRB, Ops, A&R, FRM) Third Parties (IDBs, LAs) Data (Site visits, NFCDD, GIS) Input

9 MMA Team (Arup & ASM) EA Teams (EM, FRB, Ops, A&R, FRM) Third Parties (IDBs, LAs) Data (Site photos, NFCDD, GIS) Input

The Process

11 Process– Humber RBMP

12 Process – Example from Humber RBMP

13 Process – Understand WB & Generic Pressures

14 Process – Understand WB & Generic Pressures

15 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures

16 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures

17 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures List of Pressures in Excel WFD Tool 3 rd Party information GISNFCDD Other EA GIS data OS mapping, Historical maps, aerial photos Site photos FRB, A&R Reports

18 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures Meeting with EA teams List of Pressures in Excel WFD Tool 3 rd Party information GISNFCDD Other EA GIS data OS mapping, Historical maps, aerial photos Site photos FRB, A&R Reports

19 Process – ‘Sense Check’

20 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify specific pressures Ops GIS layers Obstructions database Detailed river network Flood zones WFD Monitoring points Abstractions

21 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures

22 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation RBMP Annex B Specific Pressures ‘Increase in-channel morphological diversity’ ‘Set-back embankments’ ‘Educate landowners on sensitive management practices’.. Identify specific pressures

23 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures

24 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures

25 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process

26 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Already in place? Increase Flood Risk? Socio- economic effects? KPI 962 -ve evironmental impact Measures Carried Forward

27 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process ‘Sense Check’

28 Process – ‘Sense Check’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process

29 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

30 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

31 Process – ‘Stage 2’

32 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

33 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation

34 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost

35 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost

36 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost

37 Process – ‘Stage 2’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost ‘Stage 2’

38 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment

39 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment ‘Low’£0 - £25k ‘Medium’£25 - £50K ‘High’£50+

40 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Final key criteria Is the measure technically feasible? Is the measure disproportionately costly?

41 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Final criteria Actions Carried forward

42 Process – ‘Action Assessment’ Identify generic mitigation Identify specific pressures Filtering process Define specific mitigation Build up estimate cost Cost-benefit assessment Final criteria Actions Carried forward Specific Actions for Specific Locations

43 Process – ‘Action Assessment’

44 Potential Improvement More GIS-based process Consultation/discussion with ‘preferred options’ Greater flexibility in spreadsheet for different contexts More initial filtering of measures (feasibility, relevancy and cost) Potential Improvement Spatially Linked Relevant to waterbody Quick! Decision Making

Questions?

46 More information: Matthew Natalie Walker Patricia Thanks for Listening!