1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gender Audit. Traditional use of audit relates to accounting: Analysis of gender budget Gender audit still evolving… -now used interchangeably with evaluation.
Advertisements

Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
Overview M&E Capacity Strengthening Workshop, Maputo 19 and 20 September 2011.
Monitoring and Evaluation for HES Activities
MINISTRY OF DEVOLUTION AND PLANNING. M&E DEPARTMENT WELIME Using Technology in Monitorin g and Evaluation (e-ProMIS)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
M&E Issues: RAFIP and REP Kaushik Barua Accra, 12 Dec
Action Logic Modelling Logic Models communicate a vision for an intervention as a solution to a public health nutrition (PHN) problem to:  funding agencies,
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Logic Modeling for Success Dr Kathryn Wehrmann Illinois State University.
PPME Training in IAC, Netherlands Organisation: Sida-Amhara Rural Development Program (SARDP) Experience with (P)PME: »Involving in the consolidation of.
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Monitoring, Review and Reporting Project Cycle Management A short training course in project cycle management for subdivisions of MFAR in Sri Lanka.
At the end of this module, participants should have a better understanding of the following : Elements of Gender Mainstreaming Basics of Gender Analysis.
Monitoring & Evaluation in World Bank Agriculture and Rural Development Operations SASAR Monitoring & Evaluation Workshop New Delhi; June 20, 2006.
EVALUATION IN THE GEF Juha Uitto Director
The participants should have understood the following basic principles: Integrating gender considerations into project design and implementation Assessing.
Participants should expect to understand: Concept of M&E Importance of gender in M&E Different steps in the M&E process Integrating gender into program/project.
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) in Project Management.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Development of Management Information System for the Forestry Sector in Viet Nam F O R M I S II Annual Work Plan 2014 Tapio Leppänen Chief Technical Adviser.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Evaluation and impact assessment David Souter. BCO Impact Assessment session, Bern, September 2007 Why evaluate?  It is dangerous to assume that what.
The role of assumptions
KEYWORDS REFRESHMENT. Activities: in the context of the Logframe Matrix, these are the actions (tasks) that have to be taken to produce results Analysis.
Framework for Monitoring Learning & Evaluation
Assessments. Assessment in the Project Cycle DESIGN IMPLEMENTATION MONITORING EVALUATION ASSESSMENT.
The LOGICAL FRAMEWORK Scoping the Essential Elements of a Project Dr. Suchat Katima Mekong Institute.
1 Using Logic Models to Enhance Evaluation WESTAT Center to Improve Project Performance (CIPP) Office of Special Education Programs Amy A. Germuth, Ph.D.
ODI work on Cash Transfer Programmes Rebecca Holmes, ODI Regional workshop on cash transfer activities in southern Africa 9-10 October 2006, Johannesburg,
Aaron Zazueta Chief Evaluation Officer 2013 EVALUATION IN THE GEF.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
UK Aid Direct Introduction to Logframes (only required at proposal stage)
M&E Monitoring & Evaluation Outcomes Measurement – Monitoring & Evaluation Creating Opportunities for Rural Youth (CORY)
Results achieved under IFAD VII and directions for results measurement under IFAD VIII Edward Heinemann Programme Manager, Action Plan Secretariat, Office.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Screen 1 of 22 Food Security Policies – Formulation and Implementation Policy Monitoring and Evaluation LEARNING OBJECTIVES Define the purpose of a monitoring.
Farmers’ organizations, policies and markets Implications of the Performance Base Allocation System for Countries and Projects.
SUB-MODULE. 3 RESULTS CHAIN RESULTS BASED LOGICAL FRAMEWORK TRAINING Quality Assurance and Results Department (ORQR.2)
Evaluation of Rashtriya Sam Vikas Yojna (RSVY) AMS Consulting (P) Limited.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
M E T R Monitoring and Evaluation for Timely Responses “Measuring the right things in the right way at the right time” Briefing for Discussion at FEMA,
From Outcome To Output. Outcome  The intended or achieved short-term and medium-term effects of an intervention’s outputs,  usually requiring the collective.
Gender & Transport Module Six Developing IMT Programs for Women.
Monitoring Afghanistan, 2015 Food Security and Agriculture Working Group – 9 December 2015.
27/04/2017 Strengthening of the Monitoring and Evaluation system for FTPP/FTTP in FAO /SEC December 2015 FTPP/FTFP Workshop, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan.
What IE is not and is not Male Circumcision Impact Evaluation Meeting Johannesburg, South Africa January 18-23, 2010 Nancy Padian UC Berkeley.
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
Logical Framework Approach An Evaluation Toolbox Presentation
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
Organizations of all types and sizes face a range of risks that can affect the achievement of their objectives. Organization's activities Strategic initiatives.
United Nations Statistics Division Developing a short-term statistics implementation programme Expert Group Meeting on Short-Term Economic Statistics in.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Module 8 Guidelines for evaluating the SDGs through an equity focused and gender responsive lens: Overview Technical Assistance on Evaluating SDGs: Leave.
Project monitoring and evaluation
Impact-Oriented Project Planning
Optimizing Outcomes for Equitable, Efficient, Safe, and Green Mobility
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Background to GRTI Est. Nov, 1999, as a support programme to Rural Travel and Transport Programme (RTTP), a component of SSATP. Funded by Development Grant.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Session 9 Recap on LFM and IL.
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
Data for PRS Monitoring: Institutional and Technical Challenges
Presentation transcript:

1 Designing a Monitoring and Evaluation System for a Rural Travel and Transport Project Michael Bamberger Gender and Development Group The World Bank RTTP Conference Pretoria, South Africa December

2 A good M/E system helps ensure that a project Is being efficiently implemented Is reaching the intended target groups Is achieving its intended objectives

3 A good M/E system will  Monitor the use of project inputs  Monitor the effectiveness of the project implementation process  Monitor the production of project outputs  Assess project impacts on the target communities  Assess the effectiveness of project outputs in producing the intended short-term and long-term impacts.  Assess the extent to which these impacts can be attributed to the effects of the project.

4 An RTT M/E system should Extract lessons and best practices for the design of future projects Provide guidelines for the modification of project design Provide adequate data for the evaluation of program impact

5 The Basic Monitoring and Evaluation Model

6

7 Stages of the project cycle covered by the M/E system Project planning and inputs Implementation process Output Short and long term impacts Project sustainability

8 Project implementation and impacts are also affected by The organizational and institutional context The economic and political context The social and economic characteristics of the communities

9

10 Key questions for designing a M/E system What indicators should be used to measure and monitor each stage of the project? How should the information be collected? How to measure quality and effectiveness? How and when to communicate findings to managers and stakeholders?

11 Key questions continued…. How do we assess the benefits and impacts produced by the project? How to assess whether pilot projects have been successful.

12 Developing and using indicators Good indicators should Cover all stages of the project cycle Provide essential information needed to monitor progress, identify problems and assess results Provide information which can easily be used by managers and policy makers Be objective and easily measurable Include the minimum number possible

13 Examples of indicators for a feeder road project Planning and inputs Implementation process Outputs Stakeholder groups consulted Funds approved and available Equipment available All community included in planning and implementation Targets set for women representatives Local organizations established at district level Km. Roads constructed/ upgraded

14 Feeder road indicators page 2 ImpactsIncreased household income Higher proportion of girls attending school Increased agricultural production Wider range of goods available in villages

15 Feeder road indicators page 3 SustainabilityCash payments for road maintenance Community labor for road maintenance Condition of roads 1, 2 and 5 years after construction

16 M/E systems must identify all stakeholders and ensure their information needs are covered. All community groups affected by the project Local government agencies National government agencies NGOs International development agencies

17 Evaluation studies and evaluation systems

18 Individual M/E studies can be conducted each using the methods best suited to the particular issue being studied

But to assess the overall progress of a program involving many different activities …. An evaluation system is required

Logical framework analysis [LOGFRAME] Is one of the best methods for setting up a monitoring and evaluation system

21 LOGFRAME helps define the basic assumptions on which the project design and implementation systems are based.

22 LOGFRAME monitors the following logical sequence of activities……

23 If certain inputs are used effectively then certain outputs will be produced if the outputs are produced then certain impacts will be achieved

24 Example Using LOGFRAME to monitor and evaluate the impacts of a feeder road on women

25 If feeder roads are upgraded then women will take more agricultural produce to market then household income will increase and women’s economic status will improve

26 Main kinds of M/E studies See Handout Annex I for details Question 1.Are RTTP activities being implemented on schedule? 2.Are women fully involved in all stages? 3.Are the activities producing their intended benefits? Study Monitoring study Gender responsiveness assessment study Impact evaluation

27 Main kinds of studies page 2 Question 4.Are the activities sustainable? 5.Were the pilot interventions successful and could they be replicated? Study Sustainability assessment Replicability assessment