Maryland Department of the Environment Implementation of GGRA Programs Assigned to MDE A Brief Analysis of Overall Success and Areas for Improvement Brian.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy Efficiency Strategy. THE ENERGY WHITE PAPER Energy White Paper sets out four key goals for energy policy to: Cut the UK’s carbon dioxide emission.
Advertisements

EPA’s Clean Power Plan Proposed Rules for Reducing GHG Emissions from Power Plants Presentation to ACPAC June 16,
California GHG policy and implications for the power sector APEX Sydney Conference October 13, 2008 Anjali Sheffrin, PhD.
State and Local Initiatives to Combat Global Warming AB A Framework for Change James N. Goldstene California Air Resources Board October 22, 2008.
Update on CAAAC Workgroup, EPA Guidance, and Possible Future EPA GHG Regulations.
Air Quality Considerations Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Council April 23 rd, 2010 Tracy Babbidge Air Planning and Standards 1.
1 Katy R. Forney Energy Sector Technical Authority Air Permits Section EPA Region 4 PSD and Title V Greenhouse Gas Tailoring Rule 14 th Annual Power Generation.
1 AB 32 Scoping Plan Energy Action Plan Meeting Mike Scheible Deputy Executive Officer California Air Resources Board California Public Utilities Commission.
Katrina Pielli U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CHP Partnership
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
Carbon offsets in our back-yard: Northern Virginia Community College & WGES CleanSteps Carbon Offsets Rob Johnson NOVA – Sustainability Officer Laura Pagliarulo.
New York State Energy Resources Marcus Doyle David Marye Mike Marziani Jimmy Perez.
Department of the Environment Implementing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009 October 2012.
Maryland Department of the Environment The Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009 Where We Are and What Has Already Been Accomplished A Brief Overview.
1 Washington Action on Climate Change Hedia Adelsman, Department of Ecology September 25, 2009.
1 Southern California Water Dialogue April 23, 2008 Jon Costantino Climate Change Planning Manager California Air Resources Board AB 32 California Global.
Water Utility Carbon Footprint/GHG Emissions Workshop Janice Adair, Department of Ecology September 29, 2009.
Transportation Sector Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Background & Strategies Local Government Climate Change Summit Washington, DC April 10, 2008 Paul Bubbosh,
Capital District Regional GHG Inventory CDTC Planning Committee Meeting 10/1/2014 GHG emissions (MTCDE)
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
U.S. EPA SmartWay Transport Partnership GSA Transportation Forum Denise Kearns March 21, 2011.
How the State of California Can Play A Greater Role in Addressing Global Warming Leonard Robinson – Chief Deputy Director California Department of Toxic.
1 Matt Kuharic Senior Climate Change Specialist (206) Introduction to King County.
Roadmap to a Sustainable Waste Management Future Waste Diversion Strategies in the Unincorporated Communities of Los Angeles County Throughout the Region.
Sustainability at NMSU A part of the integrated planning process.
August 4, 2011 Heather Ceron US EPA Region 4 1. Greenhouse Gases 2.
Potential EESE Board GHG Emission Targets for the NH Climate Action Plan NH EESE Board Goal Team Sub-Committee Friday, October 16, 2009.
NJ GLOBAL CLIMATE CHANGE PROGRAM Leslie McGeorge, Director Division of Science, Research and Technology New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection.
Bill Harnett March 30, 2010 WESTAR Spring Meeting.
Context, Principles, and Key Questions for Allowance Allocation in the Electricity Sector Joint Workshop of the Public Utilities Commission and Energy.
Driving Down GHG Emissions, Driving Up Fuel Efficiency: Coordinating a Groundbreaking National Vehicle Policy Kathryn Thomson Counselor to the Secretary.
Senate Select Committee on Climate Change and AB 32 Implementation December 3, 2013.
1 EPA’s Climate Change Strategy Robert J. Meyers Principal Deputy Assistant Administrator U.S. EPA, Office of Air and Radiation December 3, 2007.
Implementing AB 32: California’s Approach to Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions National Association of Clean Air Agencies Spring Membership Meeting May.
Department of the Environment Reducing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emissions: A State’s Perspective Renee Fizer, Climate Change Division-MDE.
2015 INTERNATIONAL EMISSIONS INVENTORY CONFERENCE: APRIL 14, 2015 DEVELOPING CALIFORNIA EMISSION INVENTORIES: INNOVATION AND CHALLENGES.
Washington State: Climate Initiative
Marty Matlock, PhD, PE, BCEE Executive Director, Office for Sustainability Professor,UA Division of Agriculture Biological and Agricultural Engineering.
Executive Office of Energy and Environmental Affairs Massachusetts Clean Energy and Climate Plan for 2020.
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
American Public Power Association Pre-Rally Workshop February 28, 2006 Washington, D.C. Climate Change: Making Community-Based Decisions in a Carbon Constrained.
Livable Delaware Energy Task Force - the Key to Energy and Environmental Co-Benefits.
CLEAN POWER PLAN PROPOSAL Reducing Carbon Pollution From Existing Power Plants Kerry Drake,Associate Director Air Division, US EPA, Region 9 California.
2014 Program Priorities January 23, Outline Major 2014 Goals 2013 Accomplishments Major 2014 Activities Partnerships 2.
June 26, Background of Federal GHG Regulation Supreme Court determines greenhouse gases (GHGs) are “air pollutants” under the Clean Air Act U.S.
Item #11 Alternative Approaches for Linking Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions to Metropolitan Transportation Planning Presentation to the National Capital.
Climate Change Climate Literacy 101 Session: Mitigation Jennifer Morales August 5 th, 2015.
Welcome and Introductions- Working Group Chair Where We Are/Where We Are Going- Lindsay Batchelor GHG Inventory and CAP Overview- Lindsay Batchelor/Jeff.
Findings from the Multi-Sector Working Group Future Greenhouse Gas Reduction Strategies in the Metropolitan Washington Region Presentation to the WRTC.
2/27/ % below 2005 by 2020 cap and trade 11/15/2007 set emissions targets by 11/15/08 ~60-80% cuts by ???? (2040?) cap and trade; C inventory, reporting.
California Energy Commission Global Climate Change: Trends and Policy Issues Susan J. Brown California Energy Commission March 3, 2005.
11 AB 32 Climate Change Scoping Plan Progress Report October 21, 2010 California Air Resources Board.
Smooth Sailing Ahead Partnering With Sustainability and Waste Compliance & Mitigation Fernando Berton, CIWMB.
Clean Air Act Section 111 WESTAR Meeting Presented by Lisa Conner U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air and Radiation November 6, 2013.
11 Regional Renewable Energy Study Review of Findings and Forecasts Presented to: Climate, Energy and Environment and Policy Committee Metropolitan Washington.
1 Summary of Phase I – Phase III Progress and Accomplishments and Phase IV Work plan April 27, 2004.
King County-Cities Climate Collaboration July 2015 Update to the GMPC
1 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Management An introduction Tim Holmes, P.E. Kenwood Energy Energy Consulting Services Kenwood Energy P.O.Box 692 Kenwood, CA
John Davis Mojave Desert and Mountain Recycling Authority.
State and Regional GHG Initiatives What are the individual states doing to mitigate GHG emissions? What are the common elements? and regional differences?
Funding Transportation through Carbon-Based Revenue Sources. What Works? What Doesn't? And Why? Ella Claney, Associate Consultant WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff.
The Florida Energy and Climate Commission (FECC)
Funding Transportation through Carbon-Based Revenue Sources. What Works? What Doesn't? And Why? Ella Claney, Associate Consultant WSP | Parsons Brinckerhoff.
BACWA Air Issues & Regulations ● Wednesday, June 15, 2016
Implementing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009
The Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009 Where We Are and What Has Already Been Accomplished Frequently, presenters must deliver material of.
Implementation of GGRA Programs Assigned to MDE
Implementing Maryland’s Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Act of 2009
Implementation of GGRA Programs Assigned to MDE
Anna Garcia Air Innovations Conference August 2004
Presentation transcript:

Maryland Department of the Environment Implementation of GGRA Programs Assigned to MDE A Brief Analysis of Overall Success and Areas for Improvement Brian Hug, MDE Mitigation Workgroup Meeting, May 6, 2015

Overview Snapshot of all Programs Assigned to MDE More Detail on Top Programs –3 for MDE Program Enhancements –Short-Term (2020) –Long-Term (2030 to 2050) Key Issues Working Group Discussion 2

MDE’s Assigned Programs 15 Programs assigned to MDE to implement Emission Reductions in Plan from these measures –Reductions as Initially Designed: 9.19 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: MMtCO 2 e Expected emission reductions by 2020 –Between 12 and 15 MMtCO 2 e Two of MDE’s programs were identified as needing enhancements –Progress is being made on these enhancements 3

MDE Program Snapshots C. The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative (RGGI) –RGGI is a cooperative effort by nine Northeast and Mid-Atlantic states to design and implement a regional power plant emissions cap-and-trade program. Revenues from the program support energy efficiency programs and augment EmPOWER Maryland and the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard. The recent agreement by Maryland and the other RGGI States to lower the RGGI cap from 165 to 91 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent will directly contribute to emissions reductions by –More detail later –Overall Success: Enhanced status achieved with 2014 regulation change D.1.A. Boiler Maximum Achievable Control Technology (MACT) –EPA has adopted new air emissions requirements for industrial, commercial, and institutional boilers under two separate rulemakings. The first, which took effect January 31, 2013, establishes national emission standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (HAPs) for major sources. The rule affects thousands of boilers and process heaters at facilities nationwide which are considered as major sources of HAPs. These facilities also emit GHGs. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.07 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.07 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 89 Jobs -$17.6 million net economic benefit –Overall Success: Program is working as designed 4

MDE Program Snapshots (Continued) D.1.B. GHG New Source Performance Standard –EPA is using the New Source Performance Standard authority under the federal Clean Air Act to promulgate new regulations to reduce GHG emissions from fossil fuel-fired power plants. –Reductions as Initially Designed: Included in D.1 –Reductions with Enhancements: Included in D.1 –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 40 Jobs $28.3 million net economic benefit –Overall Success: Indeterminate as no new sources have been permitted D.1.C. GHG Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) Permitting Program –The PSD program is a federal preconstruction review and permitting program applicable to new major stationary sources and major modifications at existing major stationary sources. It requires the application of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) to control emissions of certain pollutants, which now include GHGs. –Reductions as Initially Designed: Included in D.1 –Reductions with Enhancements: Included in D.1 –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 0 Jobs $223,823 net economic benefit –Overall Success: Program is working as designed 5

E.1.A. Maryland Clean Cars Program –The Maryland Clean Cars Program adopts California’s stricter vehicle emission standards and directly regulates carbon dioxide emissions. These standards became effective in Maryland for model year 2011 vehicles, significantly reducing a number of emissions including volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides. –More detail later –Overall Success: Program is performing as expected. E.1.C. National Fuel Efficiency and Emission Standards for Medium and Heavy-Duty Trucks –In 2011, the Obama Administration adopted the National Fuel Efficiency & Emission Standards for Medium and Heavy-Duty Trucks, the first national program designed to reduce GHG emissions and improve fuel efficiency for this class of on road vehicles. The program is implemented through a joint rule issued by EPA and NHTSA. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.88 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.88 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of -915 Jobs -$3.2 billion net economic benefit –Overall Success: Program is working as designed MDE Program Snapshots (Continued) 6

H.1. Evaluating the GHG Emissions Impact of Major New Transportation Projects (In partnership with MDOT) –This new initiative is aimed at ensuring that potential increases in GHG emissions associated with the growth and increased vehicle miles traveled (VMT) resulting from major new transportation projects are addressed –MDE and MDOT are working with Maryland’s two major MPOs to voluntarily: Report CO 2 emissions data generated each time Conformity modeling is done for other air pollutants Set CO 2 emissions reduction benchmarks for each transportation plan update and measure against previous plan –Chapter 725 – 2010 Maryland law requires each transportation project selected for funding in the State’s Consolidated Transportation Plan to include an analysis of why the project satisfies climate goals in the GGRA Plan - MDOT has begun to implement –Reductions from this program are realized with the execution of new transportation projects and a detailed economic analysis was not performed in 2012 –Overall Success: Still evolving L. Zero Waste: Maryland’s Long-Term Strategy to an 85% Reduction in Generation of Solid Waste by 2030 –Zero waste is a concept that calls for the near-elimination of solid waste sent to landfills or incinerators for disposal. Instead, the vast majority of Maryland’s solid waste will be reused, recycled, composted, or prevented through source reduction. –More detail later –Overall Success: Mixed with possible upside, recycling rate have been lower, but waste generation has reduced more than expected MDE Program Snapshots (Continued) 7

M.2. Leadership-By-Example: Maryland Colleges and Universities –In Maryland, the presidents’ of 23 colleges and universities—including all USM schools, Morgan, SMCM, 4 community colleges and 4 independent institutions— have signed the American College and University Presidents Climate Commitment, which requires each school to complete a GHG inventory, develop a climate action plan and implement strategies to reduce GHG emissions to achieve a set target. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.37 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.37 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 182 Jobs $50.7 million net economic benefit M.3. Leadership-By-Example: Federal Government –Federal agencies with facilities located in Maryland are implementing suites of lead-by-example programs to improve efficiency, reduce waste, and integrate renewable energy and sustainable practices into their operations, facilities and fleets. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.27 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.27 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 1,347 Jobs $138.9 million net economic benefit –Overall Success: Positive, with likely greater than previously estimated results MDE Program Snapshots (Continued) 8

M.4. Leadership-By-Example: Local Government –Maryland county and municipal governments, together with State agencies, are adopting policies and practices to obtain high performance and energy- efficient buildings, facilities and vehicle fleets, and reduce the carbon footprint in purchasing, procurement and other government operations. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.25 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.25 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 1,982 Jobs $186 million net economic benefit –Overall Success: Indeterminate with possible upside N.1. Voluntary Stationary Source Reductions –GGRA provides two paths for sources in the State’s manufacturing sector to follow to potentially get credit for any voluntary programs that they are implementing. Either companies may simply take totally voluntary action and provide a good faith estimate of potential reductions, which if appropriate, included in the plan as a reduction, or a company can implement an early voluntary GHG emissions reduction plan, which must be approved by MDE before January 1, 2012 and secure a formal “credit.” –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.17 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.17 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 4 Jobs $4.9 million net economic benefit –Overall Success: Program is working as designed MDE Program Snapshots (Continued) 9

O.1. The Transportation and Climate Initiative (TCI) –In partnership with MDOT –TCI is a regional effort of Maryland and 10 other Northeast and Mid- Atlantic states and Washington, D.C. to reduce GHG emissions in the region’s transportation sector, minimize the transportation system’s reliance on high-carbon fuels, promote sustainable growth to address the challenges of vehicle-miles traveled, and help build the clean energy economy across the region. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.02 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.02 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 0 Jobs $154,659 net economic benefit –Overall Success: Program has morphed and is focusing on Clean Fuel Vehicles more than freight O.2. Clean Fuels Standard –The Clean Fuels Standard program is a cooperative effort being undertaken by eleven Northeast and Mid-Atlantic States to design and implement a regional low carbon fuel standard to reduce the carbon intensity of transportation fuels. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.00 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.00 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of -97 Jobs -$583.7 million net economic benefit –Overall Success: Program is stalled MDE Program Snapshots (Continued) 10

Q. Outreach and Public Education –State-sponsored public education and outreach combined with community actions form the foundation for behavioral and life style changes necessary to reduce GHG emissions. –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.03 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.03 MMtCO 2 e –2012 RESI Economic Estimates: Total of 0 Jobs $130,092 net economic benefit –Overall Success: Program is working as designed MDE Program Snapshots (Continued) 11

More Detail - RGGI RGGI is a cooperative effort by nine Northeast and Mid- Atlantic states to design and implement a regional power plant emissions cap-and-trade program –Revenues from the program support energy efficiency programs and augment EmPOWER Maryland and the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard –The recent agreement by Maryland and the other RGGI States to lower the RGGI cap from 165 to 91 million metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent will directly contribute to emissions reductions by

More Detail – RGGI – Jobs and the Economy The Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative, Inc. analyzed the effects of lowering the RGGI cap to 91 million tons in Current analyses project that the RGGI program would result in an estimated net economic benefit of $155.2 million and support a total of 269 jobs. RGGI is also linked to funding State energy efficiency and renewable energy efforts. –The last RGGI Auction generated $16.5 million in revenue for Maryland, which will contribute to the cumulative 32 percent intended to support EE/RE efforts. – A RGGI report on how auction proceeds are being used to support EE/RE efforts in the nine RGGI states was issued on April 2015 and is available on the MWG web page. 13

More Detail – RGGI - Reductions Reductions as calculated in 2012: –2020 Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.00 MMtCO 2 e –2020 Reductions with Enhancements: 3.60 MMtCO 2 e Reductions as calculated in 2015 – Do you have an estimate of where things are in 2015? –Reductions as Initially Designed: 0.00 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 0.48 MMtCO 2 e 14

RGGI is a well-established program that needs little help other than when future enhancements are proposed During the last RGGI auction held on March 11, 2015, 15,272,670 CO 2 allowances were sold at the auction at a clearing price of $5.41. Allowances sold represent 100 percent of the allowances offered for sale. Overall Success: Enhanced status achieved with 2014 regulation change Future Reductions –RGGI states will be holding a program review in 2016 –Coupled with EPA Clean Power Rule (111d) there is the potential that deeper reductions will be achieved in the 2020 to 2050 timeframe –Will also impact the carbon intensity of imported electricity More Detail – RGGI - The Future 15

More Detail – Clean Cars The Maryland Clean Cars Program adopts California’s stricter vehicle emission standards and directly regulates carbon dioxide emissions – These standards became effective in Maryland for model year 2011 vehicles, significantly reducing a number of emissions including volatile organic compounds and nitrogen oxides. –Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) The Clean Cars Program also includes a requirement for manufacturers to make and distribute ZEVs In 2013 Maryland joined forces with seven other states to stimulate the introduction of ZEVs into the fleet Maryland has also been very proactive with electric vehicle infrastructure initiatives as part of the ZEV effort 16

More Detail - Clean Cars – Jobs and the Economy Towson University’s Regional Economic Studies Institute (RESI) analyzed the Clean Cars program to look at jobs and the economy. Current analyses project that the Clean Cars program would result in and estimated net economic benefit of $678.8 million and support a total of 1,312 jobs. The Clean Cars program is also linked to numerous economic development and green jobs opportunities. Examples include: –The GM plant in White Marsh that manufacturers electric motors and transmissions –Numerous new business starts related to electric vehicle infrastructure including: SemaConnect (Annapolis – Charging Infrastructure) TimbeRock (Frederick – Chargers, Solar) Clinton Electric (Fast Chargers and installation) Numerous other opportunities For more information see

More Detail - Clean Cars - Reductions Reductions as calculated in 2012: –2020 Reductions as Initially Designed: 4.33 MMtCO 2 e –2020 Reductions with Enhancements: 4.33 MMtCO 2 e Reductions as calculated in 2015 – Do you have an estimate of where things are in 2015? –Reductions as Initially Designed: 2.80 MMtCO 2 e –Reductions with Enhancements: 2.80 MMtCO 2 e MOVES Model Data needs and/or gaps to do 2015 calculations –What other data is available that would be useful? –Is another methodology possible? 18

More Detail - Clean Cars – The Future This program has been implemented through regulations adopted by MDE into COMAR The 2013 update incorporated LEV III emission standards for cars Vehicle registration data shows that 673,626 new “clean cars” have been purchased in Maryland since 2011 Ongoing fleet turnover, market forces linked to fuel economy, efforts on the ZEV component of the program and initiatives on electric vehicle infrastructure will allow this program to generate significant additional emission reduction benefits in the 2030 to 2050 timeframe. 19

More Details – Zero Waste Zero waste is a concept that calls for the near-elimination of solid waste sent to landfills or incinerators for disposal. Instead, the vast majority of Maryland’s solid waste will be reused, recycled, composted, or prevented through source reduction. –MDE has begun implementing about 60 different initiatives that would increase recycling and source reduction to varying degrees. –Planned actions include: enhanced waste management reporting; new source reduction requirements; augmented composting, recycling and reuse guidance and mandates; clean energy recovery incentives; expanded materials and process bans; numerous government lead-by-example initiatives; and market and job creation inducements. 20

Towson University’s RESI analyzed the Zero Waste program to look at jobs and the economy. Current analyses project that the Zero Waste program would result in an estimated net economic benefit of $10 million and support a total of 4 jobs. Zero Waste provides many opportunities for enhancement of state and local economic development activities and new green jobs. Examples include: –Processing of recyclables –Processing of organics –Manufacturing paper, iron and steel using recycled materials –Manufacturing plastics using recycled materials For more information see mccc.aspx mccc.aspx More Details – Zero Waste – Jobs and the Economy 21

Reductions as calculated in 2012: –2020 Reductions as Initially Designed: 2.80 MMtCO 2 e –2020 Reductions with Enhancements: 4.80 MMtCO 2 e Reductions as calculated in 2015: 1.5 MMtCO 2 e Progress Update: –A revised goal of 3.5 (compared to 4.8) MMTCO2e reduced by 2020 has been set –Waste generation continues to be lower than projected (in 2013, it was 6.5 million tons compared to the projection of 7.7 million tons). –Less waste generation (and less recycling) results in less GHG reductions - less waste generation is a good thing –It’s preferable to not generate waste than to recycle it. More Details – Zero Waste - Reductions 22

The 2012 GGRA Plan identified enhancements for this initiative To implement these enhancements, MDE has drafted the 25- year plan that establishes 2040 recycling and waste diversion goals of 80% and 85%, respectively, along with interim targets. –The 2013 recycling rate was 44.5%. The goal for 2020 was 60.0% and the projection for 2013 was 46.4%. –The 2013 waste diversion rate was 48.2%. The goal for 2020 was 65% and the projection for 2013 was 49.1%. Planned actions include: enhanced waste management reporting; new source reduction requirements; augmented composting, recycling and reuse guidance and mandates; clean energy recovery incentives; expanded materials and process bans; numerous government lead-by-example initiatives; and market and job creation inducements. More Details – Zero Waste – The Future 23

Working Group Discussion What programs should be the focus of our effort? Where are there untapped opportunities? Where could resources be better spent? Where are partnerships needed? Where else can the State show leadership? 24