Quality Assurance Initiative. What is it anyway? The Quality Assurance (QA) Initiative is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to assess the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Quality Matters Building a Quality Online Course.
Advertisements

Orientation to EVALUATION PROCEDURES August, 2006.
Troy University eTROY Colloquium April 17-18, 2012.
Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Using the Quality Matters Rubric to Improve Online Course Design
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
Quality Bucks Inter-Collegiate Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
Quality Matters TM : Introduction to QM and to the Rubric The Quality Matters™ Rubric 2008 – 2010 Edition Updated July 08.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Introducing the Quality Matters Continuing Education Rubric
MED  Problem of the Day: SEND +MORE MONEY.
School of Nursing Student Grade Appeal Procedure Prepared by cgalang Revised fkhoiny 4/2011.
What are the necessary ingredients?. Necessary Ingredients Design Considerations Design Considerations –Planning the media depends on lifestyle, lifestyle,
Peer-Led Team Learning: A Model for Enhancing Student Learning Claire Berardini & Glenn Miller Third Annual Faculty Institute Pace University.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Assessment Assessment involves the sampling of some aspect of a person's learning/knowledge at a particular moment. Depending upon the kind of sample.
Quality Matters : Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning Teaching with New Technologies May 2007.
Online Course Quality and Peer Review Adapted from Maryland Online FIPSE Project “QUALITY MATTERS” Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning.
INACOL National Standards for Quality Online Teaching, Version 2.
Web Design Course Review Grade Level: High School Semester: Fall 2012 Reviewers: Tonya C., Vickie C., Anet E., Sha S. Review Date: November 2012.
Quality Matters: Inter-Institutional Quality Assurance in Online Learning A Grant Initiative of MarylandOnline Sponsored by the U.S. Dept. Education Fund.
Teachers directing the work of paraprofessionals
Quality Matters and Online Courses in Sakai Brian Dashew, Instructional Designer, Marist College Dr. Reba-Anna Lee, Assistant Director for Academic Technology.
HOW TO DESIGN A SIMPLE ONLINE COURSE April 28, 2009 ED 641 STEPHEN CHESKIEWICZ, MS.ED AND IMPROVE STUDENT SUCCESS.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
Managerial Role – Setting the Stage Lesson 6 Jeneen T. Chapman John Madden Facilitators.
Review completed by: David Copeland Mary Leigh Sellers Randall (Luke) Young.
Welcome & Introductions Christy Savakinas, NEIU  Educational Technology Coordinator   (570) Brian Dempsey,
Finding the Good Fit: Faculty Members, Instruction, Evidence, and Technology Patricia A. McGee, PhD Associate Professor/2003 NLII.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Overview Changes in the re-accreditation process since 2007 Assessment Resources.
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
Internet Safety Getting On Board with the Plan. Introduction Technology and the Internet offer valuable resources and tools that enhance learning, but.
The IR Role in Subscriber Managed Course Reviews QM Institution Representative Training © MarylandOnline, Inc., All rights reserved.
GSU Online Degree and Certificate Programs Preparation for North Central Association Accreditation Visit.
March 26-28, 2013 SINGAPORE CDIO Asian Regional Meeting and Workshop on Engineering Education and Policies for Regional Leaders Programme Evaluation (CDIO.
Dakota State University.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
 Office of Student Affairs › All about students › Admission, tracking progression, and graduation › Facilitate student success › Administer the curricular.
MAKING THE SHIFT: FROM CLASSROOM TO ONLINE COURSE DESIGN
Course Introduction CEN 5016 Software Engineering Dr. David A. Workman School of EE and Computer Science January 9, 2007.
Instructional Strategies Teacher Knowledge, Understanding, and Abilities The online teacher knows and understands the techniques and applications of online.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
Mathematics Program Improvement Review. KWL Complete the following sections of the KWL Chart K – What you know? W – What you want to know? We will complete.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Research Problem The role of the instructor in online courses depends on course design. Traditional instructor responsibilities include class management,
Working With the Instructional Development Team Presented by Heidi King 20 November 2002.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT Teacher Appraisal and Development System Update Training HOUSTON INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Quality Matters Jennifer Strickland, PhD,
Tips on Discussing the Standards & Giving Peer Feedback February 2010.
Amendments to the District ESE Policy and Procedures that outline Virtual education guidelines appear in blue. "The noblest pleasure is the joy of understanding."
Learning Management System. Introduction Software application or Web-based technology used to plan, implement, and assess a specific learning process.
Mapping Your Online Course Susie Bussmann, Ph.D. & Sandy Johnson, M.A. & M.S.
CIAS Program Level Assessment Office of Educational Effectiveness Assessment September 6, 2016.
Pilot’s Log: Getting Our Professional Development Course QM Recognized
A community of learners improving our world
Online Teaching Conference
Tools for Infusing QM Standards into the Course Development Process
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Executive Committee Meeting May 18, 2018
A Guide to the Sharing Information on Progress (SIP)
Student Assessment and Evaluation
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Aligning QM Standards with Higher Education Accreditation Hallmarks
Presentation transcript:

Quality Assurance Initiative

What is it anyway? The Quality Assurance (QA) Initiative is a faculty-centered, peer review process designed to assess the quality of online courses.

What the process is not… Not about an individual instructor Not about faculty evaluation Not a win/lose or pass/fail test It’s about the course design It’s about course quality It’s a diagnostic tool to facilitate continuous improvement of online/hybrid courses

By Show of Hands…. Familiar with the Quality Assurance (QA) Peer Review Process? Had your online course QA reviewed? Participated in a QA course review?

Our Process

Peer Course Review Feedback Course Course Meets Quality Expectations Course Revision Review Report with Faculty (along w/team chair) Select Courses to be reviewed Organize Peer Review Team Peer Review Team Paperwork Submit Review Planning Sheet to eCampus QA eCampus QA Course Peer Review Process Notify Faculty of Course Review Conduct Faculty Orientation Provide Reviewer Support Monitor Review Progress & Completion Gather Review Results Course Did Not Meet QA Provide Instructional Design Support Review Revisions w/Faculty Assist with Course Amendment Form Notify QA of “Met” Courses Notify Faculty Member, Dean & eCampus Academics

Course Alignment 5 of the 8 general standards should align: –Course Overview and Introduction –Learning Objectives –Assessment and Measurement –Resources and Materials –Learner Interaction –Course Technology –Learner Support –ADA Compliance Key components must align.

Some essential standards… A statement introduces the student to the course and the structure of the student learning Navigational instructions make the organization of the course easy to understand Learning activities foster interaction: –Instructor-student –Content-student –Student-student (if appropriate) Clear standards are set for instructor response and availability

Other Essential Standards… Assessment strategies should provide feedback to the student Grading policy should be transparent and easy for the student to understand Implemented tools and media should support learning objectives –And integrate with texts and lesson assignments The course acknowledges the importance of ADA compliance

Our Challenges

Challenges… Managing High Volume of Paperwork and files Tracking multiple aspects of each review Collecting information from Reviewers Timely processing of Review Analysis Keeping the momentum Convincing faculty this is not a formal “evaluation”

Solutions “Formally” approved internal QA Procedure Standard reporting requirements to track status of reviews (newly implemented online forms) “Getting Started” Letter Regular communication with reviewers Created Website for