Guillermo Fernández de la Garza Member of the Board of Innovation in Science Education President & CEO of the U.S. – Mexico Foundation for Science.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

National Academy of Engineering of the National Academies 1 Phase II: Educating the 2020 Engineer Phase II: Adapting Engineering Education to the New Century...
Partners in Learning Partners in Learning UK: Next Steps Kristen Weatherby UK Programme Manager Partners in Learning.
Review of the Strategic Planning Process Science Advisory Committee Meeting June 9, 2004.
Teacher Education for the Global Age The Imperative for Change LONGVIEW FOUNDATION for Education in World Affairs and International Understanding, Inc.
Materials Support Assessment Professional Development Community/ Administrative Involvement Curriculum Materials Science: It’s Elementary Bringing science.
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
1 Fundación México-Estados Unidos para la Ciencia The United States - Mexico Foundation for Science FUMEC experience and the tri-national cooperation in.
Leadership Role in Creating an Effective Mathematics Classroom.
Association of Science-Technology Annual Conference October 31-November 1, 2009 Session Leader: Diane LaFollette, Network Coordinator, Arkansas Discovery.
Guillermo Fernández de la Garza Member of the Board Innovation for Science Education.
21st Century Skills in Minnesota TIES 2009 Education Technology Conference Leslie Yoder, Saint Paul Schools Julie Beddow-Schubert, Le Crescent-Hokah Schools.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Standards Aligned System April 21, 2011 – In-Service.
CYCO Professional Development Packages (PDPs) Teacher Responsiveness to Student Scientific Inquiry 1.
Slovenian Innovation Journalism initiatives INCO JR. Innovation Journalism Violeta Bulc, Vibacom Stanford University,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Embedded Assessment M.Ed. In Curriculum & Instruction with a Specialization in Language & Literacy.
1 UTeach Professional Development Courses. 2 UTS Step 1 Early exposure to classroom environment (can be as early as a student’s first semester)
Contribution of a Professional Development Program for Teachers’ Learning Mónica Baptista; Ana Maria Freire
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Experiences and requirements in teacher professional development: Understanding teacher change Sylvia Linan-Thompson, Ph.D. The University of Texas at.
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Differentiating Instruction Professional Development.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
1 Intel ® Teach ST & ITA Summit Copyright © 2010 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Implementation of District- Wide Middle School Student Research Projects A Three Year Plan to Build Inquiry Skills and Create Sustained Vertical Articulation.
Illinois MSP Program Goals  To increase the content expertise of mathematics and science teachers; 4 To increase teaching skills through access to the.
Stronge and Associates Educational Consulting, LLC Documenting Teacher Performance: Using Multiple Data Sources for Authentic Performance Portraits Simulation.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel and Intel Education are trademarks or registered trademarks of Intel Corporation or its.
Texas Science Technology Engineering and Math (T-STEM) Initiative Robin Gelinas—Texas Education Agency Director of Policy Initiatives.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
The Areas of Interaction are…
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok Reflecting National Education Goals in Teacher’s Competency Standards Jonghwi Park Programme Specialist ICT in Education,
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
ISLN Network Meeting KEDC SUPERINTENDENT UPDATE. Why we are here--Purpose of ISLN network New academic standards  Deconstruct and disseminate Content.
Chapter 1 Defining Social Studies. Chapter 1: Defining Social Studies Thinking Ahead What do you associate with or think of when you hear the words social.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
DVC Essay #2. The Essay  Read the following six California Standards for Teachers.  Discuss each standard and the elements that follow them  Choose.
Plenary Session 7: Technologies and Principles of Learning in Support of Teaching Delwyn L. Harnisch University of Nebraska, Lincoln.
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
Teaching to the Standard in Science Education By: Jennifer Grzelak & Bonnie Middleton.
1 What Are We Doing Here Anyway? Vision for our Work: Effective Science Learning Experiences Dave Weaver RMC Research Corp.
School in Front of Challenges of Knowledge Society, Again and Again Liisa Ilomäki Department of Psychology University of Helsinki EDEN conference.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
STEM EDUCATION TRANSFORMATION Barbara McAllister May 2013 INTEL’S MODEL FOR.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
Department of Education and CultureOrganization of American States Inter-American Program on Education for Democratic Values and Practices Progress Report.
Part I Educational Technology1 INTRODUCING THE STANDARDS TOOLKIT (Educational Technology) Performance Indicator Progression Scope and Sequence Instructional.
Course, Curriculum, and Laboratory Improvement (CCLI) Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics PROGRAM.
THE IANAS PROGRAM ON SCIENCE EDUCATION La Paz, Bolivia February 25, 2010 José A. Lozano Coordinator ACADEMIA COLOMBIANA DE CIENCIAS EXACTAS, FISICAS Y.
SAS What is a coach to do? Classrooms for the Future/21st Century Teaching and Learning with Technology, Pennsylvania Department of Education.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Science Notebooks Research-Based Strategies on how to implement them in today's science classroom by Karen Shepherd.
90/90/90 Leadership Summit District Leadership Team
Using PLCs to Build Expertise Community of Practice October 9, 2013 Tammy Bresnahan & Tammy Ferguson.
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Equipping the Next Generation for Active Engagement in Science EngagingScience.eu שילוב נושאים סוציו-מדעיים ואתיים בלימודי מדע ד"ר יעל שורץ, אתי דגן ואמיל.
Asking the Right K-12 Questions How to Answer Them to Evaluate K-12 STEM Outreach and Engagement Carlos Rodriguez, Ph.D., Principal Research Scientist.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
Designing Curriculum for the Next Generation
Collaborative Literacy
Presentation transcript:

Guillermo Fernández de la Garza Member of the Board of Innovation in Science Education President & CEO of the U.S. – Mexico Foundation for Science

Context Mexico has more than 25 million students in elementary education. The level of proficiency of Mexican students in PISA,in Math, Sience and Reading has been poor since our country became part of the study.

Innovation in Science Education (INNOVEC) INNOVEC was created in 2002 to contribute to enhance the learning science capabilities in elementary students from kindergarten to secondary schools (k-9). Is a non profit organization integrated by distinguished members from academia, bussiness and education.

INNOVEC established a long term alliance with the Mexican Secretary of Public Education and the National Science Resources Center in the U.S. to use in Mexico the Science and Technology for Children (STC) curriculum. Since then INNOVEC adopted a systemic model to promote Inquiry-Based Science Education, giving special attention to enhance the pedagogical capabilities of teachers. Innovation in Science Education (INNOVEC)

A research based curriculum Few topics, well structured units and lessons, clear objectives ( content, skills, attitudes) based on progression to develop the fundational ideas of science and technology. Materials support Materials and opportunities to manipulate and perform the experiments. Teacher ready in the classroom. Professional Development First hand training for teachers, with experts coming from science, education and bussines fields. At least 18 hours of training at the beginning of the school year. Mentoring and pedagogical advice during the implementation phase. In depth continuous education Adequate Assessment School system support Community support A Systemic approach means…

After ten years of INNOVEC 30 thousand trained teachers More than 1 million students beneffited 6 Students beneffited in the scholar year

The IBSE Program in México is working yearly with: 8,000 Teachers, 120 Pedagogical Advisors IBSE &Professional Development of Teachers IBSE´s Professional Development of Teachers has been done with the support of the State Ministries of Education, specialized institutions and other IBSE Programs from abroad. Advanced PDoT has focused in giving teachers a deeper understanding of inquiry and the tools to use it in classroom, in the scientific content, in formative assessment and in the use of science notebooks.

Our research shows that our classrooms teachers do much better with the support of a pedagogical advisor who helps them to improve their pedagogical practices in science lessons, as part of its Professional Development. Additional to their formal training, the follow up with pedagogical advice, Lesson Studies with other teachers, tailored made complementary training in content and pedagogy, are very important. INNOVEC operates a diferentiated PD for novice, competent and expert teachers. Mentors help us to identify the level of proficiency for teaching through inquiry. Pedagogical advice is critical…

International Conferences Since 2001 INNOVEC and FUMEC have organized Six International Conferences on Science Education. This effort has been developed jointly with the National Ministry of Education Public, the Nuevo Leon State Government and the Mexican Academy of Sciences. The Conference’s subject has been on: Educational Research to support IBSE Social and Economic impact of IBSE worldwide Professional Development for Teachers Science and Well-being from Amazement to Citizenship Quality Growth of Inquiry-Based Science Education Programs Innovate and transform the world through Science Education The Conferences have been a key element to consolidate different programs and initiatives, not only in Mexico but also in other Latin American Countries such as Chile, Panamá and Costa Rica.

In order to implement PD strategies with a global perspective as well as to learn and adapt the lessons learned in other countries and regions INNOVEC has collaborated with similar projects in other regions of the world. International Collaboration…

Cooperation with NSRC INNOVEC and The US – Mexico Foundation for Science have a strong collaboration with the National Science Resources Center (NSRC). Mr. Leopoldo Rodríguez from INNOVEC is member of the NSRC Advisory Board. With NSRC support and the Chilean Program, in February, 2006 INNOVEC started the Mexican “LASER Institutes” where there is an important involvement of the local authorities, bussiness and scientific community to support Mexican IBSE programs. It is key to create a common vision and a strategic plan to incorporate a systemic model in the state programs.

Cooperation with La main à la pâte Program. France La main à la pâte Program in France and INNOVEC collaborated to produce the international edition of the DVD “Learning science and technology at primary school”. This DVD was developed by the National Education Ministry and the French Academy of Sciences as a tool for the professional development of teachers. INNOVEC also collaborated with La main à la pâte program to make the spanish edition of the book: “29 notions to savourer et faire savourer la science”. “ 29 notions to enjoy and making enjoy science”

IAP: Principles and Big Ideas about Science Education In October 2009, a small group of UK and international science educators, from Chile, Mexico, Canada, USA, China and France, met to discuss how a set of big ideas in science education might be identified and how they should be expressed and communicated. The members of the group all have extensive experience in defining science curricula in their countries; several are distinguished scientists or engineers and members of their country’s academy of sciences.

Impact of Big Ideas on teaching and learning In relation to pedagogy, it is fair to ask: what difference would it make to be working ‘with big ideas in mind’? Consciously building understanding into big ideas so that students arrive at a picture of the world in which parts are connected with each other. In other words, it means both teachers and students realizing that ‘Just as a house is not a pile of bricks, so science is not a pile of disconnected facts’ (p.47)

ASSESMENT In Mexico it has not been posible to implement a comprehensive assessment to know the impact and results of the IBSE program Through many limited studies it is clear that there is significant evidence about the results in students and teachers. There is a plan to set up a continuous assesment program based on the experiences of other programs with a similar vision and estructure.

The ASSET Project in Pittsburgh

Student performance and teacher PD in ASSET

The Leadership and Assistance for Science Education Reform (LASER) initiative, launched by the National Science Resources Center in 1998, has the overarching goal of promoting a sustainable, inquiry-based model for kindergarten through Grade 12 science education reform. The use of hands-on science instructional modules (kits) and inquiry- based pedagogy are hallmarks of the LASER approach. Other key elements of LASER are ongoing professional development, effective program and student assessment, curriculum materials supplied to teachers in ready-to-use condition, and the development of strong administrative and community support. Washington State LASER 2009 – 2010 Evaluation Report

Finding 2—The following characteristics were more likely to be observed among students by principals in science classes in high ranking schools: Clarity of Purpose—Students clearly understood why they were performing each activity. Intellectual Engagement—Students were intellectually engaged with the science content. Science Discourse—Students had opportunities to make claims, use evidence to support their claims, or critique others’ claims. Closure—Students had an opportunity to make sense out of how the lesson related to science concepts, and it was clear that most drew the appropriate conclusions. Metacognition—Students had an opportunity to reflect on their thinking and most could identify ways in which their thinking about the science concepts had changed.

Thank you ¡¡¡