Observation Process and Teacher Feedback

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Advertisements

The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals: Observations and Feedback ___________________
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 6: Observations and Feedback ___________________
DPAS II Jessica Baker & Cheryl Cresci MED 7701 Dr. Joseph Massare.
Gwinnett Teacher Effectiveness System Training
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
Thank you!. At the end of this session, participants will be able to:  Understand the big picture of our new evaluation system  Create evidence-based.
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
Educator Evaluation Workshop: Gathering Evidence, Conducting Observations & Providing Feedback MSSAA Summer Institute July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Department.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
Handouts for Session 4 Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION August 25, 2014 Wilmington. OVERVIEW 5-Step Cycle.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Grade 12 Subject Specific Ministry Training Sessions
Collaboration and continuous learning are the focus.
1 SESSION 1 using The New Performance Standards and New VDOE Requirements
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation System Natick Public Schools.
NAPS Educator Evaluation Spring 2014 Update. Agenda Evaluation Cycle Review Goal Expectations and Rubric Review SUMMATIVE Evaluation Requirements FORMATIVE.
Collaboration I nstruction Assessment 1st AnalysisReflection Intervention Assessment 2nd COMING FULL CIRCLE Mallard Creek and UNCC PDS Work Plan Outcomes.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Document Review STANDARDEVIDENCE Standard 1 - Professional KnowledgeDocumentation and Observation Standard 2 - Instructional PlanningDocumentation and.
The Third Year Review A Mini-Accreditation Florida Catholic Conference National Standards and Benchmarks.
Professional Learning Communities. Today’s Learning Targets ✓ I can explain common formative assessments. ✓ I can unwrap a standard. ✓ I can identify.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
DDMs for School Counselors RTTT Final Summit April 7, 2014 Craig Waterman & Kate Ducharme.
New Teacher Introduction to Evaluation 08/28/2012.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
APS Teacher Evaluation Module 9 Part B: Summative Ratings.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 7: Formal Observation Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
EDUCATOR EVALUATION New Regulation adopted on June 28, 2011.
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Overview.
Kathy Mears National Catholic Educational Association Teacher Performance Development Process.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
1 Overview of Class #7 Teaching Segment #3: Warm-up problem Introduction to base-ten blocks Analysis of student thinking using samples of students’ written.
Agenda: PD What drives PD? +/- of Traditional PD Analyzing Data/Categorizing Data Characteristics of Effective PD PAGES SWOT EQ: How can you create.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
1 Support Provider Workshop # East Bay BTSA Induction Consortium.
Education Unit The Practicum Experience Session Two.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
The District Management Council 70 Franklin Street Boston MA, Tel: 877.DMC Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective.
ASSESSMENT LITERACY PROJECT Kansas State Department of Education Introduction and Overview Welcome !
New Work January 28, 2015 Yukon Koyukuk School District.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Conducting Observations and Providing Meaningful Feedback Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
An Integral Part of Professional Learning Communities.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Candidate Assessment of Performance Using the CAP Rubric Workshop for Program Supervisors and Supervising Practitioners.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
DANIELSON MODEL SAI 2016 Mentor Meeting. Danielson Model  Framework with rubrics  Define specific types of behaviors expected to be observed  A common.
Calibrating Feedback A Model for Establishing Consistent Expectations of Educator Practice Adapted from the MA Candidate Assessment of Performance.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Professional Growth Through Self-Assessment and Goal Writing September 2012.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Teacher Evaluation & CEL 5 D
Springfield Public Schools Springfield Effective Educator Development System Overview for Educators.
PLC Leadership Academy Session 2: February 16, 2016 Jeremy Koselak Secondary RtI Coordinator.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Goals, Sources of Evidence, Rubrics
Georgia Department of Education
Leveraging Performance Management to Support School Priorities
CLASS KeysTM Module 6: Informal Observations Spring 2010
Presentation transcript:

Observation Process and Teacher Feedback

5 Step Cycle of Evaluation

Observation Feedback Article Effective observation and feedback isn’t about evaluation, it’s about coaching Question should be: How can teachers be coached to improve student learning? Feedback sessions should focus on one or two high impact changes in bite-sized pieces Give teachers a chance to practice the change From: Leverage Leadership by Paul Bambrick Santoyo

Observation and Feedback that Improve Practice Frequent observation with feedback is essential to improving practice (see Sawchuck handout) Only feasible if most observations are short, unannounced, and followed by brief, focused feedback A visit of approximately 10 minutes can yield useful information More samples of practice can be collected More powerful conversations about practice can be held

Principles of Brief Observations Focused Varied Useful and Timely Feedback Feedback should consist of a conversation followed by brief written feedback summarizing the conversation and/or targeted advice for improvement

Length and Frequency of Observations Arlington will use 10 -15 minute observation periods for the Pilot In some cases, longer observations are appropriate Novice or struggling teachers may benefit from longer observations, on occasion

Strategies for Collecting Evidence Identify a focus ahead of time Goals, specific Standards and Indicators Record evidence, not judgment Quotations, observed actions or movements by teacher and students, literal descriptors, etc.. Take efficient notes Establish abbreviations, paraphrase

Characteristics of Effective Feedback FOCUSED: feedback should focus on what was observed EVIDENCE-BASED: feedback should be grounded in evidence of practice CONSTRUCTIVE: feedback should reinforce effective practice and identify areas for continued growth TIMELY: feedback should be provided shortly after the observation

Evidence vs. Judgment Evidence Judgment Teacher: “Explain your answer to me. Show me what you did.” Teacher does a good job getting students to explain their reasoning. Students constructed sailboats using various types of materials independently. Teacher wasn’t engaged enough with the students and just sat at his desk.

10 Minutes Observation Video Kelli teaches 4th grade A math lesson is in progress Kelli’s goals focus on: Improving students’ understanding of place value and properties of operations in order to perform multi-digit arithmetic (Standard 4.NBT.4-6); and Using instructional practices that engage all students during independent or small group work time (Indicators II-A and II-B). http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dRczDWKhwlg&feature=youtu.be

Observation Activity Watch the video Take notes as to what you observe (use Observation Form) Compare what you noticed with a neighbor Identify points of agreement and note what differed Look at the completed Sample Observation Form (Kelli Sample) Discuss possible feedback based on the teacher’s goals

Constructing Feedback Kelli’s Goal: Using instructional practices that engage all students during independent or small group work time (II-A-2, II-B-2.). Using your observation notes and the rubric: Draft two points of feedback for Kelli Focus on feedback that is Focused Evidence-based, and Constructive

Option 2: Secondary Video Chuck teaches 10th grade physics Chuck is a 3rd year, non-PTS teacher Chuck’s goals focus on: Helping students to analyze, interpret and communicate results of scientific investigations and translate numerical or technical information into words. Creating a safe and collaborative learning environment (II-B-1 and II-B-2) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AxBavxlDC9s

Evidence of Chuck’s Goals During the video observation, what evidence did you see of: Helping students to analyze, interpret and communicate results of scientific investigations and translate numerical or technical information into words. Creating a safe and collaborative learning environment Fill out the Observation Form

Draft Feedback for Chuck Draft feedback for Chuck based on the evidence you recorded Come to consensus with your table on two to three pieces of feedback for Chuck

Educators without PTS or First Year in a New Assignment* At least one announced observation during year At least four unannounced observations during year Years 2 – 3 At least 3 unannounced observations during year *per DESE Regulations

Educators with PTS Overall Rating: Proficient or Exemplary At least one unannounced observation during cycle* Overall Rating: Needs Improvement At least two unannounced observations during cycle Overall Rating: Unsatisfactory At least one announced, and four unannounced observations during the cycle * cycle – time period between start and formative assessment, then time period between formative and summative assessment

Unannounced Observations* May be in the form of partial or full classroom visitations, or other means deemed useful by the evaluator Educator will be provided with feedback from the Evaluator within 3 to 5 school days of the observations Arlington will use the Baseline Edge software for all evaluation communication (password protected) *per DESE Regulations

Arlington Pilot Protocol 10 – 15 minute observations Educator follows up with times to meet with Evaluator within 48 hours of observation Evaluator and Educator meet and discuss observation Evaluator follows up with brief written feedback using “Evaluator Observation Form” (within 48 hours) Educator always has the option of completing an “Educator Response Form”

Announced Observation Form

Educator Response Form

If Observation is Judged Unsatisfactory* Any observation resulting in one or more standards judged to be unsatisfactory or needs improvement for the first time must be followed by at least one observation of at least 30 minutes in duration within 30 days *per DESE Regulations

Observations Outside the Classroom Observations can also entail teachers being observed during grade level meetings, faculty meetings, parent conferences, PLC meetings, TAT meetings, and any other time teachers are performing their professional responsibilities.

Department Meeting: History Department Head Observations: I observed you working with two teachers of grade 10 History during a dept. meeting. You were guiding them through the process of reviewing, discussing and revising the skills listed on unit maps for the 10th grade curriculum. Materials were displayed on the SMART board using the unit maps in the shared folders on the network. You were at the computer making changes to the document. You reviewed the 9th grade skills prior to addressing the 10th grade curriculum maps. You had expressed to me previously that one of the teachers is anxious about making changes to the curriculum.

You guided the discussion by asking specific questions and then giving the teachers time to reflect and respond. Your responses encouraged further discussion. You provided specific praise, especially to the anxious teacher about the work each of them is doing to teach the skills in each unit that was discussed. You demonstrated deep content knowledge of the curriculum for the 9th and 10th grade English courses. The changes you made on the map during the meeting acknowledged an validated the expertise of the teachers. Observation highlights your expertise as it relates to: Standard 1-A1, and IV-A3

Next Up: Rating Educator Performance and Wrapping Up