Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital BY Dr. Khaled Helmy Al Mahmora Chest Hospital Treatment Of Hypertension In Diabetes.
Advertisements

THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
Aggressive Hyperglycemia Management. Significant hospital hyperglycemia requires close follow-up Previously diagnosed diabetes and elevated A1C Without.
BLOOD PRESSURE LOWERING. UKPDS design Aim To determine whether intensified blood glucose control, with either sulphonylurea or insulin, reduces the risk.
CVD risk estimation and prevention: An overview of SIGN 97.
Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
CVD prevention & management: a new approach for primary care Rod Jackson School of Population Health University of Auckland New Zealand.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Dyslipidemia Chapter 24 G. B. John Mancini, Robert A. Hegele, Lawrence A. Leiter.
Benefits of intensive multiple risk factor intervention.
Cholesterol and Lipids TIPS Wokefield Park 15/5/2013.
Introduction To The Alphabet Strategy And Evidence Based Medicine.
Special Diabetes Program for Indians Competitive Grant Program SPECIAL DIABETES PROGRAM FOR INDIANS Competitive Grant Program Clinical Goals for the Healthy.
CHOLESTEROL LOWERING.
Diabetes Mellitus Type 2
The concept of Diabetes & CV risk: A lifetime risk challenge
Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines Targets for Glycemic Control Chapter 8 S. Ali Imran, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Stuart Ross.
Canadian Diabetes Association Clinical Practice Guidelines Vascular Protection in People with Diabetes Chapter 22 James A. Stone, David Fitchett, Steven.
Only You Can Prevent CVD Matthew Johnson, MD. What can we do to prevent CVD?
Diabetes Trials Unit University of Oxford WebSite: Lipids in Diabetes Study.
ACCORD - Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes ADVANCE - Action in Diabetes to Prevent Vascular Disease VADT - Veterans Administration Diabetes.
{ A Novel Tool for Cardiovascular Risk Screening in the Ambulatory Setting Guideline-Based CPRS Dialog Adam Simons MD.
Source: Site Name and Year IHS Diabetes Audit Diabetes Health Status Report ______Site Name_________ Health Outcomes and Care Given to Patients with Diabetes.
Lipid Lowering Substudy Trial of the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial JAMA 2002;288: ALLHAT- LLT.
William B. Kannel, MD, FACC Former Director, Framingham Heart Study
IDC Diabetes Update: Recent Research and Impact on Diabetes Management Type 1 DiabetesType 1 Diabetes –Post DCCT findings--improving glycemic control and.
EXAM 1.A normal adult should have their BP checked at least how often? 2.What level of CVD risk over 10 years is considered high risk for primary prevention?
Session II: Glycemic control, when the lower is not the better Strict glycemic control and cardiovascular diseases Stefano Genovese Diabetologia e Malattie.
Modern Management of Cholesterol in the High-Risk Patient.
Standards of Medical Care for Patients with Diabetes Mellitus John Guzek, MD March 2003.
1 NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health NHLBI/NEI National Institutes of Health.
Shadi Al-Ahmadi. The Presentation will include: Hypertension Dyslipidemia CVD Type 2 Diabetes-Associated Retinopathy Diabetic Periphral Neuropathy Diabetic.
Rationale, Study Design & Study Population
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
FDA Endocrinologic and Metabolic Drugs Advisory Committee 1st June 2008 Rury Holman Clinical outcomes with anti-diabetic drugs: What we already know.
NATIONAL D I ABET ES DEI TACUON PROGRA M Changing the way diabetes is treated.
Glycemic Control: When the Lower is Not the “Better”?
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
AA-2-1 Jerome D. Cohen, MD, FACC, FACP Professor of Internal Medicine / Cardiology Director, Preventive Cardiology Programs St. Louis University Health.
VBWG PROactive: Study design Dormandy JA et al. Lancet. 2005;366: Charbonnel B et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: Objective: Assess the effects.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
UKHDS (UKPDS): UK Hypertension in Diabetes Study Purpose To determine whether tight control of blood pressure (aiming for BP
Diabetes Mellitus 101 for Cardiologists (and Alike): 2015
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Part 3. Diabetes Report Card: HbA 1c Levels in the United States Hoerger TJ, et al. Diabetes Care. 2008;31: Patients (%) HbA 1c (%)
MACROVASCULAR COMPLICATIONS, DYSLIPIDEMIA and HYPERTENSION 2003 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada.
Treatment of Hypertension in Adults With Diabetes DR AMAL HARFOUSH.
Diabetes and the Kidney Richard Kingston Department of Renal Medicine Kent and Canterbury Hospital.
The MICRO-HOPE. Microalbuminuria, Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in the Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation Reference Heart Outcomes Prevention Evaluation.
Journal Club Julie Shah, MD Milton S Hershey Medical Center Penn State University.
Antonio Coca, MD, PhD, FRCP, FESC
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Blood Pressure and Lipid Trials: Rationale, Importance and Design
Redefining Quality Care in T2DM Patients with CV Disease
ACCORD Design and Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials Ungroup once.
Reducing Adverse Outcomes after ACS in Patients with Diabetes Goals
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
Diabetes Health Status Report
Heart Health & Diabetes
Macrovascular Complications Microvascular Complications
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT)
Type 2 diabetes.
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Potential mechanisms whereby statins may reduce the risk of stroke
Goals & Guidelines A summary of international guidelines for CHD
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
The following slides highlight a report on a presentation at the American College of Cardiology 2004, Scientific Sessions, in New Orleans, Louisiana on.
Section overview: Hyperglycemia in ACS
Section 6: Update on lipid treatment guidelines
Presentation transcript:

Facts and Fiction about Type 2 Diabetes Michael L. Parchman, MD Department of Family & Community Medicine September 2004

Complications from Type 2 Diabetes Microvascular Microvascular  Retinopathy  Neuropathy  Nephropathy  Autonomic: gastroparesis, blood pressure Macrovascular Macrovascular  MI  CVA  Claudication/PVD

Preventing Complications from Type 2 Diabetes Glucose Glucose Blood Pressure Blood Pressure Lipids Lipids What is the Evidence? What is the Evidence?

UKPDS The only large study of patients with Type 2 DM of new onset The only large study of patients with Type 2 DM of new onset 20 year study conducted in 23 centers in the U.K. 20 year study conducted in 23 centers in the U.K. More than 5,000 patients enrolled More than 5,000 patients enrolled Primary Aim: determine the effect of intensive control of glucose on 21 predetermined end- points. Primary Aim: determine the effect of intensive control of glucose on 21 predetermined end- points. Added a secondary arm to study the effect of blood pressure and lipid control. Added a secondary arm to study the effect of blood pressure and lipid control.

Glucose: Fact or Fiction? Tight control of blood glucose improves mortality. Tight control of blood glucose improves mortality. FACT: Tight control of blood glucose did not prevent premature mortality FACT: Tight control of blood glucose did not prevent premature mortality

Glucose: Fact or Fiction? All patients with type 2 diabetes benefit from treatment with metformin. All patients with type 2 diabetes benefit from treatment with metformin. FACT: In overweight patients, metformin decreased mortality related to diabetes or other cause (13.5 v events per 1000 pt yrs, NNT per year=141) AND diabetes related complications (29.8 v events/1000 pt yrs) FACT: In overweight patients, metformin decreased mortality related to diabetes or other cause (13.5 v events per 1000 pt yrs, NNT per year=141) AND diabetes related complications (29.8 v events/1000 pt yrs) “Overweight patients with type 2 DM seem to benefit not so much from the overall control of glucose but rather from taking metformin.” “Overweight patients with type 2 DM seem to benefit not so much from the overall control of glucose but rather from taking metformin.”

Glucose: Fact or Fiction? Tight control of blood glucose prevents the onset of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Tight control of blood glucose prevents the onset of microvascular and macrovascular complications. FACT: Changes in HbA1c produced by intensive drug treatment did not correlate with microvascular or macrovascular outcomes. FACT: Changes in HbA1c produced by intensive drug treatment did not correlate with microvascular or macrovascular outcomes. FACT: In overweight patients, treatment with insulin or sulfonylureas had no effect on individual or aggregate microvascular or macrovascular outcomes. FACT: In overweight patients, treatment with insulin or sulfonylureas had no effect on individual or aggregate microvascular or macrovascular outcomes.

BP: Fact or Fiction Tight blood pressure control prevents macrovascular but not microvascular complications Tight blood pressure control prevents macrovascular but not microvascular complications FACT: Tight control of blood pressure decreased likelihood of ALL 21 different endpoints, microvascular, macrovascular and mortality. FACT: Tight control of blood pressure decreased likelihood of ALL 21 different endpoints, microvascular, macrovascular and mortality. Control of BP had greater effect on complications than glucose control (24% v. 12% decreased risk in diabetes related complications Control of BP had greater effect on complications than glucose control (24% v. 12% decreased risk in diabetes related complications

BP: Fact or Fiction Diastolic blood pressure is a more important risk factor for MI and stroke than systolic Diastolic blood pressure is a more important risk factor for MI and stroke than systolic FACT: Systolic BP is a more important risk factor for MI and stroke than diasolic. FACT: Systolic BP is a more important risk factor for MI and stroke than diasolic. FACT: Each 10mm Hg reduction in systolic BP associated with 12% reduction in risk for ANY complication of diabetes FACT: Each 10mm Hg reduction in systolic BP associated with 12% reduction in risk for ANY complication of diabetes FACT: No lower threshold for any complication below which risk no longer decreased. FACT: No lower threshold for any complication below which risk no longer decreased.

Systolic BP and Incidence Rate of Any DM Complication

How Do We Get This Low? UKPDS: Over 60% of patients in “tight” BP control group requires 3 or more drugs 2 (“tight” = mean BP 144/82) UKPDS: Over 60% of patients in “tight” BP control group requires 3 or more drugs 2 (“tight” = mean BP 144/82)

Lipids: Fact or Fiction Patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of CVD should have an LDL level of <130 Patients with type 2 diabetes and no history of CVD should have an LDL level of <130 FACT: Heart Protection Study* FACT: Heart Protection Study*  T2DM over age 40  Total Cholesterol over 135  LDL reduction of 30% associated with 25% reduction in first major coronary event, regardless of baseline LDL level

How Low Can We Go? Grundy et al. Circulation 2004;110:227. July 13, 2004

Adult Treatment Panel III Guidelines as of July 13, 2004 Diabetes AND CHD Diabetes AND CHD LDL goal of less than 70 mg/dl Diabetes Without CHD Diabetes Without CHD LDL goal of less than 100 mg/dl Grundy et al. Circulation 2004;110:227. July 13, 2004

Heart Protection Study* “…statin therapy should now be considered routinely for all diabetic patients at sufficiently high risk for such major vascular events, irrespective of their initial cholesterol concentrations.” “…statin therapy should now be considered routinely for all diabetic patients at sufficiently high risk for such major vascular events, irrespective of their initial cholesterol concentrations.” *Lancet 2003;361:

Evidence: Know your “A,B,Cs” “A”: A1c “A”: A1c  less than 7.0 “B”: Blood Pressure “B”: Blood Pressure  less than 130/80 “C”: Cholesterol: “C”: Cholesterol:  LDL less than 100 mg/dl;  OR 30% reduction in LDL with a statin if over age 40 & total cholesterol>135 mg/dl

The “5-minute” Diabetes Visit Pressure Pressure Lipids Lipids Aspirin Aspirin Glucose Glucose Urine protein Urine protein Eyes Eyes Feet Feet

ADA Target: BP < 130/80 P: Blood Pressure

L: Lipid Control LDL < 100 LDL < 100 TG < 150 TG < 150 HDL > 40 men; HDL > 40 men; >50 women If over 40, and total Cholesterol >135: If over 40, and total Cholesterol >135:  Use statin to reduce LDL by 30% regardless of baseline LDL level

A: Aspirin, mg/day Recommended for all patients with T2DM Recommended for all patients with T2DM US Physician’s Health Study US Physician’s Health Study  a reduction in myocardial infarction from 10.1% (placebo) to 4.0% (aspirin), Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study  For those on ASA: relative risk 0.72 for myocardial infarction in the first 5 years Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Trial Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) Trial  Aspirin significantly reduced cardiovascular events by 15% and myocardial infarction by 36%

G: Glucose Testing If < 7.0: A1c testing twice each year, at least 3 months apart If < 7.0: A1c testing twice each year, at least 3 months apart If > 7.0; every 3 months If > 7.0; every 3 months

ADA Target: A1c < 7.0%

U: Urine Protein Annual screening urine micro-albumin Detection of nephropathy Begin ACEI to slow progression of nepthropathy

E: Eyes Annual dilated eye exam or at frequency recommended by eye specialist after initial exam Annual dilated eye exam or at frequency recommended by eye specialist after initial exam

Screening for Retinopathy: Vijan S, et al JAMA 2000;238: Risk Group Risk of Any Retinopathy No Screening Annual Screening High (age 45y; A1c 11% Moderate (age 65 y; A1c 9% Low (age 75y; Ac1 7% Risk of Blindness, %

F: Feet Visual inspection at every visit Visual inspection at every visit Comprehensive exam once each year with monofilament, tuning fork, palpation and visual examination Comprehensive exam once each year with monofilament, tuning fork, palpation and visual examination