The Continuous Improvement Process Tutorial Goal of the Tutorial – Introduction to the process - (for those with little or no experience with the framework)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
The NDPC-SD Intervention Framework National Dropout Prevention Center for Students with Disabilities Clemson University © 2007 NDPC-SD – All rights reserved.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida Y3D1 SBLT Tier 3 Problem Identification & Problem.
Campus Improvement Plans
Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System Maintaining & Sustaining Fidelity of Implementation in Your RtI System The Wisconsin.
Mike W. Olson RTI. RTI is… 2 the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time.
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
- McKinsey & Co. Report Thought to ponder… “It’s a system thing, not a single thing.” -McKinsey & Co. Report.
CHANGING ROLES OF THE DIAGNOSTICIAN Consultants to being part of an Early Intervention Team.
Ingham RtI District Leadership Team November 4, 2009.
CA Multi-Tiered System of Supports
NC SSIP: 5 Things We’ve Learned Directors’ Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Principal Professional Development Summer 2006 Getting Ready for SIP: Identifying “Root Causes” Office of School Intervention & SupportOffice of Accountability,
project DATA. Agenda Entry task Welcome and introductions project DATA –Background –Purpose and.
National Center on Response to Intervention Developed by the National Center on Response to Intervention and RMC Research RTI Integrity Framework: A Tool.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Proposed Action Plan for Goal #3 Learning Supports Actions Activities Formative/Summative Evaluation.
Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Partnership in Mathematics and Science (CKPIMS) Central Kentucky Education.
Iowa Support System for Schools and Districts in Need of Assistance Phase III: Design AEA 267 SINA Process Se.
NC SSIP DAC Update March 2015 ncimplementationscience.ncdpi.wikispaces.net/Recent+Presentations.
Continuing QIAT Conversations Planning For Success Joan Breslin Larson Third webinar in a series of three follow up webinars for.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Module 3 of 3.
SINA COLLABORATIVE LEARNING WEBINAR FOR S PECIAL EDUCATION T EAM REPRESENTATIVES AND EDUCATIONAL S ERVICES C ONSULTANTS You should be hearing music at.
Atlanta Public Schools Project Management Framework Proposed to the Atlanta Board of Education to Complete AdvancED/SACS “Required Actions” January 24,
Implementation Phase Great Prairie AEA - December 2012 Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance TODAY’S AGENDA Event versus Process Monitoring.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Monica Ballay Data Triangulation: Measuring Implementation of SPDG Focus Areas.
2 The combination of three concepts constitutes the foundation for results: 1) meaningful teamwork; 2) clear, measurable goals; and 3) regular collection.
PBIS Data Review: Presented by Susan Mack & Steven Vitto.
Performance Measurement 201: Best practices in performance measure design & implementation Ia Moua, Deputy Director, Grants & Program Development Patrick.
The Instructional Decision-Making Process 1 hour presentation.
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Student Learning Objectives The SLO Process Student Learning Objectives Training Series Deck 3 of 3.
Why must we do Data Teams? We know the implementation of DT benefit STUDENTS -helps teachers identify exceeding/proficient students and plan for targeted.
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
OIP The Ohio Improvement Process and the role of the BLT.
Accomplishing the Mission Mission and institutional effectiveness expectations in the revised Accreditation Standards Prepared for MPC Academic Senate.
Focused Review of Improvement Indicators A Self-Assessment Process SPP Stakeholder Meeting December 16, 2009.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Reading and Math. Current Reading Program at Elmira Minimum of 90 minutes per day Whole group instruction Small group instruction Individual & partner.
Teacher Data Teams FOR RTI MODULE 5 ..
A simple tool for a complex job INDISTAR. Learning Outcomes As a result of this training, participants will be able to… Navigate the Wisconsin Indistar.
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
INTRODUCING THE PSBA-GTO ACT FOR YOUTH CENTER OF EXCELLENCE IN CONSULTATION WITH HEALTHY TEEN NETWORK Planning for Evidence-Based Programming.
V 2.1 Version 2.1 School-wide PBIS Tiered Fidelity Inventory.
Iowa’s SPDG/SSIP Alignment March Who is collaborating? Collaborating for Iowa’s Kids (C4K) Pre-K K-3 Assistive technology Significant Disabilities.
DECISION-MAKING FOR RESULTS HSES- Data Team Training.
BENCHMARK #3 “ASKING THE RIGHT QUESTIONS TO GUIDE THE RIGHT WORK” PLC YEAR 2 DAY 2 INQUIRY CYCLE.
Selection Criteria and Invitational Priorities School Leadership Program U.S. Department of Education 2005.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
June 14, Become aware of: How the continuous improvement process relates to the instructional decision-making process The guiding principles of.
PLC Year 2 Day 2 Inquiry Cycle
Overview: Understanding and Building a Schoolwide Assessment Plan
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores!
Parent Discussion Meeting
Part B: Evaluating Implementation Progress and Impact of Professional Development Efforts on Evidence-Based Practices   NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives.
Implementation reflection
Presentation transcript:

The Continuous Improvement Process Tutorial Goal of the Tutorial – Introduction to the process - (for those with little or no experience with the framework) – Review of the process - (for those wanting to check their understanding, or refresh their memories)

The Continuous Improvement Process Tutorial Materials needed for this tutorial – download a copy of the required worksheet is available for download to the right of this screen Estimated time needed to complete tutorial – approximately minutes depending upon the number of participants and the depth of your interaction with the application activities

Select one work activity that you are responsible for. Individually or with a partner, outline the steps you typically follow when making decisions. Your Work:

The Continuous Improvement Process The cornerstone of any school improvement effort is the relentless pursuit of excellence through the application of the Continuous Improvement Process.

The Continuous Improvement Process Needs Assessment PlanningImplementation Evaluation The process we use to get even better!

Needs Assessment: Activities Collect and analyze multiple sources of data (quantitative and qualitative) Identify prioritize needs (at a system, building, individual level) ; establish the “what” Identify root cause(s) of needs; establish the “why” Establish a baseline Continuous Improvement Process

Needs Assessment: Guiding Questions  What data sources, and assessment tools and methods are available and necessary to identify areas of need?  “What” are the identified needs and “Why” does this need exist (root cause)?  What is the baseline (specific and measureable) for the identified need(s)? Continuous Improvement Process

Planning: Activities  Select research-based practices to address identified needs  Establish intended results/goals  Create implementation action plan(s)  Plan professional development  Align resources

Continuous Improvement Process Planning: Guiding Questions  What research-based approaches best address the identified need(s)?  What are the intended results/goals (measureable)?  How will staff be adequately trained to carry out the action plan?  How will resources be prioritized to address the needs?

Continuous Improvement Process Implementation: Activities  Implement action plan(s) w/integrity/fidelity  Collect and analyze implementation data (adult actions)  Collect and analyze progress/performance data (students)  Monitor resources  Make mid-course corrections as necessary

Implementation: Guiding Questions  How will we assure the action plan is being implemented with integrity and fidelity and measured?  How will progress toward intended outcomes be monitored?  What “mid-course” corrections are necessary (delivery of action plan or resource allocation)? Continuous Improvement Process

 Evaluation: Activities  Collect and analyze data so progress toward intended results and goal can be evaluated  Collect and analyze data to determine the merit, and worth of the plan/program  Link data back into the needs assessment phase and modify plan (chosen solution, action plan, goal, etc…) if indicated by data Continuous Improvement Process

Evaluation: Guiding Questions  What data needs to be collected and analyzed to determine the success of the action plan in meeting the intended goal(s)?  Was the goal met and is the current action plan worthy of continuation?  How will evaluation data be used to redefine or reconsider identified needs? Continuous Improvement Process

14 Continuous Improvement Initiatives Instructional Decision Making Process (IDM) Schools/Districts in Need of Assistance (SINA/DINA) Individual Professional Development Process Iowa Professional Development Model (IPDM) Comprehensive School/Service Improvement Plan LEA and AEA (CSIP) Positive Behavior Intervention Supports (PBIS) General Education Interventions (GEI)

Individually or with a partner, reflect upon the following questions:  Which phase(s) do you/your school do well? How do you know?  Which phase(s) do you/your school need to improve? How do you know?  How can the work I do improve? Developing a culture of Continuous Improvement Process

Thank you for taking the time to complete this tutorial on the Continuous Improvement Process. Needs Assessment PlanningImplementation Evaluation