Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Bio-Oncologia Dott.ssa Alessandra Santomaggio Oncologia medica P.O. San Salvatore Università Degli Studi.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Radio Maria World. 2 Postazioni Transmitter locations.
Advertisements

The Fall Messier Marathon Guide
EcoTherm Plus WGB-K 20 E 4,5 – 20 kW.
Números.
1 A B C
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
AGVISE Laboratories %Zone or Grid Samples – Northwood laboratory
Trend for Precision Soil Testing % Zone or Grid Samples Tested compared to Total Samples.
/ /17 32/ / /
Reflection nurulquran.com.
1
EuroCondens SGB E.
Worksheets.
Slide 1Fig 26-CO, p.795. Slide 2Fig 26-1, p.796 Slide 3Fig 26-2, p.797.
Slide 1Fig 25-CO, p.762. Slide 2Fig 25-1, p.765 Slide 3Fig 25-2, p.765.
Sequential Logic Design
Addition and Subtraction Equations
David Burdett May 11, 2004 Package Binding for WS CDL.
Create an Application Title 1Y - Youth Chapter 5.
Add Governors Discretionary (1G) Grants Chapter 6.
CALENDAR.
CHAPTER 18 The Ankle and Lower Leg
Summative Math Test Algebra (28%) Geometry (29%)
2.11.
The 5S numbers game..
突破信息检索壁垒 -SciFinder Scholar 介绍
A Fractional Order (Proportional and Derivative) Motion Controller Design for A Class of Second-order Systems Center for Self-Organizing Intelligent.
Numerical Analysis 1 EE, NCKU Tien-Hao Chang (Darby Chang)
Break Time Remaining 10:00.
The basics for simulations
PP Test Review Sections 6-1 to 6-6
MM4A6c: Apply the law of sines and the law of cosines.
2013 Fox Park Adopt-A-Hydrant Fund Raising & Beautification Campaign Now is your chance to take part in an effort to beautify our neighborhood by painting.
1 2 Teeth and Function 3 Tooth structure 4 Dental Problems.
Regression with Panel Data
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
1 Prediction of electrical energy by photovoltaic devices in urban situations By. R.C. Ott July 2011.
TCCI Barometer March “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
Copyright © 2012, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved. 1 Chapter 7 Modeling Structure with Blocks.
Progressive Aerobic Cardiovascular Endurance Run
Biology 2 Plant Kingdom Identification Test Review.
Adding Up In Chunks.
MaK_Full ahead loaded 1 Alarm Page Directory (F11)
Facebook Pages 101: Your Organization’s Foothold on the Social Web A Volunteer Leader Webinar Sponsored by CACO December 1, 2010 Andrew Gossen, Senior.
TCCI Barometer September “Establishing a reliable tool for monitoring the financial, business and social activity in the Prefecture of Thessaloniki”
When you see… Find the zeros You think….
2011 WINNISQUAM COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=1021.
Before Between After.
2011 FRANKLIN COMMUNITY SURVEY YOUTH RISK BEHAVIOR GRADES 9-12 STUDENTS=332.
Subtraction: Adding UP
: 3 00.
5 minutes.
Numeracy Resources for KS2
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
1 hi at no doifpi me be go we of at be do go hi if me no of pi we Inorder Traversal Inorder traversal. n Visit the left subtree. n Visit the node. n Visit.
Static Equilibrium; Elasticity and Fracture
Converting a Fraction to %
Resistência dos Materiais, 5ª ed.
Clock will move after 1 minute
Physics for Scientists & Engineers, 3rd Edition
Select a time to count down from the clock above
Patient Survey Results 2013 Nicki Mott. Patient Survey 2013 Patient Survey conducted by IPOS Mori by posting questionnaires to random patients in the.
A Data Warehouse Mining Tool Stephen Turner Chris Frala
1 Dr. Scott Schaefer Least Squares Curves, Rational Representations, Splines and Continuity.
1 Non Deterministic Automata. 2 Alphabet = Nondeterministic Finite Accepter (NFA)
Introduction Embedded Universal Tools and Online Features 2.
Schutzvermerk nach DIN 34 beachten 05/04/15 Seite 1 Training EPAM and CANopen Basic Solution: Password * * Level 1 Level 2 * Level 3 Password2 IP-Adr.
Presentation transcript:

Consorzio Interuniversitario Nazionale per la Bio-Oncologia Dott.ssa Alessandra Santomaggio Oncologia medica P.O. San Salvatore Università Degli Studi DellAquila 28 novembre 2008

la tossicità del 5-FU è maggiore nellanimale da laboratorio quando lanimale è nella fase di attività rispetto alla fase di riposo incremento della attività a metà notte, nelle cellule mononucleate periferiche dell'uomo, della diidropirimidina deidrogenasi (DPD) riduzione nell'uomo, della sintesi del DNA da parte delle cellule del midollo osseo e della mucosa orale e gastrointestinale, nella prima metà della notte (tra le ore e le ore 4.00) rispetto alla prima metà della fase di attività

Chronomodulated versus fixed-infusion-rate delivery of ambulatory chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid (leucovorin) in patients with colorectal cancer metastases: a randomized multi-institutional trial. Levi FA, Zidani R, Vannetzel JM, Perpoint B, Focan C, Faggiuolo R, Chollet P, Garufi C, Itzhaki M, Dogliotti L, et al. J Natl Cancer Inst Nov 2;86(21): CRONOFLAT 5-FU ; l-OHP 20-25; AF gg 3 w 5-FU ; l-OHP 20-25; AF gg 3 w 45 patients47 patients G3-4 Stomatitis 18%G3-4 Stomatitis 89% HF s. 4%HF s. 11% 5-FU median dose 7005-FU median dose 500 RR 53%; TTP 11; OS 19RR 32%; TTP 8; OS 14.9

CRONOFLAT 5-FU 700; l-OHP 25; AF gg 3 w 5-FU 700; l-OHP 25; AF gg 3 w 93 pazienti G3-4 Stomatitis § 14%G3-4 Stomatitis § 76% Neurotoxicity 16%Neurotoxicity 31% 5-FU median dose 7005-FU median dose 500 RR 51%*; TTP 10; OS 16RR 29%*; TTP 8; OS 17 Randomised multicentre trial of chronotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and folinic acid in metastatic colorectal cancer. International Organization for Cancer Chronotherapy. Levi F, Zidani R, Misset JL. Lancet Sep 6;350(9079): * p 0,003 § p <

4 AM 10 AM 10 PM 4 PM 5-FU 22-h continous infusion 5-FU bolus 5-FU 2800 mg/mq 46-h continous infusion LVLV LVLV LVLV 5-FU continous infusion 12-h Timed Flat Infusion TFI/5-FU

CPT mg/m 2 5-FU mg/m 2 /d h day CPT mg/m 2 Ficorella C Oncol Rep

As Treated analysis (%) n. assessable patients 24/33 CR 3 (12,5) PR 6 (25) SD 5 (21) PD 10 (41,5) AsT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 37,5% (α0.05; CI 20) AsT Disease Control Rate 58,5%

12 At median follow-up of 17 months, we observed: Median Time to Progression (TTP)* 10 months (Range months 2-28+) Median Overall Survival (OS)* 25 months (Range months ) *calculated with method of Kaplan and Meier

As Treated analysis (%) n. assessable patients 37/52 CR 3 (8) PR 12 (32) SD 12 (32) PD 10 (28) AsT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 40% (α0.05; CI 16) AsT Disease Control Rate 72%

15 At median follow-up of 19 months, we observed: Median Time to Progression (TTP)* 10 months (Range months 2-32+) Median Overall Survival (OS)* 21 months (Range months 3 – 47+) *calculated with method of Kaplan and Meier

La migliore tollerabilità di L-OHP si verifica a 16 HALO (hours after light onset) negli animali trattati

4 AM 10 AM 10 PM 4 PM 5-FU 22-h continous infusion 5-FU bolus 5-FU 2800 mg/mq 46-h continous infusion LVLV LVLV LVLV 5-FU continous infusion 12-h Timed Flat Infusion TFI/5-FUl-OHP

CPT mg/m 2 5-FU mg/m 2 /d h day l-OHP mg/m CPT mg/m l-OHP mg/m 2 Submitted

Total N. (%) No. of patients 36 Sex M/F 22/14 Age, years median range > 65 years (39) WHO Performance Status (83) 6 (17) Primary tumor colon rectum 26 (72) 10 (28) No. of involved sites (72) 10 (28) Sites of metastases liver lung lynph nodes local Other 22 (61) 8 (22) 7 (19) 4 (11) 6 (17) Liver metastases single Multiple 3 (8) 19 (53) Previous adjuvant chemotherapy: FA/5-FU bolus 5-FU bolus + i.c. Irinotecan/5FU 9 (25) 6 (17) 2 (6) 1 (3) Previous radiotherapy: RT alone RT+CT (5-FU i.c.) 2 (6) - 2 (6)

Dose levels CPT11 (mg/m 2 d1,15)- l-OHP (mg/m 2 d8,22)- 5-FU (mg/m 2 /d d1-2, 8-9, , 22-23) No. patients a (new patients) No. cycles No. Patients with DLT b /total patients (%) No. New patients with DLT/new patients (%) No. cycles with DLT/total cycles (%) DLTs I (2) II (1) III (0) IV (4) 121/7 (14%)-1 (8%)G3 Diarrhea V (6) 30 3/11 (27%) 3/6 (50%)3 (10%) G3 Diarrhea G1 Fever with delay > 2 weeks G3 Hypotension a intra- and inter-patient dose escalation ( Simon R. et al., JNCI 1997) b dose-limiting toxicity

Adverse events NCI-CTC grade (%) per Cycles NCI-CTC grade (%) per Patients Nausea 30 (24) 12 (9,5) (43) 6 (26) -- Vomiting 13 (10) 11 (9) -- 7 (30) 6 (26) -- Diarrhea 18 (14) 18 (14) 11 (9) - 3 (13) 8 (35) 8 (35) - Stomatitis 16 (13) 1 (1) -- 6 (26) 2 (9) -- Asthenia 33 (26) 16 (13) 1 (1) - 9 (39) 9 (39) 1 (4) - Neurotoxicity 54 (43) 6 (5) 1 (1) - 14 (61) 2 (9) 1 (4) -

Adverse events NCI-CTC grade (%) per Cycles NCI-CTC grade (%) per Patients Anemia 13 (10) 3 (2) -- 5 (22) 3 (13) -- Leucopenia 19 (15) 17 (13) -- 3 (13) 8 (35) - 1 (4) Neutropenia 10 (8) 21 (17) 7 (5.5) 1 (1) 3 (13) 6 (26) 3 (13) 1 (4) Thrombocytopenia 10 (8) 4 (3) -- 3 (13) 3 (13) --

Intention to treat analysis (%) Assessable patients (%) n. patients 3330 CR 2 (6) 2 (6.7) PR 21 (63.6) 18 (60) SD 3 (9) 3 (10) PD 7 (21.2) 7 (23.3) ITT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 69.6% (α0.05; CI 16) ITT Disease Control Rate 78.6% AsT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 66.7% (α0.05; CI 17) AsT Disease Control Rate 76.7%

24 With a median follow-up of 19 months (range 1-31), we observed: Median Time to Progression (TTP)* 12 months (Range months ) Median Overall Survival (OS)* 20 months (Range months ) *calculated with method of Kaplan and Meier

AutoreFasePts PDI CPT-11 mg/m 2 /w PDI OXP mg/m 2 /w PDI 5-FU mg/m 2 /w LV mg/m 2 G3-4 diarrea (% of pts) Neutropenia febbrile (% of pts) RR % Falcone 2002 I4287, h ic Ychou 2003 I349042,5 400 b h ic or 400 b h ic 200 or * Goetz 2003 I3550 or 5817 or b or 320 b2016,6--* Abad 2004 I187542, h ic Cals 2004 I h ic--16,650 # Gil-Delgado 2004 I349042,5 400 b h ic 20012,5 44 Present Study I-II TFI -37,5-57 Bécourarm 2001 II324521,2 400 b h ic #6# Calvo 2002 II2662, h ic50034, Souglakos 2002 II317532,5 400 b h ic Garufi 2003 II § 933 § 150 § # Rosati 2004 II404432, or h ic 15072, Masi 2004 II3282,542, h ic

CPT mg/m 2 Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg 5-FU 900 mg/m 2 /d h day l-OHP mg/m CPT mg/m 2 Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg l-OHP mg/m 2

Total N. (%) No. of patients 46 Sex M/F28/18 Age, years median range > 65 years (50) WHO Performance Status (96) 2 (4) Primary tumor colon rectum 22 (48) 24 (52) No. of involved sites (57) 20 (43) Sites of metastases liver lung lynph nodes local Other 31 (67) 11 (24) 17 (37) 9 (19) 5 (11) Liver metastases single Multiple 10 (22) 21 (46) Previous adjuvant chemotherapy: FA/5-FU bolus Capecitabine Folfox4 9 (19) 4 (9) 1 (2) 4 (9) Previous radiotherapy: RT alone RT+CT (5-FU i.c.) RT+CT (XELOX) 6 (13) 2 (4) 3 (6) 1 (2)

Dose levels CPT11 (mg/m 2 d1,15)- Bevacizumab (mg/kg d1,15)- l-OHP (mg/m 2 d8,22)- 5-FU (mg/m 2 /d d1-2, 8-9, 15-16, 22-23) No. patients a (new patients) No. cycles No. Patients with DLT b /total patients (%) No. New patients with DLT/new patients (%) No. cycles with DLT/total cycles (%) DLTs I (9) 12 1/9 (11%) 1/9 (11%) 1/12 (8%) G3 Diarrhea II (3) 110/110/30/11- III (3) 41 1/14 (7%) 0/3 1/41 (2%) G3 Mucositis G2 Diarrhea + G2 Hypoalbumin. a intra- and inter-patient dose escalation ( Simon R. et al., JNCI 1997) b dose-limiting toxicity

PatientsCycles Number46196 NCI-CTC Grade Nausea (%)22 (48)12 (26)3 (7)-66 (34)19 (10)4 (2)- Vomiting (%)9 (20)6 (13)2 (4)-18 (9)9 (5)2 (1)- Diarrhea (%)19 (41)13 (28)11 (24)-58 (30)26 (13)12 (6)- Hypoalbuminemia (%)2 (4)1 (2)--2 (1)1 (0.5)-- Constipation (%)15 (33)1 (2)--20 (10)1 (0.5)-- Stomatitis/mucositis (%)14 (30)2 (4)3 (6.5)-24 (12)3 (1.5) - Erythema (%)1 (2)- -3 (1.5)-1 (0.5)- Asthenia (%)11 (24)19 (41)2 (4)-32 (16)30 (15)2 (1)- Neurotoxicity (%)31 (67)5 (11)--101 (52)6 (3)-- Hypertension (%)12 (26)4 (9)1 (2)-22 (11)4 (2)1 (0.5)- Hypotension (%)1 (2)---1 (0.5)--- Hematuria (%)2 (4)1 (2)--3 (1.5)1 (0.5)-- Gengival recession/gengivitis (%)7 (15)---10 (5)--- Rhinitis (%)32 (70)---86 (44)--- Epistaxis (%)25 (54)2 (4)--59 (30)--- HFS (%)1 (2)---1 (0.5)--- Headache (%)5 (11)---8 (4)--- Hypokalemia (%)3 (6.5)1 (2)--2 (1)-1 (0.5)- Hypertransaminasemy (%)3 (6.5)1 (2) 7 (15)3 (1.5)1 (0.5) Hyperpigmentation (%)6 (13)2 (4)--11 (6)2 (1)-- Fever without infection (%)10 (22)---11 (6)--- Alopecia (%)3 (6.5)8 (17)2 (4)-7 (4)12 (6)5 (3)-

PatientsCycles Number46196 NCI-CTC Grade Anemia (%)7 (15)1 (2)--13 (7)1 (0.5)-- Leucopenia (%)12 (26)11 (24)--37 (19)16 (8)-- Neutropenia (%)8 (17)11 (24)4 (9)-28 (14)18 (9)7 (4)- Trhombocitopeny (%)5 (11)1 (2)--14 (7)1 (0.5)--

Intention to treat analysis (%) As Treated analysis (%) n. assessable patients 3935 CR 2 (5) 2 (6) PR 30 (77) 27 (77) SD 2 (5) 2 (6) PD 5 (13) 4 (11) CR complete response; PR partial response; SD stable disease; PD progressive disease 1 pt lost to follow-up; 6 pts had not received at least 3 cycles of treatment; 4 pts evaluated after 2 cycles of treatment

Intention to treat analysis (%) As Treated analysis (%) n. assessable patients 3935 CR 2 (5) 2 (6) PR 30 (77) 27 (77) SD 2 (5) 2 (6) PD 5 (13) 4 (11) ITT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 82% (α0.05; CI 12) ITT Disease Control Rate 87% AsT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 83% (α0.05; CI 13) AsT Disease Control Rate 89%

BEV5-FUCPT-11L-OHP Mediana (range) Media (C.I. α 0,05) Mediana (range) Media (C.I. α 0,05) Mediana (range) Media (C.I. α 0,05) Mediana (range) Media (C.I. α 0,05) DI/ciclo mg/m 2 (Kg)/w 2,25 (1-2,5) 2,1 ( 0,06) 1575 ( ) 1519 ( 47,1) 72 (25-80) 68 ( 2,1) 35 (14-40) 33 (1,05) DI/pz mg/m 2 (Kg)/w 2,1 (1,7-2,5) 2 ( 0,08) 1530 ( ) 1514 ( 66) 67 (50-80) 68 ( 2,9) 33 (21-38) 32 (1,45) 33 BEV84% of projected D.I. 5-FU85% of projected D.I. CPT-1184% of projected D.I. OXP82% of projected D.I.

34 With a median follow-up of 12 months (range 1-31), we observed: Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)* 12 months (Range months ) Median Overall Survival (OS)* 28 months (Range months ) *calculated with method of Kaplan and Meier

35 Total N. (%) No. of patients6/46 (13) Sites liver single multiple liver and lung primary tumor and lymph nodes 3/6 (50) 2/3(67) 1/3 (33) 1/6 (17) 2/6 (33)

DTX mg/mq 5-FU mg/mq/d day h 10pm-10amTFI traces the 12h circadian-timed infusion of 5-FU (10PM-10AM with maximum delivery at 4AM) and may contribute to increase its tolerability, using an easier administration than the chromodulated infusion.

As Treated analysis (%) n. assessable patients 13/14 CR 2 (15) PR 6 (46) SD 3 (24) PD 2 (15) AsT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 61% (α0.05; CI 28) AsT Disease Control Rate 82%

Recommended DoseMTD a Authorpts5-FU schedule docetaxel mg/m 2 5-FU mg/m 2 /d docetaxel mg/m 2 5-FU mg/m 2 /d DLT b Petit [22]37bolus60 d1 every 4 w 300 d1-3 or d1-5 every 4 w 75 d1300 d1-3mucositis neutropenia Ando [23]19C.I.50 d1 every 3 w 500 d1-5 every 3 w 60 d1500 d1-5diarrhea neutropenia Lortholary [24]32C.I.85 d1 every 3 w 750 d1-5 every 3 w 100 d1750 d1-5stomatitis Present study1412-h C.I.85 d1 every 3 w 800 d1-5 every 3 w 85 d1900 d1-5diarrhea a MTD maximum-tolerated dose b DLT dose-limiting toxicity

n (%) Number of patients Median age Range 18(100) WHO performance status: (83) 3(16) Surgery: Mastectomy Lumpectomy 6(33) 12(68) Adjuvant therapy: Chemotherapy with anthracyclines Chemotherapy without anthracyclines Hormonal therapy Radiotherapy 9(53) 5(30) 7(40) Previous metastatic breast cancer therapy: Hormonal therapy2(13) Disease sites: Soft tissue and skin Liver Lung and pleura Bone Brain 1(6) 9(50) 1 2(70) 2(11) Number of organs involved: 1 2 2(12) 15(83)

Cycles 141 Patients 18 Grade Fever (%)-4 (3)---3 (23)-- Neutropenia (%)1 (1)12 (8)24 (17)29 (20)-1 (5)2 (11)13 (76) Leucopenia (%)4 (3)20 (16)28 (19)8 (5)1 (5) 9 (52)5 (29) Anemia (%)8 (6)1 (1)--4 (23)1 (5)-- Nausea (%)11 (9)5 (4)--4 (23) -- Vomiting (%)3 (2)2 (1)--2 (11) -- Diarrhea (%)4 (3)2 (1)--4 (23)2 (11)-- Stomatitis (%)7 (5) 3 (2)1 (1)2 (11)4 (23)3 (17)1 (1) Neurotoxicity (%)2 (1)---2 (11)--- Dermatitis (%)-2 (1)---2 (11)-- Fluid retention (%)5 (4)----3 (17)-- Asthenia (%)1 (1)----1 (5)-- Cardiotoxicity (%) cases (8%) of thrombosis related to the venous access dev

As Treated analysis (%) n. assessable patients 13/14 CR 2 (15) PR 6 (46) SD 3 (24) PD 2 (15) AsT Overall Response Rate (ORR) 61% (α0.05; CI 28) AsT Disease Control Rate 82%

47 We observed: Median Progression Free Survival (PFS)* 10 months (Range months ) Median Overall Survival (OS)* 25 months (Range months ) *calculated with method of Kaplan and Meier

Grazie per lattenzione