Language Change LING 100

How does language change proceed? We’ve seen how language families spread and interact How languages constantly change, and diverge when separated

Language Change What actually changes? phonetics phonology morphology syntax Semantics We’re talking primarily about internally motivated change in this chapter, not change as a result of language contact (borrowings, etc.)

Samples of change… P. 484 Check out the examples of Old English all the way up to Modern English and compare them. What kinds of changes do you see?

Sound samples… Wanna know what OId English sounded like? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7Wl-OZ3breE Middle English (taken from Canterbury Tales) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QE0MtENfOMU

Sound change (Files 12.3) All languages contain variation at all times Sound change is complex, and probably reflects subtle changes in the distribution of variation that accumulate over time Keeping this in mind, we can still get some mileage out of simplifying the situation Sound change implies an initial state of affairs that is replaced by another state of affairs at some historical point (remember though: change is not abrupt)

Sound Change Sound changes as a result of some phonological process (~a rule) a new rule, or the expansion of an old one e.g. pin~pen - some English dialects or registers have the same vowel in both words if this rule spread to all similar environments, or all mid front lax vowels became high front lax vowels, then it would count as a sound change this would be an example of an unconditioned sound change - the vowel changes regardless of its phonetic environment

Sound Change An example of a conditioned sound change: /s/ aspiration in Spanish - occurs at the end of a syllable, e.g. ¿cómo ehtás/ehtáh? /s/ at the beginning of a word is unchanged s / V_V also changes in some dialects, so the process would be different, but it’s still conditioned

Sound Change Types of conditioned and unconditioned sound changes are listed in Files pp 494-95 NOTE!!! These are closely related to the phonological processes we looked at synchronically earlier in the course It might be good to review that chapter!

Sound Change The big picture: There is a close relationship between synchronic variation and diachronic sound (or other) change in language. Changes originate as variation, then spread through the lexicon, affecting all instances of a sound (in a particular context, if it’s a conditioned change) Once the change has spread through the whole lexicon, there’s no going back - the link to the earlier forms is broken

Sound Change - one more note Phonemic changes alter the phonemic structure of a language the pin~pen one we mentioned, if it took over all of English, would collapse the mid front lax and high front lax vowels into one phoneme Phonetic changes alter allophones, but not phonemes Spanish /s/-aspiration (/s/ becomes /h/) would create another allophone of /s/, but it’s still the same phoneme This doesn’t necessarily correlate with whether the change is conditioned or not

Morphological Change Refer to Files Summary: morphological change is usually analogical, either by proportional analogy (a:b::c:X) or by paradigm leveling (where related words are changed to look more like each other It also results from reinterpretation (Files calls this misanalysis) (if burglar has the suffix /er/, then there must be a verb to burgle) We also add words by various processes (see p. 500/501)

Practice! Exercise (13), p. 518 What sounds changes that occurred between Proto-Quechua and its daughter language Tena? Which sounds changes are conditioned and which are unconditioned?

Syntactic Change Consider these examples: “father our”… NP->N Det “our father” NP-> Det N

Syntactic Change Also: fæder ure (subject) fæder urne (object) Change in marking of grammatical function from OE to ModE. OE had nominal inflection (case marking) ModE based on word order

Practice (24), p. 521

Semantic Change Semantic extensions Semantic reductions OE “dog” – particular breed ModE “dog” – general term Metaphorical extension: broadcast - “to scatter seed over field” – “to send radio waves through space” Semantic reductions OE “hund”- referred to dogs in general ModE “hound” – particular breed of dogs

Semantic Change Semantic elevations Semantic degradations Positive change in connotation knight (OE cniht) initially meant “youth”/”military follower” and later on a romanticized warrior. Semantic degradations Acquisition of a pejorative meaning ME “silly” – happy, innocent ModE “silly” – foolish, inane

Practice Think of terms you use to talk about computers and actions related to using the PC. How many of these are old words that have been put to new use? How many are totally new words? Why do you think this is the case?

The Comparative Method 2 crucial assumptions sound-meaning correspondences are arbitrary otherwise we couldn’t tell if languages were related, or if similarity was just meaning-related Sound chage is regular a sound either changes completely across a language or it changes completely, within a given phonetic environment By this assumption, we expect sister languages to have regular sound correspondences between words with the same meaning

The Comparative Method Goals: to discover which languages are related to discover why and how languages change Protolanguages: we either have a historical record or we can reconstruct protoforms (e.g. proto-Indo-European *ma:te:r (mother))

The Comparative Method Procedure (Files pp 511ff) compile cognate sets, eliminate borrowings list sound correspondences across cognates reconstruct sounds in each position total correspondence most natural development Occam’s Razor (most frequent variant) check for regularity (exceptions mean you have to revise!)

Example A B C siza sesa siza Sound correspondences s>s>s i>e>i z>s>z a>a>a (p. 512) common sound changes /s/ voices between vowels to [z] So *[s_sa] preliminary reconstruction

What about the vowel [i] or [e] in the 1st syllable? Occam’s Razor: It is easier to posit that i > e (one change) than to say that e>i (two changes)! = > Final Reconstruction: *[sisa]

Practice Group up and do the reconstructions pp. 523 (36), (37), (38)