John Locke: The state of nature PHIL 1003: 2008-09.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Social Contract Theory
Advertisements

WHAT WERE THE POLITICAL PHILOSOPHIES OF HOBBES AND LOCKE?
ROOTS OF AMERICAN GOVERNMENT. We will compare and contrast (purposes, sources of power) various forms of government in the world (e.g., monarchy, democracy,
Second Treatise on Government
Ms. Ramos Alta Loma High School
John Locke: SoN, SoW & Property PHIL 2345:
English influence on American democratic-republic ideals The Enlightenment.
The Enlightenment Fill in the blanks on your worksheet by copying the underlined sentences.
The Enlightenment ca (a.k.a. The Age of Reason)
NICCOLO MACHIAVELLI JOHN LOCKE THOMAS HOBBES JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU Secular Humanism.
James II ( ) Charles II’s brother Catholic! Reactions
LOCKE VS HOBBES – ON THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT Thomas Hobbes 1588 – 1678 England John Locke England.
Thomas Hobbes British ( ) Leviathan (1654)
Key Vocabulary Enlightenment: a period during the 1600s and 1700s in which educated Europeans changed their outlook on life by seeing reason as the key.
John Locke Second Treatise on Government. After years of dynastic war, England settled down with the Tudors and Stuarts. Well, with a lot of “persuasion”
Parliament Limits the English Monarchy
TWO VIEWS OF GOVERNMENT
Ideas About Government
The Political Philosophers Philosophy Dr. Mark King.
John Locke Two Treatises on Government (1690). Locke’s times Locke ( ) 1658 Cromwell’s death 1660 Restoration of Charles II (son of Charles I).
Enlightenment Philosophers
John Locke ( ). John Locke “Blank Slate” – people learn and develop differently because they are exposed to different things. His philosophy heavily.
English 12 - Mr. Rinka Lesson #25 John Locke V Thomas Hobbes.
Section 2: Constitutional Monarchy in England
John Locke: SoN revisited PHIL 2345: Hobbes’ political theory Life in state of nature is ‘nasty, brutish and short’; People living in danger.
A new way of thinking!!!. King James I The Absolute Monarch.
The Origins of Liberalism
John Locke. “The state of nature has a law of nature to govern it, which treats everyone equally…[B]eing equal and independent, no one ought to harm.
John Locke and the Declaration of Independence. Two Treatises on Government: 1689 First treatise argues against the Divine Right of Kings – Says political.
Using the Trivia Game Template Copy the PowerPoint presentation to your hard drive.Copy the PowerPoint presentation to your hard drive. Open the file.
Philosophical Framework of American Government
Foundation of American Government. Standard SSCG1 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the political philosophies that shaped the development of.
Historic foundations of Democratic concepts of government
Enlightenment Philosophers. What was the Enlightenment New ideas in government and politics People begin questioning the need for all powerful kings Can.
THE ORIGINS OF OUR GOVERNMENT. Thomas Hobbes Wrote: Leviathan Before GOV people lived in a state of nature (chaos) Weak overcome by strong Made GOV to.
American Government WHAT SHAPED THE U.S. GOVERNMENT?
Influences on the Founding Fathers. The Things the Founding Fathers Created…
The Enlightenment Answer questions in this color in complete sentences.
The Origins of Liberalism (Classical Liberalism) The only part of the conduct of anyone for which he is amenable to society is that which concerns others.
Our English Heritage. Magna Carta First document in England that limited the power of the king *Everybody (even the king) must also obey the law Established.
Transition to Immanuel Kant
History of Law Presentation John Locke Kitti, allison, vincent, alex.
The Colonial Period.
 Principles of Government Chapter One Notes Updated 2015.
Historical Roots of U.S. Gov’t Foundations of U.S. Gov’t – Follows Ch. 2-1 in Textbook.
SSCG1 The student will demonstrate knowledge of the political philosophies that shaped the development of United States constitutional government. SSCG1.
OPENER Define “Humanism” Define “Secular”. Humanism: an outlook or system of thought attaching prime importance to human rather than divine or supernatural.
Discussion Questions 10/16 1.In what way was Aristotle and Ptolemy’s view of the solar system different from Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton? 2.Bacon is.
Class 24: John Locke Dr. Ann T. Orlando 28 March 2016.
The Origins of Liberalism The only part of the conduct of anyone for which he is amenable to society is that which concerns others. In the part which merely.
The Enlightenment: The Age of Reason. Essential Understanding Enlightenment thinkers believed that human progress was possible through the application.
Class 24: John Locke Dr. Ann T. Orlando 23 March 2017.
The Origins of Liberalism (Classical Liberalism)
The Origins of Liberalism
Second Treatise on Government
The Impact of Key Philosophers
THE ORIGINS OF OUR GOVERNMENT
Modern Political thought
State of Nature and Social Contract Theory
Philosophers that Influenced American Government
Origins of Our Government
U.S HISTORY Ms. Ramirez Foundations of American Political and Social Thought The Enlightenment.
Great Enlightenment Thinkers
Age of Reason – Neoclassical Period
United States GOVERNMENT
ON THE ROLE OF GOVERNMENT
THE ORIGINS OF OUR GOVERNMENT
John Locke ( )                    .
Hobbes vs. Locke.
Class 26: John Locke Dr. Ann T. Orlando 27 March 2019.
Presentation transcript:

John Locke: The state of nature PHIL 1003:

Thomas Hobbes Leviathan 1660

Hobbes’ political theory Life in state of nature is ‘nasty, brutish and short’; People living in danger and disorder agree to submit to a common authority: –not necessarily a king; –state religion to maintain order, limit religious and civil discord (Thirty Years’ War, English Civil War). Problem: when must the political authority be overthrown or replaced? Hobbes is reluctant to acknowledge that sometimes this must be done.

John Locke ( )

Biography B. 1632, son of a lawyer; Oxford, –studied chemistry, medicine, and new mechanical philosophy; Involved in politics: –Allied w/ Lord Ashley, whom he treated for a liver abscess; Plotted to assassinate King Charles II and his Catholic brother, the future King James II; Exile in Holland, ; 1689: 3 major works published.

Major works and themes: A Letter Concerning Toleration (1689) -Argues for religious toleration; -Except for atheists, “who deny the Being of a God”: -b/c they cannot be trusted to keep their promises (e.g. in contracts); -Note similarity to Bossuet! Context: - Religious wars and persecution in England (‘Test’ Acts) and on the Continent.

Works, cont. Essay Concerning Human Understanding (1689) Argues against innate ideas of Descartes; Argues for the acquisition of knowledge solely through the senses: –“Intuitionism” or “Sensationalism”; Re-opens ancient and medieval debates about essentialism versus conventionalism –theorizes naming, classification and natural kinds.

Works, cont. Two Treatises on Government (written 1679/80; published 1689/90) First Treatise: –argues against traditional basis for political authority expressed in Filmer’s Patriarcha, divine right of kings; Second Treatise: –protection of private property, life and liberty = basis for civil government.

Locke’s Second Treatise: government within bounds

Liberalism Liberalism: –from Latin: ‘libertas’ = freedom; Individual rights: –life, –liberty, –Property. Private sphere US Declaration of Independence: life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness (Thomas Jefferson).

Origins and Role of Government Traditional: “divine right of kings” –Paternal (like a father): father may intervene in children's’ lives for their own good; –Sacred--decreed by God; see Bossuet; –Symbolized by anointing the monarch’s head with holy oil in shape of a cross. Locke’s understanding: –No divine mandate; civil gov’t =man-made –Limit to protecting citizens’ goods and lives.

Coronation of Queen Elizabeth II, Westminster Abbey, 1953

Locke on PA Locke is against: 1. Sacred Character of Political Authority Locke, Second Treatise, pars Paternal Character of Political Authority L, pars. 1, 52ff., Absolute Rule L, pars. 90-4, Absolute rule = tyranny

What are Rights? Magna Carta, 1215: –England, King John confronted by nobles –They demanded ‘liberties of Englishmen’ –E.g. compensation for goods seized by Crown Examples of RIGHTS today (HK, US): –liberty to speak; –to practice a religion as one wishes (or not); –assemble or associate freely (including strike); –so long as one does not harm others.

Ch.1 (pars. 1-3) No divine right of kings; Adam did not have rights as father or from God that Filmer, et al. allege; Impossible to assert succession from Adam— makes Filmer moot; Magistrate’s (officer of gov’t) power: –Not father’s –Not husband’s –Not master’s over servant or slaves –I.e. not absolute!

State of Nature (‘SON’), ch. 2 All are under laws of nature –Reciprocal equality –Perfect freedom –Reason: ‘no one ought to harm another in his life, health, liberty, or possessions’ (2.6) ‘…a state of liberty, yet…not a state of licence’ (emph. orig.; 2.6) Each is free to act in own behalf as judge, jury and executioner (2.7).

Implications of 2.7 Punishment of offender should be proportionate: ‘reparation and restraint’ (2.8) Punishment: deterrence, retribution, reparation Offender trespasses –‘against the whole species’ (2.8); –‘quits the principles of human nature’ (2.10); –becomes a ‘noxious creature’ (2.10); –May be destroyed like a wild beast (2.11) Violates natural law and reason implanted in us by God (2.11)

Death penalty Punishment must be deterrent— sufficiently severe to prevent repetition Rational agent will be deterred—’an ill bargain to the offender…and terrify others from doing the like’; Death penalty may be consequence But what about our self-interest when we judge? –civil govt = better way (2.13).

Has SON ever existed? Yes, in international sphere: –states are in SON w/ each other! Yet treaties, agreements can work: –Promise b/w a Swiss and an Indian ‘in the woods of America’ (2.14); –What does ‘America’ represent? Business can be conducted in SON! Implications for establishment of property (ch. 5).

Ch.1.3: Purpose of gov’t ‘Political power, then, I take to be a right of making laws with penalties of death, and consequently all less penalties, for the regulating and preserving of property, and of employing the force of the community, in the execution of such laws, and in the defence of the common-wealth from foreign injury; and all this only for the public good.’