Manure management facilities on farms and their relevance to efficient nutrient use Bernard Hyde & Owen, T. Carton Teagasc, Johnstown Castle The Fertilizer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Environmental Impacts of dairying in Canterbury Ross Redpath Royal society teacher fellow 2003.
Advertisements

Nitrates, Derogation, Cross Compliance. Nitrate in groundwater
Phosphorus in manures and other organic products: What limits proper recycling of this resource in agriculture? Sylvain PELLERIN, Christian MOREL, Thomas.
Daily Manure Production Per Animal We have estimates of manure production –4.5 kg/day/hd for swine (liquid manure) –45-50 kg/day/hd for dairy cow (liquid)
A. What is it? B. Why is it important? C. How is it done?
The Impact of Achieving Targets set out in Food Harvest 2020 on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Usage Noel Culleton.
Ammonia Volatilization from Wet Animal Manures C.W. Wood, J.J. Meisinger, P.A. Moore, Jr., and R.B. Thompson Auburn University, USDA-ARS, Beltsville, MD.
Measurement of surface runoff of mixed contaminants arising from the landspreading of treated sewage sludge Mark G. Healy 1, Dara Peyton 1,2, Gerard Fleming.
Dutch manure policy | November 19th, 2013 Dutch manure policy Seminar Portugal Emar Gemmeke Policy Coordinator.
Danish GHG and ammonia emissions
UCC Opportunities for Carbon Sequestration in Irish Grasslands Vesna Jakši ć Supervisors: G. Kiely, University College Cork O. Carton, D.Fay, Johnstown.
N surplus and handling of WFD in the Netherlands Gerard Velthof.
Dutch practice for application of slurry in the field Herman van Schooten.
FERTILIZER USE SURVEY by B. Coulter, W. Murphy, N. Culleton, G. Quinlan and L.Connolly.
Level II Agricultural Business Operations. Nutrients In Nutrients Out.
Leaving Certificate Agricultural Science
Environmental Systems Analysis National Inventories of Methane and Nitrous Oxide Emissions from Agriculture in the Netherlands Carolien Kroeze, André van.
Innovations in natural fertilizers in agriculture Jaap Uenk, chairman Section manure distribution CUMELA.
Update of COGAP and adoption by signatory states J Webb.
A. What is it? B. Why is it important? C. How is it done?
N-flow in Danish agriculture And FarmAC in Amazonas Ib Sillebak Kristensen & Nick Hutchings Aarhus University Dept. of Agroecology Foulum. Denmark 10.
 To gain an understanding of the principles of soil science  To assess the nutrient content of soils through soil sampling & analysis  To understand.
Organic agriculture – a option for mitigation and adaptation Urs Niggli.
Update on Revision of Annex IX & the Economic Costs of its Provisions Oene Oenema and Mark Sutton (co-chairs TFRN) WGSR-48, April
Background 1 Critical levels of acidification and nutrient- N are still exceeded in many parts of Europe reductions in SO 2 and NO x emissions have been.
Rural Economy Research Centre Rural Development Conference Agricultural (Mini) Catchments Programme Cathal Buckley 26 th January 2009.
Jens B. Aune Department of International Environment and Development Studies, Noragric Norwegian University of Life Sciences Conservation agriculture in.
1 « Agri-environmental indicators: Nitrogen balance at NUTS IV level. A case study in Greece » NATIONAL STATISTICAL SERVICE OF GREECE.
Gaseous Emissions from Irish Agriculture Trevor Donnellan FAPRI-Ireland Partnership Teagasc Dublin.
Practicalities of Nutrient Redistribution Alan Morrow & George Mathers Acknowledgement Dr John Bailey & Martin Mulholland.
Prospects for Improving Asia’s Irrigation.  The Problem  Agricultural Irrigation Solutions  Other Irrigation Solutions  Conclusion Prospects for Improving.
The impact of concentrated pig production in Flanders: a spatial analysis G. Willeghems, L. De Clercq, E. Michels, E. Meers, and J. Buysse Juan Tur.
 A fertilizer or manure contains one or more of the essential elements e.g. Nitrogen, Potassium, Phosphorus, Calcium, Magnesium etc.  It is applied.
U N I V E R S I T Y O F A A R H U S Dept of Agroecology Task Force on Emission Inventories and Projections Expert Panel on Agriculture and Nature Co-chairs:
Ivona Sigurnjak, C. Vaneeckhaute, E. Michels, B. Ryckaert,
Nutrient content of dairy slurry Slurry nutrient variability and nutrient prices Slurry data from UW soils lab (Marshfield, WI) First year available 715.
Soil & Nutrient Management
SOIL NUTRIENT BALANCES Lindsey Clothier Defra November 2011.
Development of Precision Applicator for Solid and Semi-Solid Manure By NEHA PATEL Soil 4213 : Precision Agriculture.
Nutrient Management Planning CNMP Core Curriculum Section 4 – Nutrient Management.
MANURE MANAGEMENT PLAN SUMMARY – RATE TABLES Completing a Manure Management Plan Workshop v
Marginal costs of reducing nitrogen losses to water and air in Denmark Senior Researcher Brian H. Jacobsen Institute of Food and Resource Economics University.
Lessons learnt from the dairying Accounting for Nutrients project Warwick Dougherty.
Potassium Cycle, Fertilizer, and Organic K Sources. Fundamentals of Nutrient Management Training. August Morgantown, WV. Ed Rayburn West Virginia.
Definitions: the ecosystem approach; sustainable agriculture Definitions: the ecosystem approach; sustainable agriculture Problems or non-sustainable.
The 3rd Nitrates Directive programme and beyond
Proposal for Derogation, under Paragraph 2(b) of Annex III of Nitrates Directive, from the limit of 170 kg N/ha/year from livestock manure for grassland.
The cost of reducing nutrient loss from agriculture
Manure management plan summary – MMP NBs
The Netherlands: manure policy and request for a derogation to the livestock manure limit of 170 kg N/ha per year for dr. ir. Cindy.
M. G. Healy. , O. Fenton, G. Lanigan, J. Grant, R. B. Brennan, C. J
Presentation to the Nitrates Committee of the European Commission, 28 October 2008 Request from Britain for a derogation to the livestock manure limit.
Nutrient Management as Risk Management
The Netherlands: towards a request for a derogation for the period
SCOPE OF MULTIPLICATION STRATEGY
Fertiliser Products Timings of Application Suggested Programmes
Grassland P & K Advice Mark Plunkett Johnstown Castle, Wexford
Lime Advice for Grassland
Mark Plunkett, Teagasc, 2018 Delivery of P & K Slurry / FYM / Fertilisers Mark Plunkett, Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford Mark Plunkett, Teagasc.
Saturday, 24 November 2018 Nitrogen Management Selecting a suitable N fertiliser type David P. Wall Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Co Wexford.
Nutrient balance for nitrogen TAPAS action – Statistics Belgium in collaboration with the Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries Research 11 June 2009.
P Build-up Training - FAS Advisors
Water & Agriculture Seamus Barron Nitrates, Biodiversity & Engineering Division.
Mark Plunkett, Teagasc, 2018 Delivery of P & K Slurry / FYM Mark Plunkett & David Wall, Teagasc, Johnstown Castle, Wexford.
SCOPE OF MULTIPLICATION STRATEGY
Lime Advice for Grassland
Fertiliser Products Timings of Application Suggested Programmes
Grassland P & K Advice Mark Plunkett Johnstown Castle, Wexford
P Build-up Training - FAS Advisors
Calculating regional gross nutrient balances
Presentation transcript:

Manure management facilities on farms and their relevance to efficient nutrient use Bernard Hyde & Owen, T. Carton Teagasc, Johnstown Castle The Fertilizer Association of Ireland Winter Scientific Meeting 25 th November 2005 Faculty of Agriculture, University College Dublin

Manure million animals = 37 million tonnes Slurry = 29.3 million tonnes Solid = 7.7 million tonnes Dairy cows ~ 28% of slurry & ~ 7% of solid manure

Topic – facilities & utilisation Manure management facilities  Storage  Spreading date  Spreading method Nutrient efficiency  Manure type  N, P & K Cost vs. nutrient value

Requirements for efficient nutrient use NMP Changing slurry spreading date Changing slurry spreading method Storage vs. spreading date? Cost benefit?

Efficient manure nutrient use

NMP Soil Manure Crop demand Code of Practice  Rate  Date  Method

Current utilisation? Indicators? FUS (2002 & 2005)  Indications of N, P & K overuse Fert. input = Fert. required Slurry? Farm Facilities Survey (2003) – crop & timing of application

Topic – facilities & utilisation Manure management facilities  Storage  Spreading date  Spreading method

Timing of slurry application & % of total SpringSummerAutumnWinterTotal Conservation land Grazing land Maize Tillage Total

Timing of slurry application & % of total SpringSummerAutumnWinterTotal Conservation land Grazing land Maize Tillage Total

Timing of slurry application & % of total SpringSummerAutumnWinterTotal Conservation land Grazing land Maize Tillage Total

Timing of slurry application SpringSummerAutumnWinter Conservation land Utilisation efficiency N25500 P100 K ?

Timing of slurry application SpringSummerAutumnWinter Conservation land Utilisation efficiency N25500 P100 K ? WHY ?

Efficient manure nutrient use

Storage Spreading date – 4% in winter Estimated storage deficits – national basis  21% for 16 week storage  31% for 22 week storage Action Programme  Ban on winter spreading  Required minimum slurry storage Reconcile deficit and date?

Landspreading - N efficiency N efficiency – key issue Spreading date & rate  Soil/weather conditions Contamination  Spreading date Spreader availability  Farmer owned  Contractor

Slurry spreading opportunities Distribution of the number of days on which soils have a soil moisture deficit in excess of 10 mm. (Schulte et al., in press)

Silage contamination ? End March/early April Crop – too far advanced Risk of poor fermentation

Spreader availability C.S.O. – Census of Ag , 108 livestock farms ( = 100 ha) 72, 368 livestock farms (20 to >= 100 ha) 31, 046 farms own or share slurry tankers 35, 281 farms hire or borrow slurry tankers Farm Facilities Survey

27% consist of 1 holding 31% have 4 + fragments Farm Fragmentation

Fragment Distance Farm Fragmentation – distance (km)

Topic – facilities & utilisation Nutrient efficiency

Nutrient availability Type of manure Dry matter(%) * N (kg/t) Total Spring Summer P (kg/t)K (kg/t) Cattle slurry * Dry matter content varies widely and this determines the nutrient contents

N availability in slurry Organic - N (Ammonium – N) Inorganic - N

Ammonium - N Spring NH 3 Crop available Summer NH 3

Fertiliser N for silage compared to slurry N

?

Current utilisation vs. available N Spreading method Spreading date Soil/weather conditions

=

= =

= = NH 3

= =

Efficient manure nutrient use

Advantages of trailing shoe application NH 3 emission reduced Recovery of total N ~ % Slurry can be applied to taller crops Slurry applied to soil surface – contamination ? Increased opportunity for spring application Heavier soils in wetter areas Teagasc research

Fertiliser N for silage compared to slurry N ?

Organic N Inorganic/organic = 50/50 Organic material/solid fraction Currently not considered as a reliable N source Mineralization 60 kg N/ha (33t/ha) for slurry Teagasc research

Topic – facilities & utilisation Cost vs. nutrient value

Economic value of slurry N (€ million)

6% 22% 44% 88%

Economic value of slurry N (€ million) € 67.2

Economic value of slurry N (€ million) € 67.2 € 3.8

Economic value of slurry N (€ million) € 67.2 € 3.8 € 14.8

Economic value of slurry N (€ million) € 67.2 € 3.8 € 14.8 € 29.5

Economic value of slurry N (€ million) € 67.2 € 3.8 € 14.8 € 29.5 € 59.1

Economic value (million €) of slurry

€ 83.9 million

Economic value (million €) of slurry € 98.7 million

Economic value (million €) of slurry € million

Summary 29.3 million tonnes slurry Current utilisation Key issues - storage & landspreading Nutrient availability – N efficiency Spreading methodology – conventional vs ts Economic value of slurry - €128 million

Conclusions Manure/slurry is a valuable resource Short-term  Change application timing from summer/autumn to spring  Change spreading method  Available N in slurry a/c’s ~ 45% of purchased fert. N Long-term  Increase nutrient efficiency  Organic N Research

Efficient manure nutrient use