Retrospective Study of Closed Leaking Underground Storage Tank (UST) Sites in Wisconsin A.M. Pelayo*, T.A. Evanson, J.M. Bahr and M.E. Gordon *Wisconsin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Home with an Underground Heating Oil Tank (UST) Solutions for your Leaking Heating Oil Tank.
Advertisements

PHASE II ESA 2014 ESA GUIDELINES. PHASE II ESA 2014 ESA GUIDELINES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES –PATH 2 AND 3 PROJECTS –PATH 4 AND 5 PROJECTS W/ WORK.
Greenwich Peninsula.
Remediation Programs Update MSECA Quarterly Meeting March 13, 2012.
Vermilion County Brownfield Assessment Grant. Overview Brownfield Basics USEPA Brownfield Assessment Grant Vermilion County Assessment Grant Site Selection.
Claremore Medical Office Building From Landfill to Medical Office Building A Brownfield Success Story THE GREEN SIDE OF BROWNFIELD REMEDIATION.
21 st Annual Conference. Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels Developing Soil and Groundwater Screening Levels for International Service Station Sites.
A REVIEW OF THE REMEDIATION ALTERNATIVES FOR BENZENE CONTAMINATION AT THE PESTER REFINERY COMPANY SUPERFUND SITE Jonathan M. Diller, P.E., CFM for University.
Overview of New EPA Superfund Groundwater Guidance and Tools
Federal Mogul Department for Environmental Protection Kentucky Division of Waste Management February 10, 2015 Presented by Chris Jung To Protect and Enhance.
Door County, WI. Door County Policy/Ordinance 15 days prior to closing Seller’s responsibility Evals. good for 24 months System
Background Site of a former Industrial Waste Treatment Plant Contaminants accumulated in sludge drying beds and surge pond, they subsequently leaked into.
“GAS MART” petroleum facility in Florida By: Ernest Twum-Barimah Zhengzhong Fang (John) Zhengzhong Fang (John)
H23A14 Briton Ferry Gas Works Land Contamination Antreas Christodoulides Georgios Efstathiou Antreas Christodoulides Georgios Efstathiou.
WasteMINZ 2007 Contaminated Site – Case Study Former Market Garden Land.
The Role of the Licensed Site Remediation Professional (LSRP) Paul Sakson, LSRP Paul D. Sakson Associates, Inc.
DRAFT Field Sampling Guidance To be used this field season by DEC and consultants Initial focus on soil, groundwater, and vapor intrusion Future versions.
Evaluation of Florida C&D Debris Groundwater Monitoring Data Presentation discusses: Results of analysis of groundwater monitoring data Results of groundwater.
HONR 297 Environmental Models Chapter 2: Ground Water 2.3: Typical Quantitative Issues.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
Presentation to the Restoration Advisory Board Plan for Site Investigation: Munitions Response Program (MRP) Site 1 Carr Point Shooting Range March 18,
GFOA PS3260 Contaminated Sites Workshop Thursday, November 14, 2013 Whitehorse, YT.
Idaho Solid Waste Facility Record Keeping June 20, 2006 Idaho Department of Environmental Quality.
2010 Long-Term Surveillance and Maintenance Conference Institutional Controls Featuring the Pinellas Site Jack Craig U.S. Department of Energy Office of.
Denver Federal Center Calibration Silo Removal Plan What are the DFC Calibration Silos? Installed in 1981 by Bureau of Mines Support minerals industry.
The Role of Groundwater Sampling/Monitoring COGCC Proposed Rule 609 University of Colorado Law School Nov 26, 2012.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
Italy: developments in the new legislation and progress in the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
ENVIRONMENTAL ODDITIES From Here to There, and There to Here… PESTICIDES CAN BE FOUND ANYWHERE! Prepared By: Jeffrey Sotek, PE, CSP, CIH
Fairbanks Areawide Industrial Reclamation Project ADEC AREAWIDE MANAGEMENT GOALS Janice Wiegers ADEC.
Italy: the new legislation on the remediation of contaminated sites F. Quercia, APAT Tour de Table NATO CCMS Pilot Study Meeting 5-7th June 2006, Athens,
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
OVERVIEW OF OIL & GAS EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT and STATE REGULATION OVERVIEW OF OIL & GAS EXPLORATION, DEVELOPMENT and STATE REGULATION February 18, 2012.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
September 18, 1998 State of Illinois Rules and Regulations Tiered Approach to Corrective Action (TACO) Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical.
New activities Tour de Table – Lithuania Kestutis Kadunas, Geological Survey of Lithuania.
Deanna Streifel Environmental Engineering Officer Arnprior Waste Disposal Site Annual Monitoring Results.
Hydrogeologic Analysis of the Delphi Corporation Site, Wyoming Michigan Mark Bryson, Emily Daniels, Sara Nagorsen, Kirk Perschbacher, Joe Root, Jason Stewart,
Case Study of Groundwater Contamination at the Delphi Corporation, Wyoming, Michigan Dr. Peter E. Riemersma Department of Geology Grand Valley State University.
Debra Harrington and Haizhi Chen FDEP Groundwater Protection March, 2005 PROTOTYPE FOR SPRING SYSTEM ASSESSMENTS.
1 RAB Update Trap and Skeet Range 17 Remedial Investigation Activities 25 March 2010.
LDEQ RECAP.
Outreach for the On-Call Hazardous Waste Site Investigation and Design Services Contract Caltrans D9 February 17, 2016.
Release Reporting. How Do I Know If I Have a Leak in My UST System? 1. Unusual operating conditions; such as, erratic behavior of the dispensing pump.
By Alex Walton Josh Bush Alex Walton, Josh Bush1.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
Using 3-D Image to Develop A Remediation Engineering Design A 3D Image of an Area Of Petroleum Impacted Soil Was Used to Design.
Melissa Boggs California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Office of Spill Prevention and Response.
Wisconsin’s New Approach to Land Use Controls Presented by Mark F. Giesfeldt Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources.
Omaha Riverfront Redevelopment Project Brownfields 2004 C. Dale Jacobson, P.E., DEE.
Unity Ground Water Investigation Steve Faryan, USEPA.
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Analysis of Brownfields Cleanup Alternatives
Excess Liability Trust Fund Claims Section (ELTF)
General Principles for Hydrocarbon Vapor Intrusion
Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies
ASSESSMENT OF CORRECTIVE MEASURES PUBLIC MEETING
Environmental Cleanup Program Status
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Area C Location 1.
Welcome.
Desirable Results Since 1998
Timothy Veatch, Section Chief
Rapid Closure of Lingering Off-Site Plume Remediation Program in Residential Neighborhood using Horizontal Air Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells Narayanan.
Bill Reetz Kansas P.G. A Better Earth, Inc. Lawrence, KS 66044
Chemical Metals Industries, Inc. (CMI)
Presentation transcript:

Retrospective Study of Closed Leaking Underground Storage Tank (UST) Sites in Wisconsin A.M. Pelayo*, T.A. Evanson, J.M. Bahr and M.E. Gordon *Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources Bureau for Remediation & Redevelopment GSA, Oct. 7, 2008

What is “Closure?” State regulator agrees with request from responsible party that NO FURTHER ACTION is necessary. Closure involves proper abandonment (i.e., filling and sealing) of all monitoring wells.

Brief Administrative History Affecting WI UST Closures Nov. 1996: Allowed “flexible closure” for sites that may still exceed state cleanup standards May 2001: Implemented web-based “GIS Registry of Closed Remediation Sites” ( ) : Huge influx of closures (1,378  now in GIS Registry)

Retrospective Study 1. Database –Devised a stratified random sampling to select sites for review –Compiled site-specific information (133 site reviews) –Evaluated collective data for metric(s) to determine effectiveness of NA as a remedy 2. Post-closure fieldwork at 10 sites –Did forecast prove to be true?

Closures Reviewed 133 Sites from 45 counties Milwaukee, Brown and Dane had 34% of sites reviewed. Stratified-Randomly Selected Sites

DB Queries Monitoring Wells Total number of wells with GW data Median: 7 wells Remediation Soil Excavation?85 Yes Pump and Treat?33 Yes 38 sites (or 29%) implemented NO remediation.

Depth to Groundwater ≤10’

Highest Concentrations in GW Samples from the Database Sites 37 Sites (or 28%) have NO Naphthalene data!

HISTORICAL Maximum Benzene in Groundwater

CLOSURE Maximum Benzene in Groundwater

Median Time Interval: 3.5 yr for sites with active remediation 1.1 yr for MNA-sites

Synopsis – Database Study Collectively, a factor of 10 reduction in maximum benzene concentration Short monitoring period, even shorter for sites that were not remediated Will we see similar decrease 5 years post closure?

10 Field Sites in the WI Closure Protocol Study Former Retail Station Non-Commercial Site Post-Closure Field Study

Post-Closure Investigation Installed monitoring wells: –Near locations where previous site investigation (SI) detected benzene –Further downgradient than SI Used GeoProbe, except at 2 of the 10 sites. PC water-table wells had screens as long as SI wells.

Total BTEX Plumes Closure (Blue) Outline Post Closure Outline [Keller, 2005] [Greve, 2007] Closure Post-Closure

Groundwater flow variability Total BTEX Plume [Greve, 2007 ] Former Grandma’s Restaurant site’s plume axis shifted roughly 40°.

Benzene Maximums Red Post-Closure > Closure

Out of the 10 Field Sites... We found 5 sites with benzene levels higher than their respective closure maximums. BUT... We did not find benzene in as many wells as previously found for all 10 sites.

SI SI benzene detection (1991 to 1999)

Post-Closure P-C benzene detection ( ) Benzene Detections BTEX Plume

Q: Did we miss the B plume in our Post-Closure investigation? A: Perhaps. But if we missed B, why are we finding TEX at locations farther than previously found? Let’s look further at the Naphthalene data.

Naphthalene Detections (at Water-Table Monitoring Wells)

Naphthalene Improvement? Red Post-Closure > Historical Max Yellow Improvement, but not by a factor of 10!

Post-Closure VOC Plume Characteristic has changed over time –P-C benzene levels at the source wells about as high as closure max, but benzene plume more spatially constrained, tending to remain near the source. –P-C naphthalene levels at the source wells as high as historical max, and plume extended farther from the source.

Post-Closure Post-Closure BENZENE detection

Post-Closure Post-Closure NAPHTHALENE detections BTEX Plume

Conclusion/Recommendation After the Study Contaminant concentrations in source zones are relatively unchanged 5 – 6 years post-closure. Unable to make realistic projections of when standards will be met in groundwater. (Monitoring ~ < 5 yrs; Time to reach standards ~ 10s of Decades or Longer) Effective land use controls are needed far into the future to account for the long period of time contaminants are likely to remain in soil and groundwater.