The Influence of Scholarships on the Recruitment of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Majors to Teach in High Needs Settings Pey-Yan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
HELPING THE NATION SPEND WISELY Jonathan Mackay Audit Principal Staying the course: The retention of students in higher education.
Advertisements

Preparing Your Application for the Gates Millennium Scholars Program.
TEACHER QUALITY AND DISTRIBUTION Principals and Teachers Effectiveness and Evaluation NSBA’s Federal Relations Network Conference February
UNCF: Building the STEM Pipeline One Student at a Time October 31, 2012.
“NSF’s Division of Undergraduate Education: Funding Opportunities for Community Colleges” CUR November 18, 2011 Eun-Woo Chang Montgomery College.
AMERICAN COMPETITIVENESS INITIATIVE U.S. Department of Education.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Western Regional Noyce Conference April 9-11, 2010.
T HE W HO AND THE H OW ? K EY COMPONENTS OF RECRUITING HIGHLY QUALIFIED STEM TEACHERS Anica Bowe, PhD Student; Christina Madsen, M.Ed; Frances Lawrenz,
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Azra Rafique Khalid Mahmood. Introduction “To learn each and everything in a limited time frame of degree course is not possible for students”. (Mahmood,
S-STEM Program Evaluation S-STEM PI Meeting Arlington, VA October 2012.
Secondary Teacher Preparation in Mathematics Institute for Mathematics and Education Tucson, Arizona March 7 – 8, 2008.
Investing in Human Capital Underrepresented Racial Minorities’ Intentions to Attend Graduate School in STEM Fields Kevin Eagan Christopher Newman University.
Mathematics and Science Teaching Programs Grant Proposal Workshop Panel Discussion: Writing Successful STEM Education Proposals - Principal Investigator.
Noyce Program Evaluation Group Our evaluation project has four major components: –Preparation of an extensive literature review pertaining to recruitment.
NSF-Noyce Scholars Partnership of Western NY New Jersey Science Convention, Somerset, New Jersey 06 October 2005 Joseph Zawicki, Department of Earth Science.
Selected Results from the Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Evaluation Frances Lawrenz Christina Madsen University of Minnesota.
TRIPARTITE SYNTHESIS OF RESEARCH AND DATA ON RECRUITMENT AND RETENTION OF STEM TEACHERS FRANCES LAWRENZ JIM APPLETON MARJORIE BULLITT BEQUETTE ANN OOMS.
Interaction with and Reflection on the Noyce Program Evaluation Data Frances Lawrenz Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Christopher Desjardins Allison Kirchhoff.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Noyce Program Participatory Evaluation FRANCES LAWRENZ JIM APPLETON MARJORIE BULLITT BEQUETTE ANN OOMS DEENA WASSENBERG University of Minnesota.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
Pey-Yan Liou and Frances Lawrenz Quantitative Methods in Education of the Department of Educational Psychology, University of Minnesota Abstract This research.
Cluster Analysis on Perceived Effects of Scholarships on STEM Majors’ Commitment to Becoming Teachers versus Teaching in High Needs Schools Pey-Yan Liou.
International Workshop on Graduate Programs for Secondary Mathematics and Science Teachers at Tokyo University of Science Tad Watanabe Kennesaw State University.
❧ Preparing NOYCE Scholars in the Rocky Mountain West to Teach Mathematics & Science Jacqueline Leonard Saman Aryana Joy Johnson Monica Mitchell University.
BE07: Funding Opportunities for Physics Teacher Certification Candidates AAPT Chicago Meeting Feb 2009 Daniel L. MacIsaac, SUNY Buffalo State College Physics,
META Alternate Licensure Program for Special Education Teachers Terry Dozier, Director VCU Center for Teacher Leadership Wednesday, May 24, 2006 National.
ACCOMACK COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS LEADERSHIP PROFILE REPORT April 1, 2014.
Austin Community College TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAM It’s all about the Kids!
Fifth Annual NSF Robert Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program Conference July 7-9, 2010 Enrique Ortiz University of Central Florida Using a Teaching Goals.
Profile of an Engineering Education and Professions Introduction to Mechanical Engineering The University of Texas-Pan American College of Science and.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Design (1) A discipline-level disaggregation of national data on STEM teachers and (2) a longitudinal examination of that data using SAS 9.3 Definition:
Preparing Your Application for the Gates Millennium Scholars Program.
Frances Lawrenz and The Noyce evaluation team University of Minnesota 1 Acknowledgement: This project was funded by National Science Foundation (Grant#REC )
Austin Community College TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAM It’s all about the Kids!
WEB CONFERENCE TO SUPPORT BOARD LEADERSHIP DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY Please standby, the web conference will begin shortly! We invite you to use the chat feature.
National Center for Alternative Certification Facts from NCEI’s Alternative Teacher Certification: A State- by-State analysis 2009  Every state now has.
Issues and Actions: Joint Study Committee of Teacher Training and Certification & Alliance Math and Science Task Force Kelly Henson, Executive Director.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Retention and Advancement for Mid Career Faculty K.D. JoshiKelly Ward Associate Professor of Interim Chair and Information Systems Professor, Education.
Evaluation of the Noyce Teacher Scholarship Program 2010 NSF Noyce Conference Abt Associates Inc. July 9, 2010.
Progress Report: Teacher Supply and Demand in School Year New York State Education Department May 2008 Full report at
Preparing Your Application for the Gates Millennium Scholars Program.
ACG, SMART and TEACH Grants Presented by Jennifer Hutchinson Senior Associate Director, UMF.
The Development and Validation of the Evaluation Involvement Scale for Use in Multi-site Evaluations Stacie A. ToalUniversity of Minnesota Why Validate.
Criteria Administrators Considered When Hiring First Year Agricultural Education Teachers Jeremy Cantrell Union City High School Union City Oklahoma.
Columbus State University C ollege of Education and Health Professions PSC Program Review February 14-17, 2010.
Background, Motivation, and Training as Factors in the Success of Online Professional Development Facilitators Carolyn J. Starkey CAT 689 May 3, 2008.
Austin Community College TEACHER CERTIFICATION PROGRAM It’s all about the Kids!
The Importance of Equitable Access to Effective Educators.
2009 Annual Employee Survey U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development December 29,2009 (updated January 8, 2010)
University of California, San Diego Beth Simon Sr. Associate Director of Learning Sciences and Technology, Center for Teaching Development and Lecturer.
Network to Transform Teaching Supporting Educator Effectiveness Development Presentation to the Board of Directors The National Board Unpacking The Problem.
Preparing for the Title III Part F STEM Competition Alliance of Hispanic Serving Institutions Educators Grantsmanship Institute March 20, 2016.
Barbara Houtz, M.Ed..  To SHOW your prospective colleagues or employer that you know the fundamentals of effective teaching:  Engaging your students.
Strategies for blended learning in an undergraduate curriculum Benjamin Kehrwald, Massey University College of Education.
Getting into a Summer Program: The Application Process Keisha John, PhD.
Southern Illinois University Edwardsville,
Research Opportunities in AMSP UK Mathematics Education Retreat October 15, 2005.
Lindsay K. Lightner and Judith A. Morrison Washington State University
The University of Texas System Assessment of
Competency Assessment
Developing as a Professional
House Appropriations Committee Retreat Update on Degree Funding Initiative Tony Maggio November 13, 2018.
Get Onboard with the Campaign
Title II Preparing, Training, and Recruiting High Quality Teachers and Principals Ismail Ardahanli.
Presentation transcript:

The Influence of Scholarships on the Recruitment of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) Majors to Teach in High Needs Settings Pey-Yan Liou Allison Kirchhoff Frances Lawrenz Christina Madsen 1 University of Minnesota Acknowledgement: This project was funded by National Science Foundation (Grant#REC )

Presentation Outline Introduction Context – Noyce Scholarship Program – STEM majors’ perceptions of the influence of the scholarship Method Results Discussion 2

Introduction  Positive relationship between teacher quality in science and math education and student achievement  Shortage of qualified teachers in high needs areas  Strategies employed by federal and state agencies as well as teacher preparation institutions to recruit and retain qualified teachers: ― alternative certification routes ― financial incentives *National Defense Education Act (NDEA) of 1958 *27 states have some loan forgiveness or scholarship program(s) for prospective teachers (Jerald and Boser, 1999)  Little research on the effects of scholarships, especially for high needs settings 3

Context  The National Science Foundation’s Noyce Scholarship Program (NSP) attempts to recruit qualified science and math teachers to high needs settings through financial incentives  Scholars commit to two years of teaching in high needs settings for each year of scholarship support  Research goal: We are interested in scholars perceptions of the influence of the NSP Scholarship 4

Noyce Scholarship Programs Overview Generally teacher preparation programs use some screening criteria to select Noyce scholars: – GPA (98.5%) – personal statement (97%) – letters of recommendation (91%) – upper level undergraduate status in science or mathematics major (82%) – structured interviews (73%) – bachelor’s degree in the candidate’s subject area (73%) – and previous work experience (69%) Most programs provide opportunities for interactions with children from different cultures such as mentoring or tutoring, coursework relating to diverse cultures, and specific instruction about practicing in high needs schools.

High Needs or Diversity Opportunities in Programs 6

Principal Investigators Perceptions about the Influence of the Scholarship(N=66) Principal investigators=faculty in teacher preparation programs responsible for the operation of the NSP at their school – Noyce funding greatly increased their ability to recruit a variety of students – Noyce funding had a effect on relationships with community, districts, STEM faculty, and industry 7

Survey  Evaluation Scholar Survey administered online during the summer of mple.asp mple.asp  Participants were asked to respond to a variety of items regarding their perceptions of and experiences with NSP (a) project overview (b) program characteristics and organization (c) teaching environment and experience (d) the decision to become a teacher (e) background and experience (f) overall experience 8

Sample (n=555)  Scholars had strong content backgrounds and reported taking several mathematics and science classes. ―about 50% of all scholars indicated taking 10 to 20 STEM courses ― majority of scholars specified that they had taken 1 to 8 teaching methods courses 9 CategoryCharacteristics GenderFemale 65% (329/507) Male 35% (178/507) RaceWhite 68% (319/469) Non-White 32% (150/469) Intention to teach science Yes 59% (301/507) No 41% (206/507) Current educational status In a teacher certification program, not yet a full-term teacher 31% (171/555) Completed a teacher certification program, but never taught 8% (42/555) Did not complete a teacher certification program and will not return 1% (7/555) In a teacher certification program and teaching full-time as part of that program 13% (70/555) Teaching full-time or part-time 50% (255/555) Taught after being certified, and now working in education but not as a teacher 1% (5/555) Taught after being certified, and now not working in education 1% (5/555)

Outcome Variable “How influential is the Noyce Scholarship money in your commitment to:” (a) become a teacher (b) complete the certification program (c) take a teaching job (d) teach in a high needs school (e) remain teaching in a high needs school for the full term of your commitment (f) remain teaching in a high needs school beyond the full term of your commitment The four-point scale: 1) not at all influential, 2) not very influential, 3) somewhat influential and 4) very influential 10

Analyses  Hierarchical cluster analysis (performed with SPSS 16.0) ― Technique which statistically groups similar items together. Items included in the same cluster are considered more closely related to each other than items in other clusters  Confirmatory factor analysis (performed with AMOS 16) ― CFA was then performed to confirm the theories and provide additional data regarding patterns that emerged 11

Dendogram from HCA 12

Confirmatory Factor Analysis 13 Factor name ItemR2R2 Influence of scholarship on STEM majors becoming teachers (Cronbach’s Alpha=0.88) Become a teacher0.763 Complete certification0.654 Take teaching job0.749 Influence of scholarship on STEM majors becoming high needs teachers (Cronbach’s Alpha=0.90) Full commitment0.815 Teach in high needs0.791 Beyond commitment0.589

Conclusion & Future Research  We found two underlying factors (Underlying constructs) of effects of the NSP: ―(1) scholars’ commitments to teach in high needs settings ―(2) scholars’ commitments to finish their teacher preparation program  More data need to be collected to determine whether these teachers actually stay in high needs schools beyond their initial commitments (long- term retention) because it is beyond the NSP’s control  Recruitment strategies need to be considered when giving this kind of scholarship  Strategies should seek to determine and award those most committed to high needs settings 14

Implications  Recruitment : scholarship application procedures need to be sensitive to recruiting and awarding candidates committed to teaching in high needs settings  Those with lower commitment levels may not stay in high needs settings beyond NSP requirements  Teacher preparation : provide extensive and positive high needs experiences  Scholars who may not be very committed to high needs settings may be positively influenced by such experiences and remain in high needs settings longer 15

Questions Thank you! 16