Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA September 2003.
Advertisements

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Before IDEA One in five children with disabilities was educated. One in five children with disabilities was educated. More than 1 million children with.
BIE Flexibility Request Summary of Key Provisions Bureau of Indian Education U.S. Department of the Interior.
LCFF & LCAP PTO Presentation April, 2014 TEAM Charter School.
New Mexico Education: Do You Know What Is Happening? Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Cambrian School District Academic Performance Index (API) Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Program Improvement (PI) Report.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
Local Control Accountability Plan. LCAP  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a document that provides details regarding the District’s services,
Questions & Answers About AYP & PI answered on the video by: Rae Belisle, Dave Meaney Bill Padia & Maria Reyes July 2003.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
FotherGile School District Mission, Vision and Graduation Proposal.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Evolving Oregon Educational Policy Courtesy of Pat Burk, Ph.D. Department of Educational.
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Standards The Achievement Gap The Debate Continues.
Power Point Introduction The new Oregon Diploma raises the rigor of educational requirements in order to ensure that students graduate with the skills.
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
The Improving Teacher Quality State Grants Program California Postsecondary Education Commission California Mathematics & Science Partnership 2011 Spring.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Annual Student Performance Report October Overview NCLB requirements related to AYP 2012 ISAT performance and AYP status Next steps.
1 No Child Left Behind for Indian Groups 2004 Eva M. Kubinski Comprehensive Center – Region VI January 29, 2004 Home/School Coordinators’ Conference UW-Stout.
PREPARING [DISTRICT NAME] STUDENTS FOR COLLEGE & CAREER Setting a New Baseline for Success.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
District Improvement….. Outcomes  Why we are in District Improvement.  What is DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT?  How we got this rating.  What does this mean.
Annual Student Performance Report September
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) /22/2010.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
C R E S S T / CU University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Measuring Adequate Yearly.
ESSA = OPPORTUNITY!  After nearly 14 years of asking for less federal intrusion into the teaching and learning process, it is.
Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2004 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 Implementation of the.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP). What is Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)? As a condition of receiving federal funds under No Child Left Behind (NCLB), all.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge
Welcome to our SCHOOL’S Parents Are Connected (PAC) Meeting
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
National Conference on Student Assessment June 2016
What Parents Need to Know
What Parents Need to Know
How Do We Identify Standards and Write Objectives?
What Parents Need to Know
Analysis of No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB)
Quality Education Commission Presentation to the Senate Committee
Starting Community Conversations
AYP and Report Card.
Presentation transcript:

Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability

New Mexico Education: Innovation, Sustainability and Growth 1. Past and Present 2. Innovation 3. New Mexico Public Education 4. New Mexico Path to Improvement 5. Sustainability - What is success? 6. Growth

Background to AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) ALL SCHOOLS MUST REACH 100% PROFICIENCY BY SY Originated with the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (NCLB) Applied to All States - All Districts and All Public Schools Requires assessments in reading and math for each grade 3- 8 and 11 – –(Used in determining AYP) Added Science assessment –(Not used in determining AYP)

AYP Has 3 Main Parts Schools must meet all 3 criteria to make AYP 1.Participation – 92% 2.Performance Goals – Annual Measurable Objectives changed each year 3.Other Academic Indicators – graduation rate or attendance Subgroups are not required to meet the other academic indicator.

NCLB Subgroups Ethnic groups: –American Indian/Native American –Asian/Pacific Islander –Black –Hispanic –White/Caucasian Students with Disabilities English Language Learners Economically Disadvantaged

School or Group Proficiency Based upon the percent of students Proficient and Advanced Computed for whole school Computed for subgroups with 25 or more students Computed separately for Reading and Math Includes “Full Academic Year” students only

Performance Compared to AYP Target Compares the school/subgroup performance to the AYP Goal of percent of students proficient and advanced If performance is equal or higher than goal, AYP is met

Starts with Rigorous Standards Content Standards –Provide broad descriptions of the knowledge and skills students should acquire in particular subject areas. Benchmarks –Provide statements of what all students should know and be able to do in a content area by the end of designated grades or levels. Performance Standards –Provide concrete examples and explicit definitions of what students have to know and be able to do to demonstrate proficiency in the content standards.

Proficiency Levels Advanced Proficient Advanced and Proficient scores meet standards Nearing Proficiency Beginning Step Nearing Proficient and Beginning Step scores do not meet standards

National Assessment of Educational Progress Reading: 4 th Grade +8.4 (Scale Score Change on NAEP ) 8 th Grade (-0.8) No significant change (Scale Score Change on NAEP ) Mathematics: 4 th Grade +5.5 (Scale Score Change on NAEP ) 8 th Grade +4.3 (Scale Score Change on NAEP )

Results from the Spring 2008 Assessments

Where are we seeing gains? What about different grades?

Reading Do ethnicities fare better in certain grades?

Data from SY Assessments SBA and NMAPA combined

Where are we seeing gains? What about different grades?

Math Do ethnicities fare better in certain grades?

Data from SY Assessments SBA and NMAPA combined

Where are we seeing gains? What about different grades?

How are Subgroups doing?

Data from SY Assessments SBA and NMAPA combined

Jobs that require at least some postsecondary education will make up more than two-thirds of new jobs. Source: Carnevale, Anthony P. and Donna M. Desrochers, Standards for What? The Economic Roots of K–16 Reform, Educational Testing Service, 2003.

Legislative Partners Key Business Partners Community Input P – 20 Alignment Career Cluster Initiatives State Agency Partners Youth Groups

Full Implementation of Standards Based System Resource Equity Math & Science Cohort Graduation Rate Closing the achievement gaps – within subgroups, nationally and internationally

Holistic Approach to Children and Learning Students Ready to Learn Redesign of High School System Instructional Materials Alignment Teacher and Principal Quality School Improvement Framework Seamless P-20 System

The definition of success is changing and emerging for high schools. Significant shifts in role, function and purpose are occurring.

…students are challenged and engaged in relevant learning that prepares them for their futures as productive citizens …schools meet the individualized needs of students …project- based, active learning experiences are driven by student need and interest …flexibility and choices exist, including a variable pace of completion and active student roles and responsibilities in developing, executing, and evaluating their own education plans

…develop- ing lifelong learning skills and a love of education …using modern techno- logies and multiple resources …a community working together that includes strong roles for parents, employers, and community organizations … high quality teachers responsive to students, who continue to develop throughout their careers

… students showing learning through authentic assess- ments of bench- marks …smooth transitions from middle school to high school and from high school to higher education and work …small learning commun- ities

… equitable access to all learning opportun- ities, funding, and outcomes …a flexible system that builds on and reflects native and local cultures …safe, modern, cost- effective, functional and attractive facilities

Integrated Technology Strategic Business Partnerships Collaborative Regional Networks Personalized Program Of Study Flexible Scheduling Policy and Statute

New Mexico will close the Achievement Gap! Every child deserves a good education –Holistic or whole-child approach to closing the achievement gap –Involved parents and community members –High quality teachers and principals –Strong and clear accountability –High expectations... By everyone making the commitment to close the achievement gap