Cooperative Programs in Authority Control Adam L. Schiff University of Washington Libraries

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NACO Canada Sharing Our Work, Sharing Our Expertise Jonathan David Makepeace Leddy Library University of Windsor.
Advertisements

When parallels collide: Parallel records, parallel fields and hybrid records OCLC Users Group Annual Meeting 3/6/2004 Hsi-chu Bolick University of North.
One Year After RDA Implementation Committee on East Asian Libraries March 2014 Jessalyn Zoom LC Cooperative and Instructional Programs Division.
1 Subject Authority Control and Cooperative Cataloging May 18, 2005.
1 In-Class Exercise 1 (cont.) society in East Asia consumers behaviors cultural anthropology research global influence of culture societal/social change.
CJK NACO Project CEAL Conference, Boston, March 21, 2007 Jiping Wu.
Session 6 Issues in Cataloging Loose-leaf Integrating Resources Original content by Rhonda K. Lawrence Head of Cataloging, UCLA Law Library.
The US RDA Test: Status & Next Steps For the Authority Control Interest Group, American Library Association Midwinter Meeting, January 9, 2011 Presented.
SALALM 2010 Cataloging & Bibliographic Technology Subcommittee Angela J. Kinney Chief, African, Latin American & Western European Division, Library of.
SACO-At-Large Midwinter ALA - Denver 2009 SACO Workflow & Tracking of SACO Proposals Prepared by John N. Mitchell January 2009.
Training Module 1: Associations & Non-Profit Organizations – The Basics Presented by the Southern Early Childhood Association.
The US RDA Test For the European RDA Interest Group/JSC Seminar Copenhagen, Denmark, August 8, 2010 Presented by Beacher Wiggins Director for Acquisitions.
Application of Subdivisions June 22, 2003 ALA Annual Conference, Toronto.
Wizard Rocking the Library of Congress: Submitting a New Subject Heading to LC By Joy E. Lambert August 14, 2008 NPR.org.
Using Metadata in CONTENTdm Diana Brooking and Allen Maberry Metadata Implementation Group, Univ. of Washington Crossing Organizational Boundaries Oct.
1 Cataloging for School Librarians: It’s Child’s Play! Or is it? Basic Tools for Cataloging Sources for Bibliographic and Authority Records, Helpful Tools.
The Library Cataloging Tradition
1 Cataloging for School Librarians — It Matters! Margaret Maurer Head, Catalog and Metadata Kent State University Libraries and Media Services 2006 ILF.
Descriptive Cataloging of Monographs 1. Introduction DRAFT.
Integrating Resources: the Cataloging of Chameleons Judith A. Kuhagen Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress Washington, D.C. U.S.A. Hong.
SACO: Subject Authority Cooperative Program. What is SACO?  A component of the Program for Cooperative Cataloging (PCC)  A means for libraries to propose:
Employers’ Expectation for Entry-Level Catalog Librarians: What Position Announcement Data Indicate.
Introduction to MARC Cataloguing Part 2 Presenters: Irma Sauvola: Part 1 Dan Smith: Part 2.
RDA Test “Train the Trainer” Module 7: Identifying Corporate Bodies [Content as of Mar. 31, 2010]
Module C: Identifying expressions User task: identify.
Technical Services & Cataloging and Classification Jennifer Anielski and Christina Tracy IS 554 Public Library Management.
Ask A Librarian and QuestionPoint: Integrating Collaborative Digital Reference in the Real World (and in a really big library) Linda J. White Digital Project.
Improving Access to Audio- Visual Materials by Using Genre/Form Terms OLAC Conference 1-3 October 2004 Montreal, Quebec.
1 Catalog Displays, Retrieval, and FAST May 31, 2005.
1 On the Record Report of the Library of Congress Working Group on the Future of Bibliographic Control Diane Boehr Head of Cataloging, NLM
LI 804.  What MARC is  How MARC was developed  How MARC is used  The future of MARC  Our evaluation of MARC.
The Library Cataloging Tradition Marty Kurth CS 431 February 9, 2005 [slides stolen from Diane Hillmann]
Beyond Copy Cataloging: MARCing the Next Frontier Susan M. Sutch An Infopeople Workshop Winter/Spring
June 2004 IAMSLIC Resource Sharing Committee, Requesting Copies and Interlibrary Loans in the IAMSLIC Z Catalogue.
LC Update to the Authority Control Interest Group Janis L. Young Policy and Standards Division Library of Congress 2011 ALA Annual Conference.
RDA in NACO Module 6.a RDA Chapter 11: Identifying Corporate Bodies—Overview Recording the Attributes.
The Future of Cataloging Codes and Systems: IME ICC, FRBR, and RDA by Dr. Barbara B. Tillett Chief, Cataloging Policy & Support Office Library of Congress.
Update on Genre/Form Projects at the Library of Congress Janis L. Young Cataloging Policy and Support Office Library of Congress January 2008.
RDA in NACO Module 4.a Module 4.b Module 4.c RDA Chapter 9: Identifying Persons— Overview Recording the Attributes.
1 Prepared by Cooperative Programs Section & Associates NACO Training for OCLC Libraries.
Integrating Resources Cataloging Workshop Instructors Place/Date 1-1.
AACR2 Pt. 1, Monographic Description LIS Session 2.
Cataloguing Code and Cataloguing Process. What is a Catalog(ue)?  A list of library materials contained in a collection, a library, or a group of libraries.
RDA DAY 1 – part 2 web version 1. 2 When you catalog a “book” in hand: You are working with a FRBR Group 1 Item The bibliographic record you create will.
The physical parts of a computer are called hardware.
Improving Description through Collaboration: The Ethnomusicological Video for Instruction & Analysis Digital Archive Music Library Association, February.
WELCOME TO TULANE UNIVERSIY BIBCO TRAINING. TRAINERS: Kate Harcourt Columbia University Robert Killheffer Yale University.
RDA Updates Since the Creation of LC RDA Training Material (May 2012) Annual Meeting of Council on East Asian Libraries March 19, 2013 Jessalyn Zoom Library.
Library of Congress Update Presentation for ALA Midwinter Conference January 20, 2002 Ann Della Porta Assistant Coordinator, Integrated Library System.
Renee Register Senior Product Manager OCLC Cataloging and Metadata Services Sandy Piver OCLC Publisher Services Consultant OCLC Services for the Publisher.
The British Library Guide to RDA Name Authority Records © The British Library Board 2014.
Session 2 Tools and Decisions. 2-2 Session 2 1. What tools are available to help you catalog IR’s? 2. What decisions need to be made?
Library of Congress Authorities on the Web: Accessing Authority Records via the LC Online Catalog ALA Annual Conference 2002 Ann Della Porta Integrated.
The ___ is a global network of computer networks Internet.
Cooperative Programs in Authority Control Adam L. Schiff University of Washington Libraries
1 Shelflisting and Filing Rules and Subject Authority Control May 11, 2005.
ONE LINK IN THE INTEGRATION OF DATA Name and subject authority G. Wakuraya Wanjohi 18 December 2010.
Respect My Authoritay! Mary S. Konkel, College of DuPage Illinois Library Association Conference 9/26/2008
RDA Cataloging and DOI Assignments for NOAA Technical Publications NOAA Central Library October 2015.
LC Update to the Authority Control Interest Group
Library of Congress Update to the Authority Control Interest Group
Shi Deng BIBCO Coordinator April 20, 2015
UCSD BIBCO Orientation October 2014
Module 6: Preparing for RDA ...
Cataloging Tips and Tricks
MARC: Beyond the Basics 11/24/2018 (C) 2006, Tom Kaun.
NACO Updates Since April 2017
CJK NACO Project Report on RDA Implementation
Library of Congress Update
Library of congress subject headings
Presentation transcript:

Cooperative Programs in Authority Control Adam L. Schiff University of Washington Libraries

Cooperative Cataloging The original cataloging of bibliographic items through the joint action of a group of independent libraries which make the bibliographic records accessible to group members and sometimes to non- participating libraries as well -- The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science

Authority Control The methods by which the authoritative forms of names, subjects, uniform titles, etc., used as headings in a file of bibliographic records are consistently applied and maintained -- The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science

Authority Record A record which shows a heading in the form established for use in a set of bibliographic records, cites the sources consulted in establishing the heading, indicates the references to be made to and from the heading, and notes information found in the sources as justification of the chosen form of heading and the specified references -- The ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science

Cooperative Authority Control The creation and maintenance of authority records through the joint action of a group of independent libraries which make the authority records accessible to group members and to non- participating libraries as well.

The PCC is an international cooperative program coordinated jointly by the Library of Congress & PCC participants around the world. The Program aims to expand access to library collections by providing useful, timely, and cost- effective cataloging which meets mutually-accepted standards of libraries around the world.

PCC Goals 1. Cooperatively enhance the timely availability of bibliographic and authority records by cataloging more items, producing cataloging that is widely available for sharing and use by others, and performing cataloging in a more cost-effective manner. 2. Develop and maintain mutually acceptable standards for records. 3. Promote the values of timely access and cost-effectiveness in cataloging, and expand the pool of catalogers who catalog using the mutually-accepted standards. 4. Increase the sharing and use of foreign bibliographic and authority records. 5. Provide for ongoing discussion, planning, and operations among participants in order to further the program's mission.

Monographic Bibliographic Record Component Serial Bibliographic Record Component Name Authority Cooperative Program Subject Authority Cooperative Program

contribute authority records for names, uniform titles, and series to the national authority file via OCLC or RLIN make changes to existing name, uniform title, and series authority records individual institutions may join this program, or a group of libraries with a common interest may form a “funnel project” to contribute records via a coordinator participants agree to follow a common set of standards and guidelines when creating or changing authority records in order to maintain the integrity of a large shared authority file

NACO Required Documentation Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., rev. (AACR2) MARC 21 Authority Format (plus the Z1 “yellow pages” issued by LC) Library of Congress Rule Interpretations (LCRIs) Subject Cataloging Manual:Subject Headings (SCM) Instruction Sheet H 405 (“The division of the world”) FAQ - Joining NACO

NACO Training A week of specialized NACO training is undertaken by participants, either at their home institutions or at LC. During the training, guidelines are discussed and expanded upon with an ever-growing awareness of the need to streamline cataloging efforts while building a consistent and predictable file. This file will help the global library community work more efficiently and effectively, allowing it to maximize its resources. Training Outline

Current NACO Participants in Washington State Central Washington University - WaElC Seattle University Law Library - WaSU-L University of Washington - WaU Western Washington University - WaBeW

Whom to Contact About Joining NACO Ruta Penkiunas, Team Leader Cooperative Cataloging Team Library of Congress Washington, DC voice: (202) fax: (202)

submit proposals for authority records for Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH) and to change existing LCSH submit proposals for new Library of Congress Classification (LCC) and to change existing LCC individual institutions may submit proposals directly, or a group of libraries may form a “funnel project” to submit proposals via a coordinator participants follow the policies in the Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings (SCM) unlike NACO, there is no formal training requirement for participation

SACO Required Documentation For Subject Headings Library of Congress Subject Headings Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings Free-Floating Subdivisions: An Alphabetical Index MARC 21 Format for Authority Data For Classification Numbers Library of Congress Classification schedules LC Classification, Additions and Changes Subject Cataloging Manual: Classification

FAQ - Joining SACO

Why Participate in SACO? existing LCSH and LCC are not always adequate LC’s collections and yours are not the same; you may collect materials in areas or disciplines not collected by LC or at a much greater depth than LC allows catalogers to assign subject headings and classification numbers at an appropriate level of specificity instead of having to assign headings or numbers that are too broad cooperative cataloging benefits all of us and allows smaller libraries and libraries with highly specialized collections to share their efforts and their expertise by getting new headings and numbers into LCSH and LCC, you don’t have to maintain specially created local lists

Why Participate in SACO? you can add useful cross-references to existing headings and change obsolete terms to more current terminology if you use LCC, establishing new numbers and Cutters helps making copy cataloging and shelflisting simpler and more reliable across libraries it serves users’ needs it is intellectually stimulating to do the research to establish a new subject and satisfying to see your work included in the national authority file and LCSH and/or LCC it’s the only component of the PCC that is open to any library that wishes to participate. You don’t have to attend any formal training, and you don’t even need to belong to a utility like OCLC or RLIN nor even catalog in an online environment in order to submit proposals.

What Else is Needed for SACO Proposals? MARC Organization Code (not the same as your OCLC code) basic set of reference resources to do authority research - authoritative sources such as general and subject dictionaries, encyclopedias, thesauri, indexes, atlases, gazetteers, directories, etc. SACO home page maintains a list of Web-based reference resources that can also be usedWeb-based reference resources there is no definitive list of preferred sources - use your judgment as to what sources are appropriate and useful

Proposal Forms on SACO Home Page

SUBJECT AUTHORITY PROPOSAL FORM Complete and mail to the Internet address: or print, complete, and fax to: (For instructions on filling in form see: Guidelines for formulating LC Subject Heading proposals)Guidelines for formulating LC Subject Heading proposals 008/06: (Direct or indirect geographic subdivision) ______ (May Subd Geog) ______ (Not Subd Geog) ______ (No Decision) 008/39: (Cataloging source): c 040: ________$b eng $c DLC 053 : _________________________ 1_______: ___________________________________________________________________________________ 4_______: ___________________________________________________________________________________ 5_______ (BT): _______________________________________________________________________________ 5_______ (RT): _______________________________________________________________________________ 670 Work cat.: ________________________________________________________________________________ 670 (Sources found): __________________________________________________________________________ 670 (additional "Sources found" to justify hdg or x-refs): _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 675 (Sources not found): _______________________________________________________________________ 680 Here are entered works on __________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________________________ 781 (Geographic subdivision): $z _______________________________ $z ______________________________ 667 (Note field):_______________________________________________________________________________ 952 :..... bib. records to be changed 952: LC pattern or SCM Memo: ___________________________________________________ 953 : yz00 Submitted by __________________________________________________________________ /phone: __________________________________________________________________

Annotated Proposal Forms

Some New LCSH Established by Washington Libraries Academic-industrial collaboration African American women public relations personnel Bal  gansang (Legendary character) Charity sports events Chehalis River Estuary (Wash.) Children of teenage mothers Drive-by shootings Ecosystem health Express highway interchanges Fidalgo Bay (Wash.) Firearms and crime Flaggers (Road construction workers) Fort Spokane (Lincoln County, Wash. : Fort) Ice mummies Incantations, Mongolian Internet entertainment industry Jadeite jewelry Jesuit scientists Landscape architectural projects Non-monogamous relationships Olympia oyster Pacific banana slug Pacific geoduck fisheries Pacific salmon fisheries--Climatic factors Resort development Safe rooms Skywalks Songs, Manchu Teachers' contracts Transsexual students Vietnam--Civilization--Confucian influences Volunteer workers in city planning Walla Walla Valley (Or. and Wash.) Washington (State), Eastern Washington (State), Western Water lettuce Wetland restoration Wildlife smuggling

LC SUBJECT HEADING CHANGE PROPOSAL FORM Fill in and to: refer to LC Subject Heading Change Guidelines for help when filling in this form.LC Subject Heading Change Guidelines Requestor's MARC 21 identification code: _______________________ Record Control Number 010: sh_______________________________ Geographic subdivision (008/06): ________ i = May Subd Geog Library of Congress Classification Number 053: add: ________________________________________________________ 053: change to: ___________________________________________________ 053: delete: ______________________________________________________ CHANGE OF HEADING: 1XX: change to: ________________________________________________________________________________ Changes to Cross-References: 4XX: add: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 4XX: change to: ________________________________________________________________________________ 4XX: delete: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Broader Term (BT) & Related Term (RT) References: 5XX: add: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 5XX: change to: ________________________________________________________________________________ 5XX: delete: ___________________________________________________________________________________ Source Citations: 670: add: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 670: _________________________________________________________________________________________ 675: _________________________________________________________________________________________ Scope Notes 680: add: _____________________________________________________________________________________ 781: add: $z _______________________________________ $z _________________________________________ Submitted by: __________________________________________________________________________________ /phone: __________________________________________________________________________________

Classification Form and Instructions

Current SACO Participants in Washington State Central Washington University - WaElC University of Washington - WaU Washington State University - WaPS Western Washington University - WaBeW

Proposal Process proposals are sent to Cooperative Cataloging Team at LC Coop Team member reviews and forwards to Cataloging Policy and Support Office (CPSO) or contacts submitter to inform them if there are problems with proposal CPSO assigns proposals to a future weekly list; at this stage, proposals are considered “pre-approved” and can be used

Proposal Process tentative weekly lists of new and changed subjects are posted to the SACO home page. Example: Tentative Weekly List tentative weekly listsTentative Weekly List editorial meeting is held every Wednesday; proposals are reviewed and some revised, some withdrawn, some not approved if SACO proposal was revised, withdrawn, or not approved, the Coop Team will notify the library that submitted the proposal

Proposal Process within two weeks of the editorial meeting, the final approved list for that week is posted on the CPSO home page. Example: Weekly List approved listWeekly List approved headings are sent through the Cataloging Distribution Service to be distributed to OCLC and other subscribers generally, the process from submission to appearance in OCLC takes about 6 weeks if a proposal that’s been submitted does not appear on a tentative weekly list within four weeks, contact the Coop Cat Team

Statistics LC Cooperative Cataloging Team maintains PCC statistics Fiscal Year 2000 statistics by library/funnel

View this Presentation