Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 8 of 8 Implement the Special Education Services Evaluate the Impact of Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

ACCOMMODATIONS MANUAL
Session Learning Target You will gain a better understanding of identifying quality evidence to justify a performance rating for each standard and each.
K-6 Science and Technology Consistent teaching – Assessing K-6 Science and Technology © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 7 of 8 Decide What Before How.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 2 of 8 Background and Legal Context.
Purpose of Instruction
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Module: IEPs Head Start Center for Inclusion
Considering Assistive Technology and the AT Plan Sara Menzel, ATP UCP Michigan Assistive Technology Center
Understanding the IEP Process
LEARNING MORE ABOUT SPECIAL EDUCATION Weng Ventura designs.
Implementing Assistive Technology in School and Beyond 1.
Training Module for Cooperating Teachers and Supervising Faculty
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 3 of 8 Team Practices.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 6 of 8 Some Students with IEPs May Need Related Services.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 5 of 8 Determine the Special Education Services.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 4 of 8 Learn About the Student Learn About the Context.
Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 1 of 8 Introduction and Overview.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
 Inclusion and the Common Core State Standards  Inclusion and State Assessment  Inclusion and Teacher Evaluation  Results Driven Accountability 
IEP Training Module Two Data. Cypress-Fairbanks I.S.D. Purpose of Training The purpose of these training modules is to refine and expand your current.
Intel ® Teach Essentials ICT in the Classroom Conference St John's College, Johannesburg 5-7 July 2011 Workshop by Claire Dean Senior Trainer SchoolNet.
What Is Evidence? PRESENTED BY SCHAUNA FINDLAY, PH.D.
STANDARDS BASED GOALS and OBJECTIVES
PDHPE K-6 Using the syllabus for consistency of assessment © 2006 Curriculum K-12 Directorate, NSW Department of Education and Training.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Eva M. Kubinski, MS Special Education Team Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction 2009 Children Come First Conference November 16, 2009.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Push-in teaching strategies in a small school
1 Considering Assistive Technology in the IEP Process.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
Council for Exceptional Children/Division of Early Childhood Conference October 2010 Kim Carlson, Asst. Director/619 Coordinator Ohio Department of Education.
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
A Principled Approach to Accountability Assessments for Students with Disabilities CCSSO National Conference on Student Assessment Detroit, Michigan June.
Act 117: “Every Child A Learner” Presented by: Vermont Department of Education Vermont School Boards Association.
Special Education Law for the General Education Administrator Charter Schools Institute Webinar October 24, 2012.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Fourth session of the NEPBE II in cycle Dirección de Educación Secundaria February 25th, 2013 Assessment Instruments.
Assessment for learning
The IEP: Drafting the IEP (Steps 1, 2, 3, and 4) Southwest Ohio Special Education Regional Resource Center Tuesday, November 7, 2006.
Grading Special Education Students Elementary, Middle School, and High School Ages “Research suggests that grading practices vary considerably among.
Inclusion: Effective Practices for All Students, 1e McLeskey/Rosenberg/Westling © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved What.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
Fair and Appropriate Grading
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
©2012 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Problem-Solving Meeting Foundations
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
Ensuring Progress in the General Education Curriculum ED 222 Spring 2010.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Gathering Information: Monitoring your Progress. What does it mean to monitor your progress? Monitoring your initiative can help you weigh your actions.
Collaboration. © 2010 Pearson Education, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 2  Collaboration refers to “ongoing participation of two or more individuals who are.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
Using Student Assessment Data in Your Teacher Observation and Feedback Process Renee Ringold & Eileen Weber Minnesota Assessment Conference August 5, 2015.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
School-Wide Positive Behavior Coaches Meeting Year 1 Day Donna.
Teacher Roles and Responsibilities in the IEP Process Amanda Strong Hilsmier EDUC 559.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Standards-based Individualized Education Program Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student Progress SBIEP Module Four: Assessing and Reporting Student.
Assessing Students With Disabilities: IDEA and NCLB Working Together
Presentation transcript:

Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services IEP Services 8 of 8 Implement the Special Education Services Evaluate the Impact of Services

This series of slide shows is based on: Guidelines for Making Decisions about IEP Services 2001 Michael F. Giangreco, Ph.D. University of Vermont, Center on Disability and Community Inclusion This document is available in a pdf (portable document format) on the internet Distributed by the Vermont Department of Education Family and Educational Support Team Montpelier, Vermont Development of this material was supported by a grant from the Vermont Department of Education, Montpelier, Vermont under the auspices of Vermont Act 117: An Act to Strengthen the Capacity of Vermont’s Education System to Meet the Needs of All Students, Section 7 (d) (5).

Implement the Special Education Services as Documented in the IEP (and Related Services if Identified) The first order of business is to ensure the services documented on the IEP are being provided.

Establish a Schedule Developing a schedule is a simple method to facilitate service provision. Scheduling can be challenging, especially when there are multiple service providers. Involve the team in making scheduling decisions

Develop a Written Plan, Including Data Collection Methods Having a written plan is key, especially when there are several people carrying it out Include enough detail so everyone knows what to do Avoid making the paperwork cumbersome. Sometimes you can use photos or other visual representations that communicate what to do

Examples of Data Collection Quizzes and tests Self-assessment Projects Direct observations Demonstrations Work Samples Frequency and rate counts Rubrics Accuracy and quality Impact on quality of life

Data collection helps maintain professional accountability and is a vital step in the teaching-learning cycle.

Develop a plan that explicitly explores and addresses training, supervision, and support of team members. Later meetings can be used to review the status of the plan set forth by the team. Ensure Appropriate Training, Supervision, and Support of Team Members

All of this planning and organizing is leading up to the important, rewarding, and enjoyable part of your work— actually working with the students and helping them learn! Implement the Plan and Collect Data

Evaluate the Impact of Services Use data to determine impact Use data to make decisions about the continued need for the services or adjustments to the type, mode, and frequency

When considering whether any particular service should be continued, increased, reduced, or discontinued the team needs to look at more than grades and tests. First, ask whether the service has addressed the purposes for which it was selected.

Which aspects of the student’s education was the service supposed to effect? Access to, and participation in school? Access to extra-curricular activities? Access to the general education curriculum? Progress toward IEP goals or objectives? Progress toward general education learning outcomes? Provision of general supports or accommodations? Enhancement of valued life outcomes?

What observable or reported impact has the service had on the corresponding aspects of the student’s education?

What does the data tell you? It may show the student... is ready to move to a new goal or a higher level of performance with that goal, needs more time to accomplish the goal, requires more or different teaching strategies, or requires modified or different goals.

After the team has decided what they believe the data mean, it’s time to consider possible actions, select a course of action, and take that action.

Effective IEP services decision-making contributes to quality education and meaningful outcomes for students with disabilities. If done well, this can make a difference in the lives of students with disabilities and their families -- and that’s what good education is all about!