1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Cryostat Front End Design Update Matthew Glisson Van Graves.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Concept Teaching I like this / that / these / those……?
Advertisements

Liquid H 2 Absorber Production Contents (1)MICE Absorber Status (2)MICE Absorber Modification (3)Plan/Schedule (4)Summary MICE CM-23 in HARBIN Shigeru.
MICE RF and Coupling Coil Module Outstanding Issues Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory MICE Collaboration Meeting October 26, 2004.
SPL Intercavity support Conceptual design review 04/11/ A. Vande Craen TE/MSC-CMI.
Mercury Chamber Update V. Graves NF-IDS Meeting October 4, 2011.
EXAMPLE 5 Find arc lengths to find distance TRACK The curves at the ends of the track shown are 180° arcs of circles. The radius of the arc for a runner.
© red ©
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Neutrino Factory Mercury Containment Concepts V.B. Graves 2 nd Oxford-Princeton High- Powered Target.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Flow Loop V. Graves C. Caldwell IDS-NF Videoconference March 9, 2010.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 11 Mar 2009 Neutrino Factory Cryostat 1 Concept V.B. Graves MERIT Videoconference.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF/IDS Hg Vessel Layout 30 Jun 09 Cryostat 2 Front Drain Mercury Vessel Concept Matthew F. Glisson.
MERIT Equipment Disposal Van Graves MERIT Video Conference September 1, 2010.
Mercury Nozzle Status V.B. Graves Hg Jet Design Meeting Princeton University Nov 15, 2004.
MERIT Primary Containment Inspection Van Graves MERIT Video Conference October 13, 2010.
MCTF Harold G. Kirk MUTAC 5-Year Plan Review 22 August Targetry R&D in the 5-Year Plan Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Lab.
KT McDonald Muon Collider 2011 June 28, The Target System Baseline K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 28, 2011) Muon Collider 2011 Telluride, CO More.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF-IDS Videoconference 2 Jun 2009 Neutrino Factory Magnet Layout Comparison V.B. Graves NF-IDS.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Optics Cleaning Status 31 August 2011 MERIT Optics Cleaning Status V.B. Graves August 31,
KT McDonald Target Studies Meeting June 14, Mechanical Issues for the Target System K. McDonald Princeton U. (June 14, 2011) Target Studies Meeting.
Harold G. Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory Target Baseline IDS-NF Plenary CERN March 23-24, 2009.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NMFCC Friday Meeting 10 Apr 2009 Neutrino Factory Nozzle Layouts V.B. Graves NFMCC Friday Meeting.
IDS-NF Target Studies H. Kirk (BNL) July 8, 2009.
K. McDonald Muon Collaboration Meeting 19 Mar 2008 Future Target System R&D Analysis (and simulation) of MERIT data is ongoing, but the success of the.
Tagger and Vacuum Chamber Design. Outline. Design considerations. Stresses and deformations. Mechanical assembly.
APOLLON TEAM HOOKE vs. NEWTON. Discussion 1: Hooke: Light is a wave motion Newton: Light is a particle beam Interference shows the following: Which can.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy NF Splash Mitigation 12 July 2011 Neutrino Factory Mercury Pool Splash Mitigation V.B. Graves.
Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Review of NFMCC Studies 1 and 2: Target Support Facilities V.B. Graves Meeting on High Power Targets.
Mercury Chamber Considerations V. Graves IDS-NF Target Studies July 2011.
Water Tests of Hg System V.B. Graves P.T. Spampinato Muon Collaboration Friday Meeting Dec 8, 2006.
Installation. Indoor Unit Installation Typical Installation.
LEL Reduction Using Gold Crew Vapor Lock. About 3 gallons of Gold Crew Vapor Lock are added to a pressure washer tank with about 300 gallons of water.
Preliminary studies for Muon shield modification to accommodate LCLS II Alev Ibrahimov December, 2010 BSY.
Front End Technologies Harold Kirk Brookhaven National Laboratory February 19, 2014.
IDS-NF Mercury System Overview Van Graves IDS-NF 5 th Plenary Meeting April 9, 2010.
COLOURS.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy PASI_2012_Flowing_Target_Challenges Challenges for Flowing Targets Bernie Riemer (ORNL) (Jan.
SuperFRS Multiplett and Dipole Vacuum Interfaces Multiplett: Insulation vacuum: Insulation Vacuum Pumping flanges: Two CF flanges of the size DN160 must.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Vessel: Initial Cooling Calculations V. Graves Target Studies Nov 15, 2012.
1 Discussion for basic options — engineering video conference July 12, 2006 Outline Water pool — advantages — issues, problems, engineering options Aquarium.
Review of Recent IDS120 Target Concepts Van Graves October 31, 2013.
20to2T5m100cm Images Van Graves February 13, 2014.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS: NEW Hg MODULE mars1510 ( DESKTOP ) vs. mars1512 ( PRINCETON CLUSTER ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (3/28/2012) 1.
Shield Module Design Considerations Adam Carroll Van Graves July 3, 2014.
Monkey, Monkey In the Tree. Monkey, monkey in the tree Throw the yellow coconut down to me!
ConcepTest 19.1a Magnetic Force I 1) out of the page 2) into the page 3) downward 4) to the right 5) to the left A positive charge enters a uniform magnetic.
Brookhaven Science Associates U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Project Review December 12, 2005, BNL, Upton NY MHD Studies of Mercury Jet Target Roman Samulyak.
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS MODIFYING Hg MODULE Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (11/1/2012) 1.
Proton Driver – Target Station Interfaces Keith Gollwitzer Fermilab Wednesday May 28, 2014 MAP 2014 Spring Meeting.
IDS120j WITH AND WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS PION AND MUON STUDIES WITHIN TAPER REGION, III ( 20 cm GAPS BETWEEN CRYOSTATS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL (9/4/2012)
IDS120j WITHOUT RESISTIVE MAGNETS SEMGENTATION STUDIES FOR BEAM PIPE BEYOND FIRST CRYOSTAT ( 20 cm GAPS AND 15.8 g/cc W BEADS ) Nicholas Souchlas, PBL.
Neutrino Factory Target Vessel Concept Update V. Graves Target Studies EVO June 12, 2012.
Neutrino Factory Target Cryostat Review (Update Aug 12) Van Graves Cale Caldwell IDS-NF Phone Meeting August 10, 2010.
LBNE Remote Handling Layout Options Adam Carroll Van Graves Tom Burgess FNAL/ORNL Videoconference March 11, 2010.
Ids120h_side. ids120h_top ids120h_iso ids120h_end.
Target On axis field [scale /20 T] Target Magnets Decay-Channel Triplets Taper magnets.
Neutrino Factory Mercury Catcher Concept
Integration issues at IHEP
V.B. Graves Hg Jet Design Meeting Princeton University Nov 15, 2004
Update on GEp GEM Background Rates
Chemistry 13.1.
SHMS Downstream Beamline Large SHMS/HMS Angles (Config-1)
Chemistry 13.1.
Isotropic View Conceptual Design for MONALISA setup at CERN Magnet
What Color is it?.
©
C c Cc is for cat. © ©
©
Kinetic Theory and a Model for Gases
Presentation transcript:

1Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Cryostat Front End Design Update Matthew Glisson Van Graves

2Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Front of the Cryostat: Considerations Beam window must be added to the front of the cryostat to provide mercury vapor containment Mercury nozzle must be positioned below proton beam and at specific angle Everything must come straight into cryostat so iron plug can be removed

3Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Front of the Cryostat: Possible Solution Mercury vessel extension comes off the front of the cryostat Provides location to mount beam window, contains nozzle, and vent Due to shallow angle between mercury nozzle and beam, extension must be very long to provide enough space for window, pipe connections Vessel Extension Mercury Vessel Iron Plug Mercury Jet/Beam Cryostat Wall

4Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Vessel Extension: Front Note how close pipe connection flange (white) and window (brown) must be Window, pipe angled away from each other  Will angle in pipe create flow problems downstream? Window covers hole that goes back to mercury tank, beam (red) travels through hole Beam Beam Window Vent Connection Flange Nozzle Opening

5Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Vessel Extension: Back Mercury nozzle (highlighted in blue) machined directly out of extension Nozzle ends in small chamber, allows mercury jet (blue) to begin curving downwards into tank (yellow) Chamber floor sloped, splashed mercury will flow out into tank Mercury Nozzle Mercury Jet Mercury Vessel Wall Beam Vent Line Chamber

6Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Vessel: Iron Plug Iron plug (pink) can travel straight in and out of the cryostat Once iron plug travels entire length of extension it is free to be moved elsewhere Many holes in iron plug  Is this acceptable?

7Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Iron Plug/HC Magnet Removal: Animation (Double click on title below)

8Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Iron Plug/HC Magnet Removal: Summary Iron plug support structure (red) keeps plug in place during use, moves it back for removal Plug unbolted from support structure, hook (blue) removes iron plug Second hook (purple) interfaces with HC magnet group and removes it Vessel extension, not shown in animation, compatible with this method Support Structure Iron Plug Plug Hook Magnet Hook

9Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Summary Added extension to mercury vessel to make it a closed volume Extension contains mercury nozzle, mounting point for beam window Conceptualized possible method for removing iron plug, HC magnets

10Managed by UT-Battelle for the U.S. Department of Energy MERIT Videoconference 5 Aug 2009 Future Work Viability of vessel extension needs to be examined  Can the cantilevered structure support itself?  Can it be machined? Vent line needs more consideration (rough concept highlighted in blue) Viability of removal process needs to be examined  Can the iron plug support structure withstand the magnetic forces?  Will the structure interfere with other infrastructure