Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Uli Schäfer 1.
Advertisements

Uli Schäfer JEM Status and Test Results Hardware status JEM0 Hardware status JEM1 RAL test results.
GOLD down the drain Uli Schäfer 1 What’s left after Heidelberg.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans Hardware status JEM0 Hardware status JEM1 Plans.
GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Uli Schäfer 1.
Phase-0 Topological Processor Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
L1Calo – towards phase II Mainz upgraders : B.Bauss, V.Büscher, R.Degele, A.Ebling, W.Ji, C.Meyer, S.Moritz, U.Schäfer, C.Schröder, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge.
Programmable logic devices / tools Programmable logic devices are digital logic devices, providing combinatorial logic (gates, look-up tables) and flip-flops.
High-speed optical links and processors for the ATLAS Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger upgrade B.Bauss, V.Büscher, R.Degele, A.Ebling, W.Ji, C.Meyer, S.Moritz,
ATLAS L1 Calorimeter Trigger Upgrade - Uli Schäfer, MZ -
GOLD Status and Phase-1 Plans Andi E. & Uli S. Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 BLT – status – plans BLT – backplane and link tester Recent backplane test results Test plans – week June 15.
Phase-0 topological processor Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Level-1 Topology Processor for Phase 0/1 - Hardware Studies and Plans - Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Phase-1 with new JEP Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
JEM upgrades and optical data transmission to FEX for Phase 1 Andi E. & Uli S. Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 S-L1Calo upstream links architecture -- interfaces -- technology.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options Upgrade will always be in 5 years time.
Phase-1 with new JEP Uli Schäfer Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz Uli Schäfer 1.
Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz L1Calo upgrade activities news – BLT hardware/firmware status.
Cluster Processor Module : Status, test progress and plan Joint Meeting, Mainz, March 2003.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM PRR Design changes Post-FDR tests FDR issues.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options.
S. Silverstein For ATLAS TDAQ Level-1 Trigger updates for Phase 1.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University L1Calo upgrade hardware planning + Overview of current concept + Recent work, results.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM: Status and plans JEM1.2 Status Test results Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options Uli, Sam, Yuri.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans JEM1.1 Status Plans.
Uli Schäfer 1 CP/JEP backplane test module What’s the maximum data rate into the S-CMM for phase-1 upgrade ?
Uli Schäfer 1 Production modules Status Plans JEM: Status and plans.
Uli Schäfer JEM Status and plans RAL test results Hardware status Firmware Plans.
Uli Schäfer JEM hardware / test JEM0 test programme Mainz standalone RAL sub-slice test JEM re-design Heidelberg slice test.
Uli Schäfer 1 JEM1: Status and plans power Jet Sum R S T U VME CC RM ACE CAN Flash TTC JEM1.0 status JEM1.1 Plans.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University L1Calo upgrade discussion Overview Issues  Latency  Rates  Schedule Proposed upgrade strategy R&D.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. Jet processing Phase-0 jet system consisting of Pre-Processor Analogue signal conditioning Digitization Digital signal processing.
FEX Uli Schäfer, Mainz 1 L1Calo For more eFEX details see indico.cern.ch/getFile.py/access?contribId=73&sessionId=51&resId=0&materialId=slides&confId=
Status and planning of the CMX Philippe Laurens for the MSU group Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger General Meeting, CERN May 24, 2012.
CMX (Common Merger eXtension module) Y. Ermoline for CMX collaboration Preliminary Design Review, Stockholm, 29 June 2011.
Topology System Uli Schäfer 1 B.Bauß, V.Büscher, W.Ji, U.Schäfer, A.Reiß, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge, V.Wenzel.
Atlas L1Calo CMX Card CMX is upgrade of CMM with higher capacity 1)Inputs from JEM or CPM modules – 40 → 160Mbps (400 signals) 2)Crate CMX to System CMX.
L1Topo Status & Plans Uli Schäfer 1 B.Bauß, V.Büscher, W.Ji, S.Krause, S.Moritz, U.Schäfer, A.Reiß, E.Simioni, S.Tapprogge, V.Wenzel.
Hardware status GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Assess the use of optical backplane connectivity for use on L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1.
L1Topo-phase0 Uli Schäfer 1. Topo GOLD successfully used to explore technologies and initially verify 6.4Gb/s link integrity over moderate length electrical.
CMX status and plans Yuri Ermoline for the MSU group Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger Joint Meeting CERN, October 2012,
Status and planning of the CMX Wojtek Fedorko for the MSU group TDAQ Week, CERN April , 2012.
S. Rave, U. Schäfer For L1Calo Mainz
CMX Hardware Overview Chip Brock, Dan Edmunds, Philippe Yuri Wojciech Michigan State University 12-May-2014.
Uli Schäfer 1 From L1Calo to S-L1Calo algorithms – architecture - technologies.
ATLAS Trigger / current L1Calo Uli Schäfer 1 Jet/Energy module calo µ CTP L1.
Algorithms and TP Y. Ermoline et al. Level-1 Calorimeter Trigger Joint Meeting, Heidelberg, January 11-13, 2010.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1. Constraints & Numerology Assumption: one crate, several modules. Each module covers full phi, limited eta range Data sharing with.
CMX Hardware Overview Chip Brock, Dan Edmunds, Philippe Yuri Wojciech Michigan State University 19-May-2014.
The ATLAS Global Trigger Processor U. Schäfer Phase-2 Upgrade Uli Schäfer 1.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. L1Calo Phase-1 System Uli Schäfer 2 CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo ROD JMM PPR From Digital Processing System CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo.
Samuel Silverstein Stockholm University CMM++ firmware development Backplane formats (update) CMM++ firmware.
Hardware status GOLD Generic Opto Link Demonstrator Uli Schäfer 1.
JFEX Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz. L1Calo Phase-1 System Uli Schäfer 2 CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo ROD JMM PPR From Digital Processing System CPM JEM CMX Hub L1Topo.
16 February 2011Ian Brawn1 The High Speed Demonstrator and Slice Demonstrator Programme The Proposed High-Speed Demonstrator –Overview –Design Methodology.
L1Topo post review Uli Schäfer 1 Observations, options, effort, plans Uli.
GOLD TESTS (Virtex-6) ● Jitter analysis on cleaned TTC clock ( σ = 2.9 ps) ● Signal integrity: sampled in several positions along the chain ● MGT and o/e.
Samuel Silverstein, SYSF ATLAS calorimeter trigger upgrade work Overview Upgrade to PreProcessor MCM Topological trigger.
CMX: Update on status and planning Yuri Ermoline, Wojciech Dan Edmunds, Philippe Laurens, Chip Michigan State University 7-Mar-2012.
Uli Schäfer 1 Mainz R&D activities. Uli Schäfer 2 MZ R&D BLT has been built and tested (backplane transmission only). A few minor issues were found. Possible.
ATLAS calorimeter and topological trigger upgrades for Phase 1
L1Calo Phase-1 architechure
L1Calo upgrade discussion
ATLAS L1Calo Phase2 Upgrade
Possibilities for CPM firmware upgrade
Run-2  Phase-1  Phase-2 Uli / Mainz
(Not just) Backplane transmission options
Presentation transcript:

Uli Schäfer 1 (Not just) Backplane transmission options

Uli Schäfer 2 So far Preliminary design for phase 1 had been suggested Extract topological information from digital processors (firmware upgrade) Replace CMMs by serialiser w. fibre output Up to 160 Mb/s backplane data rate 3 Gb/s optical out Aggregate bandwidth at merger slot 64 Gb/s Total bandwidth of JEP and CP ~700 Gb/s Two-stage top level calorimeter processor (quadrant) ?Hard facts on backplane bandwidth limits ?Detailed algorithms ?Simulation ?Muons

Uli Schäfer 3 Recently... Some backplane results: 160 Mb/s possible Need separate clock line ?... even with CMM (Richard, CPM only) Higher rates possible only with sink termination Some simulation results (non-)schedule seems to be sliding Technology moves on BTW: are we really sure the current trigger scheme is good enough for design luminosity (phase 0) ?  Difficult to judge as long as there are no collisions at all !

Uli Schäfer 4 What can we do by firmware only ? – backplane We can be rather sure that 80 Mb/s backplane operation suits current CMMs 120 Mb/s would probably require clean external clock, due to Virtex-E DLL limitations : Spare differential inputs in the back of a CMM SFP o/e transceiver cheap and low jitter Signal integrity seems ok even for 160 Mb/s At an elevated data rate the data windows shrink due to known jitter and walk from TTCdec (TTCrx).  Need a per-slot phase optimization at source JEP: clkdes1/2 are in use. Could be made available (major f/w mod on input processor), s/w CP:

Uli Schäfer 5 And on to the CTP Probably quite some spare bandwidth on the CMM outputs To run at 80 Mb/s ? LVDS signalling rate depends on cable length and cable properties, double rate should be ok. Conversion to optical rather simple if DC balanced (firmware, SNAP12/MPO : $) Will require conversion to electrical at CTP end? Need detailed assessment of CMM capabilities Nothing known about CTP inputs (?)

Uli Schäfer 6 Algorithms : just an example... Most algorithms of which we expect performance gains require massive increase in data rate throughout the system  not for phase 0 Let’s use most simple ones? Keep existing data from CMM to CTP? Leading jets angle cuts require two most energetic ROIs only: Moderate bandwidth requirement Sort algorithm required at all stages JEM: 2 of 8 –RoI position and threshold? Data format and b/w? Crate merger : 2 of 32 System merger: 2 of 4 Calculation of angle and thresholding (LUT)

Uli Schäfer 7 Phase 1 Backplane CP rates probably limited to 160 Mb/s Data format? JEP possibly higher if required (termination) Merger links (optical) Xilinx Virtex-5/6 stuck at 6.5 Gb/s (2010/11) Aggregate bandwidth ~200 Gb/s per chip No information on Virtex-6 HXT (10 Gb/s) Merger could be ATCA or similar form factor But LaCalo VME legasy? Optical components for high density processors available High density blind mate opto backplane connectors Splitters MPO fanout (Optical backplanes too exotic)

Uli Schäfer 8 Plans Improve performance of current system (firmware) Devise and simulate algorithms for phase 1 Make optimum use of existent demonstrators Stockholm link tester generate 3.2 Gb/s optical BLT serialise backplane data to 6.5 Gb/s optical Build a demonstrator global merger with 6.5 Gb/s links “Inverse” use of BLT as receiver? Design for unrestricted choice of algorithms: restricted only by the CP/JEm backplane bw aim to feed maximum of data into single point  maximum link density, high performance FPGAs “single box” approach? Discuss timeline  decide on Form factor Amount of processing power required Signal replication scheme Extensive use of optical technology Replication at source Electrical multi-Gb/s link replication at sink

Uli Schäfer 9 To Do – Who – What ? Mainz interested in Firmware-based improvements on current JEMs 6.5 Gb/s FPGA based link technology Optical : passive replication – blind mate connector Ready to work on global merger demonstrator Not yet given up on possible JEM rebuild MSU: interested to join the GM demonstrator activity output from “VHDL framework” data formats, algorithm implementation